Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Self-proclaimed "sex abuse" expert Dr Anthony William Baker, Woking
To General Medical Council by C. Smith-Byrne 13 March 2011
Self-proclaimed "sex abuse" expert Dr Anthony William Baker, now falsely claiming to be a "professor"
To General Medical Council by C. Smith-Byrne 10 June 2011
Entitlement to use "MRCPsych" / registered membership of RCPsych?
To Royal College of Psychiatrists by C. Smith-Byrne 20 October 2011
Panelist Expenses
To General Medical Council by Miss Smith 19 June 2011
Vehicle Hire/lease Contract
To Kingston University by Southern Seaters Ltd 26 February 2011
Application Statistics
To Kingston University by James Carter 31 December 2011
Pharmacy Formulary and Information
To Lothian NHS Board by Simon Price 2 November 2010
Marlborough Family Service
To Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust by C. Smith-Byrne 25 February 2010
Council Tax Exemption Regulations
To Kingston University by Kiara Vincent 8 April 2011
ELQ students 2011
To Kingston University by Abdul Hai 1 December 2011
Visiting "professor" teaching sex therapy at Kingston University?
C. Smith-Byrne made this Freedom of Information request to Kingston University
The request was successful.
From: C. Smith-Byrne
11 May 2011
Dear Kingston University,
Could you please confirm that the following individual is legally
permitted to use the title "professor" and is employed as such by
Kingston University:
"Prof Tony Baker, Consultant in psychiatry at Ashwood, visiting
professor, Kingston University"
since this gentleman has asked a national newspaper, the Guardian,
to publish the above today, on 11th May 2011. I have been unable to
find any evidence for his claim to this title, but can prove that
this "professor" has had at least two previous misconduct hearings
in front of the Fitness to Practise Panel of the General Medical
Council because of his unhealthy interest in vulnerable young women
- the man is over 60 but prefers 15-year-olds -, i.e. molesting and
kissing teenage patients (ex-rape victims) and inviting them over
to spend the night in his house. He was struck off temporarily in
2009, but is now obviously back on the road to wealth and fame. I
would hereby like to refer to my previous FOI request
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/se...
which contains more links.
Is Kingston University aware of the background of this
self-proclaimed "sex abuse therapist", have any checks been made on
him, and what kind of lectures does he contribute to the education
of the nation? Which subjects does he teach, how often and when, in
which department(s)?
What is Kingston University's understanding of "Ashwood"? And why
does this individual use the youthful "Tony" instead of his real
name, Dr Anthony William Baker, which would, come to think of it,
add more credibility to his distinguished title? Under which name
is he registered on your payroll?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/m...
I look forward to your response.
Yours faithfully,
C. Smith-Byrne
From: C. Smith-Byrne
28 May 2011
Dear Kingston University,
Could you please explain why this "doctor" is employed as a
"professor" with your university although the GMC website tells us
that he is not even on their Specialist Register? Very weird
indeed.
GMC Reference Number
2209887
Given Names
Anthony William
Surname
Baker
Gender
Man
Primary Medical Qualification
MRCS 1974 Royal College of Surgeons of England
LRCP 1974 Royal College of Physicians of London
MB BS 1974 University of London
Provisional Registration Date
20 Nov 1974
Full Registration Date
08 Jan 1976
Specialist Register
This doctor is not on the Specialist Register
GP Register
This doctor is not on the GP Register
Status
Registered with a licence to practise
Information for Employers
Substantive, honorary and fixed term consultants working in the
NHS are required to be on the Specialist Register, however there
are exemptions. Please refer to the National Health Service
(Appointment of Consultants) Regulations 1996, as amended.
Doctors working in general practice in the UK health service are
required to be on the General Practitioner Register. Please refer
to the NHS (Performers Lists) Regulations 2004, as amended.
Annual retention fee due date: 08 Jan 2012
Doctor History
Fitness to practise history since 20 October 2005
From To Status
22 Nov 2008 21 Dec 2008 Suspended
Registration and licensing history since 20 October 2005
From To Status
16 Nov 2009 Registered with a licence to practise
21 Dec 2008 16 Nov 2009 Registered
22 Nov 2008 21 Dec 2008 Suspended
20 Oct 2005 22 Nov 2008 Registered
GMC Hearings
Date Panel
23 Oct 2008 Fitness to Practise Panel
Yours faithfully,
C. Smith-Byrne
From: Laughlan, Gail A
Kingston University
9 June 2011
Dear C. Smith-Byrne,
Further to your recent request for information the University’s response
to your information request follows.
