box junction of Archway Road/Jacksons Lane/Highgate Ave/Shepherds Hill

Malcom Briggs made this Freedom of Information request to London Tribunals
This authority is not subject to FOI law, so is not legally obliged to respond (details).
This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

London Tribunals did not have the information requested.

Dear Parking and Traffic Appeals Service,
Can I please have a list of all the PATAS case numbers referring to the box junction of
Archway Road/Jacksons Lane/Highgate
Ave/Shepherds Hill?

Yours faithfully,

abraham stern

PATAS Team,

Please note that we are no longer able to respond to correspondence
received at this email address.

Information on the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service can be found on our
website www.patas.gov.uk.

If you require any further assistance, please contact our call-centre on:

Telephone number: 020 7520 7200

Our opening hours for telephone enquiries are Monday to Thursday 08:00 to
18:30, Friday 08:00 to 18:00 and Saturdays 08:30 to 14:00. Please note
that telephone calls are recorded

We can also be contacted as follows:

Fax: 01932 578493

Minicom: 020 7520 7205

DX 155080 Chertsey 7

If you need to write to us, for example to send evidence related to your
appeal, please send this to the appropriate address below:
Parking, Bus lane, Moving traffic and London lorry ban appeals:

Tribunal Manager
PO Box 279
Chertsey
Surrey
KT16 6BU

Congestion Charging appeals or Low Emission Zone appeals:

Tribunal Manager
PO Box 280
Chertsey
Surrey
KT16 6BW

Case Management Team
Parking and Traffic Appeals Service
PO Box 279, Chertsey KT16 6BU
Tel: 020 7520 7200 Fax: 01932 578493

This email (and any attachment) is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, any copying; distribution or other use
of the information in this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be in
breach of government policy, commercial confidentiality or legal
professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

London Councils does not authorise or take responsibility for any emails
or part of any e-mails that are personal in nature. Please note that all
emails are potentially the subject of monitoring by London Councils and
could be read and intercepted by someone else. Nothing in this email
amounts to a contractual or other legal commitment on the part of London
Councils unless confirmed by an authorised written communication.

show quoted sections

PATAS Team,

Dear Mr Stern

Thank you for your email below.

Please be advised that all the decisions of the Parking and Traffic
Adjudicators are kept on our Statutory Register.

The register can be found on our website www.patas.gov.uk.

As such please feel free the search the register on line for the requied
information.

Kind regards

Case Management Team

show quoted sections

Dear PATAS Team,
Thank you for your reply. However there is no facility for making a surch location wise. This can easily be done when one has all the data. Can I therefore have this list?

Yours sincerely,

Malcom Briggs

PATAS Team,

Dear Mr Stern

Please accept our apologies for the late reply.

The Regulations requires the tribunal to hold a Statoary Register for
appeals in form of the register which is currently present on our
webiste. Unfortuantely this means that we are unable to provide a list
of appeals specific to a particular location.

In light of the above, you may wish to contact the parking department at
relevant local authority as they may be able to provide such
information.

Kind Regards

Case Management Team

show quoted sections

Paul Stead left an annotation ()

is this not a different P.A.T.A.S than the 1 in Islington I note your complaint is inside the borough

Dear PATAS Team,
I understand that the regulations require that you hold a register in this form. However as you have it on your database it would be a simple task to furnish a list of cases pertaining to a particular location. This would be mandatory under the FoI and currently well within the guidelines of transparency.

Yours sincerely,

Malcom Briggs