Impact of Lovebox & Field Day festivals in Victoria Park 2017

The request was partially successful.

Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS),

Did the Met experience increased demand during Lovebox/Citadel festival held 14 & 15th July 2017 and Field Day/Mighty Hoopla festival held 2nd & 3rd June in Victoria Park?

How much additional demand was associated with each event – specifically:
• Number of people using your service?
• Number of calls taken?
• Number of incidents responded to?
• Number of violent incidents?
• Number of injuries sustained by any means?

How much additional resourcing was required in terms of:
• Preperation & planning?
• Extra staffing?
• Capacity measures?
• Infrastructure improvements?

Did the police have concerns about the safety of either event for:
• Festival attendees?
• Local residents?
• Other park users?

What was the cost to your service of meeting the additional demands created by:
• Lovebox 14/7/2017
• Citadel 15/7/2017
• Field Day 2/6/2017
• Mighty Hoopla 3/6/2017

Many Thanks

Corinne Clarkson

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)

Dear Ms Clarkson

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2017120000241

I write in connection with your request for information which was received
by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 10/12/2017.  I note you seek
access to the following information:

"Freedom of Information request - Impact of Lovebox & Field Day festivals
in Victoria Park 2017

Did the Met experience increased demand during Lovebox/Citadel festival
held 14 & 15th July 2017 and Field Day/Mighty Hoopla festival held 2nd &
3rd June in Victoria Park?

How much additional demand was associated with each event – specifically:
•        Number of people using your service?
•        Number of calls taken?
•        Number of incidents responded to?
•        Number of violent incidents?
•        Number of injuries sustained by any means?

How much additional resourcing was required in terms of:
•        Preperation & planning?
•        Extra staffing?
•        Capacity measures?
•        Infrastructure improvements?

Did the police have concerns about the safety of either event for:
•        Festival attendees?
•        Local residents?
•        Other park users?

What was the cost to your service of meeting the additional demands
created by:
•        Lovebox 14/7/2017
•        Citadel 15/7/2017
•        Field Day 2/6/2017
•        Mighty Hoopla 3/6/2017"

Your request will now be considered in accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 (the Act).  You will receive a response within the
statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act.  

If you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please contact
us at [email address] or on the phone at 0207 161 3500, quoting the
reference number above. Should your enquiry relate to the logging or
allocations process we will be able to assist you directly and where your
enquiry relates to other matters (such as the status of the request) we
will be able to pass on a message and/or advise you of the relevant
contact details.

Yours sincerely

R. Loizou
Support Officer - Freedom of Information Triage Team
 
COMPLAINT RIGHTS

Are you unhappy with how your request has been handled or do you think the
decision is incorrect?

You have the right to require the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) to
review their decision.

Prior to lodging a formal complaint you are welcome to discuss the
response with the case officer who dealt with your request.  

Complaint

If you are dissatisfied with the handling procedures or the decision of
the MPS made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) regarding
access to information you can lodge a complaint with the MPS to have the
decision reviewed.

Complaints should be made in writing, within forty (40) working days from
the date of the refusal notice, and addressed to:

FOI Complaint
Information Rights Unit
PO Box 57192
London
SW6 1SF
[email address]

In all possible circumstances the MPS will aim to respond to your
complaint within 20 working days.

The Information Commissioner

After lodging a complaint with the MPS if you are still dissatisfied with
the decision you may make application to the Information Commissioner for
a decision on whether the request for information has been dealt with in
accordance with the requirements of the Act.

For information on how to make application to the Information Commissioner
please visit their website at www.ico.org.uk.  Alternatively, write to or
phone:

Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
Phone: 0303 123 1113

Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary.

NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your system.  To avoid incurring
legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this
email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are
monitored to the extent permitted by law.  Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by
email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements
reached with other employees or agents.  The security of this email and
any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned
but malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur
during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in
this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS).

 

Find us at:

Facebook: Facebook.com/metpoliceuk

Twitter: @metpoliceuk

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)

Dear Ms Clarkson

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2017120000241

I write in connection with your request for information which was received
by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 10/12/2017.  I note you seek
access to the following information:

"Freedom of Information request - Impact of Lovebox & Field Day festivals
in Victoria Park 2017

Did the Met experience increased demand during Lovebox/Citadel festival
held 14 & 15th July 2017 and Field Day/Mighty Hoopla festival held 2nd &
3rd June in Victoria Park?

