Amended FOI re:UK/US use of weapons I previously gave the misnomer 'Voice of God 'weapon systems
Waiting for an internal review by Ministry of Defence of their handling of this request.
From: Paul Gaffney
Dear Sir or Madam,
I have read that that the US forces has experimented with the use
of such weapons (...microwave weapons,etc)in Afghanistan/Iraq .I am
writing to enquire
1)if this is true,
2)whether UK forces have used them, and further
3))if the use of such weapons is legal or if the opposite is trued
and such being the should be investigated and referred to
instiution such as the International Criminal Court.
Paul Gaffney LLB BA
From: Paul Gaffney
Dear Sir or Madam,
Today is the thirteenth.The time alloted by the Freedom of
Information act is up.I believe I have annotated the original FOI
with some details you may find of interest.
Paul GaffneyLLB BA
From: Paul Gaffney
Dear Ministry of Defence,
please raed the following
Technological Simulation of Hallucination
John J. McMurtrey, M. S. a and Edward A. Moore, M. D. b
Copyright 2005, 6 Jan. 2008
Background: Psychiatrists frequently evaluate complaints of remote
transmission. Aim: Evidence for technologies capable of remote
sound or voice
transmission isolated to individuals is surveyed along with target
tracking capacity that
can maintain apparent psychosis. Method: Examination of government
engineering databases, the patent database post 1976, PubMed, and
the Internet for
available pertinent authentic sources. Results: Ultrasound and
radio frequency voice
transmission are described as methods to remotely isolate voice to
of ultrasound and radio frequency energy forms used on people also
Evidence indicates development of technologies capable of remotely
isolating sound and
voice to an individual. Covert misuse of such technologies would
result in simulated
hallucination, which has no diagnostic recognition.
“Such a device has obvious applications in covert operations
designed to drive a target
crazy with ‘voices’ or deliver undetectable instructions to a
--Robert O. Becker regarding microwave hearing voice transmission,
who was twice
Nobel Prize nominated for biological electromagnetic fields
a Corresponding author. Email- [email address] Address: 903 N.
Calvert St., Baltimore MD
b Affiliated with University of Texas at San Antonio, College of
gmail.com Address: 403 Terrell Rd., San Antonio, Texas 78209.
Medical professionals regard the perception of voice or sound,
which cannot be
heard by others nearby as hallucination excepting only tinnitus,
and deem such
phenomena as psychotic manifestations on persistent, disturbing
‘hearing voices’ can involve numerous diagnoses, 2 this symptom is
characteristic in schizophrenia with 47-98% prevalence, 3 but the
symptom has reported
prevalence in dissociative identity disorder (DID) of 30-64%, 4 and
in bipolar disorder of
7-48%. 5 Patients frequently believe that such voices are
externally transmitted to them. 6
Apparently unrecognized by the psychiatric community, two
technologies have the
described capacity to remotely transmit voice or sound in an
manner. Considering that misuse of such technologies could simulate
confuse diagnosis, the available body of evidence for such capacity
Herein is substantiated:
1. Development of remote ultrasound and radio frequency
for transmitting sound or voice, which can be isolated to an
2. Human tracking technologies.
3. Reports and published anecdotes of ultrasound and radio
energy use against people.
c Abbreviations: ATC = American Technology Corporation. ABR =
Auditory Brainstem Response. DID =
Dissociative Identity Disorder. FOIA = Freedom of Information Act.
Hz = cycles per second, and is an
eponym honorific abbreviation for Heinrich Rudolph Hertz. LRAD =
Long Range Acoustic Device. MHz
= Mega-Hertz denoting one million cycles per second.
Literature examination by relevant terminology was performed on
National Technical Information Service, Google search, US and
European patent office
databases, as well as Compendex, the Wilson Web, and Inspec.
microwave bioeffects references were also cross examined for
relevance per article.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria are pertinence and authenticity.
Time series bibliometry of citations from the most recent radio
review was plotted in histogram with differentiation of known
military support (Figure 1,
presently only papers in 1967, and 1975 are unexamined, now
indicated no military
support.) The significance of difference in total publication rate
was assessed by t-test d
of means for baseline publication prior to 1972 either as
considered from the 1956
citation of advertisement with microwave hearing mention or the
1961 more definitive
Frey substantiation compared with the 1973-1980 apparent
Regression was plotted for the baseline with no upward trend, and
per the concerns of
single case time series analysis, 7 the 1973-1980 upslope data were
adjusted by per datum
d t – test equation:
. \/ nx + ny
(The back slash-forward slash and underline combination above
square root of the denominator terms.)
x and y are the mean of the respective populations compared.
sx and sy are the standard deviations of the respective
nx and ny are the numbers of samples in the population.
subtraction of the mean from Frey 1961 through 1972 publication
baseline for the
presented p value (all t-tests are highly significant.)
ULTRASOUND VOICE TRANSMISSION
The loud, steady production of two different tones results in a
third tone equal to
the frequency difference between the original tones. The sounds so
created are known as
the tones of Tartini 8 who was an 18th century violinist, and
result from air non-linearity
that causes sound to scatter itself. The effect also occurs in
water for sonar generators
called parametric arrays, with the short ultrasound wavelength
permitting high directional
projection. Acoustic tones produced in air by ultrasound beams were
first reported in
1962, 9 followed by several abstract reports 10 11 12 and then had
publication. 13 Voice modulated on an ultrasound beam is caused to
peal off by another
ultrasound beam in loudspeakers for directionally projecting audio
sound, 14 15 16 17 with
mathematical prediction compared to experimental results. 18 19
Basic methods for such
speakers are described in the Audio Engineering Handbook. 20
Recently reported are
improvements in emitters, 21 and directivity. 22 Though utilized as
a term in many reports,
‘loudspeaker’ has somewhat misleading connotations for these
speakers, since virtual
point sound sources are generated within the ultrasound beams 23
outside the beam intersection. 23 A recipient perceives this sound
as originating within the head without directional orientation as
demonstrations for an audio engineering society, 24 an engineering
news article, 25 and
Popular Science 26 as well as non-lethal weapon applications
An ultrasound voice transmission patent clearly focuses on
non-lethal weapon use
against crowds or as directed at an individual. 27 Communication
that is understood as an
inner voice can have powerful emotional reactions in people, “since
attribute inner voices either as a sign of madness, or as messages
from spirits or demons.”
23 Another ultrasound voice transmission patent describes sound
within cavities such as the ear canal. 28 An individual readily
by the device across a noisy crowded room without discernment by
others nearby. Sound
can also be made to appear as originating from mid-air or from
surfaces by reflection.
