Dear Local Government Ombudsmen,

Reference: My complaint to you: 10 000 639/BAM2/ssr about Portsmouth City Council.

I was informed by letter from you dated 14 July 2010 that you have received a response from Portsmouth City Council about my complaint to you, about them. Since then I have had no communication from you. My freedom of information request is therefore to provide all correspondence related to this complaint, including the complete response from Portsmouth City Council. Please also provide copies of all transcripts and notes that you have made, concerning any conversations you have had with Portsmouth City Council, with regards to my complaint against them, referred to above.

Yours faithfully,

Keith Edmunds

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ()

Keith, they have a valid FOI exemption regarding any information they obtained from the Council. (The Council doesn't!) PS The exemption does not include information produced by themselves.

Section 32 (2) LG Act 1974: Information obtained by a Local Commissioner, or any officer of either Commission, in the course of or for the purposes of an investigation under this Part of this Act shall not be disclosed.

Dear Local Government Ombudsmen,
I am in receipt of your written acknowledgement to my FOI request:
Your 10 000 639 FOI ref no: B/10/0060 dated 13 August 2010.

Please in future pass all communications through this website.

You will be aware that on the Information Commissioner's ruling, Public Authorities have no exemption from not communicating through this website.

Yours faithfully,

Keith Edmunds

Foi Officer, The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Dear Mr Edmunds

I think you'll find the IC's ruling was that public authorities cannot refuse to deal with a request made via the website, not that they have to respond using the website. We will continue to respond to emails.

Yours sincerely

Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's office | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |

show quoted sections

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ()

Keith

You submitted a valid FOI request using this website as a return address for their response.

"My freedom of information request is therefore to provide all correspondence related to this complaint, including the complete response from Portsmouth City Council. Please also provide copies of all transcripts and notes that you have made, concerning any conversations you have had with Portsmouth City Council, with regards to my complaint against them, referred to above."

When they deviated from your preference you confirmed your preference for them to use this address for all responses regarding your FOI request.

"Please in future pass all communications through this website."

Pook appears to forget that they should respond to the address given for a response. FOI Act asks for an "address for correspondence", and that the email address you are using (this website) is sufficient.

If they don't respond to the address you have given (this website) one could argue that they have failed to respond to a valid FOI request.

You have two options, complain to the ICO because they have failed to respond to the address given or copy and paste all their off-line responses below this request. However, if you do you can hardly complain they didn't respond.

Having said that they still have a number of exemptions they could (will) use to deny you the information.

A Johnson left an annotation ()

ICO has informed another public authority that they MUST respond to an FOI request made via the What Do They Know website to the What Do They now website.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ne...

Dear Foi Officer,
By law you should respond to FOI requests promptly and should normally have responded to this request by 8 September 2010. Please provide a full reply to my FOI request on this website immediately.

Yours sincerely,

Keith Edmunds

David Pollard, The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

3 Attachments

Dear Mr Edmunds

Further to my letter of 3 September 2010 in which I responded to your
request, I attach an electronic copy with an electronic version of Mr
Miles’s letter of enquiry to the Council. We do not hold electronic
copies of the two emails I sent you in hard copy..

Yours sincerely

David Pollard

Acting Assistant Ombudsman | DL: 02476 820062 |

The Oaks No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB
|

[1]www.lgo.org.uk |

[2]LGO 4 col SML at 70%

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.lgo.org.uk/

Anne Hide left an annotation ()

"We do not hold electronic copies of the two emails I sent you in hard copy."

No computer copies of emails retained, only a hard copies kept. Pull the other one!

Dear Local Government Ombudsmen,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Local Government Ombudsman's handling of my FOI request 'Release of Documents'.

I am asking for an internal review for the following reasons:

1. There should be full disclosure in any judicial/or any other inquiry, so that both parties can review and comment on any information provided by the Counter-party. This is a basic tenet of English Law. Withholding information marked 'confidential' by Portsmouth City Council is both counter to English and Natural Law, and makes a mockery of the Local Government Ombudsman's claim to be unbiased in his so called investigation system - all information should be seen and commented on by both parties in the complaint.
2. At a previous investigation of a complaint I made against Portsmouth City Council (as stated in my non published emails), I stated that a previous Chief Executive Portsmouth City Council had lied in a response to the Local Government Ombudsman. This I proved conclusively, yet nothing was done about it by the Local Government Ombudsman, whom I then accused of aiding and abetting perjury (a criminal offence) by the said Chief Executive. Release of these documents would dispel any further impression of collusion between the Local Government Ombudsman and the Council.
3. There is much published evidence of the Local Government Ombudsman, covering up maladministration against Councils, and I myself have made formal complaints about this. I have also published the evidence online of previous cover ups, of complaints made by myself, by both personnel in question here - Mr D.J. Pollard (Acting Assistant Ombudsman) and Mr Brian Miles (Senior Investigator).
I therefore request that neither of these persons be involved in the internal review, nor should be Mr Neville Jones, Deputy Ombudsman, for similar reasons. I will be quite happy to publish links to this evidence of cover ups by the Local Government Ombudsman on this website, with regards to my previous complaints, should it be required.
4. A further reason for my request for an internal review, is that the documentation already received (both the Senior Investigator's letter to the Council and their response) bears very little resemblance to my complaint; much of it has been ignored. I therefore believe that a further cover up may be in train.
5. I further request that the names and status of those carrying out the internal review be published with the formal reply to the internal review; and, because of the seriousness of my allegations, that the Ombudsman herself be involved in the internal review.
5. I wish all information, with regards to this investigation as initially requested by me be published on this website, to achieve full transparency of both my complaint and it's investigation.
6. I trust I need not point out that making a false response to a freedom of Information request is a criminal offence.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/re...

Yours faithfully,

Keith Edmunds

Keith edmunds left an annotation ()

It is most interesting that the second letter released above by the LGO, about my complaint, to the Chief Executive, Portsmouth City Council 2010, is dated 11 September 2010.
Particularly interesting as the Chief Executive, Portsmouth City Council, replied to this letter on 13 July 2010.
If you are corrupt, to be successful, you also have to be competent.
MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS TO A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST, IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ()

Download the Cx enq.doc version and it is clearly dated the 11th September 2010. View the HTML version and it is clearly dated the 11th June 2010.

However, no such double dating in the preceding Refusal 96 information when comparing the document version with the html version.

Keith edmunds left an annotation ()

Two days have now passed and I have not had a response from this corrupt Institution about my request for an internal review. I do not use the adjective 'corrupt' lightly,there is much evidence of this on the internet. Visit the following links for incontrovertible evidence of this corruption:

http://www.ombudsmanwatch.org.uk/

http://www.psow.co.uk/

I will next put on a link on this website about how this corruption has affected me personally, if I do not get a response within 24 hours from the LGO with regards to my request for an internal review.

Anne Hide left an annotation ()

I doubt the ICO would accept anything less than a week or so as an unreasonable delay on the part of a public authority acknowledging an FOI requester's correspondence.

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ()

How Local Government Ombudsmen get away with running an unjust, unfair and biased system of justice.

The Local Government Ombudsman and their seven pillars of injustice

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2010/08/i...

Anne Hide left an annotation ()

If anyone is unhappy at the way the Local Government Ombudsmen operate they should submit a response to the law commission's review of public service ombudsmen which includes all three local government ombudsmen or at least make a comment on the sister site to this one when questions are asked in the house about the local government ombudsman.

They Work For You

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=...

A Johnson left an annotation ()

If the LGO haven't got a policy that covers the situation they will just make one up.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/to...

If the LGO haven't got the minutes to a meeting they will just make them up.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/th...

If they need others to sign fabricated documents they can call upon their ex colleagues.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/re...

If they don't want you to see a document they will try and keep it confidential

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/to...

Whilst they are allowed to fabricating documents, manipulate statistics and conjure up policy on the fly you don't stand a chance of getting at the truth through the Local Government Ombudsman.

Pauline Nunn left an annotation ()

In addition to all their other tricks they also fail to record or destroy any embarrassing information.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/lo...

Dear David Pollard,
I am in receipt of your email: 28 September 2010 10:58:42 GMT+01:00.

It was sent to me personally. I asked for all correspondence between me and the Local Government Ombudsman, on this Freedom of Information request, be published on this website. You have not done so. Please put your email, referenced above on this website.

With regards to the information contained within it, that Mr Neville Jones, Deputy Ombudsman, will carry out the review, this is entirely unacceptable, for the reasons I have given above in my request for an internal review. I give you the reason again - Mr Neville Jones had been involved in Local Government Ombudsman cover up's with regards to my previous complaints and therefore is neither fit nor trustworthy enough to carry out this review. Please pass this on to the Ombudsman as originally requested.

Yours sincerely,

Keith Edmunds

Dear David Pollard,

http://ombudsmanwatchers.org.uk/personal...

Yours sincerely,

Keith Edmunds

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ()

The interesting thing to note about LGO reviews is that the person who reviews the case only uses case work paperwork and evidence given to them, and filtered by, the Investigator. This allows the investigator to rig the case work paperwork and evidence to support their view of the case. It is nigh on impossible to get anyone above investigator to actually get of their backsides and review a case properly.

This has happened to me twice and I have been let down by the Ombudsman twice.

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ()

Forgot to add a link to my last annotation. Whilst it is difficult to believe that Ombudsmen need no qualifications to do their job what is even more alarming is that they have the authority to delegate their function to other even less qualified and experienced Commission staff. Legally and technically this could be the office cleaner. However, having said that office cleaners would probably do a better job than most investigators/assistant ombudsmen and deputies currently do.

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2010/08/i...

Dear David Pollard,

When will I get the outcome of your internal review to my FOI request from the Ombudsman. You are now outside the time limit to provide this, and therefore, in breach of the law. I repeat, what I have already said that it is totally unacceptable for the Deputy Ombudsman, Mr Neville Jones, to carry out this review, for the reasons already given, and that I expect a reply from the Ombudsman herself.

Yours sincerely,

Keith Edmunds

David Pollard, The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

I shall be out of the office until Thursday 28 October 2010. I will deal with your enquiry on my return. If you have a Freedom of Information request please email [email address].

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

Dear David Pollard,

This FOI request should now be out of your hands, and in the hands of the Ombudsman herself, for internal review, so I do not see why I should wait for you to return, to your office for the internal review to be sent to me. It would appear that more corruption is taking place within your organisation.

Yours sincerely,

Keith Edmunds

David Pollard, The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Dear Mr Edmunds

Mr Jones wrote to you on 25 October 2010 to give you the outcome of the internal review and you should have received it by now. Please let me know if you have not and I shall arrange for a further copy to be sent.

Yours sincerely

David Pollard
Acting Assistant Ombudsman | DL: 02476 820062 |
The Oaks No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |
www.lgo.org.uk |

show quoted sections

Dear David Pollard,

I have told you twice now that I do not wish for Mr Jones to carry out the internal review for the clear reasons that I have already given. I have not received the letter and as I have already stated, all communication on this matter should be posted on this website, please do so.
Please get the Ombudsman to carry out the internal review, not Mr Jones; Mr Jones is not a fit and proper person to carry out this review. When it has been carried out by the Ombudsman, post it on this website, thank you.

Yours sincerely,

Keith Edmunds

David Pollard, The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Dear Mr Edmunds

I confirm that the Ombudsman will not be dealing with your request. Mr Jones's letter explains why he is dealing with the matter. In the light of this information please confirm whether you wish Mr Jones's letter to be posted on this website.

Yours sincerely

David Pollard
Acting Assistant Ombudsman | DL: 02476 820062 |
The Oaks No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |
www.lgo.org.uk |

show quoted sections

Dear David Pollard,

Yes please, post it on this website. I have not yet received the letter.

Yours sincerely,

Keith Edmunds

David Pollard, The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Edmunds

Letter attached as requested.

Yours sincerely

David Pollard
Acting Assistant Ombudsman | DL: 02476 820062 |
The Oaks No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |
www.lgo.org.uk |

show quoted sections

Trevor R Nunn left an annotation ()

More evidence that the Local Government Ombudsman doesn't follow the principles of natural justice. How can it be fair that information given to them by others can't be seen and validated by the complainant. How is that fair? How is that just?

Where is the independent scrutiny that any information withheld from the complainant was done for the right reason rather than for corrupt reasons?

http://lgowatcher.blogspot.com/2010/08/i...

Keith edmunds left an annotation ()

I agree Trevor, In this case however. I have already received the information from a similar FOI request to Portsmouth City Council, so there can be no reason whatsoever for them not to send the information. Except of course that one of their letters has been clearly fabricated - their letter to PCC dated 11 September 2010. If they had provided the information, they would have left themselves wide open to criminal prosecution for providing false information to a FOI request! More blatant corruption!