Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United kingdom on Volunteer bill of Indictment 1915 & 1933 Act and Electronic Communications

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee made this Rhyddid Gwybodaeth request to Criminal Procedure Rule Committee

This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

Roedd y cais yn rhannol lwyddiannus.

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Criminal Procedure Rule Committee,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee do hereby make a request as when will the Criminal Procedure Rule Committee make some changes to allow any Person to Appeal Direct to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom against the refusal by the High Court Judge to issue a Volunteer Bill of Indictment.

You do have the decision made in the Court of Appeal Civil Division of Tapecrown Ltd versus The Secretary of State and another where the Appeal had been dismissed in the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal Civil Division Registry doesn't transfer to the Court of Appeal Criminal Division by virtue of Section 53 of the Senior Courts Act 1981.

The Fraud Act 2006, This is a Statute Law What is the Meaning of the "Person" under Statute Law.

Since there are now Four Rules Committee, where the First Tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal does not have the Jurisdiction Power to deal with the Criminal Law as Perjury and Subornation of Perjury can be committed before the Tribunal and before the Civil and Criminal Courts.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Solly, Jonathan, Criminal Procedure Rule Committee

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

Thank you for your message. I am the Rule Committee secretary.

The powers of the Criminal Procedure Rule Committee are limited to those conferred by section 69 of the Courts Act 2003 and by the other statutory provisions listed in the preamble to the Criminal Procedure Rules 2015. Those powers do not extend to creating avenues of appeal, which remains a matter for Parliament.

Yours sincerely,
Jonathan Solly

Jonathan Solly | Criminal Procedure Rule Committee secretariat | Ministry of Justice | 102 Petty France | London | SW1H 9AJ | Tel: 020 3334 4031

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Criminal Procedure Rule Committee,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Criminal Procedure Rule Committee's handling of my FOI request 'Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United kingdom on Volunteer bill of Indictment 1915 & 1933 Act and Electronic Communications'.

The First Point I would like to make it clear, When the Parliament did grant Independence and Republican Status to many Countries which were under the British Colonial Rule, Does the Members of the Criminal Procedure Rule Committee and the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales and Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales did issue a practice directions to take away the Independence and change the Constitution of those Countries.

There is a Legal Right to Appeal under Part 9 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 where this is under the Criminal Justice Act 1968.

Perjury-Subornation of Perjury is committed in the County Courts, High Court of Justice, can you provide a sample form for laying the Information for the Offence of Perjury and Subornation of Perjury.

Do you have Schedule 23 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 where under Part 3. Some of the Words have been repealed with regards to the Signing of Indictments under Section 82 (1) of the SCA 1981. The Criminal Procedure Rules Part 10.

There are no Special Forms for laying Private Criminal Prosecutions under Section 6 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 where Section 29 (3) of the SCA 1981, does require to have the Criminal Justice Act 2003, to be taken into account.

If and when a clerk or Secretary who acts in Bad Faith, than He or She is not immune from any Legal Proceedings under the Courts Act 2003.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/a...

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Solly, Jonathan, Criminal Procedure Rule Committee

2 Atodiad

  • Attachment

    RE Freedom of Information request Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United kingdom on Volunteer bill of Indictment 1915 1933 Act and Electronic Communications.txt

    3K Download View as HTML

  • Attachment

    sp001 eng.doc

    61K Download View as HTML

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

Thank you for your message.

I attach a copy of your previous request and of my reply, to which I regret that I cannot add.

I understand you also now to require a form of application for the issue of a summons or warrant under rule 7.2 of the Criminal Procedure Rules. The form is published under the Part 7 heading at this address: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedu.... I attach a copy.

Yours sincerely,
Jonathan Solly

Jonathan Solly | Criminal Procedure Rule Committee secretariat | Ministry of Justice | 102 Petty France | London | SW1H 9AJ | Tel: 020 3334 4031

dangos adrannau a ddyfynnir

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Solly, Jonathan,

We, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and Mrs Sahera Ismail Bhamjee request your attention that when any person requests for an Internal Review of the decision, than this has to be made by another person.

From my understanding of the English Language under Section 56 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, does also apply.

There are decisions made under the Criminal Justice Act 1967, that a Person can use as much force as required for the purpose of arresting the Offenders or Suspected Offenders who are or may be at large, whilst the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is also a Parliament Act. The Time Limit to take Proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is a period of Twenty Years.

The Transcript of the Judgment in the Divisional Court on the 31st July 2003 Between HM Attorney General versus Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee in Proceedings Number CO/3208/2003, The Lord Justice Maurice Kay QC had stated that I am not restricted from taking any Criminal Proceedings.

The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 had made some changes as with regards to Practice Directions, and No Practice Directions shall be issued without the approval of the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales.

The Functions of the Lord Chief Justice for England and Wales as with regards to Section 11 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 had ended in December 2015.

The Magistrates Courts does have Jurisdiction Power to hear Civil Complaints and Criminal Complaints.
Section 52 and Section 1.

There are no Directions which have been issued under Section 6, 25 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985,.

Yours sincerely,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee