Discussion between HIE and Highland Council re Skye Airport proposal

The request was successful.

Dear HIE Skye and Wester Ross, Please supply all communication between HIE and Highland Council concerning the conflict of interest inherent in some of the in depth consultees interviewed by Ekosgen being in receipt of HIE funding. I am referring to the report ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS OF PROPOSED AIR SERVICES AT SKYE AIRPORT
March 2016

Yours faithfully,
Tom Stephens

Mail Delivery System,

2 Attachments

  • Attachment

    attachment.delivery status

    0K Download

  • Attachment

    Freedom of Information request Discussion between HIE and Highland Council re Skye Airport proposal.txt

    1K Download View as HTML

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

[HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email]
host cluster8.eu.messagelabs.com [46.226.52.200]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email]>:
550 Invalid recipient <[HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email]> (#5.1.1)

Dear HIE Skye and Wester Ross,
Please send me the email address of the relevant person to whom I should send my FOI.

Yours faithfully,

Tom Stephens

HIE Skye and Wester Ross

2 Attachments

  • Attachment

    attachment.delivery status

    0K Download

  • Attachment

    Re Freedom of Information request Discussion between HIE and Highland Council re Skye Airport proposal.txt

    1K Download View as HTML

Your message to [HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email] couldn't be delivered.
joanna.smart wasn't found at hient.co.uk.
request-569950-31039. . . Office 365 joanna.smart
Action Required Recipient
Unknown To address
How to Fix It
The address may be misspelled or may not exist. Try one or more of the
following:
* Send the message again following these steps: In Outlook, open this
non-delivery report (NDR) and choose Send Again from the Report
ribbon. In Outlook on the web, select this NDR, then select the link
"To send this message again, click here." Then delete and retype the
entire recipient address. If prompted with an Auto-Complete List
suggestion don't select it. After typing the complete address, click
Send.
* Contact the recipient (by phone, for example) to check that the
address exists and is correct.
* The recipient may have set up email forwarding to an incorrect
address. Ask them to check that any forwarding they've set up is
working correctly.
* Clear the recipient Auto-Complete List in Outlook or Outlook on the
web by following the steps in this article: [1]Fix email delivery
issues for error code 5.1.10 in Office 365, and then send the message
again. Retype the entire recipient address before selecting Send.
If the problem continues, forward this message to your email admin. If
you're an email admin, refer to the More Info for Email Admins section
below.
Was this helpful? [2]Send feedback to Microsoft.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More Info for Email Admins
Status code: 550 5.1.10

This error occurs because the sender sent a message to an email address
hosted by Office 365 but the address is incorrect or doesn't exist at the
destination domain. The error is reported by the recipient domain's email
server, but most often it must be fixed by the person who sent the
message. If the steps in the How to Fix It section above don't fix the
problem, and you're the email admin for the recipient, try one or more of
the following:

The email address exists and is correct - Confirm that the recipient
address exists, is correct, and is accepting messages.

Synchronize your directories - If you have a hybrid environment and are
using directory synchronization make sure the recipient's email address is
synced correctly in both Office 365 and in your on-premises directory.

Errant forwarding rule - Check for forwarding rules that aren't behaving
as expected. Forwarding can be set up by an admin via mail flow rules or
mailbox forwarding address settings, or by the recipient via the Inbox
Rules feature.

Recipient has a valid license - Make sure the recipient has an Office 365
license assigned to them. The recipient's email admin can use the Office
365 admin center to assign a license (Users > Active Users > select the
recipient > Assigned License > Edit).

Mail flow settings and MX records are not correct - Misconfigured mail
flow or MX record settings can cause this error. Check your Office 365
mail flow settings to make sure your domain and any mail flow connectors
are set up correctly. Also, work with your domain registrar to make sure
the MX records for your domain are configured correctly.

For more information and additional tips to fix this issue, see [3]Fix
email delivery issues for error code 5.1.10 in Office 365.
Original Message Details
Created Date: 5/22/2019 8:24:36 AM
Sender Address: [FOI #569950 email]
Recipient [HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email]
Address:
Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - Discussion between
HIE and Highland Council re Skye Airport proposal
Error Details
Reported error: 550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient
[HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email] not found by SMTP address
lookup
DSN generated by: LNXP265MB0747.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM

Message Hops
HOP TIME FROM TO WITH RELAY
(UTC) TIME
5/22/2019 local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from
1 8:24:36 foi owl.ukcod.org.uk <[FOI #569950 email]>) *
AM
5/22/2019 esmtps
2 8:24:37 owl.ukcod.org.uk starling.ukcod.org.uk (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) 1 sec
AM (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from
<[FOI #569950 email]>)
5/22/2019 Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
3 8:24:38 mailer102.ukcod.org.uk HE1EUR02FT054.mail.protection.outlook.com cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) 1 sec
AM
5/22/2019 Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
4 8:24:39 HE1EUR02FT054.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com CWLP265CA0163.outlook.office365.com cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) 1 sec
AM
5/22/2019 Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
5 8:24:39 CWLP265CA0163.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM LNXP265MB0747.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) *
AM

Original Message Headers

Received: from CWLP265CA0163.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:52::31)
by LNXP265MB0747.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:18::17) with
Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1900.17; Wed, 22 May
2019 08:24:39 +0000
Received: from HE1EUR02FT054.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com
(2a01:111:f400:7e05::203) by CWLP265CA0163.outlook.office365.com
(2603:10a6:401:52::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1922.15 via Frontend
Transport; Wed, 22 May 2019 08:24:39 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 46.43.39.102)
smtp.mailfrom=whatdotheyknow.com; hient.co.uk; dkim=pass (signature was
verified) header.d=whatdotheyknow.com;hient.co.uk; dmarc=pass action=none
header.from=whatdotheyknow.com;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of whatdotheyknow.com
designates 46.43.39.102 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
client-ip=46.43.39.102; helo=mailer102.ukcod.org.uk;
Received: from mailer102.ukcod.org.uk (46.43.39.102) by
HE1EUR02FT054.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.11.84) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id
15.20.1922.16 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 22 May 2019 08:24:38 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=whatdotheyknow.com; s=2014a.mysociety; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Message-ID:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=j0/gfFcQSQMwlJEP5fPOPQz67EPUpendY2iFty0qpQY=; b=hOk4LxomBUJRWmEmOBwkbYL9J
+V3BLgNaG0CxprmRjEFwhipt8WfPYfkzXyku/somWTbyF+8ra6J/M8LGe2RvSqewk/VFJNYr9AkKI
dhgC/iYMPtFv9Z+HbXEwoe07K9mBIUqaRIeRK1oAv6m1WjnGKTDZMhWzyYS+xOgNUJHyKAVq0V0zc
LLRKK1ZmmR1n3YgRbamroaEDPI6BlX0hL0X5GRDwS7xcjkkr/wF6ZKf/6gRxIe9SlOUYE6tVdBk7Y
aW6MwrhqF8hmSBhox/x1KExnvFS4KJWmpTFCb7oyJxmK0fHESvrqJqQnW/VrHZZH/6YS1a0gurE3Z
xtU4Q5sEw==;
Received: from owl.ukcod.org.uk ([46.43.39.108]:45233)
by starling.ukcod.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <[FOI #569950 email]>)
id 1hTMY9-0004TB-1G
for [HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email]; Wed, 22 May 2019 09:24:37 +0100
Received: from foi by owl.ukcod.org.uk with local (Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <[FOI #569950 email]>)
id 1hTMY8-0003Tn-UE
for [HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email]; Wed, 22 May 2019 09:24:36 +0100
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 09:24:36 +0100
From: Tom Stephens <[FOI #569950 email]>
To: FOI requests at HIE Skye and Wester Ross <[HIE Skye and Wester Ross request email]>
Message-ID: <[email address]>
Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - Discussion between HIE and
Highland Council re Skye Airport proposal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: [FOI #569950 email]
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 42cd146c-1e20-4d8b-8df0-e184bb9a0994:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:46.43.39.102;IPV:NLI;CTRY:GB;EFV:NLI;
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 7f5979f8-6b3c-4164-818d-08d6de8eee6d
X-Microsoft-Antispam:
BCL:3;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(4709054)(1401320)(8001031)(1421009)(1402095)(71702078);SRVR:LNXP265MB0747;
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: LNXP265MB0747:
X-MS-Exchange-PUrlCount: 2

References

Visible links
1. https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=...
2. https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=...
3. https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=...

Sent request to HIE Skye and Wester Ross again, using a new contact address.

Craig Lawrence, HIE Skye and Wester Ross

Dear Mr Stephens,

Thank you for your email below received on the 17th June 201922nd April 2019 which will now be processed in accordance with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002. We will aim to respond as quickly as possible but in any event within 20 working days from the date the enquiry was received this is subject to any clarification which may be requested by HIE.

Should you have any queries in the meantime, please do not hesitate to get in touch at [email address]

Kind regards.
HIE Customer Service

show quoted sections

Craig Lawrence, HIE Skye and Wester Ross

Dear Mr Stephens,

Thank you for your Freedom of Information request received originally on the 17th June 2019,

Your request was for the following information;

'Please supply all communication between HIE and Highland Council concerning the conflict of interest inherent in some of the in depth consultees interviewed by Ekosgen being in receipt of HIE funding. I am referring to the report ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS OF PROPOSED AIR SERVICES AT SKYE AIRPORT March 2016'.

As per Section 17 of FOISA I can confirm that Highlands and Islands Enterprise does not hold any information relevant to the above request.

I trust the above information will be of assistance to you. Under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 you will have the right to request a review of the way in which this request has been processed. Should you wish to exercise this right, you will need to contact us within 40 working days of receipt of this e-mail. If you remain dissatisfied on completion of the review, you have the right to appeal to the Office of the Scottish Information Commissioner - www.itspublicknowledge.info.

Kind regards,

HIE Customer Service

show quoted sections