Admissions Statistics Queen Mary 2018

The request was partially successful.

Dear Queen Mary, University of London,
Under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act, I kindly request the following information information regarding the LLB in Laws course (M100) for the 2018 admissions cycle:

1. The average number of A*s already achieved at (I)GCSE level by applicants;
2. The average number of As already achieved at (I)GCSE level by applicants;
3. The average number of Bs already achieved at (I)GCSE level by applicants;
4. The average number of Cs already achieved at (I)GCSE level by applicants;

5. The average number of A*s already achieved at (I)GCSE level by offer holders;
6. The average number of As already achieved at (I)GCSE level by offer holders;
7. The average number of Bs already achieved at (I)GCSE level by offer holders;
8. The average number of Cs already achieved at (I)GCSE level by offer holders;

9. The average predicted A-level grade for applicants (for instance, A*A*A - just the grades themselves would be sufficient);
10. The average predicted A-level grade for offerholders (for instance, A*A*A* - just the grades themselves would be sufficient);

15. The total number of applicants for the M100 course;
16. The total number of offer holders for the M100 course;
17. The offer rate for the M100 course;
18. The total number of offerholders who chose LSE's M100 course as their firm choice on UCAS;
19. The total number of offerholders who met or exceeded their offer;
20. The total number of offerholders who missed their offer;
21. The number of offerholders who missed their offer in some way (for instance, by getting A*A*B instead of A*AA) but who were still offered a place to study Law (M100) on results day

Yours faithfully,

farhana khan

QM FOI Enquiries, Queen Mary University of London

Dear Fahana Khan,

We acknowledge receipt of your request and will respond as soon as we can.

Kind Regards,

Queen Mary University of London

show quoted sections

QM FOI Enquiries, Queen Mary University of London

FOI 2018/F405

 

Dear Farhana Khan,

 

Thank you for your email of 3^rd November.

 

I am pleased to provide the following answers. Please note that we have
taken your reference to LSE in part 18 to mean Queen Mary, as we assume
this is a typo left in from the request you sent to that institution. We
have also maintained your numbering even though there are no parts 11-14.

 

1-10. We do not hold any longer, data on applicants’ GCSE and A-level
predicted grades, so we cannot respond to these parts. Not all applicants
and offer holders will have these qualifications anyway and other entry
requirements may be taken in to account. Each cohort is different and each
application is considered individually.

15. 2133

16. 1116

17. 52%                      

18. 47

19. 255

20. 949

21. 44

 

If you are dissatisfied with this response, you may ask QMUL to conduct a
review of this decision.  To do this, please contact the College in
writing (including by fax, letter or email), describe the original
request, explain your grounds for dissatisfaction, and include an address
for correspondence.  You have 40 working days from receipt of this
communication to submit a review request.  When the review process has
been completed, if you are still dissatisfied, you may ask the Information
Commissioner to intervene. Please see [1]www.ico.org.uk for details.

Yours sincerely

                 

Paul Smallcombe

Records & Information Compliance Manager

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ico.org.uk/