This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Evidence v Rhetoric'.



 
 
 
2 Rivergate 
T 0300 123 1231 
Temple Quay 
Textphone 0161 618 8524 
Bristol 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx 
Direct T 03000 131 287 
BS1 6EH 
www.ofsted.gov.uk 
xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
 
9 September 2015 
 
 
P Cialfi 
   Our Reference: CAS-333137-Z65BK3
Sent via Email: 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx  
Dear Ms Cialfi, 
 
Your request for information 
 
Thank you for your email dated 8 September 2015 in which you requested the 
following information: 
 
 
The name and contact details of Richard McGowan’s line manager; 
 
The metadata generated during the processing of your FOI request. 
 
As you are aware, section 8(1)(c) of the Act sets out that a request for information  
is one that describes the information being requested. From your most recent email 
it is not clear what information you are seeking in regards to metadata generated 
during the process of your FOI request. By its very definition metadata is data that 
describes other data; for example, in the case of a text document: how many pages 
a word document contains, who the author is or indeed when the document was 
written. 
 
In the case of your recent requests, the only information generated has been the 
correspondence between yourself and Ofsted’s Information Management Team. 
Consequently we would ask that you explain what specific information you are 
seeking when you ask for ‘metadata’. 
 
The Freedom of Information Act  
 
We have dealt with the first point of your request in accordance with the Freedom of 
Information (FOI) Act 2000. The first requirement of the Act is that we should 
confirm whether or not we hold information of the description set out in your 
request. We are then under a duty to provide you with all the information we hold 
which falls within the scope of your request, provided it is not ‘exempt’ information.  
I can confirm that we hold the name and contact details of Richard McGowan’s line 
manager. 
 


 
 
 
However in this case we consider that this information is exempt from disclosure, to 
the public, under section 40(2) the Act. 
 
Section 40(2) of the Act applies to any information which is personal data and when 
its disclosure would contravene any of the data protection principles. The first data 
protection principle requires that any processing of personal data, including 
disclosure, is fair and lawful and meets relevant conditions in the Data Protection 
Act. Disclosure can be considered to be fair if the individual to whom the personal 
data relates has consented to the disclosure or has a reasonable expectation that 
their information will be disclosed to the public, or if the disclosure is otherwise 
reasonable in the circumstances of the case. 
 
The name and contact details for Richard McGowan’s line manager are both the 
personal data of Mr McGowan and his line manager.  
 
Neither individual has any expectation that personal details, in the case of Mr 
McGowan, information about his direct line manager, or in the case of his line 
manager, their name and contact details, would be shared with the public. We do 
not have consent from either individual to share this information with the public. 
Furthermore, taking into account the public forum in which this request has been 
made, we do not consider it to be fair or reasonable to do so without their consent. 
Consequently we will not be disclosing this information to you in response to this 
request. 
 
The Act is not a method for members of the public to gain information about 
individual staff against which they may have a grievance. Where individuals wish to 
contact staff, but do not have the necessary contact details, they can do so by 
submitting an email via xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx, marking it for the attention of that 
individual or, as in this case, their line manager. Ofsted has a clear published 
complaints process1 for members of the public to raise concerns about aspects of 
Ofsted’s work. This is entirely separate from, and should not be confused with, the 
information request route. 
 
I trust that this letter clearly explains our decision. If you would like to discuss it 
further or have any queries about our response please contact me on 0300 013 1287 
and I will do my best to address them. 
  
Alternatively, if you are dissatisfied with our response or the handling of your 
request, you may request a formal internal review. In order to do this, please write 
                                        
1 https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted/about/complaints-procedure  
 



 
 
to the following address, setting out which areas of the response you are unhappy 
with: 
 
Email: Alma Kucera at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx or write to: 
  
Head of Information 
Commercial Services Division 
Ofsted 
Aviation House 
125 Kingsway 
London 
WC2B 6SE 
 
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review, you also have the 
right to apply to the Information Commissioner for a decision as to whether or not 
we have complied with our obligations under the FOI Act with respect to your 
request. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at:  
 
https://ico.org.uk/concerns/getting/  
 
or:  
 
        Customer Contact  
        Information Commissioner's Office  
        Wycliffe House  
        Water Lane  
        Wilmslow  
        SK9 5AF 
 
Yours sincerely, 
 
 
Alastair O’Neill 
Information Delivery Officer 
Information Management Team