Bonus paid to Nick Read

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Post Office Limited should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

john o'sullivan

Dear Post Office Limited,"“All required evidence and information supplied on time, with confirmation from Sir Wyn Williams and team that Post Office’s performance supported and enabled the Inquiry to finish in line with expectations.”Can you please say who owned this Metric and was able to confirm it had been met in order to allow Bonus Payments to be made to POL Executive?

Yours faithfully,

john o'sullivan

information.rights@postoffice.co.uk, Post Office Limited

Our ref: FOI2023/00351

Dear John O'Sullivan,

Thank you for your request for information which was received on 20th
June. Your request is being considered under the terms of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000.

The Act requires that a response must be given promptly, and in any event
within 20 working days. We will therefore reply at the latest by 19th
July.

Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future
communications.

Regards,

Data Protection and Information Rights Team

100 Wood Street,

London,

EC2V 7ER

information.rights@postoffice.co.uk, Post Office Limited

1 Attachment

Dear John O'Sullivan,

Thank you for your patience whilst we have been handling your information
request. Please find this response attached.

With kind regards,

Data Protection and Information Rights Team

100 Wood Street,

London,

EC2V 7ER

john o'sullivan

Dear [email address],Thank you as ever for a reply.Are you saying it isnt fair to name Angela Williams as the person having ownership of this metric even though it triggered a huge unearned payment?.HSF for so long your go to legal firm have named her such.?Why is providing "highly misleading" answers to an FOI bad but telling Darren Jones each metric was personally owned good?Is HSF wrong in so identifying her?If these people or person was performing a purely adminstrative function why was that not reflected in the pay grade?With greater salary, comes great responsibility.Post Office high flier Rod Ismay claims he simply cut and pasted his unspecified water bottle discussion report and as such can not accept it is his.SPM went to prison and paid Millions because you said it was their responsibility.What responsibility do your Directors hold?

Yours sincerely,

john o'sullivan

information.rights, Post Office Limited

Dear John O'Sullivan,

Thank you for your email.

As you have not made a request for recorded information, as outlined in section 8 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, we have passed your email on to the relevant team, who will be in touch with you shortly.

With kind regards,

Information Rights Team

show quoted sections