1833 Slavery Abolition Act

Amanda-Jane made this Freedom of Information request to House of Commons

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Waiting for an internal review by House of Commons of their handling of this request.

Dear House of Commons,

I am making this FOI to clarify a few things...

1) In 1833 The Slavery Abolition Act was sealed and the ownership of slaves was unlawful is that correct?
2) On November the 11th 1998 the above act was repealed meaning its now not unlawful to have ownership of slaves, is that correct?, why has this been allowed to happen?

3) Why would you commit treason to repeal this act, just because Tony Charles Lynton Blair repealed the death sentence for treason, is he forgetting: To repeal the death sentence is an act of treason in itself especially when your guilty of treason yourself already, do you agree that all traitors should be hung whomever they are or think they are?

4) Is it not also true that all Sovereign, Legislative and Judicial powers are the rights of the people and cannot be absolutely parted with by the people to those persons who are employed to conduct the business of the state?

5) The Journals of the House of Commons volume 49 page 663 to 664 states the above (4) and doesn't this means our alleged governments are full of traitors especially by allowing foreign powers to take positions of power and infiltrating our country, also dictating to us and being allowed to do so by the employees who work for we the people, Is that not a hangable offense for High Treason against every man woman and child in Britain, is that not fact?

6) Is it correct that those who are employed to do the business of the state work for the people for the best interest of the community?

7) Is it also correct that it is: The Right and Bounden Duty of the People to Punish All Traitors Against the Nation?

I request answers on a point for point basis, thank you

sincerely without prejudice UCC 1-308

amanda-jane:

FOI Commons, House of Commons

1 Attachment

Dear Amanda-Jane,

I refer to your recent request for information made under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 (the Act), included below.

The Act requires a name to be provided before the request can be
progressed. I would be grateful if you could re submit your request
providing your full name (title and/or first name/initial with surname
satisfies the requirement for provision of a real name).

The Information Commissioner’s Office has produced guidance on this matter
which can be found at:
[1]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio...
.

Your request will be held pending receipt of this information.

Yours sincerely,

 

Sarah Price

IRIS Support Officer
Information Rights and Information Security (IRIS) Service | House of
Commons

 

[2]cid:image002.jpg@01D02B64.34D76640

Click [3]here for details about Freedom of Information

in the House of Commons and to see what we publish.

 

 

 

 

From: Amanda-Jane <[FOI #572101 email]>
Sent: 30 April 2019 14:52
To: FOI Commons <[email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - 1833 Slavery Abolition Act

 

Dear House of Commons,

I am making this FOI to clarify a few things...

1) In 1833 The Slavery Abolition Act was sealed and the ownership of
slaves was unlawful is that correct?
2) On November the 11th 1998 the above act was repealed meaning its now
not unlawful to have ownership of slaves, is that correct?, why has this
been allowed to happen?

3) Why would you commit treason to repeal this act, just because Tony
Charles Lynton Blair repealed the death sentence for treason, is he
forgetting: To repeal the death sentence is an act of treason in itself
especially when your guilty of treason yourself already, do you agree that
all traitors should be hung whomever they are or think they are?

4) Is it not also true that all Sovereign, Legislative and Judicial powers
are the rights of the people and cannot be absolutely parted with by the
people to those persons who are employed to conduct the business of the
state?

5) The Journals of the House of Commons volume 49 page 663 to 664 states
the above (4) and doesn't this means our alleged governments are full of
traitors especially by allowing foreign powers to take positions of power
and infiltrating our country, also dictating to us and being allowed to do
so by the employees who work for we the people, Is that not a hangable
offense for High Treason against every man woman and child in Britain, is
that not fact?

6) Is it correct that those who are employed to do the business of the
state work for the people for the best interest of the community?

7) Is it also correct that it is: The Right and Bounden Duty of the People
to Punish All Traitors Against the Nation?

I request answers on a point for point basis, thank you

sincerely without prejudice UCC 1-308

amanda-jane:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FOI #572101 email]

Is [5][House of Commons request email] the wrong address for Freedom of
Information requests to House of Commons? If so, please contact us using
this form:
[6]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[7]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[8]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

show quoted sections

Dear FOI Commons,
To Sarah Price in your private and unlimited capacity
Having received your email in response to my request I was astounded by your orders,where do I send your bill for the order, in case you are unaware or uneducated about law I state as follows

1)firstly I do not have a title that is for a legal fiction/ a corporate entity and a title is not legally part of the name.

