300th FOI on here; the protection of 999 & 101 calls made to a police call centre.
Fiona Watts made this Freedom of Information request to Home Office This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.
Dear Home Office,
I respectfully ask that in your response to my FOI, you adhere to the 1995 Nolan Principles of Selflessness –Integrity – Objectivity – Accountability –Openness – Honesty – Leadership.
Ai) How can the UK citizen best gain an understanding of the 999 and 101 protocols that UK police teams should adhere to when managing and best protecting recordings of 999 and 101 calls?
Aii) Have the guidelines for police agencies protecting 999 and 101 data changed or been updated since a) 2005 or since b) 2007 or since c) 2012 or since 2016?
Aiii) Do the protocols for protecting 999 call data change from region to region or are the guidelines applicable to ALL regions in England?
B) A citizen makes a desperate 999 call; how long should that recording be held by the police constabulary?
*Please do not provide a link, but if you need to, please best clarify or highlight the key data for me to review.
C) A citizen makes a series of 101 telephone calls, asking for help with continued harassment, attacks or threats; is the police force under any jurisdiction to best protect a recording of that telephone calls and if so, for how long?
Di) A citizen reluctantly complains to the police that their 999 call was terminated by the police whilst she was being attacked and threatened late at night; due to a complaint being lodged about the call being terminated, would the police be under special guidelines to best protect the data relating to that 999 incident?
Dii) If a verbal apology was provided by the Supervisor in charge of the police call centre; what protocols are in place to best protect a 999 call that relates to a complaint against the police?
Please note that a complaint against the police is not vexatious; it is made with the hope that lessons can be learned in order to best protect the police resources.
E) A private sector company has successfully got away with perjury against a citizen between 2007 and 2017; but the victim of perjury is unable to best provide a defence in a Magistrates Court or a County Court because the police refuse to comply with a series of Subject Access Requests.
What procedures are left for the citizen who has complied with every procedure and legislation to access a copy of the 999 calls that continue to be withheld from them when they are at their most vulnerable?
The Nolan Principles revisited;
If I have failed to fully comply with FOI laws due to my poorly phrasing my questions to you today, then please could you assist me in gaining the answers that I clearly seek in this FOI query attempt?
Many thanks for your time on this matter. If you need more time to fully comply with my request then please warn me as soon as possible as I am being counter-sued right now and time is important to me right now.
Yours faithfully,
Fiona Watts
@magnacarta300
#MisconductInPublicOffice
Please find attached our response to your Freedom of Information request.
Home Office
2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF
[1]www.gov.uk/home-office
References
Visible links
1. http://www.gov.uk/home-office
Dear FOI Responses,
I should not be surprised by your response.
Obviously I've been to the Information Commission, then the IPCC , CPS, PHSO and then Parliament.
If you wanted to access the information I sought - you could have. You have the power - you are the Home Office after all.
Yours sincerely,
Fiona Watts
This mailbox does not accept incoming messages. Any FOI requests or
inquiries should be sent to [1][Home Office request email].
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[Home Office request email]
Dear FOI Responses,
What a corrupt farce; suddenly your email box is unable to receive my correspondence?
Well, okay, if you want to play it that way; this month watch me erect a protest banner outside my home due to my frustration that the Information Commission, Independent Police Complaints Commission, the Independent Case Examiner, The Serious Fraud Office , The Parliamentary Health Service Commission and Public Administration Select Committee seem to be a waste of public resources and time?
RE: Suffolk Constabulary
Could you possibly find out where Ms Harbage is now? This was the police lawyer who contacted Mr Cranmer, the only witness who was willing and brave enough to give evidence about the Hate Crime and then cover up antics by Suffolk Constabulary.
I cannot be accused of libel; everything I've written can be verified.
Yours sincerely,
Fiona Watts
@magnacarta300
Fiona Watts left an annotation ()
Correction;
I'd only bought my home in December 2006 but within 6 months it had been broken into and vandalised on 9th July 2007.
A copy of the time and the reason for every 999 and 101 telephone call that I have made since 9th July 2007 continues to be withheld from me.
Why?
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
Fiona Watts left an annotation ()
*WTDK seems to be the only forum left for Child Protection whistleblowers & Victims of Perjury to be "heard"?
I am v grateful.
FAO:
a) The staff at Gallagher Bassett, especially Claire Ramage & Andrew Parker.
b) Chief Constable Gareth Wilson, Hayley Youngs & staff of Suffolk Constabulary & John McGuire & his team of Norfolk Constabulary
c) Tim Passmore & Christopher Jackson, The Police & Crime Commissioner for Suffolk
d) The 31 staff who 3 different advocates and I have been in correspondence with; from the IPCC to the Independent Office for Police Conduct.
e) The employees at The Information Commission & The Parliamentary Ombudsman
Dear All,
I refer you to my previous correspondence (4,900 letters?), my attendance at Public Meetings, my demos and my desperate protest at PACAC, Parliament on 12th December 2017 following my inability to best resolve perjury and access a GP service & dentist again.
I refer you to the harassment, hate crime and your attempts to permanently section me for being "delusional" on 3rd February 2018.
Questions that you have refused to answer;
a)
Am I delusional that I am forced on to Social Media as a direct consequence of the sly and illegal tactics used by your own insurance and legal teams?
b)
Which legislation allows the police to continue to withhold every copy of all of the Subject Access Requests that my advocates and I have attempted to best progress with your departments since 2011?
c)
You cannot deny that you have no knowledge of my attempts to access a copy of every 999 and 101 telephone call that I have made to Suffolk Constabulary since the evening of 7th July 2007?
d)
I could have resolved 12 years of perjury, NHS hate crime and prevented my supporters and I from coming into conflict with the police and the Council Tax Services if the NHS had allowed me access to my medical notes and Suffolk Constabulary had complied with my lawful access to copies of my data, including access to my 999/ 101 telephone calls since 9th July 2007.
On what legal grounds can you all justify labelling me "delusional" when I have complained about this malfeasance against me for 12 years?
e)
I still wait for the the data that would help me best resolve the perjury progressed against me since 19th June 2007 and best prove the Council Tax Services Hate Crime that I have suffered in Suffolk since 2007.
But instead, I am in court for losing my temper after being misled and mentally tortured by your unstoppable misconduct against me?
f)
Why do you label me "vexatious" when you are in no doubt that the only reason why I am living in Suffolk was in order to flee a previously botched and corrupt police/ NHS service in Manchester that left me responsible for a traumatised child that was not my home?
The tweet pinned on 1st August 2018 - confirms that I am not delusional or vexatious!
#FionaWattsWantsHerData
@magnacarta300