FORCED ADOPTION COMPLAINTS

Waiting for an internal review by Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service of their handling of this request.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please supply the figures that relate to CafCass receiving
complaints with regards to concerns relating to 'forced adoptions'
i.e. without parental consent.

In particular how many replies have been sent to the thousands of desperate
families, parents,grandparents etc trying to save their heritage
from being destroyed forever, behind the closed doors of family
courts, away from the public gaze.

Yours faithfully,

I Peroll

michael storey left an annotation ()

I Michael Storey would not trust caffcass with a syphllis virus, let alone making a judgement for a child. Michael Storey

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service's handling of my FOI request 'FORCED ADOPTION COMPLAINTS'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fo...

Yours faithfully,

I Peroll

Dear CEO/Head of Legal Team,

Please explain why you have failed to respond to this FOI request?

Yours faithfully,

I Peroll

Jassal, Jasvinder, Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service

1 Attachment

Dear I Peroll
Please find the attached an acknowledgement for your internal review sent to you on 24th July 2009.
Cafcass is following the Freedom of Information Policy and procedures and will write to you once the internal review process has concluded.
Best wishes

Miss Jassal

show quoted sections

Ms S Foster (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

House of Lords - Down Lisburn Health and Social Services Trust. Baroness Hale of Richmond. Judgement

34. There is, so far as the parties to this case are aware, no European jurisprudence questioning the principle of freeing for adoption, or indeed compulsory adoption generally. The United Kingdom is unusual amongst members of the Council of Europe in permitting the total severance of family ties without parental consent. (Professor Triseliotis thought that only Portugal and perhaps one other European country allowed this.) It is, of course, the most draconian interference with family life possible.

Although kinship placements are supposed to be the preferred option in this country, only 1 per cent. of social worker-instigated placements ended up with kinship carers, compared with 45 per cent. in Denmark, for example(EVIDENCE given in parliament June 16th 2008 by Tim Loughton MP shadow minister for children)

Mr B Gerrish (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/colum...

Will be interesting to see if Medway Family Court takes any notice of Lord Justice Thorpe and Lord Justice Wall's criticisms, the latter ordered his comments to be circulated to family courts and adoption agencies across the land.
(Could his comments be referring to the Law of the Land)

The Lords appear to recognize that there is a clear difference between the LAW and legal child kidnap; there cannot be Lawful child kidnap.

Dear Jassal, Jasvinder,

Please explain why your department has failed yet again to comply within the time limits and Law?

Yours sincerely,

I Peroll

Jassal, Jasvinder, Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service

I am currently out of the office until Monday 7th September 2009
If there is anything urgent please contact Maurren Newsam on 0844 353
3310.

Regards
Jas

This email and any files and/or attachments transmitted with it are
confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed.

If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do
not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance
on it and notify the sender immediately.

CAFCASS makes reasonable attempts to exclude from this e-mail and any
attachments viruses, or any other defect which might affect your computer
or IT system, but it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that
they are virus free and CAFCASS accepts no liability for any loss or
damage arising in any way from their receipt or use.

I Peroll (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

No surprises , how long does it take to answer one simple question.

John Harris (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

How sad and shocking, families being destroyed forever in secret,
Are there any decent judges out there, or are the authorities out of control?
It is simply disgraceful.

http://nameshamesocialworkers.blogspot.c...

MEDWAY COUNTY FAMILY COURT 7th- 15th September 2009

Ex-Tory Councillor grandchildren Elle-May ,Ruby, Lacey, Poppy Williams-Piper being stolen for forced adoption by Kent County Council(Tory run)

Everyone welcome,ring side seats available for the press, come meet your local SS workers, not to be missed ,why not make it a regular event!

I Peroll (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

maybe they cant answer because they know exactly what is going on within there system

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrS2qzk8S10

Dear Jassal, Jasvinder,

Your department has had ample time , when will they be responding fully with the FOIA law.

Yours sincerely,

I Peroll

Jassal, Jasvinder, Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service

I am currently out of the office until Tuesday 22nd September 2009
If there is anything urgent please contact Maurren Newsam on 0844 353
3310.

Regards
Jas

This email and any files and/or attachments transmitted with it are
confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed.

If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do
not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance
on it and notify the sender immediately.

CAFCASS makes reasonable attempts to exclude from this e-mail and any
attachments viruses, or any other defect which might affect your computer
or IT system, but it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that
they are virus free and CAFCASS accepts no liability for any loss or
damage arising in any way from their receipt or use.

Jassal, Jasvinder, Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service

Dear Sir/Madam

Under Section 8(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, an applicant
must provide their real name for a request to be valid and fall under the scope of the Act. I have been looking at your past request and the use of aliases for outstanding requests for information namely...

Freedom of Information requests
I .Peroll CAF 236
D Ferguson CAF 242
S.Foster CAf 237
Ms Susan Web
Mr Brian Gerrish

I suspect that the name you use 'I Peroll' is not your real name and that you are in fact utilising the names of various people some involved in children's social work as listed above.

Cafcass will therefore not proceed to consider the above requests, or any
further requests for information by you, or deal with any requests for
review until you are able to provide me with authentic identification
which verifies who you are, for example an original utility bill
showing your full name and postal address.

On receipt of such evidence, I will progress your requests and will of course be happy to return any
documentation to you without keeping a copy on file.
If your name really is as stated I apologise in advance for any inconvenience that
providing proof of identity may cause you.

If you are unhappy with this decision, and object to providing proof
that you are using your real name, you can appeal to the Information
Commissioner, who oversees compliance with the Freedom of Information
Act 2000. Details of what you need to do, should you wish to pursue this
course of action, are available from the Information Commissioner's
website http://www.ico.gov.uk/

Regards

Miss Jasvinder Jassal
Information Assurance & Data Handling Officer
Cafcass
6th Floor Sanctuary Buildings
Great Smith Street
London
SW1P 3BT

E-mail: [email address]
T

show quoted sections

Dear Jassal, Jasvinder,

Can you please explain why you have suddenly decided to refuse this request for spurious reasons after answering the other FOIA request on the same day?

This is most strange please explain your conflicting actions to justify your decisions.

Yours sincerely,

I Peroll

Dear Jassal, Jasvinder,

A reply is still awaited and a complaint has been placed with the FOI Commissioner Office.

Yours faithfully,

I Peroll

LS Palmer (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

http://www.mediafire.com/?igb0f758y7ed677

Download a real life case study on how children are kinapped by CAFCASS through the secret family courts.

Yvonne Pears. left an annotation ()

You need to look at Police records about kidnapping.

Alastair Patterson left an annotation ()

See http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/fa...

for an explanation of forced adoption.