American Technology Corporation (ATC) licensed this latter patent,
commercially sells their HyperSonic Sound® system, which has a
available 29 and a professional meeting presentation. 30 This
company also has an
acoustic non-lethal weapon called the Long Range Acoustic Device
(LRADTM) that is
deployed to the Navy, Coast Guard, Army, Marine Corps, military
prison camps, and the
US Border Patrol 31 32 as well as ground troops in Iraq and
Afghanistan. 33 An 80 %
efficacy in deterring wayward Persian Gulf vessels by the LRAD has
report. 34 The device is also deployed to police departments, 24 35
36 on cruise ships, 23
and at petroleum instillations, 37 while a version of the device is
available for automatic
operation in conjunction with remote sensor security systems. 38 A
method capable of limiting sound to one person, Audio Spotlight®
has peer reviewed
publication, 23 and is marketed. Audio Spotlight press releases
indicate exhibition at
Boston’s Museum of Science, 39 the General Motors display at
Disney’s Epcot Center, 40
the Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum, and other public
venues. 41 Press
accounts detail transmission of sound to persons unaware of such
use 42 by both
developers, along with some description of more disturbing sound
exposure, 43 which can
include pain even with ear plugs decreasing the noise. 23 A
non-lethal weapons program
director confirms the lack of sound perception by other people
nearby on ultrasound
voice transmission. 44 Though ultrasound can pass through walls, 45
46 the encoded sound
from ultrasound speakers reflects audibly upon striking hard flat
Radar technicians had microwave hearing effect anecdotes in World
War II 47 48
and the late 1940’s. 49 Allan H. Frey was the first to
substantially characterize the
microwave hearing effect in a series of articles beginning in 1961,
50 51 52 yet much earlier
less defined observations in open literature by Cazzamalli of
hallucination’ 53 may well be the same effect. Subjects can hear
microwaves at least up to thousands of feet from the transmitter.
24 Peak pulse power
largely determines loudness, though with some dependence on pulse
Microwaves are the higher frequency portion of the radio frequency
Frequency is denoted in Hz, which is an abbreviated eponym to honor
Heinrich Rudolph Hertz, but Hz just means cycles per second.
Frequencies relevant to
microwave hearing are in Mega-Hertz (MHz) units or one million
cycles per second, and
Giga-Hertz (GHz) units or one billion cycles per second. Though
most hearing effect
literature refers to microwave hearing, radio frequency hearing is
an appropriate term,
since the phenomenon extends below the 300 MHz microwave definition
frequency 24 to include 2.4 MHz magnetic resonance imaging radio
Microwave hearing is the most accepted of low power microwave
of direct perception by many microwave workers with well replicated
24 and numerous reviews of the phenomenon. 24 24 55 56 57 58 The
sound produced is
perceived within or near the head. 24 Microwave hearing results
thermoelastic expansion causing sound waves within the head. 24 The
involved, but not the middle ear. 25 The thermoelastic effect
elicits sound within
substances with only certain materials or conditions able to emit
air conducted sound. 59
Lin extends the range of microwave hearing to frequencies into the
‘tens of gigahertz.’ 24
A review of microwave bioeffects describes “receiverless” and
transmission discovery in 1973 by Sharp and Grove, 60 e who were
then at the Walter
Reed Army Institute of Research according to a different microwave
submission date. 61 The method was simple: negative deflections
from recorded spoken
numbers were processed to cause triggering of microwave pulses.
Upon illumination by
such verbally modulated energy, the words were understood remotely.
An Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command report
microwave speech transmission with applications for “camouflage,
decoy, and deception
operations” as a main rationale for a microwave exposure brain
blood flow study, which
affirms “by proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible
speech may be created.” 62
Between the inclusive dates given for these affirmations of
microwave hearing voice
transmission development, the total simple sound radio frequency
publication rate increased 3.7 fold, even with per datum
subtraction of any possible mean
baseline trend (t-test p < 0.02) for normal statistics on the
bibliometric time series of
e Both these researchers had then recently done classified work on
the weapons implications of the Moscow
American Embassy irradiation according to Project Bizarre FOIA
citations from the most recent radio frequency hearing review. 25
The Oskar, 1980
affirmation was published the year after the raw data historical
peak of publications for
total and military supported simple sound radio frequency hearing
reports, where for 45
years of investigation, half of citations cluster for publication
date in the decade after
1973 as given for Dr. Sharp’s account of voice transmission
discovery with the interval
having double the number of articles with military support compared
to other periods,
and apparent clustering towards the dates of interest (Figure 1).
The rapid drop in simple
sound microwave hearing publication coincides with evidence of Air
Force interest in
defining radio frequency “forced disruptive phenomenon . . . to
interrupt, degrade or
direct human central nervous system functioning.” 63 The Air Force
frequency acoustic phenomenon, 25 but within the simple sound
literature with expected
interest as forced disruptive phenomenon are notations of
vibration, 64 buffeting of the
head as well as a “pins and needles” sensation, 24 and petit to
grand mal seizures with
unconsciousness for 4-5 minutes 65 at altered f pulse parameters.
Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications describes applications
voice transmission as “obviously not limited to therapeutic
medicine.” 66 A Defense
Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirms
microwave sound and
indicates voice transmission. The report states: “Sounds and
possibly even words which
appear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be
induced by signal
modulation at very low average power densities.” 67 Among weapon
“great potential for development into a system for disorientating
or disrupting the
behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.” 25
f At presumably higher pulse parameters, but only fully specified
in the last reference.
The Brunkan Patent “Hearing system” is a device for verbal
microwave hearing. 68
The invention details microwave speech transmission with a
parabolic antenna remotely
illuminating the head. Complex sound and voice are built up by
patterns of bursts with a
single burst composed of tightly grouped evenly spaced pulses. The
spectrum granted by the patent is from 100 to 10,000 MHz with pulse
width from 10
nanoseconds to 1 microsecond, and bursts of such pulses lasting
from 500 nanoseconds to
100 microseconds (a nanosecond is 10 -9 or one billionth of a
second; a microsecond is 10
-6 or one millionth of a second.) The 1000 MHz preferred operation
is the optimal tissue
penetration frequency. 69 A similar German patent for remote
antenna microwave voice
transmission is also based on microwave bursts. 70 A non-remote
transmission patent based on microwave bursts is designed so that
the burst frequency
matches the sound frequency. 71
Microwave hearing literature confirms an ability to reproduce sound
characteristics, and aspects of these patents. Though loudness is
modulated by pulse
power, 24 72 closely spaced pulses also increase sound intensity,
73 74 or lower the
perception threshold. 24 The tonal quality of a pulse train
corresponds to pulsation
frequency, 25 75 76 and longer pulse widths produce lower frequency
Microwave pulse width differentially influences cat cochlear
nucleus auditory units that
are responsive to different tones 77 over sound frequencies from
931 Hz to 25.5 kHz. 78
Twin pulse separation responses 25 have at least some analogy to
discrimination parameters. 79
Two separate devices with non-remote transducers show efficacy in
reviewed publication either by independent analysis of operation,
80 81 or the developers
demonstrating improved speech discrimination. 82 83 Although this
latter report’s title
features electrotherapy, radio frequency hearing just previously
was considered as
electrophonic hearing 84 and a radio frequency method is stated,
description is referred to an Air Force study. 85 This 1964 study
is the first English radio
frequency voice transmission report with improved word
discrimination for the hearing
A 1993 classified non-lethal weapon conference demonstration of a
voice transmission device of Lockheed-Sanders manufacture is
reported by Nexus
Magazine. 86 Quoted descriptors are ‘voice synthesis’ or ‘synthetic
telepathy.’ 26 This
same year a US Department of Defense contract was awarded entitled
Via the Microwave Auditory Effect.” Communication initial results
are: “The feasibility
of the concept has been established” using both low and high power
systems. 87 A
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for information on the
project met with
denial on the part of the US Air Force, on the grounds that
disclosure “could reasonably
be expected to cause damage to national security.” 88 Though the
Air Force denied FOIA
disclosure, an Air Force report elaborates such a contract’s
purpose for “the possibility of
covert suggestion and psychological direction” by “high fidelity
speech” from microwave
hearing enabling a capacity “to ‘talk’ to selected adversaries in a
fashion that would be
most disturbing to them.” 89 90
This Air Force discussion framed as ‘possibility’ is belied by
he same year as patent application for a pulse amplitude modulation
implementation of such capability 91 by Air Force employees 92 93
with rights assigned to
the Air Force. FOIA releases related to the patent list “a
communication tool” under government use, 94 state experimental
intelligible speech transmission, 95 and provide some description
of initial experiments. 96
This first patent was followed by another related patent, 97
neither of which evidence
knowledge of previous development or citation of the obviously
relevant Brunkan 25
Under voice to skull devices, a microwave voice transmission
is referenced in the thesaurus of the Center for Army Lessons
Learned, which is a
military instruction website. 98 The US Navy has awarded a contract
for the development
of an aversive non-lethal weapon termed MEDUSA, and based on the
auditory effect that is to be able to focus on a single individual.
99 However, no voice
transmission is indicated for the Navy system. 26
When electromagnetic signatures of spoken words are applied to the
head at very
low field levels (1 microTorr), word choice is reported
significantly affected for related
words along the same emotional dimensions as the applied word. 100
Though inspired by
microwave hearing, this report is not of direct auditory
perception, but of subliminal
word choice influence. The authors suggest that such an influence,
even though weak
could shift the direction of group decisions in large populations,
and have previously
elaborated the possibility for more general electromagnetic
influence on populations. 101
TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGY
Diagnostic confusion with major psychotic states would require
target tracking for
the maintenance of isolated hearing effects on people. Common
technology utilizes the
radio frequency hearing spectrum, which encompasses cell phone, 102
103 TV, and radar
frequencies. 104 Since the ability to direct radiation is related
to wavelength, which
becomes shorter with increasing frequency, g microwaves are
directive in a manner
similar to light 105 except with structural penetrating ability. A
variety of methods assist
radiation localization for collimation or focusing including
masers, 106 and antennas that
are parabolic, have lens materials, 107 or are arranged in phased
array. 108 Phased array
antennae can be of small configuration with the formation and
direction of radar beams
without physical motion by precise phasing of current between array
constructive and destructive interference. 26
Jane’s Radar and Electronic Warfare Systems lists 13 target
specifying such capability on personnel at ranges from 4-20 km,
which are utilized by
countries around the world. 109 Automated target tracking involves
a track initiation
processor acquiring a target, while a data association filter
maintains a tracking lock on
the target 110 with this process utilized to continuously direct a
radar beam at a target for
tracking position. 111 Even a quarter century ago, specifications
for weapons fire control
designs whereby aiming was entirely determined by radar tracking
evident with numerous radars dedicated to one weapon. 112 Radars
devoted to tracking
isolated targets are presently prominent enough to merit a few
paragraphs in a recent
science and technology encyclopedia. 113 Other components can be
directed by radar
tracking, such as a camera at a human target for commercial
security surveillance. 114
One patent describes human target tracking with automatic aiming of
induced pain, now a declassified capability, 26 115 and even remote
physiologic stress. 116
g By the relation: wavelength times frequency equals the speed of
Movement excursions less than a frequency’s wavelength alter the
phase of a
target echo waveform as compared to the transmitted frequency.
Since waveform phase
relates to distance in wavelength, this allows radar assessment of
life by breathing and
heartbeat measurement from body surface excursions, which is
medical or rescue use, 117 and hypovolemic states are
discriminated. 118 Surroundings
without motion do not return echoes with waveform out of phase from
signal in contrast to living subjects, so that vital organ cycle
detection is utilized in
through wall radar discernment of humans developed for security
purposes. 119 The
capacity is evaluated as a covert polygraph for lie detection. 120
121 One system 122 for
radar visualization of humans through walls utilizing just range
radar with a moving
target indication method, has a 5 inch resolution, 123 and is
approved for sale by the US
Federal Communications Commission. 124
Patents for rescue 125 and security systems 126 with radar
detecting vital organ
motion describe the ability to distinguish individuals through
obstruction by frequency
analysis, which forms a type of “electronic fingerprint.” Besides
vital organ oscillation
from phase change contributions to the human radar signature,
another method is based
on the Doppler effect, whereby motion adds or subtracts energy to a
radar echo so that
the return signal frequency is changed in proportion to velocity.
Doppler effects produce
individual variance of human signals 127 with gait 128 and
heartbeat 129 considered as
biometric identifiers. Humans have good radar reflectance, 27 and
body parts can be
resolved by through wall imaging. 130 Human motion generated
Doppler frequencies are
regarded as a frequency spectrogram resulting from moving centers
of body and
appendage radar scattering, where just thigh height would provide
discrimination between males or females based on relevant biometric
(expected accuracy for sex; male – 84%, female – 91%). 131
Stationary surroundings only
return echoes at the transmitted frequency, so the Doppler effect
moving targets inside structures. Other information available to
radar is the human radar
cross section, which is about one square meter, 132 but is
proportional to a target’s weight,
133 and varies with the subject’s orientation with respect to the
radar antenna even from
front versus back such that differences in radar cross section
relate to body position. 134
Further general target recognition methods are based on
polarization characteristics, and
the frequency amplitude response. 135
Target illumination tracking systems have at least microsecond
Such responses require no wide scan area to lock illumination upon
a person at
achievable speeds. Less than 1/100th of an inch in a microsecond is
traversed at 90 miles
Battlefield human tracking specifications are not expected to
obstruction. Radar capability through obstruction is apparent from
the optimization and
adaptation of military radar to commercial through-the-wall
surveillance development, 136
with open literature surveys or overviews available. 137 138 139
Most materials negligibly
attenuate radar at the lower microwave frequencies. High
frequencies in the millimeter
wavelengths (95 GHz = 3 mm) can provide detailed imaging of humans,
but are not
suitable for brick and concrete. 27 Though lacking in more detail,
some human image
can be obtained at frequencies as low as 10 GHz, which also has
good building material
Raytheon’s Motion and Ranging System is battery operated, briefcase
sized, has a
100 foot range, 140 provides two dimensional tracking, and can
report range to motion of
30 targets. 141 142 Another system characterizes through wall
capability as at “any
distance.” 143 A portable, battery operated radar report states
detection of individuals
through 3 walls. 144 Other literature reports detection of
personnel through several
intervening walls, 27 or through a single brick wall 15 inches 145
and ½ meter wide (about
5 brick courses). 27 Since through-wall surveillance systems
evident in the open
literature are subject to commercial regulatory, pricing,
portability, and imaging
constraints, they cannot be regarded as the capability limit
especially regarding radars for
less economically constrained security markets or without portable
ACCOUNTS OF MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUND USE AGAINST HUMANS
Ultrasound behavioral influence technology use in Northern Ireland
is cited. 146
The device could focus on one person, though voice transmission is
Americans employed the system in Vietnam, which is termed the
squawk box, while a
news report characterizes psychological effects as ‘spooky,’
annoying, and intolerable. 147
British police inventories list the specific device, though a
spokesman denied use. 148
The Long Range Acoustic Device has published descriptions of
utilization for clearing
occupants from a building to execute a search warrant, repelling a
pirate attack from a
cruise ship, and ‘drawing out snipers’ for destruction, 23 besides
acknowledged use as a
‘hailing’ device with the demonstrations and developer ‘pranks’
The most documented citizen microwave irradiation was of peace
Greenham Common American Air Force Base in Berkshire England, who
investigation of unusual symptoms 149 that fit well with
syndrome. 28 Radiation measurements exhibited microwaves with
up to a hundred times the background level, and rose sharply on
protests nearer the base.
