Follow this request

There is 1 person following this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

More similar requests

Event history details

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

The National Archives decision to phase out the OPSI and HMSO brand by 2011

Christopher Corbin made this Freedom of Information request to Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman did not have the information requested.

From: Christopher Corbin

6 October 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 I request the following
information regarding the Parliamentary and Health Service
Ombudsman and the decision of The National Archives to phase out
The Office of Public Sector Information, the OPSI brand and the
HMSO brand by 2011 and the impact that the decision will have on
the UK’s policy and implementation with respect to the re-use of
public sector information, namely Statutory Instrument 2005 No.
1515 – the UK transposition of the European Union Directive
2003/98/EC and the right of appeal and complaint.

To assist with this request I refer to the Ombudsman web site at
the following URL where it states that The Office of Public Sector
Information is a public sector body that the Ombudsman can
investigate. (Note: The National Archives is not listed as a public
body that can be investigated as far as I can tell).

http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/can_the_ombu...

The information requested to cover the period from the 1 July 2009
up to the time this request is answered.

Specifically, I need in relation to the phasing out the OPSI brand,
The Office of Public Sector Information and the HMSO brand the
following information:

1. A list of written documents (including emails) received by the
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman from The National
Archives – the list to include date, origin of the document,
position of the submitter (that is Job Title), to whom the document
was addressed (that is Job Title), the subject line of the
document.

2. A list of written documents (including emails) received by the
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman from The Cabinet Office
– the list to include date, origin of the document, position of the
submitter (that is Job Title), to whom the document was addressed
(that is Job Title), the subject line of the document.

3. A list of written documents (including emails) sent by the
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman to the National Archives
– the list to include date, position of the author, the position of
the person(s) to whom the document was addressed in The National
Archives, the subject line of the document.

4. A list of written documents (including emails) sent by the
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman to the Cabinet Office –
the list to include date, position of the author, the position of
the person(s) to whom the document was addressed in The Cabinet
Office, the subject line of the document.

I would prefer to receive the information electronically.

If the decision is made to withhold some of this information using
exemptions in the Act, I would be grateful if you would please
inform me and cite the exemptions used.

If you need any clarification then please contact me via email.

Under your section 16 duty to provide advice and assistance I would
expect you to contact me if you find this request unmanageable in
any way.

I look forward to hearing from you in the near future.

Regards

Christopher Corbin

Link to this

From: foiofficer
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

6 October 2009

Thank you for your e-mail to the Parliamentary and Health Service
Ombudsman. This return e-mail shows that we have received your
correspondence.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure
Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable &
Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve
the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK
Government quality mark initiative for information security products and
services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk

Link to this

Christopher Corbin left an annotation (10 October 2009)

Background information that may assist with this FOI request.

The National Archives Management Board met on the 29 September 2009 and took a decision to move The National Archives to one name, one brand and as such will phase out the Office of Public Sector Information (OPSI) that is a part of the National Archives since 2006 and also the HMSO by March 2011.

The UK transposition of the public sector information re-use Directive 2003/98/EC that came into force in the UK on the 1st July 2005 Statutory Instrument 1515 of 2005 makes specific reference to the Office of Public Sector Information as part of the regulatory processes.

The National Archives Management Board decision on the 29 September 2009 will require the Statutory Instrument 1515 of 2005 to be amended.

The current Office of Public Sector Information is a holder of public sector information and from a regulatory position there needs to be alternative appeal body in place should a decision taken by OPSI regarding PSI re-use or the decision on the handling of a PSI re-use complaint be deemed by the re-user to consider appealing against the OPSI - there are at least two one is the Advisory Panel on Public Sector Information another is the Ombudsman.

The National Archives is itself a large public sector information holder and this raises the issue of how can such a body regulate itself with respect to the public sector information that it holds. As such it also requires there to be an independent appeal or review body hence the FOI request to the Ombudsman's Office as to whether they were consulted on the processes under consideration within the National Archives.

The request has public interest as there is a public right of appeal and this requires the Ombudsman list of public organisations that the Ombudsman can investigate to be amended as the OPSI is phased out - if there is no Office of Public Sector Information then it needs to be removed - if the National Archives is to take on the role of regulation then the National Archives has to appear on the Ombudsman's list. The change around would be expected to take place when the Statutory Instrument is amended.

Relevant references:

OPSI - PSI Regulations
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/advice/psi-regula...

European Commission - PSI Policy
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/...

European Commission funded European Public Sector Information Platform
http://www.epsiplatform.eu/

UK Advisory Panel on Public Sector Information
http://www.appsi.gov.uk/

Link to this

From: foiofficer
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

3 November 2009

Dear Mr Corbin

Our reference: FDN-70087/0013

Further to your email of 6 October 2009, we have checked our records and
do not hold the information you have requested.

Yours sincerely

Roberta Coleman
Freedom of Information / Data Protection Officer
Office of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure
Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable &
Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve
the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK
Government quality mark initiative for information security products and
services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman only: