Highways Asset Inspection Register
Dear Birmingham City Council,
BCC’s contract with Amey ceased on 31/03/2020 and a new Interim Service Contract was awarded to Kier Highways Ltd. Please provide me with the asset register ‘handover’ document detailing the highways assets, their condition* and the date of the last inspection. If no such document was created, please provide me with the last asset register compiled by Amey and the first by Kier Highways Ltd.
Please provide these in excel format with associated notes about the condition, the due date for maintenance and renewal.
Yours faithfully,
Mr P Swift
*Safety Inspections are designed to identify all defects likely to create danger or serious
inconvenience to users of the network or wider community. The risk of danger is assessed on site and the defect identified with an appropriate priority response
The Contractor shall keep full records of all inspections, defects identified and all repairs that are subsequently carried out within Birmingham City Council’s Management Information Systems (MIS). Such records will be used to defend public liability claims.
Dear Birmingham City Council,
You are in breach of the FoIA, the information was due on or before 22/06/2022
please advise by when I can expect to receive the information
Yours faithfully,
Mr P Swift
cc ICO
Information request
Our reference: 42185246
Your reference: [FOI #863950 email]
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Dear Mr Swift
Freedom of Information Act 2000
Thank you for your request for information that was received on 23 June
2022 concerning:
Dear Birmingham City Council,
BCC's contract with Amey ceased on 31/03/2020 and a new Interim Service
Contract was awarded to Kier Highways Ltd. Please provide me with the
asset register 'handover' document detailing the highways assets, their
condition* and the date of the last inspection. If no such document was
created, please provide me with the last asset register compiled by Amey
and the first by Kier Highways Ltd.
Please provide these in excel format with associated notes about the
condition, the due date for maintenance and renewal.
Yours faithfully,
Mr P Swift
*Safety Inspections are designed to identify all defects likely to create
danger or serious
inconvenience to users of the network or wider community. The risk of
danger is assessed on site and the defect identified with an appropriate
priority response
The Contractor shall keep full records of all inspections, defects
identified and all repairs that are subsequently carried out within
Birmingham City Council's Management Information Systems (MIS). Such
records will be used to defend public liability claims....
We are dealing with your request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
and we aim to send a response by 21 July 2022 or as soon as possible. We
apologise for the delay due to a notification error from the
'whatdotheyknow' site which has resulted in a delay in receiving your
request.
In some case, a fee may be payable. If we decide a fee is payable, we will
send you a fee notice and we will require you to pay the fee before
proceeding with your request.
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 may restrict the release of some or
all of the information you have requested. We will carry out an assessment
and if any exemptions apply to some or all of the information then we
might not provide that information to you. We will inform you if this is
the case and advise you of your rights to request an internal review and
to complain to the Information Commissioner's Office.
We will also advise you if we cannot provide you with the information
requested for any other reason together with the reason(s) why and details
of how you may appeal (if appropriate).
You may experience understandable delays when making information rights
requests post pandemic, this could be due to changes in working patterns,
sickness and access to information not held electronically.
Yours sincerely
Jenny Bent
Business Support Coordinator
Digital & Customer Support Services
[email address]
NOTE: Please do not edit the subject line when replying to this email.
BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL DISCLAIMER This email contains proprietary
confidential information some or all of which may be legally privileged
and/or subject to the provisions of privacy legislation. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail; you must not
use, disclose, copy, print or disseminate the information contained within
this e-mail. Please notify the author immediately by replying to this
email. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states these to be the views
of Birmingham City Council. This email has been scanned for all viruses
and all reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that no viruses
are present. Birmingham City Council cannot accept responsibility for any
loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
Birmingham City Council The information contained within this e-mail (and
any attachment) sent by Birmingham City Council is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient or entity
to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please
accept our apologies and notify the sender immediately. Unauthorised
access, use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted and may be
unlawful. Any e-mail including its content may be monitored and used by
Birmingham City Council for reasons of security and for monitoring
internal compliance with the office policy on staff use. E-mail blocking
software may also be used. Any views or opinions presented are solely
those of the originator and do not necessarily represent those of
Birmingham City Council. We cannot guarantee that this message or any
attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted and amended.
Dear Birmingham City Council,
the request was made in MAY
The response was due JUNE
you received the request a month ago. You are in breach of the Act again.
Kindly explain your statement the response is due in JULY
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
Dear Ms. Bent,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Birmingham City Council's handling of my FOI request 'Highways Asset Inspection Register'.
You have failed to comply with the Act, you have not responded to my request.
What happened to my original request, why have you ignored it and inappropriately added another month to the response time?
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/h...
Yours,
Mr P Swift
c.c. ICO
Dear Mr Swift
Thank you for your email.
We apologise for the delay in responding to your request, which is due to
a system notification error on the 'Whatdotheyknow' site this has resulted
in a delay and your request was not received by us until 20/06/2022. We
will endeavour to reply to your request as soon as possible.
Kind regards
Jenny Bent
Digital & Customer Support Services
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Dear Birmingham City Council,
the request was made in MAY
The response was due JUNE
you received the request a month ago. You are in breach of the Act again.
Kindly explain your statement the response is due in JULY
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
Information request
Our reference: 42185246
Your reference: [FOI #863950 email]
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Dear Mr Swift
Thank you for your request for information received on 23 June 2022.
Please find attached our response to your request.
Yours sincerely
Jenny Bent
Business Support Coordinator
Digital & Customer Support Services
[email address]
Re Use of Public Sector Information
Where Birmingham City Council is the copyright holder of any information
that may be released, re-use for personal, educational or non-commercial
purposes is permitted without further reference to the City Council. Where
the re-use is for other purposes, such as commercial re-use, the applicant
should notify the City Council in writing to seek approval or agree terms
for re-use
NOTE: Please do not edit the subject line when replying to this email.
BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL DISCLAIMER This email contains proprietary
confidential information some or all of which may be legally privileged
and/or subject to the provisions of privacy legislation. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail; you must not
use, disclose, copy, print or disseminate the information contained within
this e-mail. Please notify the author immediately by replying to this
email. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states these to be the views
of Birmingham City Council. This email has been scanned for all viruses
and all reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that no viruses
are present. Birmingham City Council cannot accept responsibility for any
loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
Birmingham City Council The information contained within this e-mail (and
any attachment) sent by Birmingham City Council is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient or entity
to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please
accept our apologies and notify the sender immediately. Unauthorised
access, use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted and may be
unlawful. Any e-mail including its content may be monitored and used by
Birmingham City Council for reasons of security and for monitoring
internal compliance with the office policy on staff use. E-mail blocking
software may also be used. Any views or opinions presented are solely
those of the originator and do not necessarily represent those of
Birmingham City Council. We cannot guarantee that this message or any
attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted and amended.
Gadawodd Mr P Swift anodiad ()
Response
The Council is not aware of an "asset register 'handover' document", nor of an asset register compiled by Amey or Kier.
Kier Highways Ltd maintains details of the Council's highway assets in an electronic asset management system. We may be able to assist with information on specific named roads if details are provided.
The system does not record the due date for maintenance and renewal.
Dear Birmingham City Council,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Birmingham City Council's handling of my FOI request 'Highways Asset Inspection Register'.
I have yet to be provided with the information requested and appear to be the subject of semantics
On the one hand, you are unaware of an asset register compiled by Kier.
On the other, Kier Highways Ltd maintains details of the Council's highway assets.
Please explain the difference and why I have not been provided the Kier highways maintained details of council highways assets
Please provide this; the first they completed upon take over and
The last Amey completed before takeover
Given the register is electronic and appears to be the document i am seeking, also captured by and i believe is captured by:
'If no such document was created, please provide me with the last asset register compiled by Amey and the first by Kier Highways Ltd'
I am surprised at the lack of information forthcoming
I also refer you to:
https://www.birmingham.gov.uk/info/20013...
Safety inspections
As the highway authority for Birmingham, our aim is to keep the highway network, which includes roads, pavements and cycle paths, safe through carrying out regular safety inspections. The inspections are carried out by a team of qualified inspectors.
The Safety Inspections are designed to identify all defects likely to create danger or serious inconvenience to users of the network or wider community. The risk of danger is assessed on site and the defect identified with an appropriate priority response.
Highway defects are risk assessed by information that is provided to us and by safety inspectors who will exercise their judgement, discretion and training when deciding whether to record individual defects, and in which category to place them. Such judgements are based around a risk matrix.
When inspecting a road or if we receive a report of a potential hazard, we will review this based on the information available as to whether this needs immediate attention or are expected to need attention before the road will next be inspected.
If the defect requires attention but is not an immediate hazard, it will be programmed for repair which we aim to be completed before the next inspection, if the defects present are minor and are not considered to need attention, we will monitor when we next inspect usually within six months
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/h...
Yours faithfully,
Mr P Swift
Dear Birmingham City Council,
please advise by when i can expect the IR to be concluded and the information provided.
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
https://www.englandhighways.co.uk/birmin...
‘The Commissioner would like to place on record that during his investigation, the Council repeatedly failed to engage properly with the questions put to it and the actions it was asked to take.
He also notes with concern that the Council failed to comply with the information notice (which is published on his website) within the specified timescale’.
Gadawodd Mr P Swift anodiad ()
https://www.englandhighways.co.uk/birmin...
‘The Commissioner would like to place on record that during his investigation, the Council repeatedly failed to engage properly with the questions put to it and the actions it was asked to take.
He also notes with concern that the Council failed to comply with the information notice (which is published on his website) within the specified timescale’.
Gadawodd Sally Reader anodiad ()
This request was delivered to the council's email servers shortly after it was sent, and we got a positive response back in-line with what a normal successful email delivery looks like. As is our standard practice we used an email address which the council asked us to use to send requests to.
We suspect that the council is generally not processing requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow based on the email. Instead we think the council is using a feed provided via a service called iCasework provided by a company called Civica. We at WhatDoTheyKnow/mySociety provide a feed of data to iCasework/Civica. It appears there has been a problem with this alternative non-email route of communication. We have investigated, and we don't believe the issue was at our end.
While the feed we provide was unavailable on a small number of occasions, we would not have expected this to cause a problem as the data was present in the feed when it was successfully obtained via subsequent requests. The feed is requested from WhatDoTheyKnow approximately every eight minutes.
A number of councils asked us to stop sending them requests by email because they obtained them via the feed. We refused to do this because of the proof of delivery we get when we send requests by email.
We suspect that the council probably aren't reading emails sent to the address they've given us, and are relying on the feed. We presume that the council still has the emails and could revert to them if they had a problem with their feed.
It is the public bodies' responsibility to manage how they deal with incoming requests, and is not something we have control of. Our understanding is that whatever issue there was is no-longer ongoing.
WhatDoTheyKnow admin team
Dear Birmingham City Council,
Please note the WDTK annotation to this request:
Sally Reader left an annotation ( 2 August 2022)
This request was delivered to the council's email servers shortly after it was sent, and we got a positive response back in-line with what a normal successful email delivery looks like. As is our standard practice we used an email address which the council asked us to use to send requests to.
We suspect that the council is generally not processing requests made via WhatDoTheyKnow based on the email. Instead we think the council is using a feed provided via a service called iCasework provided by a company called Civica. We at WhatDoTheyKnow/mySociety provide a feed of data to iCasework/Civica. It appears there has been a problem with this alternative non-email route of communication. We have investigated, and we don't believe the issue was at our end.
While the feed we provide was unavailable on a small number of occasions, we would not have expected this to cause a problem as the data was present in the feed when it was successfully obtained via subsequent requests. The feed is requested from WhatDoTheyKnow approximately every eight minutes.
A number of councils asked us to stop sending them requests by email because they obtained them via the feed. We refused to do this because of the proof of delivery we get when we send requests by email.
We suspect that the council probably aren't reading emails sent to the address they've given us, and are relying on the feed. We presume that the council still has the emails and could revert to them if they had a problem with their feed.
It is the public bodies' responsibility to manage how they deal with incoming requests, and is not something we have control of. Our understanding is that whatever issue there was is no-longer ongoing.'
Please explain the contradiction with your response.
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
Dear Mr Swift
Further to your email dated 30 July 2022 and your follow-up email of 2
August 2022, I can confirm that the response was sent to you on 28 June
2022. A further copy of our response is attached for your information. The
response to your FOI request refence number FOI 42687463, addressed the
council's issues with WDTK, so we have no further comments to make.
Yours sincerely
Digital & Customer Support Services
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Dear Birmingham City Council,
Please note the WDTK annotation to this request:
Sally Reader left an annotation ( 2 August 2022)
This request was delivered to the council's email servers shortly after it
was sent, and we got a positive response back in-line with what a normal
successful email delivery looks like. As is our standard practice we used
an email address which the council asked us to use to send requests to.
We suspect that the council is generally not processing requests made via
WhatDoTheyKnow based on the email. Instead we think the council is using a
feed provided via a service called iCasework provided by a company called
Civica. We at WhatDoTheyKnow/mySociety provide a feed of data to
iCasework/Civica. It appears there has been a problem with this
alternative non-email route of communication. We have investigated, and we
don't believe the issue was at our end.
While the feed we provide was unavailable on a small number of occasions,
we would not have expected this to cause a problem as the data was present
in the feed when it was successfully obtained via subsequent requests. The
feed is requested from WhatDoTheyKnow approximately every eight minutes.
A number of councils asked us to stop sending them requests by email
because they obtained them via the feed. We refused to do this because of
the proof of delivery we get when we send requests by email.
We suspect that the council probably aren't reading emails sent to the
address they've given us, and are relying on the feed. We presume that the
council still has the emails and could revert to them if they had a
problem with their feed.
It is the public bodies' responsibility to manage how they deal with
incoming requests, and is not something we have control of. Our
understanding is that whatever issue there was is no-longer ongoing.'
Please explain the contradiction with your response.
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
Dear Birmingham City Council,
please provide :
your emails to WDTK asking them to stop sending them requests by email because they obtained them via the feed and the replies received
the original emails of my request, sent by WDTK
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
Dear Birmingham City Council,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Birmingham City Council's handling of my FOI request regarding WDTK emails.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/h...
Yours faithfully,
Mr P Swift
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
Gadawodd Mr P Swift anodiad ()
registered breach at
https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/foi-...
Thank you, we have received your complaint.
Need to send documents to us?
If you have other relevant documents for us, you can post them to:
Customer Contact - FOI complaint documents
Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Wilmslow
SK9 5AF
Please include a covering letter with your name and email address, so that we can match your documents to your complaint.