Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To City of London Police by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To Fife Constabulary by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To Essex Police by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To South Yorkshire Police by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To Staffordshire Police by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To Cambridgeshire Constabulary by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To Cleveland Police by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To Durham Constabulary by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
To Gloucestershire Constabulary by Alexander Plough 9 July 2009
warrants issued for breach of probation licence conditions
Alexander Plough made this Freedom of Information request to Thames Valley Police
The request was refused by Thames Valley Police.
From: Alexander Plough
9 July 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please provide the following data, broken down for each year:
(1) In the last 5 years, how many warrants for arrest have been
issued for an individual who has broken their probation licence
conditions?
(2) Out of this figure, how many were considered high priority,
and/or considered to pose a risk of harm to others?
(3) Out of the total number of warrants issued per year, as stated
in answer to (1), how many of those individuals have been
re-arrested?
(4) Out of the warrants consider high priority, as stated in the
answer to (2), how many of those individuals have been re-arrested?
(5) Out of the total number of warrants issued, as stated in the
answer to (1), how many of those individuals have re-offended while
a warrant for their arrest was active?
(6) Out of the total number of warrants issued, as stated in the
answer to (2), how many of those individuals have re-offended while
a warrant for their arrest was active?
(7) Referring to the individuals stated in answer in question (5),
what crimes have they committed while a warrant for their arrest
was active?
(8) Referring to the individuals stated in answer in question (6),
what crimes have they committed while a warrant for their arrest
was active?
(9) Please provide the following information about any individual
who is the subject of a warrant for arrest for breaking their
probation licence conditions, but who has not as yet been
re-arrested:
* names, ages and last offence for which they received a custodial
sentence.
Yours faithfully,
Alexander Plough
From: Hopgood Kirsty
Thames Valley Police
10 July 2009
Dear Mr Plough
Reference No: RFI2009000493
Thank you for your request for information dated 09/07/2009 concerning
warrants for individuals that have broken their probation licence in the
last five years.
This request will be dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000.
Your request will now be considered and you will receive a response
within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act,
subject to the information not being exempt or containing a reference to
a third party. In some circumstances Thames Valley Police may be unable
to achieve this deadline. If this is likely you will be informed and
given a revised time-scale at the earliest opportunity.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in
Thames Valley Police.
Yours sincerely
Kirsty Hopgood
Freedom of Information
From: FOI
Thames Valley Police
29 July 2009
Dear Mr Alexander,
Reference No: RFI2009000493
Thank you for your request for information dated 09/07/2009 which for
clarity I have repeated -
Please provide the following data, broken down for each year:
(1) In the last 5 years, how many warrants for arrest have been issued for
an individual who has broken their probation licence conditions?
(2) Out of this figure, how many were considered high priority, and/or
considered to pose a risk of harm to others?
(3) Out of the total number of warrants issued per year, as stated in
answer to (1), how many of those individuals have been re-arrested?
(4) Out of the warrants consider high priority, as stated in the answer to
(2), how many of those individuals have been re-arrested?
(5) Out of the total number of warrants issued, as stated in the answer to
(1), how many of those individuals have re-offended while a warrant for
their arrest was active?
(6) Out of the total number of warrants issued, as stated in the answer to
(2), how many of those individuals have re-offended while a warrant for
their arrest was active?
(7) Referring to the individuals stated in answer in question (5), what
crimes have they committed while a warrant for their arrest was active?
(8) Referring to the individuals stated in answer in question (6), what
crimes have they committed while a warrant for their arrest was active?
(9) Please provide the following information about any individual who is
the subject of a warrant for arrest for breaking their probation licence
conditions, but who has not as yet been
re-arrested:
* names, ages and last offence for which they received a custodial
sentence.
Your request for information has now been considered and our response is
detailed below.
The information requested is not held in an easily retrievable format or
at the level you require on ICT systems used by Thames Valley Police.
Any attempt to retrieve the information specific to your request would
involve a complicated and prolonged search of records across systems and
may not necessarily provide accurate results and would exceed the
appropriate cost limit of £450.
The cost of providing you with the information is above the amount we are
legally required to respond i.e. the cost of locating and retrieving the
information exceeds the "Appropriate Limit" as stated in the Freedom of
Information (Fees and Appropriate Limit) Regulations 2004.
Section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act allows that public
authorities do not have to comply with section 1(1) of the Act if the cost
of complying would exceed the appropriate limit. It is Thames Valley
Police general policy that should a request for information exceed the
appropriate level then we will exercise our legal right not to respond but
cases will be assessed individually to consider the implications.
In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, this letter represents
a Refusal Notice for this particular request.
Please contact me quoting the above reference number if you would like to
discuss this matter further.
Thank you for your interest in Thames Valley Police.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Picking
Freedom of Information Officer
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





