Changes to Routeing Guide: introduction of "negative easements"

Glynn Magheramorne made this Freedom of Information request to Department for Transport

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was successful.

Glynn Magheramorne

Dear Department for Transport,

As you will be aware - as you are legally required to give your approval
- the Routeing Guide was updated yesterday.

The heading of Section E, the easements list, used to read:

"Easements are relaxations of Routeing Guide rules to allow
journeys that strict adherence to the rules would forbid. Some
previously published easements are no longer exceptions to Routeing
Guide rules and have therefore been deleted as unnecessary."

Yesterday, the easements list was split in two (the first half now
comprising 'positive easements', and the second half comprising
'negative easements') and the heading was changed to read:

"An easement which extends permission is a positive easement. An
easement which narrows permission is a negative easement. Map,
double-back and fare route easements are always positive.
Circuitous route easements are always negative. Other kinds of
easements can be positive or negative. A journey which follows a
route otherwise permitted by the Routeing Guide may be forbidden by
a negative easement."

The explanation of easements in Section F (the 'more information'
instructions, which has been frequently amended over the years with
no oversight by the DfT), has also been reworded, although there is
no change of substance. Section A (the main instructions) has not
changed, and still doesn't refer to negative easements.

The ATOC website describes this change as "Changes have been made
to Section E - The list of Easements".

This introduction of the concept of a "negative easement" (which is
an oxymoron) is extremely damaging and restrictive towards
passengers.

Can the Department please disclose:
1) All correspondence regarding these changes to the wording of the
Routeing Guide
2) What steps you expect passengers to undertake when making a journey, to ensure compliance? For example do passengers have to read the entire Easements section for Negative Easements to avoid being liable to an excess fare?
3) Were Passenger Focus consulted and what was their response?

Yours faithfully,

Glynn Magheramorne

Department for Transport

Dear Glynn Magheramorne,

I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your request for information which
has been allocated reference number P0011852.

A response will be issued to you in due course.

Regards,

Ivan Pocock
Department for Transport
FOI Advice Team
Information & Security Division
Zone D/04
Ashdown House
Sedlescombe Road North
St Leonards on Sea
East Sussex
TN37 7GA

show quoted sections

AndrewB Smith,

3 Attachments

Dear Mr Magheramorne,

 

Please see the attached response to your request for information under the
Freedom of Information Act 2000.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Andy Smith

 

      

Andy
Smith                                                                                     

Correspondence Manager | Rail Executive | Department for Transport | 4^th
Floor - Great Minster House | 33 Horseferry Road | London | SW1P 4DR | 020
7944 2447 | [1][email address]

Leading a world-class railway that creates opportunity for people and
businesses

 

 

show quoted sections