RE:- Section 11 (a) (b) of the Human Rights Act 1998, Section 2 (1), of the European Communities Act 1972 and 25th October 2000 Before Mr Justice Scott Baker,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee made this Rhyddid Gwybodaeth request to

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Gwrthodwyd y cais gan .

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee do hereby request that:-

1. The Transcript of the Proceedings and Judgment at the Hearing date on the 25th October 2000 before than Mr Justice Scot Baker should be published in the Public Domain that Members of the Public should have the Knowledge.

2. The House of Lords Judgment in the DPP V Keebiline Case should no Longer be relied upon, as the DPP for the Crown Prosecution Services didn't inform the House of Lords of Section 11 (a) (b) of the Human Rights Act 1998, and Section 2 (1) of the European Communities Act 1972 Since I had challenged David Elvin QC in Open Court, where I had been given Leave of the Court to amend the Pleadings, and Mr David Elvin QC had stated that I could amend the Pleadings on any Grounds.

3. You do have reasonable access to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Judgment Trinity Term. [2013] UKSC 34
Prest (Appellant) V Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others (Respondent)
Before
(1) Lord Neuberger, President
(2) Lord Walker
(3) Lady Hale
(4) Lord Mance
(5) Lord Clarke
(6) Lord Wilson
(7) Lord Sumpton
Judgment given on the 12th June 2013
Heard on 5th and 6th March 2013
Paragraph 18 of the Judgment:

"No Court in this land will allow a Person to keep an advantage which he has obtained by Fraud. No Judgment of a Court, No Order of a Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by Fraud, unless it is distinctly Pleaded and Proved: But once it is proved, It vitates Judgments, Contracts and all Transactions whatsoever..."

5. Lazarous Estates Ltd Versus Beasley PLC [1956] 1 QB 702
Fraud and Misrepresentation is null and Void.

Oxford Administrative Law Ninth Edition
On Page 232 and 419

6. House of Lords Session 2002-2003 (2003) UKHL 6
Thursday 20th February 2003
The Appeal Committee
(1) Lord Bingham of Cornhill
(2) Lord Steyn
(3) Lord Hoffman
(4) Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough
(5) Lord Scott of Foscote.

7. 31st July 2001 Case Number A3/2000/3154 & 3155
Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA civ 1250
Before Lord Justice Aldous, Lord Justice Rix and Mr Justice Lloyd
HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd and Others
Versus
The Chase Manhattan Bank & Others.

8. The Treasury Solicitors who does represent the HM Attorney General, they do have the knowledge of the Lazarous Estates Ltd Versus Beasley PLC which had been lodged in the Administrative Court, and the Chancery Division.
There is Silent Fraud and Non-Disclosure.

9. The Lord Chancellor SS Ministry of Justice had issued a Statutory Instrument 2014 No 421
Under Regulations 9 (1) (2). 11 (1) (2) It is open for any Person to make a complaint against the Enforcement Agent where He/She had obtained his or Her Certificate, that it can be cancelled before the Circuit Judge.
If the HM Attorney General should confirm this by Letter or Email,
As you have an overriding duty to the Court.

10: Any High Court Judge in any Part of the United Kingdom, He/She doesn't have the Jurisdiction Power to deal with matters under the Town and Country Planning Act 1971,
As under Schedule 5 of the SCA 1981, This had been repealed.

The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (As amended by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991)
There was Section 73A of TCPA 1990 which had been inserted.

There is the Statutory Instrument 1995 No 297 Class B1. B2 and B8 Storage.
The Period of Six Years had expired since the Statutory Instrument had been issued.

11. Does the HM Attorney General have Jurisdiction Power to remove the General Permitted Development Order Rights and Revoke the Town and Country Planning {Use Classes} Order 1987 No 764
or It is the function of the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

12. You do have copies of the Benson Royal Commission Report where the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 had been enacted.
Section 27 (7) (10) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 had come into force on the 1st January 1991.
This Section has been repealed under the Legal Services Act 2007
Whilst Schedule 3 and 21 of the Legal Services Act 2007 does apply from the 1st January 2010.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee by Law, you should have responded promptly by the 29th May 2015, whilst this does amount to Misfeasance in Public Office in accordance with the House of Lords decision in the case of Ashby V White (1703) where the House of Lords reversed the Judgment by a Majority of fifty to sixteen.

The Treasury Solicitors whose name have been changed to Government Legal Services Department, they do hold the documents on behalf of the Attorney General and any other Minister of the Crown, say the Lord Chancellor SS Ministry of Justice.

The Contempt of Court Act 1981, The HM Attorney General does have the Power to issue Contempt of Court Proceedings. Section 11 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (As amended) does also apply.

I request that when replying you should send a copy to all members of parliament in the House of Commons, and all Heads of the Commonwealth Country. Since I wasn't a Party to the Bryan Versus the United Kingdom.

The Town and Country Planning {Use Classes} Order 1987 No 764 (As amended by Statutory Instrument 1995 No 297)

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee by Law, under all circumstances you should have responded separately for each request made to your Office, whilst you have responded by refusing to confirm or deny in One Letter regarding four or five requests made to your Office. It isn't how the Information Commissioner's Office rules are, You may have consolidated the matters in one Go, where you should have informed the Lord Chancellor SS Ministry of Justice to issue a Statutory Instrument to this point.

I assume that you should have been prepared to change your mind and inform the Court at the same time, since the General Permitted Development Order 1995 No 418 has been repealed, and there is a New General Permitted Development Order 2015 No 596 which came into force in April 2015.

When General Permitted Development Order rights have been taken away, than there is a Legal Right to seek damages and Compensation, it doesn't amount to be an abuse of the Process of the Court or Vexatious Applications.

Since Ministers and Civil Servants are not Immune from Contempt of Court Proceedings, If you can confirm whether Law Officers are immune from Contempt of Court Proceedings, as any Person even if He/She is not a Vexatious Litigant, He does require to apply for Permission of the Court to bring Contempt of Court Proceedings.

The Schedule 9, Schedule 10 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, this is a Parliament Act which does override previous decisions made by the Law Officers in the HM Attorney General Chambers, as single Letter to the High Court of Justice Administrative Court was going to reduce burden and expenses on all the Persons who are on the List of Vexatious Litigants under Section 42 of the SCA 1981, that those persons can make an Application before the County Courts if the amount they are claiming doesn't exceed the County Court Limits.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Correspondence,

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

Although the subject heading of your email mentions an "Internal review of Freedom of Information request", I can detect nothing within the text of the email which could be construed as a request for an internal review or a valid freedom of information request. To the extent that your email contains questions of any kind they are vexatious and fall to be refused under section 14 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. As explained to you in our response to your request for an Internal Review dated 4th of June 2015, we will consider further requests but will not respond to any further requests which are vexatious or repeated.

Yours sincerely,

Correspondence Unit

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Looking for an EU Authority?

You can request documents directly from EU Institutions at our sister site AskTheEU.org . Find out more .

AskTheEU.org