Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Wrong burden of proof applied.
To House of Lords by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 18 May 2009
THE WRONG BURDEN OF PROOF
To House of Commons by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 18 May 2009
the burden of proof and wrongful convictions
To Prime Minister’s Office by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 18 May 2009
burden of proof
To Animal Health by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 18 May 2009
Information on the fact that the burden of proof should be on the prosecution however it has been wrongly placed on the defendant for many years?
To Ministry of Justice by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 18 May 2009
THE RSPB PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE WHILE THE HOME OFFICE TURN A BLIND EYE
To Home Office by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 20 April 2009
THE RSPB USING THEIR MEMBERS IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS TO CONTROL THE WAY THE LAW IS FORMED IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS AND THE HOUSE OF LORDS
To House of Commons by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 20 April 2009
Hilary Benn please supply the review highlighted in the extract from Hansard mentioned in this request: 'areview some doubts arose about the proper statutory basis for charging these fees'
To Home Office by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 1 June 2009
RSPB problems
To Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal (Scotland) by Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) 12 March 2011
The burden of proof
Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Home Office
Home Office did not have the information requested.
From: Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended)
18 May 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Given what I have just found in Hansard could you please supply the
information on what you can do in relation to investigating the
fact that Parliament intended that the burden of proof should be on
the prosecution in the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 however it
has been wrongly placed on the defendant for many years?
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/writt...
WILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981: DECISIONS TO PROSECUTE HL Deb 15
March 1983 vol 440 c718WA 718WA
§ Lord Melchett
asked Her Majesty's Government:
Why, in respect of the shooting of a barnacle goose on Islay on
25th October 1982, the procurator fiscal decided that no
proceedings should be taken, and whether the procurator fiscal
decided, as with an incident that occurred on 27th January 1983 on
Islay, that no offence had been committed.
§ The Lord Advocate (Lord Mackay of Clashfern)
In deciding whether the facts as disclosed to the procurator fiscal
justified the taking of proceedings under the Wildlife and
Countryside Act 1981, the procurator fiscal had to decide whether
an offence had been committed, whether there was sufficient
evidence to prove the alleged offence against the accused and
whether there was any excuse for the accused's conduct. The
decision in respect of the incident of 25th October 1982 involved
the exercise of a judgment by the procurator fiscal taking all the
circumstances into consideration. It would not be appropriate to
give the detailed grounds upon which the decision was taken. I have
examined the circumstances of the case, and am satisfied that the
procurator fiscal exercised his judgment in a proper manner.
Forward to CIDER: PRODUCTION AND TAXATION
Noticed a typo? | Report other issues | © UK Parliament
Yours faithfully,
Derek Canning LLB [HONS]
From: Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended)
17 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Under the Freedom of Information Act YOU should have replied by
now, and are breaking the law therefore I want an internal review.
Yours sincerely,
Derek Canning LLB [HONS]
From: Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended)
25 June 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
Could you please tell me what has occurred to the internal review
and the information requested?
Yours sincerely,
Derek Canning LLB [HONS]
From: Information Access
Home Office
17 July 2009
Dear Mr Canning,
Please find attached a response to your Freedom of Information request.
Yours sincerely,
John Gomes
Information Management Service | Shared Services Directorate
Financial & Commercial Group
LG Floor | Seacole Building | Home Office | 2 Marsham Street | London SW1P
4DF
[1]www.homeoffice.gov.uk
show quoted sections
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





