Information

This request has been withdrawn by the person who made it. There may be an explanation in the correspondence below.

Dear Brockington College, Leicester,

This request follows legal and mandatory legislation under the European Performance of Buildings Directive and specifically TM44 Air Conditioning Assessments certification. Your Air Conditioning Assessments Certificates should be readily available at all times and be lodged on the government Landmark database. Failure to have appropriate Certificates will be subject to fines of £300 per building, each week.

Q. It is a legal requirement that you hold valid TM44 Air Conditioning Assessments if any building has a total of more than 12kw of air conditioning present. Certificates are valid from 5 years of the issue date. Have you undertaken a TM44 Air Conditioning Assessments?
Q. Who is the responsible person for ensuring that your buildings are surveyed and assessed, please provide the name, address, email address and telephone number of the responsible person.
Q. If your TM44 Air Conditioning Assessments Certificates are in place, what is their expiry date?
Q. What was the order value of the works placed with the Company which undertook the work?
Q. Provide a breakdown of the price per building if available.
Q. How many Certificates were produced?
Q. Was the Assessor independent as required under the Regulations?
Q. Name the Assessor organisation.

Yours faithfully,

Ryan Evans

Brockington College, Leicester

2 Attachments

  • Attachment

    attachment.delivery status

    0K Download DSN: 5.1.1 Bad destination mailbox address

  • Attachment

    Freedom of Information request Information.txt

    2K Download View as HTML

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

[1]FOI requests at Brockington College, Leicester
([email address])
The email address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the
recipient's email address and try to resend the message. If the problem
continues, please contact your helpdesk.

Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: BRO-SVR-EXC13.BrockingtonCC.Internal

[email address]
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found'

Original message headers:

Received: from BRO-SVR-EXC13.BrockingtonCC.Internal (10.58.160.10) by
BRO-SVR-EXC13.BrockingtonCC.Internal (10.58.160.10) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:53:20 +0000
Received: from mq.ifl.net (213.18.248.109) by
BRO-SVR-EXC13.BrockingtonCC.Internal (10.58.160.10) with Microsoft SMTP
Server id 15.0.847.32 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:53:20 +0000
Received: from in3.mx.ifl.net (rm.mx.ifl.net [217.181.2.35]) by mq.ifl.net
(8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id t2K9rGCL004309 for
<[email address]>; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:53:18 GMT
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DIAgC+7QtVf1InKy5cg1hagkBOsCMGgzIBjzsaBQyDE4JqgS1MAQEBAQEBEQEBCwsKCBQuhD4kZwIYDgI+IROIMwmhcoNGjAaFFpVDHASBIYRpiRwRAYEHgX0MLxKBMwWGFpBIhHaDMIwWg0eBcwGCHD4xgQuBOAEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A0DIAgC+7QtVf1InKy5cg1hagkBOsCMGgzIBjzsaBQyDE4JqgS1MAQEBAQEBEQEBCwsKCBQuhD4kZwIYDgI+IROIMwmhcoNGjAaFFpVDHASBIYRpiRwRAYEHgX0MLxKBMwWGFpBIhHaDMIwWg0eBcwGCHD4xgQuBOAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,435,1422921600";
d="scan'208";a="711842611"
X-IronPort-From: [FOI #259211 email]
Received: from titan.ukcod.org.uk ([46.43.39.82]) by in3.mx.ifl.net with
ESMTP; 20 Mar 2015 09:53:11 +0000
Received: from foi by titan.ukcod.org.uk with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from
<[FOI #259211 email]>) id 1YYtc7-0007ZO-7p; Fri, 20
Mar 2015 09:53:11 +0000
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:53:11 +0000
From: Ryan Evans <[FOI #259211 email]>
To: "FOI requests at Brockington College, Leicester"
<[email address]>
Message-ID: <[email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Information
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: [FOI #259211 email]

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Doug Paulley left an annotation ()

When this request was first sent, there was a delivery error and so the request was never received by the authority. It is now some time since this request was sent and so it would not be appropriate to re-send it to the correct address. We have therefore marked this request as "withdrawn".

I have looked up a new address for this authority. Should you wish, you could send a new request for the information.
--
Doug - volunteer, WhatDoTheyKnow.com