Retention of names on police intelligence computers.

I note, that I have not even received an acknowledgment letter, as yet.

[Potentially Defamatory Material Removed, following our attention was drawn to it by Cumbria Constabulary]

Greg Mulholland MP 06 October at 14:43 Report
Your comments are stupid and offensive. I do not wish this sort of thing posted on my FB page. I am deleting you from my friends list and putting a permanent block on you. Please do not attempt to contact me again for any reason whatsoever.

This is the way MP's think they can respond!! They do not serve the elected, they serve themselves and are very arrogant

If I have nor received an answer to my FOI by t,morrow, the 9th October. Cumbria Constabulary have failed to respond within the legal time frames. What do I do next?

I prompted them yesterday and they have sent an acknowledgment. They will struggle to answer this as I am sure they are retaining names of innocent people on police computers, as perspective child abusers, when they have neither been prosecuted or charged for any offense. This prevents people form obtaining meaningful employ with the said council and elsewhere. It constitutes a violation of rights to earn an honest living.

Very incompetent Cumbria Constabulary are stalling, as they are unable to answer my FOI request. After first failing to comply with the Act, in responding within the 20 days, and having requested an Internal Review, They now inform me it will take two months for them to reply. WHY?? Stalling tactics. They are too embarrassed to answer my request, as they are unlawfully retaining my name and the names of five other family members, on their secret computer. I believe this information, defamation of our good name and character, with no evidence to back it up, is preventing us from gaining meaningful employ, and causing us to be treated in a negative and destructive way by police personnel, working for Cumbria constabulary, who keep questioning my conduct in exercising my democratic rights. It is my sincere opinion that these common purpose led officers have a great deal to hide about their conduct in treating our family with contempt.

http://www.ukcolumn.org/events/blowing-w...

23rd October, we ned you and any evidence you hold re corporate corruption and misconduct.

By law, public authorities must respond promptly to requests.

I am now at liberty to name and shame these corporate criminals

http://www.ukcolumn.org/events/blowing-w...

Anyone care to join me, or show up to defend themselves?

I am hearing a lot of complaints about Cumbria Police. It would be a good idea to warn people who may want to take up residence in the area, to proceed with caution. If people do not want to reside in Cumbria, due to improper police behaviour, then the Police will have less people to police, thus cutting their jobs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b7ujQ0-KsA

I was always under the impression that the police where public servants and are employed to help people and not to get involved in criminalizing innocent people or to HARASS them.

What are you hiding" as this is the case' we are members of the public who pay our taxes and as such require you to answer FOI requests even if they are contentious. You are required under Common Law to answer for truth and transparency..!

In November 2010, the broadcast of Florence Bellona on the problem of the adoption forced Britain had caused the stir. The words "forced adoption" refer to scandals such as that of "l'arche de Zoé" in which Westerners embark foreign children under the pretext of extract to their misery, and without checking if they are really abandoned, for the placing on the market of international adoption.
But the fact that European countries such as the United Kingdom knowingly removes his own children and make them adopt without the consent of parents of birth remains a little-known phenomenon, because the affected families do not have the right to refer their case outside the Court of justice family, still less than in talking to a journalist under sentence of imprisonment.
The United Kingdom has a questionable history in "child protection" since the 19th century. One of the most dramatic episodes lasted 70 years: children stolen from poor families were sent to Australia State program "Migrant Children" to create "a good white strain"! 40 years after the end of the program, the beginning of 2010, Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg have produced a public apology in the House of Commons for this historic disaster.
Recognition of forced exile, despite decades of campaign by the families of victims, has virtually been no media coverage and its managers were never punished. Today, the "gagging order" (gagging order) protects the State, the press freedom, but freedom of expression. The parents came to use alternative media to describe their ordeal and above all, to find their children.
In recent years, is more material poverty but the charges of child abuse which precede the withdrawal children by social services. First, Florence Bellone listened to the explanations of MPs wishing to abolish forced adoption, those of associations for the defence of families and the testimony of parents. It soon became apparent it that parents really abusing would pass not 10 or 15 years to find their children and to all courts including the European Court of Justice to obtain their returns… And above all, there are thousands of women accused of "future negligence" or "future emotional injury" of their child, since the early days of the grossesse… It away the infant at birth and were thus removed each new baby, on the sole basis of a psychiatrist paid by social services. Their crime: have been a victim of domestic violence, either by their parents, or their partner, and very often by the family of home or orphanage or themselves were placed. Several hundred mothers, alone or in couple, fled abroad to keep their baby.
Legal records of these families and stories have him know the extent and variety of the tactics used by social services to parents. Subsequently, by becoming "MacKenzie friend" (legal support to which parents are right when they have no lawyer), Florence Bellone was able to attend hearings in the courts as well as the examinations of the parents by social services. Very often, what appears first as the false evidence are only statements not verified the Court and accepted by the judge as compelling facts. The same is true of the legal "guardians" of abducted children, who represent the child in court!

The continuous survey

In a second report on the "stolen children", Florence Bellone gives more speaking parents who have lost their children, but children who were themselves adopted force or at least, force from their families. Some are now adults, others have only 11 to 13 years. A raid of the police to take an infant and a maintenance of a woman pregnant with a social worker will also give an idea of the nightmarish situations generated by "child welfare". Finally we will discuss the issue of foreign children whose families, on the British territory, fell in the trap: Matilde, girl French 11 year removed with his little sister Louison in June, managed to call his father, late August - abusing his family of home - and -surveillance. It says "their life in prison", and especially request assistance to find their father and leave the England…

Legal Lawyers > Legal Topics > Defamation Law
Defamation Law

What is defamation law?

The concept around which all defamation law revolves around is harm or injury which is done to the reputation of another which is unjustifiable, malicious or wrong. There are a number of different types of defamation. There is the tort of defamation which is an action that is litigated in a civil jurisdiction as a dispute between parties. This means that the action is ligitated by the parties bringing evidence and the judge making a determination by applying the law to the evidence. There is a criminal defamation which is much more difficult to prove and also much more serious. It is a matter where the allegations being made are so serious and the harm done to the reputation of the person is so wrongful and so malicious that it is a matter prosecuted by the police. Some of the key points which need to be proven in order to establish a claim of defamation are the there is an imputation which is capable of being defamatory, that the imputation identifies the plaintiff and that the imputation was published, which usually means that it was communicated to a group of people, meaning more than one.