This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'SEND & Inclusion Board and Corporate Board'.


  
SEND Crisis Warwickshire
  
Information Management
Shire Hall
Warwick
CV34 4RL
Telephone 01926 412211
Email xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
 
Please ask for Bruce Green 
 
 
 
 
Our ref: 6667872
Your ref: 
Date: 13th May 2021
 
Dear SEND Crisis Warwickshire
 
Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Your request for information has been considered by Warwickshire County Council 
under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. 
 
I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by Warwickshire County 
Council.   However, please be advised we are unable to provide all of the information 
you have requested. 
 
This is because we consider some of the information is exempt under Section 36 
(Prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs) of the Freedom of Information Act 
2000.  
 
Also, some of the information is exempt under Section 40 (Personal Information) of the 
Freedom of Information Act 2000.  
 
Please see below for further details and explanation.    
 
You asked us: 
 
Please supply copies of all Minutes taken at any and all monthly and quarterly 
Board meetings of the SEND & Inclusion Board and Corporate Board from 
January 2020 to March 2021 inclusive.
 
Yours faithfully.   
 
We have dealt with your request in two parts: 
 
  

SEND & Inclusion Board Minutes.  
 
Please note: The 'SEND & Inclusion Board' was renamed 'SEND & Inclusion 
Partnership' in September 2020. 
 
Please see the following 8 PDF documents attached to our covering e-mail:
FoI_6667872_SENDandInclusionBoard_Feb20
FoI_6667872_SENDandInclusionBoard_May20
FoI_6667872_SENDandInclusionBoard_July20
FoI_6667872_SENDandInclusionPartnership_Sept20
FoI_6667872_SENDandInclusionPartnership_Oct20
FoI_6667872_SENDandInclusionPartnership_Dec20
FoI_6667872_SENDandInclusionPartnership_Feb21
FoI_6667872_SENDandInclusionPartnership_March21
The names of most staff attending these meetings have been removed from these 
documents.  Warwickshire County Council would usually provide staff information down 
to Tier 3 level (Service Manager).  This is because the more senior the member of staff, 
the less likely this is to be unfair processing of personal data under the Data Protection 
Act 2018.  However, the Council is unwilling to disclose the names of more junior 
members of staff, which is likely to constitute unfair processing of personal data under 
the Data Protection Act 2018. 
Therefore, the names of staff below Tier 3 level are exempt from disclosure under 
Section 40(2) (Personal Information) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. 
 
The information is personal data as defined by the Data Protection Act 2018 and as it is 
information about someone else we are unable to give this to you, as release of this 
information would constitute a breach of the Data Protection Act 2018.  The first 
condition is that the disclosure of the information to a member of the public otherwise 
than under this Act: 
(a) would contravene any of the data protection principles, or; 
(b) would do so if the exemptions in section 24(1) of the Data Protection Act 2018 
(manual unstructured data held by public authorities) were disregarded. 
The second condition is that the disclosure of the information to a member of the public 
otherwise than under this Act would contravene Article 21 of the General Data 
Protection Regulation (general processing: right to object to processing). 
 
Also, within the minutes of 1st July 2020 the name of a school has been removed as 
reference is made to the actions of parents of children at this school.  This information is 
also exempt from disclosure under Section 40(2) (Personal Information) of the Freedom 
of Information Act 2000.  
Please treat this letter as a refusal notice in accordance with section 17 of the Freedom 
of Information Act 2000, in respect of the names of staff below Tier 3 level, and the 
school name, as outlined above.  
 
Corporate Board Minutes. 
 
  

This information is exempt under Section 36 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 
(Prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs) on the basis that, in the opinion of 
the Council’s qualified person, disclosure of it would be likely to inhibit the free and frank 
exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation. 
 
Corporate Board is comprised of the senior officers who meet to consider issues of key 
strategic importance to the Council.  The information presented to Corporate Board 
comprises a set of detailed reports which set out, amongst other things, the issues, the 
options considered, the risks, the legal and financial implications.
 
Matters of strategic importance to the Council are discussed openly and frankly at 
Corporate Board meetings.  Discussion is held in this arena before matters are formally 
put to elected members for decision making.  These meetings are therefore an 
important and ‘safe’ space in which senior officers can deliberate and discuss matters 
affecting all elements of the Council’s functions, some of which have far reaching 
implications for service delivery.  It is important, if not critical, to maintain the ability for 
officers to express themselves openly, honestly and completely when giving their views 
as part of the process of deliberation during Corporate Board meetings.  If such minutes 
were to be disclosed and made public, officers would be likely to feel less inclined to 
discuss matters openly and frankly at these internal meetings, which would in turn be 
likely to impair the quality of decision making by the Council. 
 
In addition, the Corporate Board minutes requested are all recent (from the past 15 
months) and so contain discussions about projects and Council matters that are still live 
and in some cases have not yet come forward for elected member decision making.  In 
many cases therefore, the process of deliberation on such matters is still ongoing.  
Disclosing such minutes at this stage is therefore likely to directly impact upon 
Corporate Board’s ability to continue to have full and frank discussion about those 
matters and come to a final view.  It may also give inaccurate and / or misleading 
information to members of the public especially in cases where the final conclusions 
had not been reached.  In addition, at the point in time that such matters come forward 
for elected member decision making, the details would (unless they qualified as an 
exempt decision) be made public pursuant to The Local Authorities (Executive 
Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012.
 
Therefore, in the opinion of the Council’s qualified person, disclosure of the information 
in response to this request would be likely to inhibit the free and frank exchange of 
views for the purposes of deliberation and exemption in section 36(2)(b)(ii) of the 
Freedom of Information Act 2000 is engaged. 
 
The public interest test applies to this exemption.  We have considered the factors in 
favour of disclosure and the factors in favour of withholding the information.
 
Factors in favour of disclosure:
 
There is a presumption in favour of making decision making made by public bodies 
open and transparent, which could extend to include all internal documentation leading 
to a decision-making point.
 
There is an argument that due to their seniority, Corporate Board officers would not 
easily be deterred from expressing their views by the possibility of future public 
  

disclosure of minutes.  It is also possible that the possibility of future disclosure could 
actually lead to better quality decision-making.
 
Some of the matter discussed in Corporate Board minutes may no longer be on-going 
matters.  For those matters, there is an argument that disclosure would no longer hinder 
the free and frank exchange of views.
 
Factors in favour of withholding:
 
There is a strong public interest in quality decision-making by the Council.  The ability 
for senior officers to have free and frank discussions about matters of strategic 
importance to the Council is a key part of that process.  The Council needs to have a 
safe space in which to exchange views, debate ideas, form conclusions and reach 
decisions away from external involvement and public debate.  Disclosure of the minutes 
would invite external analysis of the internal discussion at Corporate Board, which is 
likely to have an impact on the effectiveness of the Council’s decision-making process 
and ultimately impact on the outcomes for Warwickshire residents. 
 
The Council has considered the public interest test and believes that the public interest 
lies in withholding the documents requested. In forming this view, careful consideration 
has been given to both sides of the arguments set out above.  On balance, the Council 
considers that the factors in favour of withholding the documents outweigh those put 
forward in favour of disclosure of the information requested. 
 
Therefore, please treat this letter as a refusal notice in accordance with section 17 of 
the Freedom of Information Act 2000, in respect of the 'Corporate Board Minutes' part of 
your request.  
 
 
If you are dissatisfied with the handling of your request, you have the right to ask for an 
internal review.  Internal review requests should be submitted within 40 days of the date 
of receipt of the response to your original letter and should be addressed to: 
 
Information Management 
Shire Hall 
Warwick 
CV34 4RL 
xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
 
 
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review, you have the right to 
apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision.  The Information 
Commissioner can be contacted at:  
The Information Commissioner's Office 
Wycliffe House  
Water Lane  
Wilmslow  
Cheshire  
SK9 5AF 
  

Phone: 0303 123 1113  
Website: www.ico.gov.uk
 
I will now close your request as of this date.
 
 
Yours faithfully
 
 
Bruce Green 
Information Rights Officer