Unlawful 5G technology deployment

Waiting for an internal review by Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council of their handling of this request.

Dear Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council,
How many members of the public have you and your members lied to. by informing them that Gateshead Council does not have 5G technology attached to the new LED Street Lights .
What scientific evidence do you provide to substantiate this Lie
Can I have the names of the individuals at the Council who are telling these lies to the public.

Yours faithfully,
Graham Steele

CSG InformationRights^, Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council

Dear Mr Steele

I refer to your request for information dated 4 December 2018.

Your request is being treated as vexatious. A public authority can treat a request as vexatious in the circumstances specified below:-

• Section 14(1) may be used in a variety of circumstances where a request, or its impact on a public authority, cannot be justified.

This request is part of a sustained campaign against the Council by you and your supporters about 5G. The request uses inflammatory language accuses Councillors of lying.
The Council has been subject to a disproportionate and unjustified level of disruption due to the number of requests received. This request along with others received relates to a campaign regarding the alleged use of 5G technology by the Council via transmitters placed on street lights in the borough.

The Council has advised you and your supporters on a number of occasions now, that 5G technology is not being used by the Council, however, when this information is given in response to such requests and correspondence, the Council, its officers and councillors are frequently accused of secrecy, lying, corruption, colluding with government and ignoring the health of the borough’s residents and wildlife. In addition, when responses have been provided which reasonably cite advice and guidance from the national body established for the promotion of the nation’s health and wellbeing (PHE and CRCE), such advice and guidance is similarly dismissed as rubbish, lies or irrelevant.

It is for this reason that this request is being treated as vexatious.

Right to a review:
You may apply to the Strategic Director of Corporate Services and Governance, Civic Centre, Regent Street, Gateshead, NE8 1HH, for an internal review of the decision. This will be a fresh consideration of your request by a more senior officer. If you wish to request a review must do this in writing within 40 days of receipt of this letter.

Following the internal review if you are still unhappy you have a right of appeal to the Information Commissioner as specified below.

Rights of appeal:
You may apply under Section 50 of the Act to the Information Commissioner at the following for a decision whether, in any specified respect, a request for information made by you to the Department/office has been dealt with in accordance with the requirements of Part 1 of the Act:

Information Commissioner, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF.

The Information Commissioner shall consider the matter fully and make a fresh decision.

Yours faithfully
Information Rights Officer

show quoted sections

Dear CSG InformationRights^,
This FOI request is of massive public interest and part of an open democratic process including a campaign to force the Council to comply with the ruling of a Judge in a Court of Law , to "open up the Democratic process in Gateshead" regarding the Unlawful Illegal deployment of 5G technology attached to all of the New LED street lights in the borough of Gateshead , including the detrimental health effects and damage to the Environment . The Council has lied on many occasions and fabricated forged documents to cover up this secret technology deployment , without offering any scientific facts or research to say that it is not 5G or that it is safe . leaving the community distressed and alarmed and in fear .

Yours sincerely,

Graham Steele

Andrew Peacher left an annotation ()

WAKEY WAKY GATESHEAD I do not know this requester never met them dont know where they live thousands of gateshead people are worried this dont mean they are vexatious why are you using mr dransfields name he isnt vexatious his request you could of saaid that was but it wasnt dont use dransfield please.

https://metro.co.uk/2018/04/10/nobody-be...