Legal Costs

Jo Asher made this Rhyddid Gwybodaeth request to Home Office

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Mae'r ymateb i'r cais hwn yn hwyr iawn. Yn ôl y gyfraith, ym mhob amgylchiad, dylai Home Office fod wedi ymateb erbyn hyn. (manylion). Gallwch gwyno drwy yn gofyn am adolygiad mewnol.

Dear Home Office,

This request was made by me on 14th July 2011: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ja...

The Home Office only replied on the 29th September 2011 when they refused my request.

Please supply all information under the FOIA and all other rights of access concerning the following;

1. Between 14th July 2011 and the date the request was refused, 29th September 2011, did the Home Office request or receive any internal legal advice concerning this request? If so, please supply all information.

2. Between 14th July 2011 and the date this request was refused, 29th September 2011, did the Home Office request or receive any external legal advice concerning this request? If so, please supply all information.

3. Please supply full details, including breakdown of such costs, regards 1 and 2 above.

Yours faithfully,

Jo Asher

Gadawodd Martin McGartland anodiad ()

This is not the first time the British State have used the ‘National security’ tactic as an excuse for not giving a full response to controversial questions and allegations concerning their dealings with the 1999 attempted murder of ex- British agent Martin McGartland. This is what they do, they cover-up, they lie, they break the law and they are protecting the IRA terrorists who carried out the shooting of Martin McGartland, they have been doing so for the past 12 years. Just have a look at some of the dirty tricks of the British State; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11yk7p3Kp...
www.martinmcgartland.co.uk

Dear Home Office,

By law my internal review should have been answered before 27th October 2011. Please forward me your reply.

Yours faithfully,

Jo Asher

Dear Home Office,

Can you please send me your reply.

Yours faithfully,

Jo Asher

FOI Requests, Home Office

Jo

Thank you for your email. An Internal Review on your FOI request is
currently ongoing and under the laws of the Freedom Of Information Act
2000 the Home Office has until 25th November to produce and dispatch the
Internal Review.

Thank you

FOI TEAM
Informaton Services Centre
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF

T - 0207 035 6699
E - [Home Office request email]

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Dear FOI Requests,

Please also explain why the Home Office are ignoring my other requests?

Yours sincerely,

Jo Asher

Dear Home Office,

On the 7th November 2011 you wrote to me saying, '... the Home Office has until 25th November to produce and dispatch the Internal Review."

It is now the 3rd of Jan 2012 and you have still not dealt with my request for an internal review. Can you please let me have your reply.

Yours faithfully,

Jo Asher

Gadawodd Martin McGartland anodiad ()

Theresa May MP, Home Secretary (http://www.tmay.co.uk/) has claimed in a written, signed statement (dated 12-02-2014) to the High court in London that she can not confirm or deny that Martin McGartland was an agent. However, the Home office, Jack Straw, Home office solicitors have already done so, both in public (press release), in correspondence and by speaking to the media about the Martin McGartland. Martin McGartland says; "The reason why Theresa May MP, Home Secretary and MI5 are now misleading public, Court is in a desperate attempt to try to get a Judge, court to agree to a CMP aka Secret hearing. I say this is because Theresa May MP, Home Secretary, MI5 and HMG want to cover-up their own wrongdoing and corruption while dealing with my (Martin McGartland case)."

The Home Office and Jack Straw have already confirmed a number of times that Martin McGartland had been an agent.

Jack Straw confirmed same in a letter he wrote concerning Martin McGartland, see here; http://www.scribd.com/doc/101345944/jack...

Home office and Northumbria police confirm that Martin McGartland was an agent, that they were offering Martin McGartland a new identity; Page 1 - http://www.scribd.com/doc/55690453/North...

Page 2 - http://www.scribd.com/doc/55692576/Page-...

Home office even spoke to press about Martin McGartland, they claimed they had given Martin McGartland advice on his security, see here: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Home+Offic...

Home Office, their solicitors wrote to BBC confirming that 1. Martin McGartland had been an agent 2. That they were offering Martin McGartland a new identity as a result, see here; http://www.scribd.com/doc/195869909/Mi5-...

Why is the Home Office and even a Government Minister now misleading the Court and the public by now claiming they can not confirm or deny that Marin McGartland was, had been a Spy, agent. The above evidence, penned by themselves, proves they have already confirmed he was, they have done so many times both in public and also in written correspondence.