2)You have been given my name as is written on my long birth certificate stated in column 2.

3) I do not have surname I have a family name: Salmond and Heuston Tort Law 21st edition page 387 and 18th edition page 383 second paragraph as stated: " a surname is not a mans property and if a man is called by some other than his real name he may acquire his second name by reputation, but a man is not entitled to use his own name dishonestly in order that his goods may be passed off as and for the good of another.

4) I was born into a family not a surname, My mother said i was called amanda-jane: and I come from the clan/family of Phillips.

5) You refuse to answer my FOI request because you allege the name my mother gave me is not real and doesn't belong to me the flesh and blood woman, what authority do you have to declare I am not me myself I amanda-jane: of the family/clan of phillips.

without prejudice UCC 1-308 all Unalienable rights reserved
all words stated herein are as me myself I define them.

Yours sincerely,

amanda-jane: of the family phillips

FOI Commons, House of Commons

1 Attachment

Dear Ms Phillips,

 

Freedom of Information request F19-234

 

Thank you for your request for information dated 1 May 2019, received by
us on the same date, which is copied below.

 

We will endeavour to respond to your request promptly but in any case
within 20 working days i.e. on or before 30 May 2019.

 

If you have any queries about your request, please use the request number
quoted above and in the subject line of this email.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Sarah Price

IRIS Support Officer
Information Rights and Information Security (IRIS) Service | House of
Commons

 

[1]cid:image002.jpg@01D02B64.34D76640

Click [2]here for details about Freedom of Information

in the House of Commons and to see what we publish.

 

 

 

 

From: Amanda-Jane <[FOI #572101 email]>
Sent: 01 May 2019 12:04
To: FOI Commons <[email address]>
Subject: Re: F19-234 Request Acknowledgement

 

Dear FOI Commons,
To Sarah Price in your private and unlimited capacity
Having received your email in response to my request I was astounded by
your orders,where do I send your bill for the order, in case you are
unaware or uneducated about law I state as follows

1)firstly I do not have a title that is for a legal fiction/ a corporate
entity and a title is not legally part of the name.

2)You have been given my name as is written on my long birth certificate
stated in column 2.

3) I do not have surname I have a family name: Salmond and Heuston Tort
Law 21st edition page 387 and 18th edition page 383 second paragraph as
stated: " a surname is not a mans property and if a man is called by some
other than his real name he may acquire his second name by reputation, but
a man is not entitled to use his own name dishonestly in order that his
goods may be passed off as and for the good of another.

4) I was born into a family not a surname, My mother said i was called
amanda-jane: and I come from the clan/family of Phillips.

5) You refuse to answer my FOI request because you allege the name my
mother gave me is not real and doesn't belong to me the flesh and blood
woman, what authority do you have to declare I am not me myself I
amanda-jane: of the family/clan of phillips.

without prejudice UCC 1-308 all Unalienable rights reserved
all words stated herein are as me myself I define them.

Yours sincerely,

amanda-jane: of the family phillips

show quoted sections

Dear FOI Commons,

To Sarah price in you private and unlimited capacity,

Not sure whether you can read but you are now calling me by another name that does not belong to me, as stated my mother called me amanda-jane , I DO NOT HAVE A TITLE AND/OR SURNAME you are trying to coerce me into accepting that as my name trying to entice me to into committing identity fraud, if you persist to call me by some other's identity you will be served accordingly for malfeasance in public office amongst other crimes you are committing as a person employed to do the business of the state by the people for the benefit of the community. journals of the house of common volume 49 pages 663-664 learn your place as a public servant in public office.

Yours sincerely,

Amanda-Jane

FOI Commons, House of Commons

1 Attachment

Dear requester,

 

 

As previously advised, and in accordance with section 8 (1) (b) of the
Freedom of Information Act 2000, a valid request for information states
the name of the applicant.  Further, guidance from the Information
Commissioner’s Office on this matter states “Any variation of the
requester’s title or first name combined with their surname (e.g. Mr Smith
or John Smith) will be sufficient to meet this requirement. However, a
first name or surname provided in isolation, or a set of initials, will
not.”

 

If your name is Amanda-Jane Phillips, please let us know.  If you prefer
not to be referred to by the common courtesy title ‘Ms’, we are happy to
respect that.

 

If you are now saying that your name is not Amanda-Jane Phillips, your
request is still not valid and we will not progress your request until you
provide a name that meets the requirement of the Act.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

         
Information Rights Manager
Information Rights and Information Security (IRIS) Service | House of
Commons

 

[1]cid:image002.jpg@01D02B64.34D76640

Click [2]here for information about FOI in the House of Commons,

or to see what we publish.

 

 

 

 

From: Amanda-Jane <[FOI #572101 email]>
Sent: 01 May 2019 12:45
To: FOI Commons <[email address]>
Subject: Re: F19-234 Request Acknowledgement

 

Dear FOI Commons,

To Sarah price in you private and unlimited capacity,

Not sure whether you can read but you are now calling me by another name
that does not belong to me, as stated my mother called me amanda-jane , I
DO NOT HAVE A TITLE AND/OR SURNAME you are trying to coerce me into
accepting that as my name trying to entice me to into committing identity
fraud, if you persist to call me by some other's identity you will be
served accordingly for malfeasance in public office amongst other crimes
you are committing as a person employed to do the business of the state by
the people for the benefit of the community. journals of the house of
common volume 49 pages 663-664 learn your place as a public servant in
public office.

Yours sincerely,

Amanda-Jane

 

From: Amanda-Jane <[FOI #572101 email]>
Sent: 01 May 2019 12:04
To: FOI Commons <[email address]>
Subject: Re: F19-234 Request Acknowledgement

 

Dear FOI Commons,
To Sarah Price in your private and unlimited capacity
Having received your email in response to my request I was astounded by
your orders,where do I send your bill for the order, in case you are
unaware or uneducated about law I state as follows

1)firstly I do not have a title that is for a legal fiction/ a corporate
entity and a title is not legally part of the name.

2)You have been given my name as is written on my long birth certificate
stated in column 2.

3) I do not have surname I have a family name: Salmond and Heuston Tort
Law 21st edition page 387 and 18th edition page 383 second paragraph as
stated: " a surname is not a mans property and if a man is called by some
other than his real name he may acquire his second name by reputation, but
a man is not entitled to use his own name dishonestly in order that his
goods may be passed off as and for the good of another.

4) I was born into a family not a surname, My mother said i was called
amanda-jane: and I come from the clan/family of Phillips.

5) You refuse to answer my FOI request because you allege the name my
mother gave me is not real and doesn't belong to me the flesh and blood
woman, what authority do you have to declare I am not me myself I
amanda-jane: of the family/clan of phillips.

without prejudice UCC 1-308 all Unalienable rights reserved
all words stated herein are as me myself I define them.

Yours sincerely,

amanda-jane: of the family phillips

UK Parliament Disclaimer: this e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and
delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying
is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no
liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by
this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not encrypted and
should not be used for sensitive data.

References

Visible links
2. http://www.parliament.uk/site-informatio...

Dear House of Commons,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of House of Commons's handling of my FOI request '1833 Slavery Abolition Act'.

To be refused to be give information on the truth, just because sarah price the dishonorable woman refuses to call me by what i am commonly called and I refuse to identify with a legal fiction which has a title and a surname of which I do not have or intend to use as its fraud.
Its an absolute disgrace when a public servant like dishonorable sarah price does not do the job we the people pay her to do instead she is committing treason and malfeasance in public office as a public servant and needs to be sacked from this position as she is about as much use as a chocolate fireguard and obviously doesn't know the law, ignorance of the law is no excuse.

I await the results of the internal enquiry

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1...

Yours faithfully,

amanda-jane: as commonly called of the family phillips

FOI Commons, House of Commons

1 Attachment

Dear Amanda-Jane,

 

 

Thank you for your further correspondence, copied below.  You have asked
the House of Commons to carry out an internal review.  We will not be
complying with this request.

 

The House can only carry out internal reviews on a response to a valid
request made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and, as we
have already explained to you, your request was not valid under that Act
because you declined to provide your full name.

 

If you would like to submit a valid request – i.e. one that is in writing,
provides your real first name and surname, provides a correspondence
address and describes the recorded information you wish to access – then
we will be happy to deal with that in accordance with our obligations. 

 

More information about how to make a FOIA request can be found on the
Information Commissioner’s Office website here:  [1]https://ico.org.uk/

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

         
Information Rights Manager
Information Rights and Information Security (IRIS) Service | House of
Commons

 

[2]cid:image002.jpg@01D02B64.34D76640

Click [3]here for information about FOI in the House of Commons,

or to see what we publish.

 

 

 

 

From: Amanda-Jane <[FOI #572101 email]>
Sent: 27 June 2019 16:01
To: FOI Commons <[email address]>
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - 1833 Slavery
Abolition Act

 

Dear House of Commons,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information
reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of House of Commons's handling
of my FOI request '1833 Slavery Abolition Act'.

To be refused to be give information on the truth, just because sarah
price the dishonorable woman refuses to call me by what i am commonly
called and I refuse to identify with a legal fiction which has a title and
a surname of which I do not have or intend to use as its fraud.
Its an absolute disgrace when a public servant like dishonorable sarah
price does not do the job we the people pay her to do instead she is
committing treason and malfeasance in public office as a public servant
and needs to be sacked from this position as she is about as much use as a
chocolate fireguard and obviously doesn't know the law, ignorance of the
law is no excuse.

I await the results of the internal enquiry

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on
the Internet at this address:
[4]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1...

Yours faithfully,

amanda-jane: as commonly called of the family phillips

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[5][FOI #572101 email]

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[6]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[7]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

show quoted sections

Dear FOI Commons,

You obviously refuse to comply to the truth and your oaths of office the oath you are bound by to the people, you are all committing treason, traitors to this Nation, to repeal the abolition of slavery act is your assent to slavery and owning slaves and your compliance with agenda 21-30 is that for the benefit of the community, mass murder in mind, genocide your days are numbered.
Since when did the public servants think they became the masters, questioning me on a legal fiction name which is not me, which i don't accept my mother told me who I was and it states the same on my Birth Certificate so don't you dare tell me I have a surname... As stated in Salmond and Heuston the law of Tort page 387 " A surname is not a mans legal property and if a man uses some other than his real name he may acquire second name by reputation" I come from a family not a surname.
A title is also not legally part of the name its all about courtesy, I do not have a title and you refuse to accept or reply to the abolition of slavery just because I wont commit identity fraud for you.
As stated in Journals of the house of commons;
"That all sovereign legislative and judicial powers are the rights of the people and though the people have delegated those their original powers to others in trust , for the benefit of the community, yet the rights themselves are reserved by the people and cannot be absolutely parted with by the people TO THOSE PERSONS EMPLOYED TO CONDUCT THE BUSINESS OF THE STATE (now traitors)
and it also states; THAT IT IS THE RIGHT AND BOUNDEN DUTY OF THE PEOPLE TO PUNISH ALL TRAITORS AGAINST THE NATION".
You are a disgrace to this Nation, puppets of the pedophile Zionist satanic Rothschild's and the other psychopath families in the council of 13. the elites, the scum of this earth. and on and on and on
All traitors to our great Nation will be hung for treason no if's buts or ands... the gallows await for all traitors.
What part of "all men are equal", "no one is above the law" and "ignorance of the law is no excuse" don't you understand, well its time to start understanding as we are all accountable for our own actions and all men and women aiding and abetting the traitors will hang with them.
the truth will out just hope your on the right side.
Yours sincerely,

Amanda-Jane

Dennis left an annotation ()

Bravo Amanda, she is quite correct and the excuse of acting under orders, hiding behind a title or position doesn't lawfully protect you any more than it did the SS officers at Nuremberg. You are liable for your actions both within your corrupt fictional construct and in the material and spiritual realms. you will pay.

pere left an annotation ()

love your work Amanda x