This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Gatso Calibration and Training'.





Freedom of Information  
 
Information Compliance Office (FIB) 
 
Rugby Police Station 
 
Newbold Road                                                  
 
Rugby                                                     
 
Warwickshire  CV21 2DH 
 
Telephone:  01788 853864 
 
Fax No: 01788 853781 
 
email:   xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxxxxx.xx 
 
 
 
Date:  28th September, 2011  
 
 
 
 
  Dennis Fallon 
  request-84046 xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx 
 
 
 
 
Dear Mr Fallon 
 
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: F-2011-00381 
 
I write in connection with your request for information dated 26th August, 2011 which was 
received by Warwickshire Police on the same, in which you seek access to the information 
concerning the costs of maintenance of safety cameras. 
 
Following receipt of your request searches were conducted within Warwickshire Police to 
locate information relevant to your request.   Having liaised with the Warwickshire Camera 
Enforcement Unit,  I can confirm that the information is held.  Please see below our 
questions and the responses. 
 
I would like to request a FOI disclosure which is basically to understand the annual money 
payments to Serco and Gatso for the calibration and maintenance of cameras, staff 
training, and how the speed is calculated as part of the secondary check. 
 
 
Q1. How many fixed post Gatso (FPG) and Gatso Red Light(GRL)cameras were in use, 
on an annual basis, by your partnership in the past three financial years? 
 
Response: Q1. Warwickshire Police operate 15 Gatso (FPG) cameras and 2 Gatso (GRL) 
cameras 
 
 
Q2. For these cameras, for the past three financial years, what were the total cost 
amounts paid(TCAP) for the annual calibration of these cameras, identifying the TCAP to 
intermediate agents such as Serco and the company Gatsometer B.V, and the additional 
amounts of V.A.T added ? 
 
Response: Q2 Calibration costs and any repairs arising are as below 
 
2008-2009 
Annual Cost net VAT        VAT 
£12,957                             £2,127.17 

 
 
 
2009-2010 
Annual Cost net VAT        VAT 
£6,261.60                          £1,010.29 
 
2010-2011 
Annual Cost net VAT         VAT 
£14,628.67                        £2,925.60 
 
The lower figure in 2009-2010 is accounted for by some cameras being replaced with new 
digital cameras which did not require calibrating in their first year as they come calibrated. 
 
 
Q3 .Please confirm if the partnership have ownership of these cameras, paid in full, or any 
other arrangement. 
 
Response: Q3 The partnership own the cameras 
 
 
Q4. Please confirm if the calibration contracts (CC) have been agreed for a fixed term with 
break penalty clauses or negotiated annually, if the CC are inclusive of a greater contract 
regarding maintenance, and who signed the contracts on behalf of the partnership. 
 
Response: Q4 Only GATSO and SERCO can calibrate and repair the equipment there are 
no contracts. 
 
 
Q5. After the cameras have been returned following calibration please confirm if, apart 
from the calibration certificate, Gatsometer B.V provide a report on any faults detected and 
items replaced and, if so, please identify the items, including batteries, that have required 
replacement. 
 
Response: Q5 Any cameras that are identified as faulty are repaired during the calibration 
process this is reflected in the costs. 
 
 
Q6.  After calibration, please confirm if the cameras are returned with a shutter speed of 
two photographs at intervals of 0.5 seconds, and if your Camera Enforcement Officers 
make any adjustments to the shutter speed or flash setting prior to reinstallation and, if so, 
what are the setting adjustments?. 
 
Response: Q6 Cameras are returned with varying shutter speeds they are then adjusted to 
two exposures at an interval of 0.5 seconds. 
 
 
Q7. Regarding the secondary check viewing, please advise how the viewing staff are 
trained for their task, who does the training, are certificates of completion provided, and 
are the staff given post training assessments or hard copy reference documentation. Is the 
work of the viewing staff audited or reviewed at intervals? 
 
Response: Q7 All initial training including secondary check viewing was carried out in 
Holland with GATSO. Certificates were issued. There is no formal review of staffs work. 
 


 
Q8. For FPG please confirm the distance between the calibration lines on the road which 
are part of the secondary check, so that one can calculate the speed if five lines are 
passed.
 
 
Response: Q8 The distance between the secondary check markings on the road in 
Warwickshire is 2 metres. 
 
 
Appeal Rights 
   Your attention is drawn to the attached sheet, which details your right of appeal. 
 
 
Should you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to 
contact this office. 
 
 
 
Yours sincerely  
 
Sabina Harris 
Information Compliance Officer 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 





 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
WARWICKSHIRE POLICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION APPEALS PROCEDURE 
 
This appeals procedure is issued in accordance with paragraph 36 of the Lord Chancellor’s 
Freedom of Information Access Code of Practice. 
 
Appeal Notification 
 
When a Freedom of Information (FOI) applicant,  who has made a request for information, is 
dissatisfied with the response received from Warwickshire Police, the FOI  applicant should 
inform Warwickshire Police in writing (this may be by email) of the reasons why the response 
is deemed unsatisfactory.  
 
Should a person who feels that Warwickshire Police is not complying with its Publication 
Scheme, the person should inform Warwickshire Police in writing (this may be by email) of 
the reasons for their dissatisfaction. 
 
Action by Warwickshire Police 
 
When a dissatisfaction report is received, the circumstances of the dispute will be reviewed 
initially by the Decision Makers in the Freedom of Information Office. 
 
If the Decision Makers are unable to resolve the dispute with the FOI applicant, the dispute 
will be referred to a Board comprising a Head of Department and a Chief Officer. The Board 
will not have been involved in the original decision making process to compile the response. 
 
The Board will consider the dispute and will advise the FOI applicant of their decision as soon 
as practicable, but within 20 working days. 
 
Further Action by FOI Applicant  
 
If the FOI applicant remains dissatisfied with the Warwickshire Police response, they then 
have the option to refer the case to the Information Commissioner. 
 
 
 
Freedom of Information Office                                                                  2nd March 2009