COVID-19 Test kits purchases in 2017/18

Bartholomeus Lakeman (Ataliwyd y cyfrif) made this Rhyddid Gwybodaeth request to Cabinet Office

Automatic anti-spam measures are in place for this older request. Please let us know if a further response is expected or if you are having trouble responding.

Mae'r ymateb i'r cais hwn yn hwyr iawn. Yn ôl y gyfraith, ym mhob amgylchiad, dylai Cabinet Office fod wedi ymateb erbyn hyn. (manylion). Gallwch gwyno drwy yn gofyn am adolygiad mewnol.

Bartholomeus Lakeman (Ataliwyd y cyfrif)

Dear Cabinet Office,

Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) show that in 2017 and 2018 the UK bought COVID-19 Test kits with the code 300215 and 902780 as Medical Diagnostic Test instruments, e.g. “COVID-19 Test kits (300215) exports by country in 2017. Additional Product information - Diagnostic reagents based on immunological reactions – Category: COVID-19 Test kits/ Instruments, apparatus used in Diagnostic Testing” -
• “In 2017, Top importers of COVID-19 Test kits are European Union ($17,131,541.68K , 2,759,970 Kg), Germany ($8,731,545.89K , 3,015,010 Kg), United States ($7,927,894.38K , 2,627,050 Kg), United Kingdom ($6,291,366.96K , 1,062,590 Kg)”
• The in 2018 sold Medical Test kits/ Instruments, apparatus used in Diagnostic Testing are now classified by the World Customs Organization as critical to tackling COVID-19: under HS Code 902780: HS Classification Reference based on Covid-19 medical supplies list 2nd edition, prepared by World Customs Organization (WCO) and WHO. Reporter Trade Flow Product Code Product Description -Trade Value 1000USD Quantity Unit-
United Kingdom Export 902780 Medical Diagnostic Test instruments and apparatus 453,206.36

Please will you provide of above mention purchases; the records, including:
1. The names of those involved in said purchase of test kits (code 300215 and 902780);
2. The number of said tests in quantity, with the value of said tests in GBP (£);
3. Whether these test kits have been used, and the validity of said tests;
4. Its relationship to the current used PCR tests;
5. Whether said purchase is related to CEPI, WHO, WB, the IHR (2005) and/or the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board;
6. How the purchases of said Covid-19 test kits in 2017/18 do not breach the Fraud Act 2006.

Yours faithfully,
Bartholomeus Lakeman

Cabinet Office FOI Team,

Our ref:FOI2020/15044

Dear BARTHOLOMEUS LAKEMAN,

Thank you for your request for information which was received on
22/10/2020. Your request is being handled under the terms of the Freedom
of Information Act 2000 ('the Act').

The Act requires that a response must be given promptly, and in any event
within 20 working days. We will therefore aim to reply at the latest by
19/11/2020.

Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future
communications.

Yours sincerely,

FOI Team

Gadawodd J Grove anodiad ()

It will be interesting to know whether these "test kits" are the sampling materials (e.g. swabs), the serum antibody test kits or the test kits for the real time reverse transcriptase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test that does not use a purified virus as the reference standard but rather a synthetic RNA sequence (e.g. N Gene; Genbank accession: MN908947.2 as described in The Centre for Disease Control reports).

FOI Team Mailbox, Cabinet Office

1 Atodiad

Please find attached the reply to your FOI request

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

FOI Team

Room 405

70 Whitehall,

London, SW1A 2AS

E-mail -[1][Cabinet Office request email] 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Bartholomeus Lakeman (Ataliwyd y cyfrif)

Dear FOI Team Mailbox,
It is not creditable that the UK Govt and its Cabinet has no record of these purchases: Whereas:
*The WITS recorded that is it was the UK Govt. who bought the test kits in 2017/18. Be it that it was Matt Hancock (prior part of DHSC) who since these years prepared Covid19; as via his meetings with Bill Gates at Davos. One has to assume that he did record his negotiations and purchases to the Govt.
*The ‘European Ted’ record that it is the UK Govt. who for the MHRA will pay for the Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction.
*The £75 million purchase of antibody tests from Abingdon Health; the Govt suppressed an official report that proved there were issues with rapid antibody tests purchased by DHSC; and the Govt is still refusing to fully disclose this info to the public.

I will put the same Question of FOI 202015044 to DHSC: Yet is is likely they too will eschew in one way or another their accountability.

Yours sincerely,
Bartholomeus Lakeman

Gadawodd J Grove anodiad ()

Perhaps one of the members of parliament who participate in the ‘China Research Group' could assist in the understanding of this purchase.
The ‘China Research Group' comprises Tom Tugendhat MP, Neil O’Brien MP, Dehenna Davison MP, Anthony Browne MP, Laura Trott MP, Kevin Hollinrake MP, Alicia Kearns MP, Andrew Bowie MP and Damian Green MP.
The mainstream media news today has Tom Tugendhat MP speculating that people will not be allowed back into offices and pubs until they are vaccinated.
There can now be no doubt that the UK’s leadership are part of the process to vaccinate the entire population (as desired by Gates and Fauci) against a “disease” with an average age of death around the mean age of death pre-COVID and that this has been in the planning stages for many years.

Bartholomeus Lakeman (Ataliwyd y cyfrif)

Dear Cabinet Office,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Cabinet Office's handling of my FOI request 'COVID-19 Test kits purchases in 2017/18'.
Pursuing my email and request for an internal review of 14 Nov- 2020 (left unanswered). That it is not creditable that the UK Govt and its Cabinet members have no record of purchasing the Covid-19 test kits in 2017/18: Whereas said purchase fits in with the following data:
The World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) data show that WHO members states (including the UK) ordered in 2018 Covid-19 Test kits named “Diagnostic reagents based on immunological reactions” with the HS code 300215 and 902780.
In 2018, Zhengli Shi and co published to have generated a chimeric CoVs virus; attaching a sequence coding for a spike protein that attaches to human ACE2 receptors.
On 24/01/19, after a WHO meeting at Davos, as part of pandemic preparation the USA introduced its Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act HR 748) (a version of UK Corona Act 2020).
On 24/01/20, in a meeting at Davos the WHO told its member states to buy the RT-PCR tests to confirm a Covid-19 case (which was prior the SARS CoV-2 virus scientific test data was reviewed).
In Feb. 2020, Shi Zhengli and colleagues published a paper with SARS CoV-2 virus’s partial genome, and so did Bruno Coutard and co, who mentioned its novel supercharged site CGGCGG and he commented that this “may provide a gain-of-function” capability to the virus, “for efficient spreading” to humans.
Late July 2020, Zhengli Shi, the leading CoV researcher from WIV (Wuhan), in an email interview asserted the renaming of the RaTG13 (Covid-19 virus) sample and declared that the full sequencing of RaTG13 has been carried out as far back as in 2018 and not after the SARS‐CoV‐2 outbreak. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article...
On 03/03/20, the WHO director-general Tedros A. Ghebreyesus tweeted "Globally, about 3.4% [CFR] of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% [IFR] of those infected" [however, in general the CFR is about 10 to 20 x higher than its IFR].
On 11/03/2020 when there were, outside China, 83 Covid-19 cases; the WHO declared its pandemic. On 19/03/20, when there were, outside China, on a population of 6,4 billion 44,000 cases (IFR of 0.0000007) WHO member states authorised their versions of the Corona Act and they provided to those who might cause (and benefit from) the injuries under this Act; a harmless clausal.
In March/April 2020 the UK Govt told to the public that there will be a will be a new normal.

Yet, if the Govt had not endorsed with said PCR tests its tale that asymptomatic people transmit the virus: then peoples’ collective belief that Covid-19 is such a threat that anyone should (under the Corona Act) sacrifice his/her basic rights; peoples’ collective acceptance of the Covid-19 threat implies to accept its vaccination: these would not have occurred.
Peoples’ collective obedience’s to accept their collective injury (due to the Corona Act) and the Covid19 vaccines: was only possible if these were well prepared. The WHO member states and the UK started this preparedness plan years prior the official SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Wuhan; even prior 2018.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c...

