One Brave Woman's Single Handed Crusade Against Tyrannical Forces.

Mae'r ymateb i'r cais hwn yn hwyr iawn. Yn ôl y gyfraith, ym mhob amgylchiad, dylai Coventry City Council fod wedi ymateb erbyn hyn. (manylion). Gallwch gwyno drwy yn gofyn am adolygiad mewnol.

Dear Coventry City Council,

We require answers in respect of YOUR CRUEL and LIBELLOUS ACTIONS, against a Coventry Woman over number of enduring years. Answer each and individual question. For legal reasons we will call her "EVA".

1) In 2003 Eva's Daughter was taken out of her lessons in School and ISOLATED, because she was the Victim of Bullying.
In 2004, Eva's Daughter was thrown off the School grounds and onto the Street during the School Day without reason or causation and REFUSED any further Education. Coventry City Council covered this up. She had no further Education for over 2-years. WHY did Coventry City Council REFUSE to take Court proceedings ? Is it because Eva had proof of the terrible offences committed against her daughter in School ?.

2) In 2004, Eva reported the School to the Coventry Police and the Police REFUSED to deal with it, saying it is a Civil Matter. In 2010 The Family Civil Court Judge, (Judge Anthony Cleary) ordered the Education Evidence to be provided to Eva, in relation to her daughter's School Records. This Education Evidence was refused to be provided to Eva, but it was supplied to Judge Orme and Blakemores Solicitors. Judge Orme decided not to place this before a Criminal Court, but he agreed that Eva was not responsible for the Crime of her daughter's 2-year absence from School and her being kicked out onto the street during the School day, breaching her health and safety. Why did the Coventry City Council REFUSE a child of School age any further Education ?.

3) In 2010, Eva made it known to Judge Orme that she was going to take proceedings against the Police and the Coventry City Council, to the High Court. The other Defendant in the same proceedings was also going to take proceedings against the Coventry Police to the High Court.
Weeks later the Coventry City Council obtained a Court Warrant, in the Magistrates Court, in an attempt to Section Eva to a Mental Hospital. An AMHP swore an oath to the said truth of the Warrant. It was PROVEN that Eva does NOT and NEVER has had any mental health issues whatsoever. The Coventry City Council laid terrible lies before the Court to falsely get a fraudulent warrant, including unproven criminal allegations. This was an attempt to cover up fraud and a lot lot more. Is this Common practice of Coventry City Council, in an attempt of cover up's ? The mental health team found NO REASONS to section Eva.

4) The Coventry City Council harassed Eva again in 2011, with further false allegations over Council Tax. There is tape recorded and written evidence at several different locations to back this up. Eva helped out a man in 2009, whom had a heart attack and took him into her home for a few months until he could find more suitable accommodation. This was made known to the Council whom paid rent to Eva on behalf of the man. Nearly 2-years later, the Coventry City Council called Eva into their fraud office and accused her of living with the man as a partner, saying that the man still resided at her home and threatened Eva with the Bailiffs if she did'nt pay council tax for the man. Eva explained over and over again that the man moved out in 2009. The Council kept insisting that Eva was lying, even when she told them that his housing benefit and his Council Tax Benefit is REGISTERED at his own address, which is a different address to Eva. Eva tape recorded their false allegations, which is at several different locations. Then the Council accused Eva of NOT telling them that the man had moved into her house in the first place. Eva explained to them that THEY PAID HER FOR HIM INTO "HER" OWN BANK ACCOUNT, how do they think that they did'nt know, or Eva did'nt tell them ?. Then they accused Eva of NOT telling them that he had moved out. Eva AGAIN had to explain to them that, THEY stopped paying his rent into her bank account immediately on his moving out in 2009. The Coventry City Council are obviously holding more than one set of records about people that differ, WHY ?

5) Recently The Coventry City Council, took Eva to Court over the same man whom moved out in 2009. The Council representative falsely told the Court that the man moved out of her home on 1st April 2011. When Eva tried to tell the 3-Magistrates that the Coventry City Council were committing Perjury the Magistrates would'nt listen. The Council Rep passed a letter to the Court and the Court asked Eva to read it as it was being passed. As the letter was being passed, Eva was told that she was wasting Court time and could she identify the letter as being hers. Eva said that she needed to put her glasses on so that she could look properly at it.
The Court called SECURITY and threw Eva out of the Court, with the letter still in her hand, saying that she can read it and then they will call her back in. Eva waited patiently in the Court waiting area and watched the Court slowly empty. Eventually she asked the Security how long it will be before she will be called back in. The Security told her that she is BANNED from going back into the Court and they have been told NOT to let her back in. Eva took the letter to a different Security man showing him the letter and explained that she was told to read the letter in her own time and she will be called back in. The Security man went and checked and told Eva that they will call her back in. Eva waited over 2 and a half hours and watched the Court empty until she was the last one, getting more and more frightened of being the only one in the building and she was scared of walking home under subways with few people around.
She informed the Security of her fears and asked him to tell the Magistrates that she feared for her health and safety and she could no longer wait and she was going home. Eva took the letter to a friends house and noticed that the Council had interfered with it. The letter WAS sent to the Council by Eva, but it had been redacted in parts and only showed the first page. Important information was removed.
WHY do the Coventry City Council interfere with peoples letters to falsify them ?.

