Selection criteria for medical school interview

Mae'r ymateb i'r cais hwn yn hwyr iawn. Yn ôl y gyfraith, ym mhob amgylchiad, dylai University College London fod wedi ymateb erbyn hyn. (manylion). Gallwch gwyno drwy yn gofyn am adolygiad mewnol.

Dear University College London,
I would be grateful if you kindly provide the selection criteria and cut offs used for shortlisting candidates for medical school interview for students due to start in September 2015 with scoring systems used for personal statement, BMAT scores, GCSC and AS/A grades

Yours faithfully,
S Chatterjee

Finance.FOI Requests, University College London

If you have submitted a Freedom of Information request please accept this
email as acknowledgement that your request has been received. You should
expect a response from us within 20 working days.
Data Protection & FOI
Legal Services
UCL

Finance.FOI Requests, University College London

1 Atodiad

Dear S Chatterjee,

 

I am writing in response to your request for information received by UCL
on 30 March.

 

Further to your request for the selection criteria, "cut offs" and the
scoring system for applications. The selection criteria are available
online from the UCL website:

[1]http://www.ucl.ac.uk/medicalschool/under...

 

There are no "cut offs". The current application scoring system used can
be described as follows:

 

·         GCSE profile is rated as “high”, “medium” or “low” (where medium
represents an average profile of majority A or A* grades).

·         There is also a pass/fail element depending on the candidate
meeting our minimum requirement of BB in GCSE Maths and English Language.

·         AS-level results are rated on a scale of 1 through 5 (a score of
1 represents AAAA at AS, 2 represents AAAB where the B is in a
non-mandatory subject, 3 is AAAB where the B is in a mandatory subject, 4
is AABB, 5 is anything below AABB).

·         Predicted A2 grades are pass/fail depending on whether they meet
the entry requirements.

·         A yes/no depending on whether the student has taken a
contrasting AS subject and/or EPQ.

·         Personal statement is rated as 'average', 'below average' or
'above average'.

·         Reference is rated as 'average', 'below average' or 'above
average'.

·         BMAT scores are added in their original format e.g. 5.0, 5.0,
3.0 A.

 

You are free to use any information supplied for your own use, including
for non-commercial research purposes. The information may also be used for
the purposes of news reporting. However, any other type of re-use, for
example by publishing or issuing copies to the public, will require the
permission of the copyright owner.

 

If you are unhappy with our response to your request and wish to make a
complaint or request a review of our decision, please email
[2][email address]. Emails should include the words ‘Internal
Review’ in the subject and be marked For the Attention of the Vice Provost
Operations, alternatively you should write to:

 

Vice Provost Operations

University College London

1-19 Torrington Place

London WC1E 7HB

 

Please note, complaints and requests for internal review received more
than two months after the initial decision will not be handled.

If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review, you may
apply directly to the Information Commissioner at the address given
below.  You should do this within two months of our final decision.

 

If you have any queries or concerns, please contact me using the details
provided in this letter and including the request reference number.

 

Further information on the Freedom of Information Act is available from
the Information Commissioner’s Office:

 

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

SK9 5AF

 

Telephone       01625 545700

[3]www.ico.gov.uk

 

Regards,

 

 

Alex Daybank

Data Protection & FOI

Legal Services

University College London

 

[4]cid:image003.jpg@01CF4F2E.F65C2E80

 

 

 

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir