Follow this request
There are 8 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Effectivness of S.44 Terrorism Act
To British Transport Police by Terence Eden 4 September 2008
Action taken following Section 44 Searches
To Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) by James Bridle 16 September 2008
S44 guidance
To City of London Police by Mr Henry 12 May 2010
Westminster Area Police Stop and Search Ethnic Origins
To Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) by Sandra Marshall 8 September 2010
Stop & Search (S44) of Photographers and Outcomes - January 2009
To Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) by Michael Scott 5 May 2009
Stop and search, and designated areas covering Pontypridd Train Station
To British Transport Police by D Rose 4 February 2010
misuse of the Terrorism Act 2000
To Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) by Vincent Aleck 21 May 2009
European Court of Human Rights Decision
To Merseyside Police by Paul of the Woods Family 13 January 2010
Police Training
To Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) by Dave Merccer 21 February 2010
Press logs
To Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) by James Dunn 6 September 2011
Results of random searches under S.44 of the Terrorism Act 2000
James Bridle made this Freedom of Information request to Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
The request was partially successful.
From: James Bridle
19 August 2008
Dear Sir or Madam,
MPS Officers have recently been performing random stop and searches
under S.44 of the Terrorism Act 2000. According to the officer in
this video: http://tinyurl.com/6m4jv4 - no grounds for suspicion
are required to undertake one of these searches.
Please can you provide the number of such searches (random, without
grounds for suspicion) undertaken since the implementation of the
Terrorism Act 2000, the number of such searches which have resulted
in further action (i.e. with a result that is not releasing the
person searched without charge), and for those searches, what
action was taken.
Thank you very much.
Yours faithfully,
James Bridle
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
19 August 2008
Dear Mr Bridle
Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2008080005128
I write in connection with your request for information which was received
by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 19 August 2008. I note you
seek access to the following information:
* MPS Officers have recently been performing random stop and searches
under S.44 of the Terrorism Act 2000. According to the officer in
this video: http://tinyurl.com/6m4jv4 - no grounds for suspicion
are required to undertake one of these searches. Please can you
provide the number of such searches (random, without grounds for
suspicion) undertaken since the implementation of the Terrorism
Act 2000, the number of such searches which have resulted in
further action (i.e. with a result that is not releasing the
person searched without charge), and for those searches, what
action was taken
Your request will now be considered in accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 (the Act). You will receive a response within
the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act,
subject to the information not being exempt or containing a reference
to a third party. In some circumstances the MPS may be unable to
achieve this deadline. If this is likely you will be informed and
given a revised time-scale at the earliest opportunity.
Some requests may also require either full or partial transference to
another public authority in order to answer your query in the fullest
possible way. Again, you will be informed if this is the case.
Your attention is drawn to the attached sheet which details your right
of complaint.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest
in the MPS.
Should you have any further inquiries concerning this matter, please
write or contact the Public Access Office, quoting the reference
number above.
Yours sincerely
K.Simmons
Policy and Support Officer
COMPLAINT RIGHTS
Are you unhappy with how your request has been handled or do you think
the decision is incorrect?
You have the right to require the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) to
review their decision.
Prior to lodging a formal complaint you are welcome and encouraged to
discuss the decision with the case officer that dealt with your
request.
Ask to have the decision looked at again ***
The quickest and easiest way to have the decision looked at again is
to telephone the case officer that is nominated at the end of your
decision letter.
That person will be able to discuss the decision, explain any issues
and assist with any problems.
Complaint
If you are dissatisfied with the handling procedures or the decision
of the MPS made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act)
regarding access to information you can lodge a complaint with the MPS
to have the decision reviewed.
Complaints should be made in writing and addressed to:
FOI Complaint
Public Access Office
PO Box 57192
London
SW6 1SF
In all possible circumstances the MPS will aim to respond to your
complaint within three months.
The Information Commissioner
After lodging a complaint with the MPS if you are still dissatisfied
with the decision you may make application to the Information
Commissioner for a decision on whether the request for information has
been dealt with in accordance with the requirements of the Act.
For information on how to make application to the Information
Commissioner please visit their website at
www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk. Alternatively, phone or write to:
Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
Phone: 01625 545 700
show quoted sections
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
4 September 2008
Dear Mr James Bridle
Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2008080005128
I write in connection with your request for information dated [if request
was dated, 19/08/2008 which was received by the Metropolitan Police
Service (MPS) on 19/08/2008. I note you seek access to the following
information:
MPS Officers have recently been performing random stop and searches under
S.44 of the Terrorism Act 2000. According to the officer in this video:
http://tinyurl.com/6m4jv4 - no grounds for suspicion are required to
undertake one of these searches.
Please can you provide the number of such searches (random, without
grounds for suspicion) undertaken since the implementation of the
Terrorism Act 2000, the number of such searches which have resulted in
further action (i.e. with a result that is not releasing the person
searched without charge), and for those searches, what action was taken.
Following receipt of your request searches were conducted within the MPS
to locate information relevant to your request. I can confirm that the
information you have requested is held by the MPS.
EXTENT OF SEARCHES TO LOCATE INFORMATION
To locate the information relevant to your request searches were conducted
at the Stop and Search Unit, Territorial Policing Headquarters.
RESULT OF SEARCHES
The searches located the record below relevant to your request.
DECISION
I have today decided to disclose the located information to you in full.
Please find attached record.
Inspector Andy Walker
TPHQ Stop & Search Team
Stop & Search Team
15th Floor
Empress State Building
Empress Approach
Lillie Road
SW6 1TR
www.met.police.uk/stopandsearch
COMPLAINT RIGHTS
Your attention is drawn to the attached sheet which details your right of
complaint.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in
the MPS.
Should you have any further inquiries concerning this matter, please write
to Inspector Andy Walker at the addresss above quoting the reference
number above.
Yours sincerely,
Abbey Adeboye
Information Manager
In complying with their statutory duty under sections 1 and 11 of the
Freedom of Information Act 2000 to release the enclosed information, the
Metropolitan Police Service will not breach the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act 1988. However, the rights of the copyright owner of the
enclosed information will continue to be protected by law. Applications
for the copyright owner's written permission to reproduce any part of the
attached information should be addressed to MPS Directorate of Legal
Services, 1st Floor (Victoria Block), New Scotland Yard, Victoria, London,
SW1H 0BG.
COMPLAINT RIGHTS
Are you unhappy with how your request has been handled or do you think the
decision is incorrect?
You have the right to require the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) to
review their decision.
Prior to lodging a formal complaint you are welcome and encouraged to
discuss the decision with the case officer that dealt with your request.
Ask to have the decision looked at again ***
The quickest and easiest way to have the decision looked at again is to
telephone the case officer that is nominated at the end of your decision
letter.
That person will be able to discuss the decision, explain any issues and
assist with any problems.
Complaint
If you are dissatisfied with the handling procedures or the decision of
the MPS made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) regarding
access to information you can lodge a complaint with the MPS to have the
decision reviewed.
Complaints should be made in writing and addressed to:
FOI Complaint
Public Access Office
PO Box 57192
London
SW6 1SF
In all possible circumstances the MPS will aim to respond to your
complaint within three months.
The Information Commissioner
After lodging a complaint with the MPS if you are still dissatisfied with
the decision you may make application to the Information Commissioner for
a decision on whether the request for information has been dealt with in
accordance with the requirements of the Act.
For information on how to make application to the Information Commissioner
please visit their website at www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk.
Alternatively, phone or write to:
Information Commissioner's Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
Phone: 01625 545 700
show quoted sections
From: James Bridle
16 September 2008
Dear Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your response. It was the intention of my request to
discover exactly what actions were taken following searches. Please
can you clarify what those who received non-verbal warnings
received them for, and what those arrested were charged with, and
what constitutes 'other' in this context.
Yours sincerely,
James Bridle
James Bridle left an annotation (16 September 2008)
I'm keeping track of this request, as well as details surrounding the original incident, and any supplementary material, at http://44searches.wordpress.com/
Comments welcome.
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
16 September 2008
Dear James Bridle,
Thank you for your email below.
This office has now completed its enquiry into this case. If you have further enquiry, please contact the officer below.
Inspector Andy Walker TPHQ Stop & Search Team Stop & Search Team
15th Floor Empress State Building Empress Approach Lillie Road SW6 1TR
www.met.police.uk/stopandsearch
or email the mailbox below.
http://www.met.police.uk/stopandsearch/c...
Many Thanks,
Abbey Adeboye.
show quoted sections
James Bridle left an annotation (16 September 2008)
A follow-up request has been made: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ac...
David Mery left an annotation (16 September 2008)
Surprisingly the MPS have not clarified that the "officer in the video" showing the stop of search of Terence is not a Met officer but a BTP one. There's a similar request addressed to the BTP created by Terence at http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ef... (The BTP claims in its 2007 annual report to carry more S.44 stops than all other forces combined.)
This request is for all S.44 Stop and Search, ie both S.44(1) - vehicle occupants - and S.44(2) - pedestrians-. I find the numbers in the given table surprising when compared to the data published in the S95 race stats documents (I include links to all the published ones in http://gizmonaut.net/bits/propaganda.html). According to the table published in the response there were 191,478 S.44 stops and search from Jan 2003-Feb 2008. The total number for the financial years 2003/4 to 2006/7, according to the S95 documents, is 76,177 (44, 380 S.44(1) and 31,797 S.44(2)). The difference appears too big to be accounted by the extra months covered by the table.
If you do a follow-up FOI request as mentioned in your blog post you may want to query this discrepancy.
br -d
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Francis Irving left an annotation ( 8 September 2008)
http://www.matthewhenty.com/blog/?p=169
http://www.digitalmasons.co.uk/shkspr.mo...
Link to this