Q. Is the following individual legally permitted to use the title
professor and is he employed as such by the University?
Dr Anthony Baker was appointed as a visiting professor at Kingston
University for one year from February 2010 to February 2011. At the
current time Dr Baker is not under contract to the University and the
title of ‘visiting professor’ is no longer accurate in relation to
Kingston University.
Q. Is Kingston University aware of the background of this self proclaimed
‘sex abuse therapist’, have any checks been made on him, what kind
of lectures does he contribute, which subjects does he teach, how often
and when, in which department(s)?
In 2010 the Bar Council was looking to develop a training package for
lawyers and Dr Baker was made a visiting professor by the University to
facilitate this work. The University was unaware that Dr Baker had been
investigated by the General Medical Council (this is not the kind of
information that the University would routinely request from its visiting
professors).
Visiting professors work on a contractual basis and are therefore not on
the University payroll. Dr Baker’s role was primarily advisory, although
he did, on a handful of occasions, deliver lectures to a group of
postgraduate students.
Q. What is Kingston University's understanding of "Ashwood"?
The University holds no information relating to ‘Ashwood’.
Q. Why does this individual use the youthful "Tony" instead of his real
name, Dr Anthony William Baker, which would, come to think of it, add more
credibility to his distinguished title? Under which name is he registered
on your payroll?
As a visiting professor, Dr Baker was not on the University payroll.
This completes the University’s response to your information request. If
you are unhappy with the service you have received in relation to your
request and wish to make a complaint or request a review of our decision
please contact:
Head of Secretariat, Kingston University, River House, 53-57 High Street,
Kingston upon Thames, KT1 1LQ.
In the event that you are not content with the outcome of your complaint
you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision.
Generally, the Information Commissioner can be contacted at:
The Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane,
Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF.
Kind regards
Gail Laughlan
Copyright Officer, Information Services
Tel: +44 (0)20 8417 2090
Ext: 62090
Kingston University London
[1]http://www.kingston.ac.uk/
show quoted sections
From: Laughlan, Gail A
Kingston University
9 June 2011
Dear C. Smith-Byrne,
Further to your recent request for information, the University's response
follows.
Q. Could you please explain why this "doctor" is employed as a "professor"
with your university although the GMC website tells us that he is not even
on their Specialist Register?
A. Registration on the General Medical Council Specialist Register is not
a requirement for the appointment of visiting professors at the
University. Dr Anthony Baker was appointed as a visiting professor at
Kingston University for one year from February 2010 to February 2011. He
is no longer under contract to the University.
This completes the University's response to your information request. If
you are unhappy with the service you have received in relation to your
request and wish to make a complaint or request a review of our decision
please contact:
Head of Secretariat, Kingston University, River House, 53-57 High Street,
Kingston upon Thames, KT1 1LQ.
In the event that you are not content with the outcome of your complaint
you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision.
Generally, the Information Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you
have exhausted the internal procedure provided by Kingston University. The
Information Commissioner can be contacted at:
The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane,
Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF.
Kind regards
Gail Laughlan
Copyright Officer, Information Services
Tel: +44 (0)20 8417 2090
Ext: 62090
Kingston University London
http://www.kingston.ac.uk/
show quoted sections
From: C. Smith-Byrne
10 June 2011
Dear Laughlan, Gail A,
Many thanks for your reply which gives a good overview over the
background of appointing "professors" to universities (this
obviously does not only apply to Kingston University) and explains
why paedophiles with no supervision are allowed to slip the net and
gain respectability by adding titles to their names to put cotton
wool over the eyes of the Public. Just to point this out: Mr Baker
continues to use this title and has only recently attempted to stop
the cash flow for his "expert witness" work by using it in a letter
to a major national newspaper:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/m...
This letter was published on Tuesday, 10th May 2011 when this
self-proclaimed "sex therapy expert" was fully aware that using
this title would be illegal. Of note is the fact that his good
friend Joanna Beazley-Richards (dob 03/06/1947), a privately (!)
practising psychologist in Wadhurst / East Sussex who contributes a
significant number of cases which are referred to Dr Baker (again
not subject to any supervision or accountability), has also
generously awarded herself the title "Dr" without authority. Why a
presumably self-respecting newspaper such as the Guardian would
print such nonsense - deliberately or unwittingly - without any
checks whatsoever and fool the Public remains another question
altogether.
Yours sincerely,
C. Smith-Byrne
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