Yours faithfully,
Bartholomeus Lakeman

FOI Team Mailbox, Cabinet Office

Dear Bartholomeus Lakeman,
Thank you for your email.
We did not consider your 14 November 2020 email to be a request for an
internal review as you stated that you were intending to follow our advice
and contact DHSC and no further action appeared to be requested. 
We shall however log this as a request for an internal review and you will
receive an email shortly confirming the case reference number.
Kind regards,

FOI Team
Cabinet Office

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Cabinet Office FOI Team,

Dear Bartholomeus Lakeman,

Thank you for your request for an internal review (reference
IR2021/12760), which was prompted by our response to your request for
information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

We shall endeavour to complete the internal review and respond to you
within 20 working days.

Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future
communications.

Yours sincerely,

FOI Team

Bartholomeus Lakeman (Ataliwyd y cyfrif)

Dear Cabinet Office,
The development and purchase of these Covid test kits in 2018 is in line with that 'the SARS Cov-2 icon' (a mace with spikes and suction pads) was showed in 2018 by Dr Charles Morgan, an expert on neurobiology, in his talk to the army cadets at West Point Academy about the ability to edit DNA for the purpose of mind control. In that talk, he referred to a paper published in Nature in 2015 entitled “The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons” in which Dr Zheng-li Shi explains how she altered the spike protein of a bat coronavirus to infect human cells: She described the virus as “a new era of genetic weapons which can be artificially manipulated into an emerging human disease virus, then weaponised and unleashed in a way never seen before.”

The development and purchase of these test kits is contrary to any regulator’s guidance document.
Currently there are no published data that document the PCR/Antibody test being reliable parameters for the 'novel Coronavirus' 'SARS-CoV-2'.
There is no gold standard for COVID-19 since this specific virus has never been properly purified and visualized. Thus, there is no prima facie.
As the accuracies of the tests are unknown, so is the number of Covid cases and deaths unknown, and so there is no Prima facie for the Corona Act 2020 and its injurious Lockdown restrictions.

Having purchased said Covid test kits in 2018 is denied to eschew accountability to having implemented said Act and its injurious restrictions without its claimed prima facie; but to support ‘the unleash of a new era of genetic weapons’.

Yours faithfully,
Bartholomeus Lakeman

Bartholomeus Lakeman (Ataliwyd y cyfrif)

Dear Cabinet Office,

SARS coronavirus is a new topic for many individuals. However, since 1999, the ability to manipulate and exploit coronavirus for a variety of purposes has attracted the attention of individuals, institutions and commercial organizations in public, private, and not-for-profit sectors. There is a list of over 5,100 patents and patent applications filed for the express purpose of controlling some aspect of the SARS coronavirus.
Some patent applications for the Covid19 vaccine were made prior the ‘Covid-19’ outbreak. E.g.,
Moderna’s mRNA-1273 U.S. Patent 10,702,600 is relating to, “a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) comprising an open reading frame encoding a betacoronavirus (BetaCoV) S protein or S protein subunit formulated in a lipid nanoparticle.” The specific claims addressing the pivot to the SARS Coronavirus were patented (16368270) on March 28, 2019 – 9 months before the SARS CoV-2 outbreak.

The CDC reported the first case of SARS-CoV like illness in the United States in January 2020 with the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service reporting 650 clinical cases and 210 tests. Given that the suspected pathogen was first implicated in official reports on December 31, 2019, one can only conclude that CDC: a) had the mechanism and wherewithal to conduct tests to confirm the existence of a “novel coronavirus”; or, b) did not have said mechanism and falsely reported the information in January. It tests credulity to suggest that the WHO or the CDC could manufacture and distribute tests for a “novel” pathogen; as Covid19 (RT-PCR) test kits were already purchased. And the same implies to the UK.
Which reasons to have this FOI to be answered.

Yours faithfully,
Bartholomeus Lakeman