How much additional demand was associated with each event – specifically:
•        Number of people using your service?
•        Number of calls taken?
•        Number of incidents responded to?
•        Number of violent incidents?
•        Number of injuries sustained by any means?

How much additional resourcing was required in terms of:
•        Preperation & planning?
•        Extra staffing?
•        Capacity measures?
•        Infrastructure improvements?

Did the police have concerns about the safety of either event for:
•        Festival attendees?
•        Local residents?
•        Other park users?

What was the cost to your service of meeting the additional demands
created by:
•        Lovebox 14/7/2017
•        Citadel 15/7/2017
•        Field Day 2/6/2017
•        Mighty Hoopla 3/6/2017"
DECISION

This letter is to inform you that it will not be possible to respond to
your request within the cost threshold.  This response serves as a Refusal
Notice under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act).
 Please see the legal annex for further information on the exemptions
applied in respect of your request.

REASONS FOR DECISION

To locate information for question one part a) - Number of people using
your service?would exceed the cost threshold. To determine whether there
is any information relevant to this part of the request would require a
manual search of any recorded information, for example note books. This is
because at these events those that used the MPS service would of
inevitable dealt with officers face-to face. During the course of these
interactions, officers may have recorded information within their note
books if they deemed it appropriate to record. It is this manual search of
note books that exceeds the cost threshold.

We therefore estimate that the cost of complying with this request would
exceed the appropriate limit. The appropriate limit has been specified in
regulations and for agencies outside central Government; this is set at
£450.00.   This represents the estimated cost of one person spending 18
hours [at a rate of £25 per hour] in determining whether the MPS holds the
information, and locating, retrieving and extracting the information.

I would like to provide you with advice as to how you may narrow your
request so that it does not exceed the appropriate limit.

Would you like to narrow your request to the remainder questions?

Should you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please
contact me quoting the reference number above.

Yours sincerely

Audeeba Ali
Freedom of Information Manager

LEGAL ANNEX

Section 17(5) of the Act provides:

(5) A public authority which, in relation to any request for information,
is relying on a claim that section 12 or 14 applies must, within the time
for complying with section 1(1), give the applicant a notice stating that
fact.

Section 12(1)&(2) of the Act provides:

(1) Section 1 does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request
for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with
the request would exceed the appropriate limit.

(2) Subsection (1) does not exempt the public authority from its
obligation to comply with paragraph (a) of section 1(1) unless the
estimated cost of complying with that paragraph alone would exceed the
appropriate limit.

Section 16 of the Act provides:

(1) It shall be the duty of a public authority to provide advice and
assistance, so far as it would be reasonable to expect the authority to do
so, to persons who propose to make, or have made, requests for information
to it.

(2) Any public authority which, in relation to the provision of advice or
assistance in any case, conforms with the code of practice under section
45 is to be taken to comply with the duty imposed by subsection (1) in
relation to that case.
 
COMPLAINT RIGHTS

Are you unhappy with how your request has been handled or do you think the
decision is incorrect?

You have the right to require the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) to
review their decision.

Prior to lodging a formal complaint you are welcome to discuss the
response with the case officer who dealt with your request.  

Complaint

If you are dissatisfied with the handling procedures or the decision of
the MPS made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) regarding
access to information you can lodge a complaint with the MPS to have the
decision reviewed.

Complaints should be made in writing, within forty (40) working days from
the date of the refusal notice, and addressed to:

FOI Complaint
Information Rights Unit
PO Box 57192
London
SW6 1SF
[email address]

In all possible circumstances the MPS will aim to respond to your
complaint within 20 working days.

The Information Commissioner

After lodging a complaint with the MPS if you are still dissatisfied with
the decision you may make application to the Information Commissioner for
a decision on whether the request for information has been dealt with in
accordance with the requirements of the Act.

For information on how to make application to the Information Commissioner
please visit their website at www.ico.org.uk.  Alternatively, write to or
phone:

Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
Phone:  0303 123 1113

Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless
absolutely necessary.

NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to
copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of
the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender and delete it from your system.  To avoid incurring
legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this
email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are
monitored to the extent permitted by law.  Consequently, any email and/or
attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are
authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by
email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements
reached with other employees or agents.  The security of this email and
any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned
but malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur
during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in
this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS).

 

Find us at:

Facebook: Facebook.com/metpoliceuk

Twitter: @metpoliceuk