Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review

Roedd y cais yn llwyddiannus.

Dear North Yorkshire County Council,

Please disclose the following information by way of the Freedom of Information Act:

Between the dates 2nd January, 2015 and 23rd December, 2015 all emails, letter correspondence between:

1. Director of Children Safeguarding, Pete Dwyer, and any officer employed, or retained, by
a. Leeds City Council.
b. West Yorkshire Police.
c. Leeds Safeguarding Children Board.

2. Pete Dwyer and:
a. Headmaster of Corpus Christi School, Leeds.
b. Any other person engaged with Corpus Christi School, Leeds.

3. Pete Dwyer and Nick Page of Solihull Borough Council.

Any documents attached to the emails and/or letters should also be disclosed.

Yours faithfully,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: neilwilby.com

North Yorkshire County Council

Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC). We confirm
that we have received your correspondence.
 
If you have submitted a new Freedom of Information (FOI) or Environmental
Information Regulations (EIR) request to NYCC - we will contact you as
soon as possible if we need any more information from you to respond to
your request. If we do not need any more information we will pass your
request onto the appropriate officer to respond. A response will be sent
to you as soon as possible, and within 20 working days as required by the
relevant legislation.
 
If you have requested an internal review of an FOI or EIR response sent to
you by NYCC or otherwise expressed dissatisfaction about an FOI or EIR
response – we will respond to you as soon as possible and within 20
working days, in accordance with best practice guidance.
 
If you have raised a data protection concern about the way in which NYCC
has handled your personal information – we will respond to you as soon as
possible and within 20 working days, in accordance with legal
requirements/best practice guidance.
 
If you have asked to be removed from a mailing list – we will forward your
request onto the relevant department for action.
 
If your correspondence relates to an existing case - we will forward it to
the relevant officer for consideration and action as required.
 
Copied correspondence - we do not respond to correspondence that has been
copied to us.
 
For any other enquiry – NYCC will contact you shortly.
 
If your enquiry is urgent and you request an immediate response please
call the information governance team on 01609 532526.
 
Yours faithfully
 
The information governance team

Dear North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC),

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of NYCC's handling of this FOI request 'Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review'.

The grounds for complaint are:

1. Section 10 of the Act requires a response to an information request PROMPLY and, in any event within 20 working days.

2. Section 17 of the Act requires a refusal notice to be served within 20 working days if a public authority seeks to rely on any exemption in order not to disclose the requested information.

3. NYCC is plainly in breach of both s10 and s17 and are invited to remedy the matters, as a matter of urgency.

4. It is noted that other information requests to NYCC that were made on the same day as the instant request, or later, were dealt with some time ago. A reasonable inference being that this requester - well known to Barry Khan, NYCC Assistant Chief Executive - is being discriminated against.

5. The instant request is tightly drawn and would require comparatively little effort to facilitate disclosure.

6. As part of the internal review it is requested that NYCC disclose to the wider world all internal and external email and/or letter correspondence relating to the fulfilment of this request. Up to, and including, the date of the disposal of the internal review. This should NOT be viewed as an opportunity to delay the disclosure requested initially.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/m...

Yours faithfully,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: neilwilby.com

North Yorkshire County Council

Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC). We confirm
that we have received your correspondence.
 
If you have submitted a new Freedom of Information (FOI) or Environmental
Information Regulations (EIR) request to NYCC - we will contact you as
soon as possible if we need any more information from you to respond to
your request. If we do not need any more information we will pass your
request onto the appropriate officer to respond. A response will be sent
to you as soon as possible, and within 20 working days as required by the
relevant legislation.
 
If you have requested an internal review of an FOI or EIR response sent to
you by NYCC or otherwise expressed dissatisfaction about an FOI or EIR
response – we will respond to you as soon as possible and within 20
working days, in accordance with best practice guidance.
 
If you have raised a data protection concern about the way in which NYCC
has handled your personal information – we will respond to you as soon as
possible and within 20 working days, in accordance with legal
requirements/best practice guidance.
 
If you have asked to be removed from a mailing list – we will forward your
request onto the relevant department for action.
 
If your correspondence relates to an existing case - we will forward it to
the relevant officer for consideration and action as required.
 
Copied correspondence - we do not respond to correspondence that has been
copied to us.
 
For any other enquiry – NYCC will contact you shortly.
 
If your enquiry is urgent and you request an immediate response please
call the information governance team on 01609 532526.
 
Yours faithfully
 
The information governance team

Infogov - Veritau, North Yorkshire County Council

Dear Mr Wilby,

Thank you for your email - I am sorry that you have not yet received a response to your Freedom of Information request (N4360) which was received by the Council on 05 September 2018.

The Council accepts that it should have responded to your request within 20 working days and it apologises that in this case it has not managed to do so. Please be assured that we are working on your request and hope to send you a response as soon as possible.

Whilst I do not wish to make excuses for the delay in responding to your request I would like to reiterate that the information you have requested relates to a very sensitive issue and the Council must consider all parties involved before disclosing any information through the FOI route. Please accept my assurance that the Council is not deliberately trying to avoid its FOI responsibilities. Nonetheless, I accept that the Council should have informed you that there would likely be a delay in responding to your request.

Please be aware that an Internal Review can not be conducted until a full response has been provided to you. As the Council has not yet responded to your FOI request, nor does it intend to issue a refusal notice, then I have not answered your specific queries.

With Regards,

Mr Matt North
Senior Information Governance Officer

________________________________________
From: Neil Wilby [[FOI #517986 email]]
Sent: 03 October 2018 17:42
To: Infogov - Veritau
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review

Dear North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC),

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of NYCC's handling of this FOI request 'Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review'.

The grounds for complaint are:

1. Section 10 of the Act requires a response to an information request PROMPLY and, in any event within 20 working days.

2. Section 17 of the Act requires a refusal notice to be served within 20 working days if a public authority seeks to rely on any exemption in order not to disclose the requested information.

3. NYCC is plainly in breach of both s10 and s17 and are invited to remedy the matters, as a matter of urgency.

4. It is noted that other information requests to NYCC that were made on the same day as the instant request, or later, were dealt with some time ago. A reasonable inference being that this requester - well known to Barry Khan, NYCC Assistant Chief Executive - is being discriminated against.

5. The instant request is tightly drawn and would require comparatively little effort to facilitate disclosure.

6. As part of the internal review it is requested that NYCC disclose to the wider world all internal and external email and/or letter correspondence relating to the fulfilment of this request. Up to, and including, the date of the disposal of the internal review. This should NOT be viewed as an opportunity to delay the disclosure requested initially.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2863&a...

Yours faithfully,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2863&am...

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #517986 email]

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2863&a...

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the latest advice from the ICO:
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2863&a...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Dear Infogov - Veritau,

Receipt of your communication dated 9th October, 2018 is acknowledged.

Your point concerning the internal review, and its future finalisation, is readily taken.

What I am troubled with, however, is the delay and the unsatisfactory explanation provided, so far.

May I, therefore, please have a date upon which you estimate you will be in a position to finalise the request?

Yours sincerely,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: neilwilby.com

North Yorkshire County Council

Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC). We confirm
that we have received your correspondence.
 
If you have submitted a new Freedom of Information (FOI) or Environmental
Information Regulations (EIR) request to NYCC - we will contact you as
soon as possible if we need any more information from you to respond to
your request. If we do not need any more information we will pass your
request onto the appropriate officer to respond. A response will be sent
to you as soon as possible, and within 20 working days as required by the
relevant legislation.
 
If you have requested an internal review of an FOI or EIR response sent to
you by NYCC or otherwise expressed dissatisfaction about an FOI or EIR
response – we will respond to you as soon as possible and within 20
working days, in accordance with best practice guidance.
 
If you have raised a data protection concern about the way in which NYCC
has handled your personal information – we will respond to you as soon as
possible and within 20 working days, in accordance with legal
requirements/best practice guidance.
 
If you have asked to be removed from a mailing list – we will forward your
request onto the relevant department for action.
 
If your correspondence relates to an existing case - we will forward it to
the relevant officer for consideration and action as required.
 
Copied correspondence - we do not respond to correspondence that has been
copied to us.
 
For any other enquiry – NYCC will contact you shortly.
 
If your enquiry is urgent and you request an immediate response please
call the information governance team on 01609 532526.
 
Yours faithfully
 
The information governance team

Infogov - Veritau, North Yorkshire County Council

Dear Mr Wilby,

Thank you for your email -

I hope to have a full response sent to you before Tuesday 16 October. If I am able to send a response to you prior to this then I shall do so.

With Kind Regards,

Mr Matt North
Senior Information Governance Officer

________________________________________
From: Neil Wilby [[FOI #517986 email]]
Sent: 10 October 2018 17:31
To: Infogov - Veritau
Subject: RE: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review

Dear Infogov - Veritau,

Receipt of your communication dated 9th October, 2018 is acknowledged.

Your point concerning the internal review, and its future finalisation, is readily taken.

What I am troubled with, however, is the delay and the unsatisfactory explanation provided, so far.

May I, therefore, please have a date upon which you estimate you will be in a position to finalise the request?

Yours sincerely,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2863&am...

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Infogov - Veritau, North Yorkshire County Council

2 Atodiad

Dear Mr Wilby,

Thank you for your Freedom of Information (FOI) request, dated 05 September 2018, regarding correspondence between Pete Dwyer, former Corporate Director of the Children’s and Young People’s Service at North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC), and a number of other recipients.

Once again, I express the Council’s apologies that this response has been sent to you with delay. I hope this has not caused too much inconvenience.

In relation to Part One of your request I can confirm that Mr Dwyer had correspondence with officers in Leeds City Council and officers in the Leeds Safeguarding Board. I have attached this correspondence to this response. According to its records the Council does not believe Mr Dwyer had any correspondence with West Yorkshire Police in the time period 02.01.15 – 23.12.15.

Please be aware that some information contained within the correspondence is considered to be exempt under from disclosure and has been redacted accordingly.

Some information within the correspondence is exempt from disclosure as that information is considered to be about court proceedings and is therefore exempt under Section 32(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Information withheld under this exemption can be identified by the ‘aqua’ coloured redactions.

Some information within the correspondence is exempt from disclosure as that information is considered to be Personal Information and is therefore exempt under Section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (amended by Schedule 19(58) of the Data Protection Act 2018). Section 40 (2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 exempts personal information from disclosure if disclosure would breach one or more data protection principles specified by Section 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In this case we consider that disclosure would breach the first principle, namely that personal information must be processed lawfully, fairly, and in a transparent manner in relation to the Data Subject. In this case we consider that the disclosure would be unfair and none of the conditions for processing, listed in Articles 6 and 9 of the GDPR, would be met. Information withheld under this exemption can be identified by the ‘black’ coloured redactions.

Some information within the correspondence is exempt from disclosure as that information is considered to be covered by legal professional privilege and is therefore exempt under Section 42 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Specifically the Council believes the withheld information to be ‘advice’ privilege whereby no litigation has been proposed or contemplated but that a legal adviser has provided officers with legal advice. This exemption is a ‘qualified’ exemption which means that it is subject to the public interest test. The Council can understand that there is great public interest in ensuring that Public Authorities are accountable and sufficiently transparent to ensure that members of the public can scrutinise decisions taken by Public Authorities. The Council accepts that on some occasions placing an obligation on authorities and officials to provide reasoned explanations for decisions made will improve the quality of decisions and administration. However, the Council also recognises that there is a Public Interest in ensuring that officers receive forthright and good quality legal advice so that officers are able to make informed and good quality decisions. This is a fundamental principle of the administration of justice and the public interest in breaking this privilege would have to be exceptional. In this case the Council does not believe the Public Interest in disclosing this information is exceptional and as such maintains this exemption. Information withheld under this exemption can be identified by the ‘red’ coloured redactions.

In relation to Part Two of your request, according to its records the Council does not believe Mr Dwyer had any correspondence with any member of staff (including the head teacher) at Corpus Christi School (Leeds) or Nick Page at Solihull Borough Council.

I have attached the Council’s Information Governance appeals procedure should you not be satisfied with my response,

With Kind Regards,


Mr Matt North
Senior Information Governance Officer

For more information about how North Yorkshire County Council processes your personal data you may wish to read our Privacy Notice on our website: www.northyorks.gov.uk/privacy

________________________________________

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Dear Infogov - Veritau,

The internal review is now overdue for finalisation.

Unless it is received by Friday 9th November, 2018 the matter will be referred to the Information Commissioner's Office without any further erference to NYCC.

Yours sincerely,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: neilwilby.com

North Yorkshire County Council

Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC). We confirm
that we have received your correspondence.
 
If you have submitted a new Freedom of Information (FOI) or Environmental
Information Regulations (EIR) request to NYCC - we will contact you as
soon as possible if we need any more information from you to respond to
your request. If we do not need any more information we will pass your
request onto the appropriate officer to respond. A response will be sent
to you as soon as possible, and within 20 working days as required by the
relevant legislation.
 
If you have requested an internal review of an FOI or EIR response sent to
you by NYCC or otherwise expressed dissatisfaction about an FOI or EIR
response – we will respond to you as soon as possible and within 20
working days, in accordance with best practice guidance.
 
If you have raised a data protection concern about the way in which NYCC
has handled your personal information – we will respond to you as soon as
possible and within 20 working days, in accordance with legal
requirements/best practice guidance.
 
If you have asked to be removed from a mailing list – we will forward your
request onto the relevant department for action.
 
If your correspondence relates to an existing case - we will forward it to
the relevant officer for consideration and action as required.
 
Copied correspondence - we do not respond to correspondence that has been
copied to us.
 
For any other enquiry – NYCC will contact you shortly.
 
If your enquiry is urgent and you request an immediate response please
call the information governance team on 01609 532526.
 
Yours faithfully
 
The information governance team

Infogov - Veritau, North Yorkshire County Council

Dear Mr Wilby,

Thank you for your email.

PLease

________________________________________
From: Neil Wilby [[FOI #517986 email]]
Sent: 04 November 2018 22:18
To: Infogov - Veritau
Subject: RE: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review

Dear Infogov - Veritau,

The internal review is now overdue for finalisation.

Unless it is received by Friday 9th November, 2018 the matter will be referred to the Information Commissioner's Office without any further erference to NYCC.

Yours sincerely,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2863&am...

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Infogov - Veritau, North Yorkshire County Council

Dear Mr Wilby,

Thank you for your email.

Please can you clarify which Internal Review you are anticipating?

In my email to you on 09 October I stated:

'Please be aware that an Internal Review can not be conducted until a full response has been provided to you. As the Council has not yet responded to your FOI request, nor does it intend to issue a refusal notice, then I have not answered your specific queries.'

The Council has since responded to your FOI request with an apology for the delay in processing your request. According to our records you have not submitted a request for an internal review since the information was disclosed to you.

If you would like the Council to conduct an internal review of FOI Request N4360 then please let me know. Please state exactly what you would like the Council to review (i.e if you believe information is missing or if an exemption has been incorrectly applied). Upon receipt of your request for an internal review then this shall be assigned to an officer independent of your original request.

With Regards,

Mr Matt North
Senior Information Governance Officer

________________________________________
From: Neil Wilby [[FOI #517986 email]]
Sent: 04 November 2018 22:18
To: Infogov - Veritau
Subject: RE: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review

Dear Infogov - Veritau,

The internal review is now overdue for finalisation.

Unless it is received by Friday 9th November, 2018 the matter will be referred to the Information Commissioner's Office without any further erference to NYCC.

Yours sincerely,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2863&am...

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Dear Infogov - Veritau,

Mainly for the benefit of readers and fellow users of the What Do They Know website, I reproduce below the internal review request sent to NYCC on 3rd October, 2018.

" From: Neil Wilby [[FOI #517986 email]]
Sent: 03 October 2018 17:42
To: Infogov - Veritau
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review

Dear North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC),

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of NYCC's handling of this FOI request 'Contact between Director of Children Safeguarding and other agencies concerning Learning Lessons Review'.

The grounds for complaint are:

1. Section 10 of the Act requires a response to an information request PROMPLY and, in any event within 20 working days.

2. Section 17 of the Act requires a refusal notice to be served within 20 working days if a public authority seeks to rely on any exemption in order not to disclose the requested information.

3. NYCC is plainly in breach of both s10 and s17 and are invited to remedy the matters, as a matter of urgency.

4. It is noted that other information requests to NYCC that were made on the same day as the instant request, or later, were dealt with some time ago. A reasonable inference being that this requester - well known to Barry Khan, NYCC Assistant Chief Executive - is being discriminated against.

5. The instant request is tightly drawn and would require comparatively little effort to facilitate disclosure.

6. As part of the internal review it is requested that NYCC disclose to the wider world all internal and external email and/or letter correspondence relating to the fulfilment of this request. Up to, and including, the date of the disposal of the internal review. This should NOT be viewed as an opportunity to delay the disclosure requested initially."

Under section 45 of the Act, and in line with Guidance from the Information Commissioner's Office, responsible public authorities - although, in the instant circumstances, I'm not sure that description could safely be ascribed to North Yorkshire County Council - are encouraged to deal with internal review requests in an appropriate, and timely, manner. Belatedly finalising an information request, after an internal review complaint has been submitted, does not alleviate that burden.

Your particular attention is drawn to paras 4, 5 and 6 of the internal review request and by way of explanation and/or clarification I make these further points in order to assist NYCC in finalising the internal review satisfactorily.

Para 4: An allegation of discrimination has been made. The facts support it. I name a particular officer. It needs addressing by either an admission, or a rebuttal. In the case of the latter it requires cogent reasons to be attached to the rebuttal.

Para 5: Despite indications to the contrary by NYCC, the disclosure was very limited indeed. In this light, the internal reviewer, taking a fresh look at the request, is invited to explore the proposition that there may yet be more materials to disclose. S/he might also provide an explanation as to why the finalisation of the request took so long.

Para 6: Could not be made more clear. But for emphasis these, materials should have been disclosed PROMPTLY but, in any event, on, or before, 31st October, 2018.

As stated earlier today, if the internal review request is not finalised on, or before, Friday 9th November, 2018, the matter will be referred to the ICO for determination. I will not enter into any further correspondence with NYCC on the matter.

Yours sincerely,

Neil Wilby
Investigative journalist

Twitter: @Neil_Wilby
Web: neilwilby.com

North Yorkshire County Council

Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC). We confirm
that we have received your correspondence.
 
If you have submitted a new Freedom of Information (FOI) or Environmental
Information Regulations (EIR) request to NYCC - we will contact you as
soon as possible if we need any more information from you to respond to
your request. If we do not need any more information we will pass your
request onto the appropriate officer to respond. A response will be sent
to you as soon as possible, and within 20 working days as required by the
relevant legislation.
 
If you have requested an internal review of an FOI or EIR response sent to
you by NYCC or otherwise expressed dissatisfaction about an FOI or EIR
response – we will respond to you as soon as possible and within 20
working days, in accordance with best practice guidance.
 
If you have raised a data protection concern about the way in which NYCC
has handled your personal information – we will respond to you as soon as
possible and within 20 working days, in accordance with legal
requirements/best practice guidance.
 
If you have asked to be removed from a mailing list – we will forward your
request onto the relevant department for action.
 
If your correspondence relates to an existing case - we will forward it to
the relevant officer for consideration and action as required.
 
Copied correspondence - we do not respond to correspondence that has been
copied to us.
 
For any other enquiry – NYCC will contact you shortly.
 
If your enquiry is urgent and you request an immediate response please
call the information governance team on 01609 532526.
 
Yours faithfully
 
The information governance team

Infogov - Veritau, North Yorkshire County Council

2 Atodiad

Dear Mr Wilby

 

I have been asked to review the council’s reply to your information
request reference N4360, about correspondence between its former Director
of Children’s Services and certain other parties. On 3 October 2018 you
asked a series of questions which I have addressed below. As background,
your request was made on 5 September 2018, meaning that a reply was due by
3 October. The reply was eventually made on 16 October, with some
information withheld under certain exemptions.

 

On 3 October you made the following points:

 

1. Section 10 of the Act requires a response to an information request
PROMPLY [sic] and, in any event within 20 working days.

 

2. Section 17 of the Act requires a refusal notice to be served within 20
working days if a public authority seeks to rely on any exemption in order
not to disclose the requested information.

 

3. NYCC is plainly in breach of both s10 and s17 and are invited to remedy
the matters, as a matter of urgency.

 

You are quite correct that the council should have replied in full by 3
October. It has now done so. May I repeat the apology offered by Mr North
for the delay.

 

4. It is noted that other information requests to NYCC that were made on
the same day as the instant request, or later, were dealt with some time
ago. A reasonable inference being that this requester - well known to
Barry Khan, NYCC Assistant Chief Executive - is being discriminated
against.

 

There is a very a wide range of times taken for the completion of
requests, and it is entirely reasonable that some requests may take longer
than others, sometimes even more than twenty days.  

 

5. The instant request is tightly drawn and would require comparatively
little effort to facilitate disclosure.

 

The request did in fact require considerable officer time. A badly framed
request may cause time to be wasted, but another one will not necessarily
be quick or easy just because it is tightly drawn.

 

6. As part of the internal review it is requested that NYCC disclose to
the wider world all internal and external email and/or letter
correspondence relating to the fulfilment of this request. Up to, and
including, the date of the disposal of the internal review. This should
NOT be viewed as an opportunity to delay the disclosure requested
initially.

 

This amounts to a new request. The FoI Act requires disclosure only of
information held at the time of the request, ie on 3 October 2018, but I
have included additional later items, as you ask, to avoid the need for
further correspondence. I have redacted personal data, including your own,
under Section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act.

 

The Freedom of Information Act 2000 exempts personal information from
disclosure if disclosure would breach one or more data protection
principles specified by Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR). In this case we consider that disclosure would breach
the first principle, namely that personal information must be processed
lawfully, fairly, and in a transparent manner in relation to the Data
Subject. In this case I consider that the disclosure would be unfair and
none of the conditions for processing, listed in Articles 6 and 9 of the
GDPR, would be met.

 

I hope this is satisfactory. If not you may complain to the Information
Commissioner, although please bear in mind that the information at point 6
is for a new request which the ICO will expect to be reviewed by the
Council first. The address is to be found in the council’s complaints
procedure which I attach again:

 

Yours sincerely

Robert Beane

  

Senior Information Governance Officer

Veritau Limited | Veritau North Yorkshire Limited
Assurance Services for the Public Sector

Working on behalf of Hambleton District Council, North Yorkshire County
Council, Richmondshire District Council, Ryedale District Council and
Selby District Council to provide information governance services

Telephone:  01609 533219/07534 434699
E-mail:  [1][email address]

please note I work Wednesday to Friday only. If you need an urgent reply
please contact my colleagues on 01609 532526 or email
[email address] 

For further information about the company please visit:
[2]www.veritau.co.uk

 

Access your county council services online 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
at [3]www.northyorks.gov.uk.

WARNING

Any opinions or statements expressed in this e-mail are those of the
individual and not necessarily those of North Yorkshire County Council.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely
for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this in error,
please do not disclose any information to anyone, notify the sender at the
above address and then destroy all copies.

North Yorkshire County Council's computer systems and communications may
be monitored to ensure effective operation of the system and for other
lawful purposes. All GCSX traffic may be subject to recording and/or
monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.

Although we have endeavoured to ensure that this e-mail and any
attachments are free from any virus we would advise you to take any
necessary steps to ensure that they are actually virus free.

If you receive an automatic response stating that the recipient is away
from the office and you wish to request information under either the
Freedom of Information Act, the Data Protection Act or the Environmental
Information Regulations please forward your request by e-mail to the
Information Governance Team ([4][North Yorkshire County Council request email]) who will
process your request.

North Yorkshire County Council.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.veritau.co.uk/
3. http://www.northyorks.gov.uk/
4. mailto:[North Yorkshire County Council request email]