This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Clause 99 and the Catch 22 situation it puts ESA Claimants' in'.

DWP Central Freedom of Information Team
Annex A 
e-mail: [email address].
Our Ref: VTR 4300 

30 September 2013
Annex A 
Dear C. Robinson,  
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request received on 8 September 2013.   You 
Dear Department for Work and Pensions, 
I am writing this FOI because I have seen many differing views regarding clause 99 and the 
catch 22 situation that it puts sick and disabled claimants in, 
So my questions are thus: 
Q1 When a person is refused ESA and appeals against the decision, what benefits can he 
claim if s/he has no income? 
Q2 If an ESA refusal claimant is too “fit” for ESA, but too sick or disabled for JSA what is there 
(i)         How will they pay their bills? 
(ii)        How will they be able to get medication? (as they will not be on any benefits to qualify 
for free prescriptions) 
(iii)       What about their homes? Will you still cover the rent? Or will you be setting up modern-
day workhouses? 
(iv)       Where are their human rights? I refer to article 6 and 25 respectively.  Article 6 of the 
European Convention on Human Rights act is a provision of the European Convention which 
protects the right to a fair trial. In criminal law cases and cases to determine civil rights it 
protects the right to a public hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal within 
reasonable time, the presumption of innocence, and other minimum rights for those charged in 
a criminal case (adequate time and facilities to prepare their defence, access to legal 
representation, right to examine witnesses against them or have them examined, right to the 
free assistance of an interpreter). Article 25.  (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living 
adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, 
housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event 

of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in 
circumstances beyond his control.  
Q3 How can someone have a fair hearing (see article 6 above) at a tribunal when you have 
driven them into a catch 22 situation? i.e. A claimant refused ESA,  through sheer destitution 
has to sign on and as soon as they do it cancels out their appeal, even though they are too ill 
to work and have no chance of getting a job. How legal is this since the UK signed the Human 
Rights act? Pursuant of this how many appeals will be made to the ECHR? 
Q4 When a person is turned away from the JCP because s/he doesn’t fit the criteria to sign on 
(their illnesses means hospital appointments, etc) what are their rights if any? 
Q5 What impact will Clause 99 have on the Infrastructure? i.e: 
(i)         The NHS? 
(ii)        Foodbanks? 
(iii)       Social Services? 
(iv)       The Police (people HAVE turned to crime when they have no income whatsoever) 
(v)        Local Councils (How can people pay the council tax with no money)? 
Q6 How long will it be before the application of Clause 99 causes chaos and meltdown?  
Q7 How many deaths will this cause? 
Contrary to your interpretation, I can confidently say that Clause 99, which became section 102 
of the Welfare Reform Act 2012, does not create a catch-22 situation. 
When someone is found fit for work, in the period whilst their application for mandatory 
reconsideration is being considered, that person can claim Jobseeker's Allowance, Carers 
Allowance, Personal Independence Payment or Income Support. It is accepted that for the 
majority it will be Jobseeker's Allowance which is where you see the catch-22 arising. But this 
is not correct.  
Although someone who is seeking a reconsideration may protest to the Jobcentre adviser that 
they are not fit for work, the adviser is trained to work with those who so present themselves.  
Disability Employment Advisers, trained by specialist staff from the department’s Disability 
Employment Service, will work with those who identify themselves as having a health condition 
or disability. They will take into account individual circumstances and will consider placing 
limitations on a claimant’s availability or modifying their work conditionality. Even if an 
individual provides a Fit Note from their doctor they can still claim and be entitled to 
Jobseeker's Allowance if they meet the eligibility rules. 
Against this background your questions about paying bills, buying medication, paying rent, 
human rights, a fair tribunal hearing, the NHS, food banks etc., all fall away. Your concerns are 
not new having been raised by welfare groups and in Parliament. But Parliament has agreed 
that the right safeguards are in place to mitigate the effects you and others believe will arise.  

If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number 
Yours sincerely,  
DWP Central FoI Team 
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act 
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing freedom-of-information-
[email address] or by writing to DWP, Central FoI Team, Caxton House, Tothill Street, London, SW1H 
9NA. Any review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter.  
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information 
Commissioner’s Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have 
exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information 
Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF