Following on from the GDPR Rules

Mae'r ymateb i'r cais hwn yn hwyr iawn. Yn ôl y gyfraith, ym mhob amgylchiad, dylai Land Registry fod wedi ymateb erbyn hyn. (manylion). Gallwch gwyno drwy yn gofyn am adolygiad mewnol.

Dear Land Registry,
under the Data Protection Act, l would like to request ,with consideration shown to the GDPR Rules, for all the information held to date about me on the final responses log of Land Registry,

Yours faithfully,

Diana Smith

Petty, Roger, Land Registry

Dear Diana Smith

 

Thank you for your email of 25 February 2019 making a Subject Access
Request to supply all the information held to date about you on the final
responses log of Land Registry.

 

I am writing to let you know that we have received your request and will
process it within 1 month from the date of receipt.

 

You will hear back from us by 24 February 2019 at the latest.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Roger Petty
Departmental Records Officer

Corporate Legal, Indemnity and Assurance

Head Office, 1 Bedford Park, Croydon CR0 2AQ
DD: 0300 006 7054 |
Email [1][email address]

[2]GOV.UK | [3]@HMLandRegistry| [4]LinkedIn | [5]Facebook

To see how HM Land Registry treats your personal information please click
[6]here

 

HM Land Registry’s ambition is to become the world’s leading land registry for speed, simplicity and an open approach to data. Our mission is: “Your land and property rights: guaranteed and protected”.

We check all mail and attachments for known viruses. However, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk. If you have received this email and it was not intended for you, please let us know, then delete it.

We welcome correspondence in English and Welsh.

To see how HM Land Registry treats your personal information, read our Personal information charter: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/land....

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...
3. https://twitter.com/HMLandRegistry
4. http://www.linkedin.com/company/land-reg...
5. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Land-Regis...
6. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...

Petty, Roger, Land Registry

Dear Diana Smith

 

Thank you for your email of 25 February 2019 making a Subject Access
Request to supply all the information held to date about you on the final
responses log of Land Registry.

 

I am about to send a reply. The information I will be providing contains
what may be considered as personal information. Please confirm that you
are happy for me to send it to the What do they know website. As you know
this is a site open to all. If you prefer the information not to be posted
on this website, please provide an alternative email or postal address.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Roger Petty
Departmental Records Officer

Corporate Legal, Indemnity and Assurance

Head Office, 1 Bedford Park, Croydon CR0 2AQ
DD: 0300 006 7054 |
Email [1][email address]

[2]GOV.UK | [3]@HMLandRegistry| [4]LinkedIn | [5]Facebook

To see how HM Land Registry treats your personal information please click
[6]here

 

HM Land Registry’s ambition is to become the world’s leading land registry for speed, simplicity and an open approach to data. Our mission is: “Your land and property rights: guaranteed and protected”.

We check all mail and attachments for known viruses. However, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk. If you have received this email and it was not intended for you, please let us know, then delete it.

We welcome correspondence in English and Welsh.

To see how HM Land Registry treats your personal information, read our Personal information charter: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/land....

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...
3. https://twitter.com/HMLandRegistry
4. http://www.linkedin.com/company/land-reg...
5. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Land-Regis...
6. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...

Dear Petty, Roger,
please send to my postal address:-

Diana Smith
Corner Farm
Rotten Row
Theddlethorpe St Helen
Lincolnshire
LN12 1NX

Yours sincerely,

Diana Smith

Dear Petty, Roger,
the information provided is not in a format that is workable with, or easy to understand and l request it to be supplied in a suitable easy reader and user friendly way , in line with guidelines to assist the public's use of information acts and progressively working to a better understanding of the process of making information requests work for the person making the request,

Yours sincerely,

Diana Smith

Petty, Roger, Land Registry

I am out of the office until 16 April 2019. Freedom of information
requests should be sent to [Land Registry request email]. Data Protection to
[1][email address]

 

 

HM Land Registry’s ambition is to become the world’s leading land registry for speed, simplicity and an open approach to data. Our mission is: “Your land and property rights: guaranteed and protected”.

We check all mail and attachments for known viruses. However, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk. If you have received this email and it was not intended for you, please let us know, then delete it.

We welcome correspondence in English and Welsh.

To see how HM Land Registry treats your personal information, read our Personal information charter: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/land....

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Gadawodd Diana Smith anodiad ()

I was written to in September 2008 and provided with a Land Registry Form and advice to attend my local Land Registry Office by the Assistant Registrar( John Edon) from said office. Then for it to be followed up with the advice to telephone on the day , to ensure there would be someone available to attend on me. I met with the person l telephoned on the morning of 26 th September 2008 (Mark Lawson) and pretty much along the same lines of the discrimination shown towards my disabilities and hearing problems previously , l was on this occasion then denied having my assistance dog ( hearing dog) and my carer , to stay with me. I can only state for a matter of record that to my knowledge circumstances surrounding visiting this Land Registry Office , had not changed , nor were there any signs in placing new restrictions that would of made that particular visit any different from my last visit ( arranged through my MP/ Sir Peter Tapsell), and the staff ( receptionist / security) were same people as previously. No consideration was given to creating the stressful situation they put me in. Than an agreement was struck by Mr Lawson, whereby in return for my providing my Title Deeds ( original ) to be copied , the form l had filled in and attended with , was not needed , as rectification of the register would occur and l was apologised to for the errors / mistakes they had made that had at that point caused me NINE YEARS of unbelievable stress and various court actions . The point of reference , that l had already provided knowledge of in a statement requested from me by Land Registry to be lodged in November 2007 ( timeline for lodging of was met by me), was to the identity of the true owner of the bit of land that came to then be known as the "green strip". My Title Deeds enforced that l was correct in my belief to who the owner was. NO ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO CONTACT THIS TRUE OWNER by LAND REGISTRY. I have been prevented from attending for rectification of the register , both previous to the appointment l provided these deeds for copying , and since , when no correction followed. The Equality & Human Rights Commission , directed l exercise my inalienable rights to attend a Land Registry Office to see the file for my title and to seek correction of the register , on the 1 st February 2011 . The CSM ( Claire Holland) summoned Humberside Police on a 999 call to have myself and my helpers ( CAB Generalist & 85 year old friend) that day removed. The copy of The Equality Act 2010 that the EHRC told me to take with , was refused by the Land Registry staff that l tried to hand it to. So on arrival of the two police officers, l showed them and l showed them the e-mail from David Middlemiss ( manager over Ms Holland), dated the 31 st January 2011 ( previous day) , assuring me that he would conduct "a thorough investigation" into how Ms Holland had behaved towards me over the re-presenting of my DPA(SAR) of the 21 st January 2011 , advised by The Information Commissioners Office , to word the same as my DPA(SAR) lodged and accepted to be a validly lodged request under the DPA in March 2009 by Gill Miles ( Land Registry Information Officer). Ms Holland then gathered ELEVEN OTHER LAND REGISTRY STAFF MEMBERS, to join her in the reception area to laugh and gloat at our removal that day. Both of my helpers that day made statements to our treatment and what had occurred and copies were asked for by Humberside Police together with copy of the e-mail of David Middlemiss, that l provided to them. I was eventually after FOUR YEARS, allowed to go to Peterborough Land Registry on the 3 rd June 2011. I was made as a disabled person , to travel a longer distance than would have been involved had l attended by own local Land Registry Office. On arrival and needing to use the toilet, l was kept waiting ten minutes while the key to open the toilet was located and stood guard over by two male Land Registry Staff who then stood outside the toilet with my carer , waiting for me to come out. It was then l found my stolen ( meant to have been destroyed in a fire at solicitor archives) conveyance document and my unpresented personal cheque made out to Land Registry. Not only did Land Registry steal my own conveyance document and breach the DPA ( on record for the 21 st January 2011), they proceeded to then lie to The Information Commissioners Office saying they had not complied with my DPA(SAR ) in March 2009 , because l had not paid the required £10-00p fee. Ms Holland on the 23 rd October 2007 telephoned my conveyance solicitors, the result of was that neither provided the information of the declarations , that the claim to the bit of land was solely based on. The four other on record contesting parties to my neighbours claim to the bit of land , there was also non-disclosure to, by Land Registry to what amounted to the information on which this whole claim was being made. So PERFERANCE , given over the heads of five parties , all of whom had rights, to someone who had no rights , as the land their home stood on , had reverted back to my title as registered land , together with anything that was built on it , in September 1999. I reported and made statement to Lincolnshire Police on the 18 th October 1999 to the serious crime of attack and rape on me, that my acting solicitors ( John Barkers Solicitors) , failed in their duty of care towards me ( in favour of the persons that went on to make this false claim ), that Mablethorpe CAB advised changing solicitors to one that had a 24 hour helpline as my attacker was then stalking me and making violent threats. Ms Holland was also active in the preventing of my statement to Land Registry in October 2007 , made setting out my disabilities and the pressures being placed on my already waiting to have serious structural repairs to my home, that was not in the file passed for my case to become a hearing before The Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 28 th & 29 th May 2009, and that she then published to colleagues and other's , that she "owed God one" for the LIGHTNING STRIKE that had hit my home and split it in two . A communication written by Susmah Acharyia ( Land Registry Solicitor) to Mike Westcott-Rudd ( Land Registry Corporate Lawyer ), warned him that the actions Land Registry were taking against me , could be perceived to breach The Human Rights Act. John Edon in July 2009 wrote addressing his line manager ( Steve Coveney) , stating he "held Land Registry Head Office to be in dereliction of their duty towards Diana Smith " . Now on getting an appointment to meet with the Acting CEO ( Mike Harlow) of Land Registry , together with Anthony Stansfeld PCC for Thames Valley Police , that should of gone ahead yesterday, it was cancelled with no proper explanation , after my carer ( who works full time) , went to a lot of trouble getting the day off in order to take me to the appointment in London. DISABILITY HATE CRIME by Land Registry of me, might be about to turn , as after TWENTY YEARS, my now elected MP's office have offered to write to Lincolnshire Police on my behalf , asking why l have not been able to report and have the serious crime of rape investigated. One of the parties for the orcastrated fraudulent claims to land with my already registered title ( confirmed to be my registered land in writing by a manager at Inland Revenue), was involved with the attack and rape on me and it being covered up in 1999 ,to enable the continuing of the lodging within the CAUTION REGISTER, of an ERROR CAUTION, using a legal aid GREEN PAPER, for someone who changed their name by deed poll to similar to my own name. SO THEFT OF PROPERTY / LAND FROM A VULNERABLE PERSON , TAKES PRESIDENCE , OVER THEIR RIGHTS TO REPORT THE SERIOUS CRIME OF RAPE , AND LAND REGISTRY HAVE CONTINUED FROM THE POINT OF THE RAPE AND MY RETURNING THE FILE OF PAPERWORK FOR THE PERSON PRETENDING TO BE ME , IN EARLY MARCH 2000, TO CONTINUE WITH THEIR CONDONING OF FRAUD , IGNORING FOUR JUDGES , INCLUDING THE HIGH COURT JUDGE ON THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2012. THEY EVEN WHILE ON RECORD FOR BREACHING THE DPA , CONTINUED TO GIVE AWAY FIFTY ACRES OF MY VALUABLE AGRICULTURAL LAND , ON THE 7 TH SEPTEMBER 2011 AND CONVENIENTLY LEFT THE PAPERWORK OUT OF THE FILES SENT TO ME ON THE 28TH SEPTEMBER 2011. THE DECISION OF THE AHMLR HEARING WAS THAT I WAS CORRECT TO THE TRUE OWNER OF THE "GREEN STRIP". THE OWNER THEN CAME FORWARD TWO DAYS AFTER THIS DECISION WAS SENT TO MY ACTING SOLICITOR. HE MADE AND LODGED STATEMENT ON THE 19 TH JULY 2009 AND HAS SINCE BEEN IGNORED , WHILE I HAVE BEEN DISENGAGED WITH. TO QUOTE JT OAKLEY ON THIS VERY WDTK SITE, "LAND REGISTRY HAVE PUT THEIR HANDS OVER THEIR EARS AND JUST KEPT SHOUTING THEY CANNOT HEAR ME". PERHAPS NOW WITH MY MP'S OFFICE WRITING TO LINCOLNSHIRE POLICE AND THIS FURTHER OPEN DISCRIMINATION OF ME WITH THE CANCELLING OF AN AGREED MADE APPOINTMENT, THERE MIGHT BE ONCE AND FOR ALL , SERIOUS CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO THE FACT MY CASE , LIKE THE TWENTY-TWO OTHER CASES , THAT WERE ACTUALLY SHOVED OUT BY THE AHMLR, MAKE FOR AT LEAST TWENTY -THREE CASES IN MARCH-OCTOBER 2009 , THAT WERE TOTALLY UNSUITABLE CASES FOR REFERRAL TO THE AHMLR. YOU WILL NOT FIND RECORD OF THE TWENTY -TWO CASES BEING PASSED TO THE CORRECT INVESTIGATORY BODY , BEING THE PARLIAMENTARY & HEALTH SERVICE OMBUDSMAN, THEY WERE DEALT WITH BY THE INDEPENDENT COMPLAINTS REVIEW AND DID NOT SHOW UP IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF LAND REGISTRY BY THEIR CEO (MARCO PIERLEONI) FOR 2009-2010. THIS ONLY SHOWED THERE TO BE ONE COMPLAINT IN THE PIPELINE FOR INVESTIGATION OF THE PHSO FOR COMPLAINTS LODGED AGAINST LAND REGISTRY FOR THAT WHOLE YEAR. I HAVE TO PRESUME UNLESS IT IS OTHERWISE STATED, THAT I AM THIS ONE COMPLAINT, AS I KNOW MY ELECTED MP LODGED MY COMPLAINT IN MARCH 2009 ON THE CORRECT PAPERWORK FOR SUCH A COMPLAINT,

Dear Land Registry,
you have not replied in line with legal requirements to my information request and contacting you direct at your Land Registry e-mail address also is not replied to . Am l to presume this is additional to the cancelling of my appointment to meet with Mike Harlow on 15 th April 2019 , that has the ramifications of extreme discrimination of me and my rights to lodge information requests ?

Yours faithfully,

Diana Smith

Dear Land Registry,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Land Registry's handling of my FOI request 'Following on from the GDPR Rules'.
There has not been a satisfactory response or providing of understandable clearly written information in line with legislation under validly lodged information Act requests, which are Acts of Parliament.
There could be a perceived basis of bias to be relied upon , if the information Land Registry are failing to provide , then is proved to exist in other files or provable contemptuously recorded data.
By law my FOIA request is now long overdue, although having been chased up via this website and to Land Registry direct e-mail address for Roger Petty.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/f...

Yours faithfully,

Diana Smith

McLellan, Amy, Land Registry

Dear Diana Smith

Thank you for your email of 18 May 2019 requesting an Internal Review of HM Land Registry’s handling of your FOI request 'Following on from the GDPR Rules'.

Your request will be referred to one of our lawyers in the team and will be answered within twenty working days. If it appears that it will take longer than this to reach a conclusion, we will keep you informed.

If you have any queries about this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

With kind regards,

Amy McLellan
Senior Corporate Information Officer

Corporate Legal, Indemnity and Assurance
Castle Wharf House, 2 Canal Street, Nottingham, NG1 7AU
Email [email address]
GOV.UK | @HMLandRegistry| LinkedIn | Facebook
To see how HM Land Registry treats your personal information please click here

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Gadawodd Diana Smith anodiad ()

It would appear that the one constant in all of this , is the fact l had an agreement with Kingston upon Hull Land Registry , that they would rectify the register on the 26 th September 2008 , when l attended their offices at the recorded request of their Assistant Registrar and provided my Title Deeds as the proof to back up statements l had previously been directed to provided in October & November 2007 ( "two of"), that their Mark Lawson gave his word there would be rectification of the register with my title , that would cost me nothing as it had all been down to the "errors / mistakes" of Land Registry. This is run with the decision of The Financial Ombudsman who stated that Land Registry then had no right to refer my case for the judicial involvement of The Adjudicator to HM Land Registry in 2008. Both Evelyn Holt ( Operations Manager at Peterborough Land Registry ) and Denise Dewson of The Independent Complaints Review advised the involvement of The Parliamentary & Health Service Ombudsman and to copy the AHMLR in to ensure the case was stopped from going ahead "as an unsuitable case". Despite the complete calamity of the PHSO instructing me to go ahead with the May 2009 AHMLR hearing and the then colossal "conflict matter" of the Deputy Adjudicator advised of the relation of the case to previous dealings ( meant to have been corrected in March 2000, then June 6 th 2002 & July 1st 2003 and this barrister / deputy adjudicator /commissioner ( Legal Services Commission [ involvement of fake land charges] ). The fact the person responsible for matters of conflict by LSC Staff , also happened to be the live in partner of same deputy adjudicator and it all being done while another twenty -two cases for the time frame ( March -October 2009) , were thrown out by the AHMLR as unsuitable cases for Land Registry to have referred to the AHMLR. Proving no joined up approach between any of the agencies / bodies including Land Registry. All that aside , the nineteen page decision of this deputy adjudicator was done entirely with no readable provided paperwork from either side's barrister's. My name gets mentioned ONCE in this decision and only because of the absolute proof l had provided with the evidence of my Title Deeds on the 26 th September 2008, that this whole original lodged claim was for land l did not in fact own and that he agreed with me over who was the true owner. So why when l put in an Information Act Request to Land Registry for copy of their "Final Responses Log", is my attending KUH Land Registry on the 26 th September 2008 , not in the information provided ? Land Registry are charged with keeping and updating an accurate register , yet in my case it has been allowed to go on from many years and even when the accepted true owner turns out to not have died and comes forward, both the Assistant Registrar and the involved Deputy Adjudicator ignore him, to the point of even ignoring the written directions of the Chief Adjudicator , who has made adjustments for an extension of time to my acting solicitor, and then did not bother to even tell him what they were doing . Proved by the Chief Adjudicator writing to me in October 2009 , chastising me for not bothering to have lodged an appeal because of the existence of the true owner,when he has made these allowances , when l had lodged an appeal on the 23 rd August 2009. I already have the decision of The Information Commissioners Office that Land Registry have breached the Data Protection Act for their failing to comply with my validly lodged DPA(SAR) , and here on WDTK is absolute proof that on two occasions they have failed to provide the details of how the proof of the Title Deeds were lodged and it being the whole pinnacle of a now well recorded miscarriage of justice , as recorded in the decision of a Senior High Court Judge for a hearing before him ( that he himself requested me to do), on the 3rd February 2012.