Follow this request

There are 2 people following this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

Welfare Checklist (PLO) 2008 introduced to ensure children are placed with relatives rather than in care

Mrs L Taylor (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Dorset County Council

The request was successful.

From: Mrs L Taylor (Account suspended)

14 October 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk...

December 2006 - Evidence shows children in care are being let down
and suffer more than those placed with relatives.

We are interested to see how the introduction of the PLO (Public
Law Outline) Welfare Checklist 2008 has altered the outcomes for
children.

I would be grateful if under the FOIA you could advise how many
times your Local Authority has applied for care orders via the
Family Courts WITHOUT the Welfare checklist set out in section 1 of
the Children Act 1989 being completed. The completion of the
Welfare Checklist would confirm that extended family members had in
fact been contacted prior to any application for a care order.

Whoever signs the application for a care order is responsible for
ensuring that the Welfare checklist has been fully completed,
please state who within your authority holds this position.

‘The Government recognises the importance of family members taking
care of children who cannot be cared for by their parents. We know
that a child brought up by a family member benefits from living
with someone they already know and trust rather than a stranger.
The Children Act 1989 placed a duty on local authorities to support
the upbringing of children by their families wherever possible, and
that services should be provided to children in need and their
families to enable this to happen.

There is now an increased focus on the steps that must be taken
prior to any court proceedings. Unless it is necessary to take
emergency action to protect a child from immediate harm, the local
authority must undertake various steps before initiating care
proceedings. Welfare checklist set out in section 1 of the Children
Act 1989’

Yours faithfully,

Mrs L Taylor

Link to this

Dorset County Council

14 October 2009

We acknowledge receipt of your request for information.
This will now be passed to the relevant area(s) of the authority and a
response sent within 20 working days.
If for any reason we cannot respond in full within 20 days, we will let you
know.

"This e-mail is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain information about individuals or other sensitive information and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this email in error, kindly disregard the content of the message and notify the sender immediately. Please be aware that all email may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation."

Scanned by MailDefender - managed email security from intY - www.maildefender.net

Link to this

Dorset County Council

16 October 2009

Dear Mrs Taylor
I am writing further to your email below.

I have had a discussion with the Senior Solicitor at the Council who has
responsibility for this area of work. The Childrens Act 1989 came into
force in October 1991. Since that time the authority has been following
the criteria contained in the welfare checklist. However, the checklist is
not 'filled in' by anyone, rather the criteria is followed by the courts,
guardians and ourselves when determining the best care for the child. The
contacting of extended family members is not actually one of the criteria
on the checklist, however I can confirm that this authority will always
make all possible enquiries to ensure that extended family members are
contacted. As far as this authority is concerned, the care of a child by a
family member is always going to be the preferred way forward.

I hope this information is useful to you, and completes your request for
information. If you are not completely satisfied with my response, please
contact me again, or write to the complaints officer at: Dorset County
Council, County Hall, Colliton Park, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1XJ. Or you
can follow the complaints procedure that can be found on our website
www.dorsetforyou.com at http://212.104.140.176/index.jsp?article...
If your appeal is not resolved to your satisfaction, you have the right to
apply to the Information Commissioner for a decision.

Yours sincerely

Freedom of Information Team
Dorset County Council

Mrs L Taylor
<request-21172-d7
8dc286@whatdothey To
know.com> FOI requests at Dorset County
Council <[Dorset County Council request email]>
14/10/2009 23:14 cc

Subject
Freedom of Information request -
Welfare Checklist (PLO) 2008
introduced to ensure children are
placed with relatives rather than
in care

Dear Sir or Madam,

http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk...

December 2006 - Evidence shows children in care are being let down
and suffer more than those placed with relatives.

We are interested to see how the introduction of the PLO (Public
Law Outline) Welfare Checklist 2008 has altered the outcomes for
children.

I would be grateful if under the FOIA you could advise how many
times your Local Authority has applied for care orders via the
Family Courts WITHOUT the Welfare checklist set out in section 1 of
the Children Act 1989 being completed. The completion of the
Welfare Checklist would confirm that extended family members had in
fact been contacted prior to any application for a care order.

Whoever signs the application for a care order is responsible for
ensuring that the Welfare checklist has been fully completed,
please state who within your authority holds this position.

