Nid ydym yn gwybod a yw'r ymateb mwyaf diweddar i'r cais hwn yn cynnwys gwybodaeth neuai peidio - os chi ywaaron b mewngofnodwch a gadael i bawb wybod.

Judiciary Compliance with Obligation to Refer Issues/Questions under the Turkey-EU Association Agreement (ECAA Turkey) to the European Court of Justice /CJEU

We're waiting for aaron b to read recent responses and update the status.

Dear Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service,

I am a public law research and I would like to get the following data:

1. The monthly number of Judicial Review or Appeal applications relating to refusals of ECAA Turkish Businessperson applications submitted between 2007 to 2021 coupled with the outcome. The response should be broken down as follows:

a. Monthly applications,
b. Outcome. If appeal, then whether successful or unsuccessful,
c. Outcome, if judicial review, whether the application was granted on the papers or at a hearing and the ultimate outcome;
d. the ultimate outcome together with case citations where this information is publicly available.

Any personal identifying data that is not publicly available should be removed.

2. The number of applications (whether oral or written) made by applicants/claimants seeking a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice of an issue arising under the ECAA Turkish Businessperson/Worker visa category covering the period 2007 to 2021. Such data should be broken down as followsL
a. when application made (month and year) ;
b. what issue;
c. why the judge (Tribunal/Court of Appeal) granted did not grant application for reference to the ECJ/CJEU.

This should be publicly available to determine whether the UK has complied with its obligation to refer questions arising from or relating to the EU-Turkey Association Agreement (Ankara Agreement) to the ECJ/CJEU during the period covering the UK's membership with the EU.

Sincerely yours,

Aaron b

Yours faithfully,

aaron b

Disclosure Team, Gwasanaeth Llysoedd a Thribiwnlysoedd EM

Dear Sir,

Please note, under section 8(1) of FOIA, a request for information must comply with three requirements. It must:

(a) be in writing,
(b) state the name of the applicant and an address for correspondence, and
(c) describes the information requested.

After initial consideration, this request appears to comply with requirements (a) and (c) but it does not comply with requirement (b) because you have not provided your full name.

I am therefore not required to process your request without information that can later be referred to, as per Section 8(1)(b) FOIA. The information we require is your name.

As your request has been deemed invalid, I am not obliged to disclose the requested information at this point and I would like to take this opportunity to recommend that any future FOI submissions adhere to Section 8 of the FOIA.

To enable us to meet your request, please resubmit your application in accordance with the above requirements. We will consider your resubmitted request upon receipt as long as it meets the requirements stated above.

You will then receive the information requested within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act, subject to the information not being exempt.

You can find out more about Section 8 by reading the extract from the Act available at the attached link:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000...

Kind regards,

Disclosure Team

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Please see the corrected request below:

Dear Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service,

I am a public law research and I would like to get the following data:

1. The monthly number of Judicial Review or Appeal applications relating to refusals of ECAA Turkish Businessperson applications submitted between 2007 to 2021 coupled with the outcome. The response should be broken down as follows:

a. Monthly applications,
b. Outcome. If appeal, then whether successful or unsuccessful,
c. Outcome, if judicial review, whether the application was granted on the papers or at a hearing and the ultimate outcome;
d. the ultimate outcome together with case citations where this information is publicly available.

Any personal identifying data that is not publicly available should be removed.

2. The number of applications (whether oral or written) made by applicants/claimants seeking a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice of an issue arising under the ECAA Turkish Businessperson/Worker visa category covering the period 2007 to 2021. Such data should be broken down as followsL
a. when application made (month and year) ;
b. what issue;
c. why the judge (Tribunal/Court of Appeal) granted did not grant application for reference to the ECJ/CJEU.

This should be publicly available to determine whether the UK has complied with its obligation to refer questions arising from or relating to the EU-Turkey Association Agreement (Ankara Agreement) to the ECJ/CJEU during the period covering the UK's membership with the EU.

Sincerely yours,

Aaron b

Yours faithfully,

Name: Aaron Behar
Address: 61A Bridge St, Kington, HR5 3DJ

Statistics, Gwasanaeth Llysoedd a Thribiwnlysoedd EM

1 Atodiad

Dear Mr Behar,

 

Please find attached a letter in relation to your freedom of information
request.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Olu Adedeji PC foi

 

Data and Evidence as a Service (DES),

Ministry of Justice

 

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Disclosure Team, Gwasanaeth Llysoedd a Thribiwnlysoedd EM

1 Atodiad

 

Dear Mr Behar,

 

Please find attached the MoJ’s response to your FOI request.

 

Regards

 

Disclosure Team / Ministry of Justice

 

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Nid ydym yn gwybod a yw'r ymateb mwyaf diweddar i'r cais hwn yn cynnwys gwybodaeth neuai peidio - os chi ywaaron b mewngofnodwch a gadael i bawb wybod.