28 That some of the women ‘heard voices’ has report. 150
Though the source is otherwise postulated, radio frequency field
reported in the vicinity of an Australian DID case, 151 which is a
disorder with indicated
precedent for intelligence service interest and use. 152 The
radiation intensity ranged from
7 mV in an adjacent room to 35 mV next to the head. Other published
affirm microwave field measurement without strength publication.
153 154 155 A security
company advertises investigations of electromagnetic harassment
voice transmission with field measurement. 156
Ultrasound voice transmission technology is well confirmed by peer
literature, deployed in military 23 24 24 or police situations, 24
24 24 publicly
demonstrated in museum exhibits, 24 24 24 and for sale to the
public. 157 158 Microwave
hearing literature defines pulse parameters that elicit audition,
which would be considered
hallucination by psychiatrists on complaint of covert simple sound
provides a foundation for radio frequency voice transmission
citations. Peer reviewed
literature 25 25 and a government report 25 confirm non-remote
systems. There are four patents for remote radio frequency voice
transmission, 25 25 two
of which were developed by the US Defense Department. 26 26
development of such methods is indicated twice: Original successful
25 followed by increased historical density of total and military
supported simple sound
investigations that peak the year before publication (Figure 1) of
a bioeffects study citing
speech transmission as rationale, 25 and alternative news report of
26 Later, the Air Force had their own initial experiments 26 that
with more development
became patents, 26 26 and successful demonstration is stated. 26
Duplicated effort is
usual to classified programs. Though there is only some publication
of microwave field
strength around victims 28 28 or measurement anecdotes, 28 28 28
publications of remote radio frequency voice transmission use being
in media of variable
reliability, such reports are supported by descriptions of
non-lethal weapon applications
25 26 and designation as a weapons capability. 26 26 26 The fact is
that these accounts
or any remote harassment complaints have no adequate investigation
texts and professors teach that such claims are symptoms of mental
abundant indications that voice transmission and human tracking has
feasibility for continuously isolating sound or voice to
individuals. It must be appreciated
that engineering development is often proprietary and less
published than open science,
especially in areas with covert application. Implementing microwave
transmission would apparently involve little more than programming
a radar tracking
beam for the necessary characteristics.
The logic in the prediction by Brzezinski h of a more controlled
society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern
influencing behavior without hindrance by liberal democratic values
is compelling. 159
Since prevalent expertise assumes that voice transmission
perception by any possible
National Security Advisor to President Carter.
victim only has basis as a psychotic symptom without reality,
serious complaints have
such disregard that the ability to bear witness in journalistic or
police investigation and
court proceeding is readily compromised. Potential targets are
multiple, and may include
anyone worth manipulation: domestic adversaries; witnesses of
risks, which may only comprise classified disclosures; those prone
advantageous felonies; and even those psychologically similar to
other targets for
development or training purposes. Covert voice transmission
technology is most
applicable within the same language and culture. Security agencies
have little legal
accountability, particularly with utilization of unrecognized
technology. Legality is
readily circumvented by executive orders, (particularly declaring
situation), which can be sealed with the prerogative only
accountable to co-equal
Though complaint of ‘hearing voices’ is routinely diagnosed as
psychoanalytical acknowledgement of such technological capacity and
the need for new
diagnostic criteria does exist. 161 The current standard of care
severely discredits anyone
claiming such an affliction. Longstanding complaints by numerous
remote voice transmission to the medical community 23 are too
correspondent with the
technological development herein documented to further ignore. The
rationale for civil
rights abrogation based on the presumption that such symptoms have
external etiology requires justification by rational investigation
that is absent from
medical literature. Without adequate investigation, final diagnoses
cannot be regarded as
conclusive but must be viewed as presumptive. Undermining such
presumption are some
hallucination brain response reports that support microwave hearing
as a simulated
hallucination mechanism by indicating involvement of the initial
hearing pathway, which
is a promising criterion for differential diagnosis. 162
Microwave hearing is actually heard through the cochlea of the
inner ear causing
activation of associated brain nuclei resulting in the Auditory
(ABR). 163 164 165 The ABR is a validated hearing evaluation
technique for unresponsive
patients. 166 The ABR could be altered for patient indication of
transmission/hallucination instead of audible tone presentation. An
ABR is not expected
to occur from endogenous hallucination that has inner speech
mis-identification as the
current leading theory.
Radio frequency field measurement in the vicinity of complainants,
with attention to directional cranial localization is appropriate
with any field elevation
further characterized. Investigation of electrophysiological
between microwave bioeffects and schizophrenia 167 compared with
electromagnetic shielding might provide differentiation with
existing magnetic resonance
imaging, and magnetoencephalography facilities shielded from
commercial signals, but
radar effectiveness must be proven. At least the burst-pulse
transmission patents are pulsed at such high frequencies that an
component is expected, 25 similar to microwave thermoacoustically
tomography. 168 Even recordings claiming an ability to capture
harassment sounds 25
have support in that condenser microphones are responsive to the
though as induced by a laser. 169
Considering the number of patients who complain of remote influence
authentic indications of such technology, due investigative
diligence is required to avoid
the appearance of ethical negligence in remuneration for
unsubstantiated opinion that
violates basic human rights. The ambiguity of diagnostic
supposition is supported by
extensive correlations of microwave bioeffects with reported
other than ’voices,’ which includes: short-term and spatial memory
estimation changes, deficits in sequencing, coordination deficit,
electrophysiological changes, startle decrease, neurotransmitter
alterations, immune alterations, mitochondria deficits, lipid
lipid peroxidation, deleterious histological change in disease
reduced brain areas,
activation of hallucination involved brain areas, and ocular
disease. 28 Even the most
apparently bizarre of Schneiderian symptoms may have basis in that
recent EEG analysis
studies confirm and extend the feasibility of thought reading,
which was reported initially
by a 1975 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency study, and
there are references to
‘remote EEG’ microwave methods. 170
Radio Frequency Hearing Articles per Year
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Military Support Acknowledged No Military Support Acknowledged
Figure 1. Histogram of article quantity per year for Elder and
Chou, 2003 25 radio frequency auditory
response review citations. Simple sound radio frequency hearing
publications increase on and after the
date given (1973) for Dr. Sharp’s account of successful microwave
hearing voice transmission for total and
military supported investigations. Maximal quantities for each
category occur the year before the Oskar,
1980 Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command study
affirms microwave hearing
speech transmission as a study rationale. Acknowledgement of
military support in prior or post periods are
half the rate that occurs for investigations dated from 1973
through 1983, wherein 45 % of these studies
acknowledge military support. Though some military supported
reports originated from naval laboratories,
the primary military funding source was the Office of Naval
Research with only one study having
additional Army funding contribution, and another study solely Air
Force funded. Note the relative lack of
publications during the O’Loughlin and Loree patent period of
Acknowledgements: Thanks are given to John Allman for financially
initial draft and Alfredo Julio Nieto Centeno for encouraging
donations. Thanks are also
given to God for inspiration, Sharon Weinberger for the Air Force
patent FOIA releases,
as well as the suggestions of Dr. Paul Canner and Dr. Allen Barker.
1 Becker RO, Selden G. The body electric: Electromagnetism and the
foundation of life. New York: Quill William Morrow;
1985, p 319-320.
2 Ritsher JB, Lucksted A, Otilingam PG, Gonzales M. Hearing voices:
explanations and implications. Psychiatr Rehabil J
3 Thomas P, Mathur P, Gottesman II, Nagpal R, Nimgaonkar VL,
Deshpande SN. Correlates of hallucination in
schizophrenia: A cross-cultural evaluation. Schiz Res 2007;92:41-9.
4 Kluft RP. First-rank symptoms as a diagnostic clue in multiple
personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1987;144(3):293-7.
5 Dunayevich E, Keck PE. Prevalence and description of psychotic
features in bipolar mania. Curr Psychiatry Rep
6 Adams RD, Victor M. Derangements of intellect, mood, and
behavior, including schizophrenia and manic depressive
states. In: Isselbacher KJ, Adams RD, Brunwald E, Petersdorf RG,
Wilson JD, editors. Harrison’s principles of internal
medicine, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980, p 150.
7 Franklin RD, Allison DB, Gorman RS (editors). Design and analysis
of single-case research. Mahwah, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates, Publishers; 1996.
8 Weiguo D, Qunli W. Audio sound reproduction based on nonlinear
interaction of acoustic waves. Journal of the Audio
Engineering Society 1999;47(7/8):602-6.
9 Bellin JLS, Beyer RT. Experimental investigation of an end-fire
array. J Acoust Soc Am 1962;34(8):1051-4.
10 Shealy WP, Eller AJ. Design and preliminary results of an
acoustic parametric source in air. J Acoust Soc Am
11 Bennett MB, Blackstock DT. Experimental verification of the
parametric array in air. J Acoust Soc Am 1973;54:297A.
12 Widener MW, Muir TG. Experiments in parametric arrays in air. J
Acoust Soc Am 1974;55(2):428-429A.
13 Bennett MB, Blackstock DT. Parametric array in air. J Acoust Soc
14 Yoneyama M, Fujimoto J-I, Kawamo Y, Sasabe S. The audio
spotlight: An application of non-linear interaction of sound
waves to a new type of loudspeaker design. J Acoust Soc Am
15 Aoki K, Kamakura T, Kumamoto Y. Parametric
loudspeakers—Characteristics of acoustic field and suitable
of carrier ultrasound. Electronics and Communications in Japan
1991;74(Part 3, #9):76-81.
16 Kamakura T, Aoki K, Kumamoto Y. Suitable modulation of the
carrier ultrasound for a parametric loudspeaker. Acustica
17 Pompei FJ. The use of airborne ultrasonics for generating
audible sound beams. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
18 Yang J, Sha K, Gan W-S, Tian J. Nonlinear wave propagation for a
parametric loudspeaker. IEICE Transactions on
19 Kamakura T, Tani M, Kumamoto Y. Parametric sound radiation from
a rectangular aperture source. Acustica
20 Satoh K. Sound reproduction devices and systems: Parametric
speaker. In: Benson BK, editor. Audio engineering
handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988, p 7.61-7.66.
21 Moon B-C, Kim M-J, Ha K-L, Kim C-D. Radiation characteristics
improvement of flexural type vibrator for parametric
sound source in air. Japan Journal of Applied Physics
22 Tan KS, Gan WS, Yang J, Er MH. Constant beamwidth beamformer for
difference frequency in parametric array.
Proceedings of the ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 2003;5:361-4.
23 Havelock DI, Brammer AJ. Directional loudspeakers using sound
beams. J Audio Engineering Society 2000;48(10):
24 Bush E. Meeting recap. October 29, 2002 – Alternative
loudspeaker transducer technologies. Audio Engineering Society
Los Angeles Section Meeting 2002 Oct 29; p 2. [Online] [cited 2008
Jan 3] Available from: URL:
25 Webb W. Directional beams refocus sound science. EDN 2003 May
15; p 30-4. Available also from:
26 Sparrow D. Best of what’s new grand award winner: Hypersonic
sound. Popular Science Dec 2002;61(6):94.
27 Lowrey A. Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound
using ultrasonic sound as a carrier. US patent # 6052336,
2000 Apr 18.
28 Norris EG. Acoustic heterodyne device and method. US patent #
5889870, 1999 Mar 20.
29 Croft JJ, Norris JO. Theory, history, and the advancement of
parametric loudspeakers: A technology overview. American
Technology Corporation, 2001-2003; Part # 98-10006-1100 Rev. E.
[Online] [cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from: URL:http://
30 Norris EG. The creation of audible sound from ultrasonic energy
– A fundamental paradigm shift. J Acoust Soc Am
31 Davidson N, Lewer N. Research report No. 8. Bradford Non-Lethal
Weapons Research Project (BNLWRP), Centre for
Conflict Resolution, Department of Peace Studies, 2006 Mar; p 33-5.
[Online] [cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from: URL:
32 American Technology Corporation. Military/Project Highlight.
[Online] [Cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from URL:
33 Davidson N, Lewer N. Research report No. 5. Bradford Non-Lethal
Weapons Research Project (BNLWRP), Centre for
Conflict Resolution, Department of Peace Studies, 2004 May; p 3 &
20. [Online] [cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from: URL:
34 Schollmeyer J. Pumping up the volume. Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists 2004 Nov/Dec;60(6):8-9.
35 Government/Project Highlight. American Technology Corporation.
[Online] [Cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from URL:
36 Karp J. Hey, you! How about lunch? New laserlike sound beams
messages to shoppers, aid military in Iraq. Wall Street
Journal 2004 April 1; Sect. B:1.
37 American Technology Corporation’s LRAD ™ instillations providing
infrastructure protection to oil and gas industry.
LRADs also being utilized for long range communications in Nigeria,
India, and the Gulf Coast. Business Wire 2006 July
25. Available from URL:
38 American Technology unveils new LRAD® products at West Coast’s
largest military technology expo. American
Technology Corporation. Press release of 30 Jan 2007. [Online]
[Cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from URL:
39 Holosonics announces Audio Spotlight® exhibit at Boston’s Museum
of Science. Holosonics Research Labs. Press release
of 2003 Oct 6. [Online] [cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from:
40 Audio Spotlight sound beam systems installed in General Motors
display at Walt Disney’s Epcot. Holosonics Research
Labs. Press release of 2004 June 30. [Online] [cited 2008 Jan 3]
41 Holosonics’ Audio Spotlight technology installed at the
Smithsonian. Holosonics Research Labs. Press release of 2003
Nov 6. [Online] [cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from:
42 Lee JS. An Audio Spotlight creates a personal wall of sound. New
York Times 2001 May 15; Sect. F:4.
43 Sella M. The sound of things to come. New York Times Late
Edition Final 2003 Mar 23; Sect. 6:34-9. [Online] [Cited
2008 Jan 3] Available from URL:
44 Alexander JB. Future war: Non-lethal weapons in
twenty-first-century warfare. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1999, p
45 Wild N. Hand-held ultrasonic through-the-wall monitoring of
stationary and moving people. Government Technical
Report # A857814, Nov 2003. Abstract available at
46 Wild N, Doft F, Wondra J, Niederhaus S, Lam H. Ultrasonic
through-the-wall surveillance system. Proceedings of SPIE
47 Lin JC. Auditory perception of pulsed microwave radiation,
chapter 12. In: Gandhi OP, editor. Biological effects and
medical applications of electromagnetic energy. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990, p 278-318.
48 Chou C-K, Guy AW, Galambos R. Auditory perception of
radio-frequency electromagnetic fields. J Acoust Soc Am
49 Postow E, Swicord ML. Modulated fields and “window” effects. In:
Polk C, Postow E, editors. CRC handbook of
biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Boca Raton: CRC
Press; 1986, p 425-60.
50 Frey AH. Auditory system response to radio frequency energy.
Aerosp Med 1961;32:1140-2.
51 Frey AH, Messenger R. Human perception of illumination with
pulsed ultra-high-frequency electromagnetic energy.
52 Frey AH. Human auditory system response to modulated
electromagnetic energy. J Applied Physiol 1962;17(4):689-92.
Available at http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm
53 Presman AS. Electromagnetic fields and life. New York: Plenum
Press; 1970, p 266. Presman refers to Cazzimalli’s
radiofrequency hallucination observations citing: Cazzamalli F. Di
novo appararto radio-electro rivelatore del fenomeni
electromagnetici radianto del cervello umano. L’Energio Electrica
1941;18: 28. Another English reference to this Italian
work accessed 3/8/05 is at
54 Roschmann P. Human auditory system response to pulsed
radiofrequency energy in RF coils for magnetic resonance at
2.4 to 170 MHz. Magn Reson Med 1991;21:197-215.
55 Puranen L, Jokela K. Radiation hazards assessment of pulsed
microwave radars. J Microwave Power Electromagn Energy
56 Hermann DM, Hossmann K-A. Neurological effects of microwave
exposure related to mobile communication. J Neurol
57 Lai H. Neurological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic
radiation. In: Lin JC, editor. Advances in electromagnetic
fields in living systems, vol 1. New York: Plenum Press; 1994, p
58 Elder JA, Chou CK. Auditory responses to pulsed radiofrequency
energy. Bioelectromagnetics 2003;Suppl 8:S162-S173.
59 McMurtrey JJ. Recording microwave hearing effects: Literature
review and case report of an affiant to recording remote
harassment. 2005. [Online] [Cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from URL:
60 Justesen DR. Microwaves and behavior. Am Psychologist
1975;392(Mar):391-401. Available also from:
61 Sharp JC, Grove HM, Gandhi OP. Generation of acoustic signals by
pulsed microwave energy. IEEE Transactions on
Microwave Theory and Technique 1974;May:583-4.
62 Oskar KJ. Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral
blood flow of conscious rats. Army Mobility Equipment
Command Report # AD-A090426, 1980. Available from NASA Technical
Reports. Abstract available from:
63 Final report on biotechnology research requirements for
aeronautical systems through the year 2000: Proceedings of
biotechnology research requirements study session, 4-8 January
1982, vol. II. Prepared by Southwest Research Institute for
the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. San Antonio: Southwest
Research Institute July 30, 1982; p 182-3.
64 Frey AH. Some effects on human subjects of ultra-high-frequency
radiation. Am J Med Electronics 1963;2:28-31.
65 Guy AW, Chou C-K. Effects of high-intensity microwave pulse
exposure of rat brain. Radio Science 1982;17(5S):
66 Lin JC. Microwave auditory effects and applications. Springfield
Ill: Thomas; 1978, p 176, p 49-50.
67 United States Senate: Surveillance technology, 1976: policy and
implications, an analysis and compendium of materials: a
staff report of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the
Committee of the Judiciary. Ninety-fourth Congress,
second session 1976, p 1280.
68 Brunkan WB. Hearing system. US patent # 4877027, 1989 Oct 31.
69 Frey AH. Behavioral biophysics. Psychol Bull 1965;63(5):322-37.
70 Leyser R. [Microwave hearing device uses modulated microwave
pulses for providing induced sound
warning directly within head of deaf person.] Federal Republic of
Germany patent # DE10222439,
2003 Dec 11. Abstract available from:
DB=EPODOC&IDX=DE10222439&F=0 Original German Document available
DB=EPODOC&IDX=DE10222439&F=128&QPN=DE10222439 English translation
English translation is also available from the author, and Walter
Madlinger at [email address]
71 Thijs VMJ, Thijs-Jamin A, Thijis AV. Hearing aid based on
microwaves. World Intellectual Property Organization Patent
# WO 93/10730, 1993 June 10. Summary available at
72 Lebovitz RM, Seaman RL. Single auditory unit responses to weak
pulsed microwave radiation. Brain Res
73 Olsen RG, Hammer WC. Evidence for microwave-induced acoustical
resonances in biological materials. J Microw Power
1981;16(3 & 4):264-9.
74 Olsen RG, Lin JC. Microwave pulse-induced acoustic resonances in
spherical head models. IEEE Transactions on
Microwave Theory and Technique 1981;MTT-29(10):1114-7.
75 Lin JC. The microwave auditory phenomenon. Proceedings of the
76 Tyazhelov VV, Tigranian RE, Khizhniak EO, Akoev IO. Some
peculiarities of auditory sensations evoked by pulsed
microwave fields. Radio Science 1979;14 Supp:259-63.
77 Lebovitz RM, Seaman RL. Microwave hearing: The response of
single auditory neurons in the cat to pulsed microwave
radiation. Radio Science 1977;12(Suppl.):229-36.
78 Seaman RL, Lebovitz RM. Auditory unit responses to single-pulse
and twin-pulse microwave stimuli. Hear Res
79 Bilsen FA, Ritsma RJ. Some parameters influencing the perception
of pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 1970;47(2):469-75.
80 Schafer CR. Cortical hearing aid. US patent # 4711243, 1987 Dec
81 Bennett WR. Radio frequency hearing: Electrostrictive detection
and bone conduction. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103(4):
82 Puharich HK, Lawrence JL. Hearing systems. US patent # 3629521,
1971 Dec 21.
83 Puharich HK, Lawrence JL. Hearing rehabilitation by means of
transdermal electrotherapy in human hearing loss of
sensineural origin. Acta Otolaryngol 1969;67:69-83.
84 Sommer HC, von Gierke HE. Hearing sensations in electric fields.
Aerosp Med 1964;35:834-9.
85 Puharich HK, Lawrence JL. Electro-stimulation techniques.
Defense Documentation Report # AD459956, 1964. National
Technical Information Service available.
86 Krawczyk G. CIA using old tricks again. Nexus Magazine, 1994
87 Kohn B. Communicating via the microwave auditory effect. Defense
Department Awarded SBIR Contract # F41624-95-
C9007, 1993. In: Begich N. Controlling the human mind: The
technology of political control or tools for peak performance.
Anchorage, Alaska: Earthpulse Press; p 117. Contract abstract
available from: URL:
88 Prins RE. Memorandum to Margo P. Cherney, Re: Freedom of
Information Act request. 2000 Jan 25. [Online] [cited 2008
Jan 3] Available from: URL:http://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpg
89 Castelli CJ. Questions linger about health effects of DOD’s
‘non-lethal ray.’ Inside the Navy 2001;14(12):1-6. Available
90 New world vistas: air and space power for the 21st century: USAF
Scientific Advisory Board: United States: (Ancillary
Volume) 1996; p 89-90. Quoted section available from: URL:
91 O’Loughlin JP, Loree DL. Method and device for implementing the
radio frequency hearing effect. US patent # 6470214,
2002 Oct 22.
92 Directed energy engineers win Air Force awards. Office of Public
Affairs, Air Force Research Laboratory. Kirtland AFB,
NM. News release 2004 Sept 27, DE Release #2004-44.
93 Directed energy people receive awards. Office of Public Affairs,
Air Force Research Laboratory. Kirtland AFB, NM.
News release 2002 April 25, DE Release #2002-17.
94 A method for encoding & transmitting speech by means of the
radio frequency hearing phenomenon. Disclosure and
record of invention, AF form 1279 to document inventions for
consideration of patenting by the Air Force. 1994 Oct 27.
[Online] [Cited 2007 Mar 13] Available from URL:
95 O’Loughlin J. Letter to Ken Callahan, JA. 2001 Aug 30. [Online]
[Cited 2007 Mar 13] Available from URL:
96 O’Loughlin J, Loree D. Theory and analysis of RF hearing, and
invention disclosure of a method of encoding speech on
an RF signal which intelligibly transmits that signal to the
hearing receptors of a human. 1994 Nov 1. [Online] [Cited 2007
Mar 13] Available from URL:
97 O’Loughlin JP, Loree DL. Apparatus for audibly communicating
speech using the radio frequency hearing effect. US
patent # 6587729, 2003 July 1.
98 Voice to skull devices: Weapons thesaurus. Center for Army
Lessons Learned (CALL). [Online] [cited 2008 Jan 4]
Available from: URL:
http://call.army.mil/products/thesaur/00... This URL
frequently changes. A stable URL
copy of the entry is provided by the Federation of American
Scientists Project on Government Secrecy from
URL:http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.... who noted that
CALL had made the page unprintable in Aftergood S.
Voice to skull: More army web shenanigans. Secrecy News, vol 2004,
issue 64, July 12, 2004 [Online] [Cited 25 Sept
2005} the last item available from:
the entry has again become printable. Verification of the entry is
also by Google search for Center for Army Lessons
Learned, finding thesaurus on search, and finding the voice to
skull devices entry link under V.
99 Phase I summary report. Navy Search Database, 19 May 2004.
[Online] [Cited 2008 Jan 3]
100 Healey F, Persinger MA, Koren SA. Control of “choice” by
application of the electromagnetic field equivalents of
spoken words, Mediation by the emotional meaning rather than
linguistic dimension. Percept Motor Skills
101 Persinger MA. On the possibility of directly accessing every
human brain by electromagnetic induction of fundamental
algorithms. Percept Motor Skills 1995;80:791-9.
Available at (after website preamble)
102 Frey AH. Headaches from cellular telephones: Are they real and
what are the implications. Environ Health Perspect
1998;106(3):101-3. Available at
103 Lin JC. Cellular telephones and their effect on the human
brain. Mobile Computing and Communications Review July
104 Nolan PJ. Fundaments of college physics. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C.
Brown; 1993, p 716.
105 Collin RE. Foundations for microwave engineering. New York:
McGraw-Hill; 1966, p 2.
106 Bertolotti M. Masers and lasers: An historical approach.
Bristol: Adam Hilger; 1983.
107 Seeger JA. Microwave theory, components, and devices. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986, p 163-7.
108 Bodnar DG. Radar antennas. In: Eaves JL, Reedy EK, editors.
Principles of modern radar. New York: Van Nostrand-
Reinhold; 1987, p 172-80.
109 Streetly M, editor. Jane’s radar and electronic warfare systems
12th ed, 2000-2001. Alexandria, VA: Jane’s Information
Group Ltd.; 2000, p 67-118.
110 Brookner E. Tracking and Kalman filtering made easy. New York:
111 Eaves JL, Reedy EK, editors. Principles of modern radar. New
York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold; 1987, p 539-618.
112 Petty RT. Jane’s weapon systems. Alexandria, VA: Jane’s
Information Group Ltd.; 1979, p 211-79.
113 Hill RT. Radar. Science and technology encyclopedia. New York:
McGraw-Hill; 2007, vol 15, p 5-16.
114 Fontana RJ. Recent applications of ultra wideband radar and
communications systems. In: Smith PD, Cloude SR, editors.
Ultra-wideband, short-pulse electromagnetics 5. New York: Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Press; 2002, p 225-34.
115 Hecht J. Microwave beam weapon to disperse crowds. New
Scientist 2001 Oct 27; p 26. Available at
116 Rowan L. Interactive transector device commercial and military
grade. US patent # 4893815, 1990 Jan 16.
117 Lin JC. Microwave sensing of physiological movement and volume
change: A review. Bioelectromagnetics
118 Matsui T, Ishizuka T, Takase B, Ishihara M, Kikuchi M.
Non-contact determination of vital sign alterations in
hypovolaemic states induced by massive haemorrhage: an experimental
attempt to monitor the condition of injured persons
behind barriers or under disaster rubble. Med Biol Eng Comput
119 Greneker EF. Radar flashlight for through-the-wall detection of
humans. Proceedings of SPIE 1998;3375:280-5.
120 Geisheimer J, Greneker EF. A non-contact lie detector using
radar vital signs monitor (RVSM) technology. IEEE
Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine 2001;16(8):10-14.
