This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Universal Credit Programme - Project Assessment Review Reports'.

 
 
 
DWP Central Freedom of Information Team
Annex A 
 
e-mail: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx.  
gov.uk
 
Our Ref: FoI 1618
 
 

DATE: 9 November 2016
Annex A 
 
 
Dear Mr Slater, 
 
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request of 24 April 2016. I apologise for the long 
delay. I also apologise for treating your subsequent clarification of 31 August 2016 as a repeat 
request. 
 
You asked the department to:  
 
“disclose the project assessment review reports (“PARR”) produced in respect of the Universal 
Credit Programme (“UCP”) following reviews completed in: 
 
-   May 2012  
-   February 2013  
-   June 2013   
-   March 2014 
 
If a project assessment review was carried on the UCP in 2015 please disclose the PARR 
produced following that review. 
 
If the Department is prepared to disclose some of the information it should do so whilst citing 
the statutory exemption it is engaging for the remaining information. 
 
Whilst First-Tier Tribunal decisions are not binding the Upper Tribunal has held that they 
should be considered persuasive. Therefore, the Department should consider the Tribunal’s 
decision in EA/2013/0149 (promulgated 14 March 2016) prior to making a decision on whether 
to disclosure or not. 
 
If the Department claims s.36 FOIA in respect of this information it must: 
• 

Obtain and document the opinion of a qualified person before claiming that s.36 is 
engaged.  
• 

Carry out a contents based review (Upper Tribunal precedent requires this) for the 
requested information and explain why the specific information should be withheld. This means 
that the Department can’t rely on a “boilerplate” response covering the alleged harm that would 
or would be likely to follow disclosure and its consideration of the public interest test. 
 
If the Department does engage s.36 FOIA please provide a copy of the submission placed 
before the qualified person and a copy of the qualified person’s decision. “ 
 

I confirm that the Department holds some of the information you requested but it is being 
withheld as it falls under the exemption in Section 36 (2) (b) and (c) of the Freedom of 
Information Act 2000.  
 
This exemption covers information which if released would, or would be likely to, prejudice the 
free and frank provision of advice or which would otherwise, or would be likely otherwise to, 
prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs. 
 
This exemption requires the public interest for and against disclosure to be balanced. 
 
We recognise that the publication of all the information requested could provide a greater 
understanding of the risks, issues and progress steps of the Universal Credit Programme and 
so help inform a wider public debate.  
 
However, we have to balance this against the fact that the withheld documentation includes 
details of a sensitive nature whose publication would prejudice effective conduct of public 
affairs. There is a strong public interest in the Department maintaining efficient and effective 
programme management and in ensuring that this process is not undermined by premature 
disclosure particularly where risks to delivery are not yet fully mitigated.  
 
There is also a strong public interest in the Department being able to carry out and use frank 
assessments, including unrestrained and candid contributions from business areas.  
 
The submission to the Minister seeking authority to engage the section 36 exemption was not 
held when your request was received.    
 
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number 
above. 
 
 
Yours sincerely,  
 
 
 
DWP Strategy FoI Team 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
 
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act 
 
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing freedom-of-information-
xxxxxxx@xxx.xxx.xxx.xx or by writing to DWP, Central FoI Team, Caxton House, Tothill Street, SW1H 9NA. Any 
review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter.  
 
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information 
Commissioner’s Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have 
exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information 
Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk