Advice given to Chair Tim Parker in April to July 2016
Dear Post Office Limited,In evidence today Tim Parker claimed he was misled by people who were not honest or competent.Please supply all e-mails and correspondence to/from POL and Tim Parker during this 4 moth period.
Yours faithfully,
john o'sullivan
Our ref: FOI2024/00972
Dear John O'Sullivan,
Thank you for your request for information which was received on 3rd July.
Your request is being considered under the terms of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000.
The Act requires that a response must be given promptly, and in any event
within 20 working days. We will therefore reply at the latest by 1st
August.
Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future
communications.
Regards,
Data Protection and Information Rights Team
100 Wood Street,
London,
EC2V 7ER
Dear John O'Sullivan,
We are writing in respect of your information request, FOI2024/00972. At
present, our view is that your request falls within the scope of the
qualified exemption at section 42 of the Freedom of Information Act ("
FOIA"), relating to legal professional privilege (LPP).
As permitted by section 10 of the FOIA, Post Office Limited (" Post
Office") requires further time to consider the public interest test in
relation to this exemption. An extension is permitted until such time as
is reasonable in the circumstances. Having considered the FOIA Code of
Practice, Post Office considers that an extension of 20 working days is
appropriate in this instance and will therefore aim to respond to you by
2nd September.
Kind regards,
Data Protection and Information Rights Team
100 Wood Street
London
EC2V 7ER
[1][email address]
Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy, information
about how we do this can be found on our website at
www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
Dear [email address],Thank you for a reply." An extension is permitted until such time as
is reasonable in the circumstances. "And what are the circumstances?The greatest miscarriage of justice in British Legal History.Why not get the opinion makers,Rodric,Martin and Mark to give approval to all FOI requests in pursuit of answers to how this Scandal happened and who caused it?One eye on Phase 7,current practice wouldnt hurt the decision making process either?Then instead of expensive meetings and discussion,shall we say what we know or not -matters could proceed at great speed to the benefit of Sir Wyn and the Post Office victims?
Yours sincerely,
john o'sullivan
Dear John O'Sullivan,
We are writing in respect of your information request, FOI2024/00972. At
present, our view is that your request falls within the scope of the
qualified exemptions at sections 42 and 43 of the Freedom of Information
Act (" FOIA"), relating to legal professional privilege (LPP) and
commercial interests.
As permitted by section 10 of the FOIA, Post Office Limited (" Post
Office") requires further time to consider the public interest test in
relation to these exemptions. Having considered the FOIA Code of Practice,
Post Office considers that an extension of a further 20 working days is
appropriate in this instance and will therefore aim to respond to you by
30th September.
Kind regards,
Data Protection and Information Rights Team
100 Wood Street
London
EC2V 7ER
[1][email address]
Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy, information
about how we do this can be found on our website at
www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email%20address]
Dear John O'Sullivan
Apologies, but we are still reviewing the documents in scope of your
request. The date that the response is due for your request,
FOI2024/00972, has been changed to 28th October.
Kind Regards
Data Protection and Information Rights Team
100 Wood Street,
London,
EC2V 7ER
[1][email address]
Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy, information
about how we do this can be found on our website at
www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email%20address]
Dear [email address],Thanks for the update.What is the number of documents thus described-" we are still reviewing the documents in scope of your request."?
Yours sincerely,
john o'sullivan
Dear John O'Sullivan,
Please find the response attached relating to your Freedom of Information
request.
Regards,
Data Protection and Information Rights Team
100 Wood Street,
London,
EC2V 7ER
Dear Post Office Limited,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Post Office Limited's handling of my FOI request 'Advice given to Chair Tim Parker in April to July 2016'.
[ GIVE DETAILS ABOUT YOUR COMPLAINT HERE ]Are you serious?Finding out who lied and misled Tim Parker will be too burdensome?Discovering who was incompetent isnt worth it?You have better things tio be doing?Pardoning the 23 red's presumably,Shame on you!
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/a...
Yours faithfully,
john o'sullivan
Dear John O'Sullivan,
Thank you for contacting us with your request for an internal review which
was received on 9th October.
This has been assigned to a caseworker (our ref: IR2024/01354) and we will
aim to provide you with a response within 40 working days.
If you have any questions, then please do not hesitate to contact us.
Regards,
Information Rights Team
100 Wood Street,
London,
EC2V 7ER
Dear John O'Sullivan
The date that the response is due for your request, IR2024/01354, has been
changed to 5th December
Kind Regards
Data Protection and Information Rights Team
100 Wood Street,
London,
EC2V 7ER
[1][email address]
Post Office Limited is committed to protecting your privacy, information
about how we do this can be found on our website at
www.postoffice.co.uk/privacy
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email%20address]
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now