121 Staderini EM. An UWB radar based stealthy 'lie detector'. In:
Mokole EL, Kragalott M, Gerlach KR, editors. Ultra-
Wideband, Short-Pulse Electromagnetics 6. New York: Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003, p 537-52.
122 Nag S, Barnes MA, Payment T, Holladay GW. An ultra-wideband
through-wall radar for detecting the motion of people
in real time. Proceedings of SPIE 2002;4744:48-57.
123 Barnes MA, Nag S, Payment T. Covert situational awareness with
handheld ultra-wideband short pulse radar.
Proceedings of SPIE 2001;4374:66-77.
124 Leopold G. FCC: yellow light for ultrawideband. Electrical
Engineering News 2002 Feb 18; p 2 & 4.
125 Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA,
Schimko R. Electronic life detection system. US
patent #5448501, 1995 Sept 5.
126 Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA,
Schimko R. Electronic surveillance system. US
patent #5530429, 1996 June 25.
127 Hunt AR, Hogg RD. Stepped-frequency, CW radar for concealed
weapon detection and through the wall surveillance.
Proceedings of SPIE 2002;4708:99-105.
128 Geisheimer JL, Greneker EF, Marshall WS. A high resolution
doppler model of human gait. Proceedings of SPIE
129 Grenecker EF. Radar sensing of heartbeat and respiration at a
distance with security applications. Proceedings of SPIE
130 Beeri A, Daisy R. High resolution through-wall imaging.
Sensors, and Command Control, Communications, and
Intelligence (C3I) Technologies for Homeland Security and Homeland
Defense. Proceedings of SPIE
131 Gurbuz SZ, Melvin WL, Williams DB. Detection and identification
of human targets in radar data. Proceedings of SPIE
132 Radar. The new encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia
Britannica, Inc.; 2002; vol 26, p 466.
133 Nebabin VG. (Barton DK, translator and editor): Methods and
techniques of radar recognition. Boston: Artech House;
1995, p 19.
134 Schultz FV, Burgener RC, King S. Measurement of the radar cross
section of a man. Proceedings of the IRE 476-81.
135 Astanin LY, Kostylev AA, ZinovievYS, Pasmurov AY. Bespalyi VN,
translator. Radar target characteristics:
Measurement and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1994, p
136 McMillan RW, Currie NC, Ferris DD, Wicks MC. Concealed weapon
detection using microwave and millimeter wave
sensors. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on
Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology 1998; p 1-4.
137 Ferris DD. Microwave and millimeter-wave systems for wall
penetration. Proceedings of SPIE 1998;3375:269-79.
138 Ferris DD, Currie NC. A survey of current technologies for
through-the-wall surveillance (TWS). Proceedings of SPIE
139 Frazier LM. Radar surveillance through solid materials.
Proceedings of SPIE 1997;2938:139-46.
140 Black JD. Motion and ranging sensor through-the-wall
surveillance system. Proceedings of SPIE 2002;4708:114-21.
141 Borek SE. An overview of through-the-wall surveillance for
homeland security. Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Applied
Imagery and Pattern Recognition Workshop 2005; p 42-7.
142 Looking through walls. Tech Beat, National Law Enforcement and
Corrections Technology Center: Summer 2000; p 1-2.
143 Lai C-P, Narayanan RM. Through-wall imaging and characteristics
of human activity using ultrawideband (UWB)
random noise radar. Proceedings of SPIE 2005;5778:186-95.
144 Hunt AR: A wideband imaging radar for through-the-wall
surveillance. Proceedings of SPIE 2004;5403:590-6.
145 Lin A, Ling H. Through-wall measurement of a Doppler and
direction of arrival (DDOA) radar for tracking indoor
movers. Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium
146 Lewer N, Schofield S. Non-lethal weapons: A fatal attraction?
Military strategies and technologies for 21st-century
conflict. London: Zed Books; 1997, p 11 & 62.
147 Rodwell R. Army tests new riot weapon. New Scientist 1973 Sept
20; p 684.
148 Smith CW, Best S. Electromagnetic man. London: J.M. Dent & Sons
Ltd.; 1989, p 211, 233, & 235.
149 Parry G. Doctors investigating claims of Greenham radiation
cases: Peace women fear electronic zapping at base.
(Manchester) Guardian 1986 Mar; 10:3.
150 Ramsay R. ELF: from mind control to mind wars. Lobster Magazine
151 Gillin LM, Gillin L. Subtle energies, intentionality and the
healing of traumatically abused persons. International
Conference on Trauma, Attachment and Dissociation, Melborne,
Australia, 2003 Sept 12-14. [Online] [cited 2004 Aug 30]
152 Ross CA. Bluebird: Deliberate creation of multiple personality
by psychiatrists. Richardson, TX: Nanitou
Communications, Inc.; 2000.
153 Babacek M. Are there secret weapons of mass destruction?
[Online] [cited 2008 Jsn 3] Available from: URL:
154 Babacek M. Electromagnetic and information weapons: The remote
manipulation of the human brain. New Dawn 2005
March-April; p 51-6. Article author available at email - [email
155 Welsh C. U.S. Human Rights Abuse Report. Jan 1998. [Online]
[cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from:
156 Electronic Harassment. Advanced Electronic Security. [Online]
[cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from:
157 Directional sound. Multi-Media Solutions. [Online] [cited 2008
Jan 3] Available from: URL:
158 Audio Spotlight. Holosonic Research Labs. [Online] [cited 2008
Jan 3] Available from:
159 Brzezinski Z. Between two ages: America’s role in the
technetronic era. New York: Viking Press; 1970, 57 & 252.
160 Flaum M, Schultz SK. The core symptoms of schizophrenia. Ann
161 Smith C. On the need for new criteria of diagnosis of psychosis
in the light of mind invasive technology. Journal of
Psycho-Social Studies 2003;2(2) #3. [Online] [cited 2008 Jan 3]
162 McMurtrey JJ. A simulated hallucination mechanism compared to
hallucination brain response studies. 2007. [Online]
[Cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from URL:
163 Frey AH. Brain stem evoked responses associated with
low-intensity pulsed UHF energy. J Appl Physiol 1967;23(6):
164 Lin JC, Meltzer RJ, Redding FK. Microwave-evoked brainstem
potentials in cats. J Microw Power 1979;14(3):291-6.
165 Chou C-K, Galambos R. Middle-ear structures contribute little
to auditory perception of microwaves. J Microwave
166 Nuwer MR. Fundamentals of evoked potentials and common clinical
applications today. Electroencephal Clin
167 McMurtrey JJ. Microwave bioeffect congruence with
schizophrenia. 2002. [Online] [cited 2008 Jan 3] Available from:
168 Feng D, Xu Y, Ku G, Wang LV. Microwave-induced thermoacoustic
tomography: Reconstruction by synthetic aperture.
Med Phys 2001;28(12):2427-31.
169 Dioszegny T. Photoacoustic response of condenser microphones.
Journal of Applied Physics 1987;61(1):449-50.
170 McMurtrey JJ. Thought reading capacity. 2004. [Online] [cited
2008 Jan 3] Available from:
Thisarticleshows such weapons are feasible and would I beileve
Paul GaffneyLLB BA