BDS dentistry 2021 admissions statistics

The request was partially successful.

Mohamemd Farhaan

Dear Queen Mary University of London,

I am writing to ask the average UCAT score of those invited for interview, the number of applicants, the number of interviews and the number of offers given out in the past 3 admissions cycle ie this cycle 2021 entry, 2020 entry and 2019 entry.

Yours faithfully,

Mohamemd Farhaan

QM FOI Enquiries, Queen Mary University of London

FOI 2021/F147

 

Dear Mohamemd Farhaan,

 

Thank you for your email of 19^th March.

 

For 2021 entry, the average UCAT score of applicants who were invited to
interview was 2679. We interviewed 368 candidates and made 211 offers.
Figures for pervious years are available on our website and so refused
under s.21 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, please see
[1]https://www.qmul.ac.uk/smd/undergraduate...

 

If you are dissatisfied with this response, you may ask QMUL to conduct a
review of this decision.  To do this, please contact the College in
writing (including by fax, letter or email), describe the original
request, explain your grounds for dissatisfaction, and include an address
for correspondence.  You have 40 working days from receipt of this
communication to submit a review request.  When the review process has
been completed, if you are still dissatisfied, you may ask the Information
Commissioner to intervene. Please see [2]www.ico.org.uk for details.

Yours sincerely

 

Paul Smallcombe

Records & Information Compliance Manager 

References

Visible links
1. https://www.qmul.ac.uk/smd/undergraduate...
2. http://www.ico.org.uk/

Mohamemd Farhaan

Dear QM FOI Enquiries,

I am writing to ask the number of applications you received for dentistry 2021 entry, the highest UCAT you interviewed and the lowest UCAT you interviewed. I am also asking how you use the situational judgement component in tandem with interview performance.

Yours sincerely,

Mohamemd Farhaan

QM FOI Enquiries, Queen Mary University of London

FOI 2021/F192
 
Dear Mohamemd Farhaan,
 
We have treated your email of 13^th April as a fresh request.
 
Most of the information you have requested will be published in due course
on our website at
[1]https://www.qmul.ac.uk/smd/undergraduate...
and so is refused under s.22 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
 
In terms of use of the situational judgement component, we only allocate a
mark to SJT scores of 1 & 2 and add these afterwards to the interview 
score to form the final grade.
 
If you are dissatisfied with this response, you may ask QMUL to conduct a
review of this decision.  To do this, please contact the College in
writing (including by fax, letter or email), describe the original
request, explain your grounds for dissatisfaction, and include an address
for correspondence.  You have 40 working days from receipt of this
communication to submit a review request.  When the review process has
been completed, if you are still dissatisfied, you may ask the Information
Commissioner to intervene. Please see [2]www.ico.org.uk for details.

Yours sincerely
 
Paul Smallcombe
Records & Information Compliance Manager
 
 

show quoted sections