This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Kingston-upon-Thames - Direction of Travel Adoption Report'.

Zara Pradyer 
(By email) 
Our Ref: MGLA040619-3965 
17 June 2019 
Dear Ms Pradyer 
Thank you for your request for information which the GLA received on 3 June 2019.  Your 
request has been dealt with under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.  
You asked for;  
1. Please can you send me copies of written internal communication between GLA 
officers, and of written communication between GLA officers and any person, company 
or other entity outside of the GLA - including, where permitted, the name of the 
company or entity and the position of the person within that company or other entity 
with whom communication took place - relating to the Kingston Direction of Travel 
Adoption Report, all between the dates of 1 May 2016 and 31 March 2017 inclusive, all 
in whatsoever form such communication may exist.  
2. Please can you send me agendas and minutes of any meetings, and any reports 
supporting or stemming from such meetings, in which the Kingston Direction of Travel 
Adoption Report is mentioned, all between the dates 1 May 2016 and 31 December 
3. Please can you send me evidence of the date on which the Mayor added his signature 
to the Direction of Travel Adoption Report for the Royal Borough of Kingston upon 
Thames, including a screenshot of the GLA web editing tool that shows the creation and 
edit history for the Direction of Travel Adoption Report? I am aware that there was only 
an unsigned version of the Adoption Report available from the GLA until March 2019. 
Please send me the original signed Direction of Travel Adoption Report that bears the 
Mayor's handwritten signature and not a scanned copy of his signature 

Between the 9 and 31 May 2019, the GLA received 13 similar requests for information, one of 
which is identical to your request. These requests were refused on grounds that the GLA 
considered the requests to be ‘manifestly unreasonable’ under Regulation 12(4)(b) of the 
Environmental Information Regulation (EIR).  
Between 3 and 5 June, the GLA received 4 further requests from newly created accounts that ask for the exact same information using the wording and 
format of the original requests.  This includes your request. 
These requests therefore fall under the exception to disclose because it is considered to be 

‘manifestly unreasonable’ under regulation 12(4)(b) of the Environmental Information 
Regulation (EIR), in line with our previous decision relating to the 13 requests concerning the 
Kingston Direction of Travel Adoption Report.  However, this provision also allows public 
authorities to refuse requests which are vexatious. 
The ICO has published guidance for public authorities in recognising vexatious requests and in 
particular those from a number of individuals acting as part of a campaign; 
91. If a public authority has reason to believe that several different requesters are acting 
in concert as part of a campaign to disrupt the organisation by virtue of the sheer weight 
of FOIA requests being submitted, then it may take this into account when determining 
whether any of those requests are vexatious. 

For the reasons we have described above, we have reasonable grounds to believe this request 
has been made in attempt to circumvent a previous GLA response to aggregate the cost of 
complying with campaign of requests on this same subject matter. 
Furthermore, we also have reasonable grounds to suspect that a number of requests are being 
submitted as part of a wider campaign.  In accordance with the Freedom of Information and 
Data Protection (Appropriate Limit and Fees) Regulation 2004
, the GLA is entitled to aggregate 
the cost of complying with a request where it receives requests from different persons who 
appear to the public authority to be acting in concert or in pursuance of a campaign, and who 
are asking for the same or substantially similar information.  
Please note that in engaging the exception under regulation 12(4)(b), the GLA is only 
concerned with the nature of the requests received and the impact of dealing with them and not 
any adverse effect that might arise from discourse of the content of any information potentially 
in scope.  
If you have any further questions relating to this matter, please contact me, quoting the 
reference at the top of this letter.  
Yours sincerely  
Paul Robinson  
Information Governance Officer  
If you are unhappy with the way the GLA has handled your request, you may complain using the 
GLA’s FOI complaints and internal review procedure, available at: