Request forchronological record of errors / mistakes

Waiting for an internal review by Land Registry of their handling of this request.

Dear Land Registry,

under the FOIA, l request to be provided with accurate record of the chronological records pertaining to legal aid green papers, misfiled within the caution register at Kingston upon Hull Land Registry for the time lines of J------S------ being shown in the public domain ( 192.com) in September 1999 to have changed their name to similar name as myself and affecting me as the recorded proprietary owner of a registered title, for their giving of my address/title, as where J----S---- lived. I ask to be provided with all record's from September 1999, up to and including September 2011 ( twelve years).

Bear witness to the fact l hold information that DS Ian Jarman provided in February 2013, copy of record of aforesaid legal aid green paper (s) to Land Registry's Steve Coveney, although it is not clear if the accompanying letter with which l first returned the J----S------ legal aid green paper in March 2000 to Land Charges Division of Legal Services Commission was provided at same time?

I hold record of both KUH Land Registry & LSC writing to me in December 2003 that the problems surrounding this charge had been sorted out and removed ,when in fact Yvonne Owen and LSC both confirmed to me on the 15 th February 2007, the error charge was still active.
Quote from Professor Robert Abbeys Conveyancing Books :-
"an error in the caution register that affects the proprietary owner , is grounds for immediate rectification of the register ( indemnity )".
My mortgage records show KUH Land Registry behind my back writing to Abbey National in October 2002 stating a charge was about to be put against my title that was stated to not be for the "covented land", when following the decision of District Judge Toombs 6 th June 2002, there was no charge for myself.
I require adequate record of the issues surrounding a charge that clearly was not for myself , but that was for the land that KUH Land Registry stated it was not,

Yours faithfully,

Diana Smith

Dear Land Registry,
by law, Land Registry should normally have responded promptly to my lodged information request and l am asking for a review into why l have not been replied to

Yours faithfully,

Diana Smith

Dear Land Registry,
by law you should have answered my information request in order to have complied with Information Acts that are Acts of Parliament and in line with my inalienable rights to have correct information held about me and for me to be able to summit for request to update all information you hold about me and my registered title ( properties / land[s]). No apology or reasons have been provided for such a breach of Information Act's to have occurred and l state / demand and assert to be notified forthwith of the reasoning's and development of the path my validly lodged information act request has been steered into , that l have heard no more by way of a written indication to steps not having been taken,

Yours faithfully,

Diana Smith