6) Eva was fed up of the Coventry City Council making fraudulent records about her before COURTS. She decided to find out where the man whom they made the false allegations about LIVED. She found him. He and Eva looked into his paper work to see if he had any documentation giving PROOF of Coventry City Councils false allegations about EVA. Plenty was found and placed in several different locations for Eva's safety. There are letters from the Council Tax and Housing Benefit to the man as far back as 2009, at HIS address, PROVING that he did NOT continue living at Eva's address until 1st April 2011, like the Council are saying, in attempts to fraudulently claim monies from Eva for.
HOW does the Coventry City Council continue to harass Eva and others for many years with fraudulent records and claims ?

7) There is tape recorded evidence that the Coventry City Council fraudulently placed Eva on their Finance Office records on 13th September 2010 as having a Carer. Eva has NEVER had a carer, this is again another false record, where monies can be claimed from Eva's Estate for Social Care. How are Coventry City Council placing false records on their Finance Office records as having received Care ?. Are'nt they supposed to be on the DWP records first if they are supposed to be in need of care ? How are you able to do this ?.

8) Have the Coventry City Council notified the public that the Coventry Town Centre is not Insured, as an attempted Murder was covered up on the 2nd of November 2010 ? This is why Eva is scared to walk in the Centre alone. PROOF of this can be provided.

Yours faithfully,

jessiebiach

Gadawodd jessiebiach anodiad ()

There is also the Question of well over £14,000 paid by the Benefits and the DWP to the man for his rent and his and his living allowances, during the time that the man is accused of NOT living at the address he was paid for.
There are letters to him by the Council Tax, DWP and Housing Benefit, under the address to which the Coventry City Council are saying that he did not reside at from 2009 to 1st April 2011.

Gilbert, Sue, Coventry City Council

2 Atodiad

Dear Ms Biach

 

Please find attached the response to your Freedom of Information Request.

 

Regards.

 

Sue Gilbert

Information Governance Assistant

Information Governance Team

Democratic Services

Customer & Workforce Services

Coventry City Council

Room 21a Lower Ground Floor

Council House

Coventry CV1 5RR

 

Phone: (024) 7683 3323

Fax: (024) 7683 3395

 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this
e-mail in error, you are requested to contact the sender

All e-mails are monitored by Coventry City Council IT Security, using
M@ilMeter and Star Filtering Services.

The views contained in this e-mail are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Coventry City Council.

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Gadawodd jessiebiach anodiad ()

The Coventry Magistrates have now issued Eva with a Liability order to PAY monies for the man living at her address from 2009 to 1st of April 2011. Even though their OWN RECORDS, the DWP RECORDS and the HOUSING BENEFITS RECORDS, "PROVE" that he did NOT live at her address. This accuses themselves (Coventry City Council), the DWP and the Housing Benefits of paying a Vulnerable Man and his landlord for 20-Months, under an address where they say he did NOT live. This again PROVES further Harassment and fraud against Eva.

Gadawodd jessiebiach anodiad ()

Thank You to the Coventry City Council for AGREEING that ALL OF THE AFORESAID EVENTS have taken place.

Coventry City Council

 

Dear Ms Biach,

Acknowledgement of Freedom of Information Request Ref 20045562

Thank you for your request for information under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 which I received on 09/03/2012 00:00.  Your request
will be processed under the terms of the Act.

In line with the Act we will respond to you within 20 working days of the
date that we received your request.  If there are any problems with this
request that may delay the dissemination of information, we will contact
you immediately.

Yours sincerely

Information Governance Officer

Please direct queries to:

Information Governance Team

Tel: 024 7683 3305

Fax: 024 7683 3395

[1][Coventry City Council request email]

[2]www.coventry.gov.uk

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this
e-mail in error, you are requested to contact the sender

All e-mails are monitored by Coventry City Council IT Security, using
M@ilMeter and Star Filtering Services.

The views contained in this e-mail are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Coventry City Council.

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Gadawodd name removed 23 Oct 2012 (Ataliwyd y cyfrif) anodiad ()

Hello jessiebiach

Council Tax - if a disabled person needs to be cared for in a place that is not his/her registered Council Tax place of residence, there are specific codes under the DWP which can be used.

Ask the DWP for assistance. Explain the situation and they might be able to cut the Gordian Knot.

Good luck
and best wishes
Rosemary

Gadawodd jessiebiach anodiad ()

Rosemary, the Disabled man Privately Rented his OWN flat from his Land lord. He stopped at Eva's for only 3-months whilst he was recovering from a Heart Attack, he is NOT and NEVER has been Eva's partner, which the Coventry City Council are trying to say. The Disabled man was Eva's DECEASED SISTERS long standing partner. He stood by Eva's sister right up until her sudden death on Christmas day. So Eva gave him help when he had a heart attack, in memory of her DEAD SISTER. Eva feels upset that the Council are causing ill will, upset and harassment over her sisters death and her memory. Her sister and the Disabled man shared many happy years together and they loved each other very much and her sister would have wanted her to look after him. Now the Council have upset the families on both sides. It comes to something when you cannot do a kindness for someone, in memory of a sister, when the Coventry Council take you to Court over it and send the Bailiffs to break into your house for money that their own records show that YOU DO NOT OWE.

Gadawodd jessiebiach anodiad ()

In addition the Disabled man received Council Tax benefits,Housing Benefits and his Disability under HIS OWN ADDRESS, in Binley, which is NOT Eva's address, where he lived for over 2 and a half years. He has recently moved into Sheltered Housing. HOW do they believe he lived at Eva's for an extra 20-months when they paid HIS LANDLORD under HIS OWN ADDRESS IN BINLEY. The Councils OWN RECORDS PROVE THIS. He only has one National Insurance Number. HOW are they NOT ABLE to TRACK the LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY THEY PAID DIRECTLY INTO HIS LANDLORDS ACCOUNT ?. What is wrong in their ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT ?.

Dear Coventry City Council,

One Brave Woman's Single Handed Crusade Against Tyrannical Forces. FOI Request.
As you well know that by LAW, you should have responded promptly by 5th April. WE are all waiting for your response and there are many of us, due to the fact that Eva has good reason to consider that the years of abuse to herself and her daughter by the Coventry City Council, are not normal.Including the anti-Semitic actions against herself and her Daughter on the basis of their JEWISH Surname. Your initial response to this FOI gives PROOF of your attempts to avoid this FOI by saying that you cannot reply due to peoples personal information being divulged and now you have changed your mind, after being challenged. You cannot Data Protect Criminal Offences, so your attempts to cover up these events, may be due to the JEWISH element and anti-Semitism being disclosed.

Yours faithfully,

jessiebiach

Dear Coventry City Council,

I require you to be aware of "Tortious Liability" and "Negligence Liability", of "Messed Up Lives", inter alia.

Yours faithfully,

jessiebiach

Dear Coventry City Council,
Due to EVA asking the Coventry Magistrates Court, to provide PROOF of their Liability Order. Placed against EVA, in relation to the false allegations before the Court by the CCC, of the Disabled man's residency. The CCC have now ADMITTED that EVA was a single occupier AND they have ADMITTED that the Disabled man stayed at EVA's for a matter of weeks, NOT TWO and a HALF YEARS. The CCC harassed EVA about this for over a year, including getting the Court to agree with them. Since the COURT have been asked to PROVE their claim against EVA, the CCC have dropped their case against EVA, meaning that they now AGREE that they participated in instructing the Coventry Magistrates Court to place a False Liability Order against EVA.

Yours faithfully,

jessiebiach

Harrison, Iain, Coventry City Council

3 Atodiad

Dear Jessie Biach

 

Regarding your recent request for internal review, please find attached
the Council's response.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Iain Harrison

Information Governance Officer,
Information Governance Team,

Democratic Services, 
Customer & Workforce Services,

Coventry City Council
Room 21a, Lower Ground Floor,

Council House,
Earl Street
Coventry. CV1 5RR

 

Telephone No: 024 7683 3305

Fax No:          024 7683 3395

 

[1]www.coventry.gov.uk 

 

For facts and figures about Coventry, look at the following:

 

[2]http://www.facts-about-coventry.com/

 

[3]THINK_PRIVACY001 - small

[4]http://insite.coventry.gov.uk/infogov

 

 

 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this
e-mail in error, you are requested to contact the sender

All e-mails are monitored by Coventry City Council IT Security, using
M@ilMeter and Star Filtering Services.

The views contained in this e-mail are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Coventry City Council.

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Dear Harrison, Iain,

You obviously do not realise that the above FOI cannot fall under the remits that you are referring to.
You cannot Data Protect Criminal offences, if you do it makes you a party to concealment of crime, including ignorance of Whistle Blowing Rules.

Yours sincerely,

jessiebiach

Harrison, Iain, Coventry City Council

Dear Jessie Biach

As previously stated, the Council has provided a response to your request for internal review.

Further routes of appeal have also been outlined to you.

The Council has nothing further to add to this.

Yours sincerely

Iain Harrison
Information Governance Officer,
Information Governance Team,
Democratic Services, 
Customer & Workforce Services,
Coventry City Council
Room 21a, Lower Ground Floor,
Council House,
Earl Street
Coventry. CV1 5RR
 
Telephone No: 024 7683 3305
Fax No:          024 7683 3395
 
www.coventry.gov.uk 

For facts and figures about Coventry, look at the following:

http://www.facts-about-coventry.com/

http://insite.coventry.gov.uk/infogov

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir