Track this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
All information sent by Local Government Ombudsmen to Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS on 14 August 2008.
Some information sent by Local Government Ombudsmen to Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS on 1 April 2010.
All information sent by Local Government Ombudsmen to Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS on 25 July 2008.
York Crinkley Bottom
Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS made this Freedom of Information request to Local Government Ombudsmen
The request was partially successful.
Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS
2 March 2010
Dear Local Government Ombudsmen,
On 15 October 2009 CLAE Minutes state in relation to Minute 8(3)
that:
3) To defer a decision on the transfer of Lancaster City Council in
order to establish the
current guidance in relation to the number of years that needed to
elapse before a
previous employment of an LGO could be reasonably be disregarded.
The 01 December 2009 minutes state in relation to matters arising
that:
Minute 8: Local Commissioners' areas
Agreed: to transfer complaints about Lancaster City Council from
Coventry to York
with effect from 1 April 2010.
Taking account the LGO Yorks experience with a Crinkley Bottom in
Lancashire amongst other things. Please provide a copy of all
documentation related to this change of mind and under whose
authority it was made.
Finally please identify which Ombudsman has been responsible for
Lancaster City Council since 15 October 2009, and if they are
investigating the Crinkley Bottom scandal.
Some of the issues are discused here:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/thi...
It is understood that the York LGO was employed by Lancaster City
Council at the blobby blobby time.
Yours faithfully,
Stuart Hardwicke Carruthers
Anne Hide left an annotation (2 March 2010)
Look at the date, 1 April. Are the fools playing the fool?
Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS left an annotation (3 March 2010)
In 2008 the estimate was 31 per cent of the staff were in post when Anne Seex was employed by the Council
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/lo...
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (3 March 2010)
In 2008 the 10 year rule would have blocked Anne Seex from determining complaints against Lancaster. However, irrespective of the 10 year rule I think Anne Seex will be in a very difficult position should a member of the public's complaint involve any of her ex friends or colleagues. If there are more than 25% of staff and members still working at Lancaster the odds are that she will be called to determine a complaint involving an ex colleague and this can't be right under any circumstance. In addition Pat Thomas, the Ombudsman she took over from and trained her, also lives and works in the Lancaster area.
I am sure prospective complainants from the area would be concerned to find that an ex colleague [of a significant proportion of people still working at Lancaster City Council] is going to be in charge of determining their complaint against the council.
As a Lancastrian myself I think the citizen's of Lancaster deserve a truly independent complaints system and not one manipulated for the convenience of the LGO.
Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS left an annotation (3 March 2010)
Understand that the person with responsibility for the Lancaster complaints system knew Anne Seex..
Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen
9 March 2010
Dear Mr Carruthers
Our ref: CS/10/023
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request below received on 2 March. We will respond within the 20 working day target (which would be by 30 March 2010) or, if unable to do so, we will write to you again explaining why.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's offfice | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |
|
show quoted sections
Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen
19 March 2010
Dear Mr Carruthers
Our ref: CS/10/023
I attach a letter in response to the request below.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's offfice | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |
|
show quoted sections
Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS
19 March 2010
Dear Foi Officer,
I don't use Microsoft Open Office XML Format (.docx) - would it be
possible to provide the information in an accessible format (i.e.
pdf, txt, doc, etc).
Would you additionally review your handling framework to take
account of software.
Yours sincerely,
Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS
Foi Officer
Local Government Ombudsmen
19 March 2010
Dear Mr Carruthers
The letter should have been in compatible format - I don't know what happened there.
Here it is again.
Hilary Pook
Communications & Records Manager | DL: 020 7217 4734 |
Local Government Ombudsman's offfice | 10th Floor |
Millbank Tower | Millbank | London | SW1P 4QP |
www.lgo.org.uk |
|
show quoted sections
Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS
19 March 2010
Dear Foi Officer,
Many thanks - am pleased to note that Jane Martin is not
investigating the cellulite in Lancaster.. although it is
understood that Jerry White has.. doubtless Jerry White failed to
make his files available to Jane martin
Yours sincerely,
Stuart Hardwicke CARRUTHERS
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
Trevor R Nunn left an annotation (2 March 2010)
It is also interesting to note that the previous York based LGO, Pat Thomas lives in the Lancaster area. The reason why she couldn't determine complaints about Lancaster.
I think the LGO have a ten year rule which allows the new York based Ombudsman to determine complaints about a council they used to work for over 10 years ago.
I think it may be worth an FOI to Lancaster to see what percentage of staff still work there who may be in a position to use skeletons in the cupboard to their advantage.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/pe...
Link to this