We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are John Smith please sign in and let everyone know.

Average Marks For Selected SSEES Modules

We're waiting for John Smith to read a recent response and update the status.

Dear University College London,

Could you please provide the average mark and breakdown of students who were awarded between
80%+, 70% - 79%, 60% - 69%, 50% - 59%, 40% - 49%, <40% for the following modules during the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 academic years.

Frontiers of History (SEHI0003)
Introduction to Microeconomics (SESS0007)
Introduction to Macroeconomics (SESS0008)
Applied Game Theory for Economics and Business (SESS0009)
Understanding Politics I: The Big Questions in Contemporary Europe (SESS0016)
Understanding Politics II: How Politics Works (SESS0017)
Communist Societies, 1945-1989 (SESS0018)

Yours faithfully,

J. Smith

Finance.FOI Requests, University College London

If you have submitted a Freedom of Information request please accept this
email as acknowledgement that your request has been received. You should
expect a response from us within 20 working days. 
For details on how we use your personal information, please see UCL's
general privacy
notice: [1]www.ucl.ac.uk/legal-services/privacy/general-privacy-notice
Data Protection Office
Office of General Counsel 

References

Visible links
1. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/legal-services/pri...

Finance.FOI Requests, University College London

1 Attachment

Dear John,

 

Thank you for your Freedom of Information request of 6 March 2023.

 

We have completed the compilation of information in response to your
request which read:

 

Could you please provide the average mark and breakdown of students who
were awarded between 80%+, 70% - 79%, 60% - 69%, 50% - 59%, 40% - 49%,
<40% for the following modules during the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 academic
years.

 

• Frontiers of History (SEHI0003)
• Introduction to Microeconomics (SESS0007)
• Introduction to Macroeconomics (SESS0008)
• Applied Game Theory for Economics and Business (SESS0009)
• Understanding Politics I: The Big Questions in Contemporary Europe
(SESS0016)
• Understanding Politics II: How Politics Works (SESS0017)
• Communist Societies, 1945-1989 (SESS0018)

 

 

We can confirm that we do hold information of the description specified in
your request and this information is provided in the attached spreadsheet.

 

As you will see within the attached spreadsheet, where the number of
students is 5 or fewer (˜5), the information has been withheld because,
with such low numbers, even providing this information on an anonymised
basis it is possible that the underlying individuals could be identified,
which means that this is personal data of third parties or, if linked with
other personal identifiers in the public domain, would be likely to become
personal data. This information has been withheld under Section 40(2) of
the FOIA by virtue of Section 40(3A)(i).

 

Section 40(2) of the FOIA allows a public authority to withhold
information under the FOIA where (i) the requested information is personal
data relating to someone other than the requester and (ii) its disclosure
would breach any of the Data Protection principles. In this case, we
believe that the requested information could relate to and identify
individuals and therefore would be personal data. The disclosure of these
personal data would not be within the reasonable expectations of the
individuals concerned and it would be unfair to do so; this therefore
breaches the first Data Protection principle.

 

As the Section 40(2) exemption is an absolute one, there is no need to
conduct a public interest test.

 

You are free to use any information supplied for your own use, including
for non-commercial research purposes. The information may also be used for
the purposes of news reporting. However, any other type of re-use, for
example by publishing or issuing copies to the public, will require the
permission of the copyright owner.

 

If you are unhappy with our response to your request and wish to make a
complaint or request a review of our decision, please email
[1][email address]. Emails should include the words ‘Internal
Review’ in the subject and be marked For the Attention of the
Vice-President (Operations), alternatively you should write to:

 

Vice-President (Operations)

University College London

Gower Street

London

WC1E 6BT

 

Please note, complaints and requests for internal review received more
than two months after the initial decision will not be handled.

 

If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review, you may
apply directly to the Information Commissioner at the address given below.
You should do this within two months of our final decision.

 

If you have any queries or concerns, please contact me using the details
provided in this letter and including the request reference number.

 

Further information on the Freedom of Information Act is available from
the Information Commissioner’s Office:

 

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

SK9 5AF

 

01625 545700

[2]www.ico.org.uk

[3][email address]

 

Kind regards,

 

Josh Keyte

Data Protection and Freedom of Information Adviser

University College London

Legal Services

Data Protection: [4][email address] FOI: [5][UCL request email]

 

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.ico.org.uk/
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[email address]
5. mailto:[UCL request email]

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are John Smith please sign in and let everyone know.