Is the Supreme court part of HMCTS & responsible for a void Supreme court 'order' on a statute barred claim?

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, HM Courts and Tribunals Service should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Her Majesty’s Courts and the Tribunals Service,

Fao: The Registrar
Louise di Mambro
Supreme Court

2 April 2018

Dear Louise di Mambro,

2nd NOTICE of FOIA & DSAR REQUEST

This is a FOIA request and DSAR request, being the 2nd one following your non-response to the SARN request filed with you by Recorded delivery dated 11 September 2017 (copy attached). Why haven't you responded? Is the Supreme Court deemed to be exempt from the FOIA and SARN rules?

This is being copied to the Treasury Select Committee who we're relieved to note have announced last Thursday they are opening a Public Enquiry into Economic Crimes across the UK.

Six members of my family are victims of highly sophisticated and organised White Collar frauds spanning the past 18 years, along with hundreds of others on the Baker Tilly creditors list. The evidence I hold suggests that the latter firm, now RSM, conducted a fraudulent insolvency from 2004 to allow HBOS villains to walk away scot free, misguidedly justifying it as "in the interests of the economy". We contest this.

The Official Receiver, Mr Carton Kelly, admitted to me in May 2007 that he'd entered into a bribe deal (which he termed a '£10 million cooperation agreement') with the US Receiver after being "put on the back foot" as $233 million of British money ended up on American soil and has never been retrieved, since.
Yet, under the direction of IP Geoff Carton-Kelly, Baker Tilly as a firm disingenuously took millions in fees despite there being no forensic audit trail due to false accounting and false instruments being used! Is this permitted?
The victims have been sidelined and given a few crumbs under the table, through Baker Tilly's insidious "re-structuring" arm.

Also copied to the Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley Police, Anthony Stansfeld, who is deserving of full Public recognition for his outstanding corruption-fighting stand including the valuable role he played in the jailing of the HBOS fraudsters at Reading Quayside's scandal just over a year ago. We need more honourable officials like Mr Stansfeld whose fine example is exemplary .

OUR MAIN CONCERN:
Please take careful note, I have a suspicious document purporting to be a Supreme court 'order' awarding costs to BOS dated 29 October 2013 without any Consumer credit agreement nor registered debt in existence, which "costs award" it appears the purported beneficiary (Bank of Scotland) apparently do not even know about! (see the Bank's correspondence attached, from 2016)

FACTS:
I also have some Bank of Scotland PLC documents eventually disclosed by DHL under SARN in October 2016 which are equally suspicious because:

a) they refer to an alleged 'loan account' in the names of my husband and I, no: "00803502 122456 and "05594400 122456' neither of which we mandated nor gave any signed authority to open - this was confirmed by Gareth Boardman, David Baxter & Tom Aston as not being on their system as they used fake sort codes etc in evident identity theft;

b) BOS employee Gareth Boardman confirmed in September 2013 that "there's nothing coming up under your profile and postcode" - the DSAR of BOS confirmed in their letter on 24 October 2016 "the calls with Gareth and Tom are not available as they were not on recorded lines" (Actually, they both said they were and I have the recordings, however, in evidence)

c) BOS employee David Baxter in the BOS Fraud unit confirmed in 2013/4 they are fraudulent numbers and aren't on the bank's ledger (I have the phone recording of this call, and others like it to other fraud units)

d) BOS employee tom Aston confirmed in Sept 2013 that account "0535318' was "in someone else's names and had been migrated in error in November 2011 after the BOS/Lloyds merger" - i.e. not our debt. (see PDF transcript) - I have counterfeit 'bank statements' showing DR £407,024.19 in our names being nothing to do with us and not being a debt we have incurred on this unrecognised account number where several migrations occurred from the original "00803502" account without our knowledge.

e) BOS employee Martin Watt in Credit Risk is not known to us nor is Robert Lockyer - prior to the latter coming on the scene and inviting me to meet him "to settle" in February 2014, which proved impossible as it was merely a palliative for the BBC to be able to say "but there has been some movement..." - check out google to find "Nick Wallis HBOS" for the documentary link.

* the date being some 4 days after Robert Lockyer Mgr had relinquished his Lloyds Banking licence in Jersey
* and a month before the BBC 1 Inside Out South documentary was broadcast
* the latter was exposing the HBOS thieving Head Auditor Fraser Mackay of 34 years standing at the Bank
* who misappropriated huge sums of money using fake accounts through the Private Banking Unit of HBOS
* And who I hold his transcripted evidence where he perjured before the Crown, Judge & Jury in Birmingham on 26 & 28 Nov 2007
* demonstrating incontrovertibly that Fraser Mackay, also Director of the PBU, is behind the disappearance of $233m at 2001 values from 400 fellow victims
* this was all because he used false instruments and set them all up himself without any mandate from the named 'bank clients' who all became his victims,

* nor did Mackay disclose to the Judge & Jury that he'd been taking kick backs through a Guernsey account on the quarter billion USD seed capital he misappropriated / stole from the victims - isn't this perjury?

* which account had $214,050 in it when Justice Langstaff questioned him "what's this sum of money in your name" and he responded "nothing" - its there in black & white on his transcript

* then when the Judge asked Mr Mackay why the Watson's purported 'loan' was "held to the BANK's Order" (not the Watson's order) and he responded "oh they'll get it back -" then stopped himself....

* notably, Mr Lockyer's "offer" for ADR proved fruitless as he did not want to examine any of the issues of IDENTITY THEFT or forgery of our signatures that we've suffered for over 24.5 years in this nightmare matter.

* And my husband and I have been branded 'bankrupt' on 2/10/2017 on the fake account "0535318 301818" - being an account that doesn't exist ont he BOS ledger

* it was done using fraudulent means by co-conspirators of Mackay and several employees working at Eversheds solicitors, who've never come clean that they are NOT acting for Bank of Scotland PLC but rather, a SHADOW version of it, run off ledger! Isn't this racketeering an abuse of process and a licence to steal by abusing their positions as court officers?

On account of the foregoing, we require to know:

1. Is the Supreme Court above the Laws of England, meant to protect its People of these lands?
2. Does the Supreme court have exemption from the Data Protection Act 1996 and DSAR Rules and FOIA rules?
3. Does the Supreme Court have any checks and balances in place to validate Claim numbers are authentic and genuinely on the CASEMAN files of HMCTS?
4. Does the Supreme Court regard the statutory record-keeper for the Ministry of Justice, namely THE REGISTRY TRUST, as an official record of all legitimate judgment debts on record?
5. Does the Supreme court deem that an unregistered debt (created through cyber crime activities) which by its nature is unregulated, can be ENFORCED by abusing the Bankruptcy process within the UK ?

* Because, re para (5) above, an unregistered and therefore non-existent 'judgment debt' created through cyber frauds using the fake accounts referred to above, has been relied upon by Richard Pitt ("petitioner") of Eversheds, to purportedly brand us "BANKRUPT" on 2/10/2017 - without a shred of evidence of a Note or contract or audit trail, and no CCA!

* And yet, re para. (4) above, the Registry Trust confirmed to us in writing in October 2017 that they have "no such judgment debt for claim 8PC26793".

* And re. Para (3) above, we now know that claim "8PC26793" was statute barred because it was never sealed by the Court nor served to us, with no claim ever defined, and no extension of time ever applied for within the 6 year rule after it had been filed but not issued - do you require evidence of this?

We therefore submit we are 100% entitled to a Legal Remedy for being wronged by all of the above dishonest bank employees and their cohorts.

Please now examine the attached PDF of a Supreme court 'order' which it appears you signed, awarding costs to BOS which they have not applied to claim in FIVE YEARS - so it begs the question, WHY NOT?

Is it because they do not know about it?
Or Because they know they've no debt?
Or because they have no way of covering up the 10 years of lies by Eversheds, who are acting for a SHADOW VERSION of HBOS named 'In Parallel solutions' which ran in parallel to the 'real' Bank?

It begs the question: why didn't the Supreme court determine that NO SUCH CASE as 8PC26793 exists on the System? Surely, all they had to do was to check with the Ministry of Justice's STATUTORY RECORD KEEPER at the Registry Trust?

- Why should we have been bankrupted when we've never received a penny from any Bank in 25 years?

- Why do we stand falsely accused and now branded "bankrupt" when we are innocent and have had NO FAIR TRIAL in the 10 years this entire nightmare has continued"

- How is the Insolvency Department, using secondary legislation, able to call themselves a "service" for persecuting innocent victims of organised crime like ourselves?

(1) Kindly take note, we have never received any lawfully issued Claim from Bank of Scotland PLC!

(2) We have proof we are the Claimants against the Bank of Scotland PLC (not defendants), but were prevented from having a hearing by Eversheds manipulating the court process and deceiving us to return to the lower (County Court) on the unsealed un-issued and un-served "claim 8PC26793" in 2010.

(3)A fraudster parading as a County Court "judge", Martin Alan Gordon Dancey, colluded with Richard Pitt and his instructing thieving solicitor David Ross Webb on 30/6/2015 at an unnotified UNLISTED non-hearing to steal our home in a 'kangaroo court', where he held me prisoner when I tried to call the police after he admitted intercepting the orally delivered order for Part 31 Disclosure of a higher Circuit Judge HHJ Meston on 14/9/2014

(4) That same 'judge' in the Bournemouth County Court, acting with NO JURISDICTION in Law, deceived us that he'd made an "order for possession" against our home based on "the balance of probability" with NO FACT FIND or merits determination in the preceding 7 years as at 1/7/2015.

(5) The above lie of the untested unproven and fictional "judgment debt" has been used to defame and denigrate our names and credit rating by branding us "bankrupt" - but ON WHAT?

NOTABLY

- We remain ready, willing and able to pay anything that we lawfully owe - but no one will show us any proof

- We've been literally tortured and butchered through HMCTS since 2008 on all of the above deceptions;

- Surely, if there was ever a legitimate claim, it would be an N244 form by the challenging party and not an extreme measure of a purported bankruptcy? its wholly unjustified

- We've been denied all disclosure of any supporting evidence by Eversheds employees for 10 years now

- Tim Pyle fled the scene in Jan 2015 after the High Court realised he was a scammer, then Richard Pitt came on the scene, unabashed, unashamed and undeterred, to continue the 'spin' of deceptions

- The Bank of Scotland has repeatedly referred us back to Eversheds, whom they continue to hide behind

- Eversheds, in turn, have stone-walled us and disconnected the phone, bounced back all emails and withheld all disclosure of evidence

- Perjuring barrister PAUL MITCHELL of Hailsham Chambers has lied through is teeth to mislead the Court for nearly 10 years, relentlessly persecuting us - all in this evident Conspiracy to steal our home and assets.

- all of the above has occurred without due process of Law, using denial of disclosure and abuse of data in private (shadow) courts - which are the only way criminals can launder fictional 'debts" created in shadow accounts.

MORE IMPORTANT than all of the procedural defects and hallmarks of fraud, invalid service etc etc, surely it is that there is NO DEBT and no moneys have ever been given to us by the Bank AND Eversheds have lied in Court for 10 years pretending to be acting for the Bank when they're not?

Isn't PERJURY the highest offence any Court officer can commit under the Laws of England?

I have court orders from the lower County Court awarding costs in my favour in 2010 - which weren't complied with, on our counterclaim - but it was a counterclaim against (what we now know to be ) a void 'claim' which turned out to be statute barred, so would this count?

In early March 2018, senior employees at the Bank of Scotland/Lloyds BG have confirmed to me they have "no solicitors instructed against our property or address or names". So what now?

I also have it on tape in 2013 (as all my calls are recorded) that Nigel from the Supreme court told me (off the record) "sack the solicitors" - as Eversheds (we now realise) had created a FALSE RECORD at the COURT OF APPEAL in 2012 with a FAKE APPEAL NUMBER drawn from the County Court un-issued statute-barred "claim"!

The Supreme court MUST have known there was no such claim on the system

This appears to be precisely why the Supreme court 'order' does not show the FAKE APPEAL numbers,

Nor does it show OUR unheard and unlisted HIgh Court Claim HQ08X04884 from Dec 2008 issued June 2009

But it does, however, show the fraudulent 'claim number 8PC26793' which was never sealed nor issued nor served - on your signed 'order'.

and which 'claim 8PC26793', had NO application for an extension of time ever made as at October 2013.

Until it became STATUTE BARRED in November 2014

So why didn't the Supreme court detect that there was no such claim on the CASE management System?

Is it not the case that this inverse evidence proves that the two Eversheds employees (Tim Pyle and Richard Pitt) and their barrister Paul Mitchell, have committed 10 years of perjury?

Isn't this criminal contempt of court?

Our property rights and right to family life and well being have been treated as worthless by these named parties committing such unconsciable acts of malice.

See attachments in evidence. More evidence of all documents referred to here can be provided upon request. I will now copy this to your Parliamentary website, and trust you will do the right thing by us and all other victims of legal frauds of the likes referred to abovbe.

Yours faithfully,

Liz Watson