‘The Government recognises the importance of family members taking
care of children who cannot be cared for by their parents. We know
that a child brought up by a family member benefits from living
with someone they already know and trust rather than a stranger.
The Children Act 1989 placed a duty on local authorities to support
the upbringing of children by their families wherever possible, and
that services should be provided to children in need and their
families to enable this to happen.

There is now an increased focus on the steps that must be taken
prior to any court proceedings. Unless it is necessary to take
emergency action to protect a child from immediate harm, the local
authority must undertake various steps before initiating care
proceedings. Welfare checklist set out in section 1 of the Children
Act 1989’

Yours faithfully,

Mrs L Taylor

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Mrs L Taylor (Account suspended)

17 October 2009

Dear Freedom of Information Team,

For clarification.

The 2008 PLO - Welfare checklist encapsulates the
steps that must be taken prior to any court proceedings. Unless it
is necessary to take emergency action to protect a child from
immediate harm, the local authority must undertake these various
steps before initiating care proceedings.The Welfare Checklist
being completed prior to proceedings and included as part of the
application.

Yours faithfully,

Mrs L Taylor

Link to this

Dorset County Council

19 October 2009

We acknowledge receipt of your request for information.
This will now be passed to the relevant area(s) of the authority and a
response sent within 20 working days.
If for any reason we cannot respond in full within 20 days, we will let you
know.

"This e-mail is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain information about individuals or other sensitive information and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this email in error, kindly disregard the content of the message and notify the sender immediately. Please be aware that all email may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation."

Scanned by MailDefender - managed email security from intY - www.maildefender.net

Link to this

Ian King left an annotation (24 October 2009)

WDCC social services disregard lawful procedure and the Children act especially when it comes to Fathers for sure.

My Son was taken into Foster care a year ago without my Knowledge, without my permission or even consultation and I have a parental agreement order although I was denied contact for many years for no solid reason by the corrupt family court system.

They are now trying to do the same with my daughter and deliberately did not inform me again which is illegal,I only found out because Cafcass "accidentally" sent out a letter to me.

They are also trying to block my daughter going with my mother, her grandmother, for NO GOOD REASON even though she has passed inspections which goes against the explicit rule of the children act. I am aware that Foster homes are BIG business with some getting 42,000+ a year per child and Labour party have set targets for adoption and fostering which have to be met regardless it seems whether that is in the best interest of the child.

footnote: They still however allow the Mother who constantly neglected them, who is an alcoholic and takes them to drug addicts houses to have with my Son access to them and my Son in care, but I cannot.

I will be publishing the court papers if required to warn others of these criminal practises on pain of imprisonment if I have to. A request has been made to Jim Knight MP for assistance. A complaints process has been started with the WDCC at the SS for criminal behaviour and the abuse of rights and law.

The answers you have had from them above are a complete pack of lies most certainly in my case at least.

Link to this

michelle cockram left an annotation (10 August 2010)

We are currently going through a complaint process with Poole LA,(8 Months so far) after they moved related children from us to Foster Carers in Poole.

They are unable to live with their parents and lived with us for 18 mths. However Poole LA struggled to provide 'support' because of distance and we believe social work resources also.

When they moved the children, we all wrote to disagree (family, friends, headmaster, church etc). Contact with the children for family members and some friends, has been severely restricted and subject to ridiculous conditions.

Through the complaints process, we have uncovered gross untruths in the statements of social workers and their records. There appears to be contempt for anyone who dares to question them and no reasonable discussion opportunity.

We are dismayed at the lack of process and best practise. We believe that our complaint will support they have not followed policy and process in critical decisions made for the children.

I wonder is this dreadful practise endemic in the social services across the UK and what can be done to change the system.

Link to this

Ian King left an annotation ( 6 February 2011)

Do yourself a favour RECORD EVERYTHING!

Every meeting you attend, whenever you are in the presence of social workers, cafcass, lawyers etc. It is NOT illegal and if they tell you it is they are lying.

Use a dictaphone, your mobile pone if it is a smartphone, whatever but make sure you always record!

I have already used taped phone calls and taped meetings made without the knowledge of the others present and they have been accepted into court as evidence. I have already shown a child Psychiatrist to have lied and perjurded himself (GMC complaint underway) and a Dorset Social worker to be a liar.

If you need any advice of recordings, reference to a case where they have been allowed into court or how to record covertly please feel free to contact me on here:

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/user/ian_k...

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Dorset County Council only: