Follow this request
There are 2 people following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Phorm/Second Phase of European Commission Infringement Case 64/08/INSO
To Home Office by P. John 29 December 2009
Copies of letters sent to BT and Phorm informing them of government letter to EU
To Home Office by Phillip Main 5 December 2009
Phorm Statement of compliance by UK Authorities
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Phillip Main 16 April 2009
Confirm statements made by ISBA regarding IBA principles
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Phillip Main 16 April 2009
Request for full disclosure of BERRs response to the EU commission
To Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform by P Seurre 16 September 2008
Evidence that ISPs running DPI systems for advertising do not need to sign the IAB guidelines?
To Information Commissioner’s Office by Steve Hankin 31 March 2009
Confidentiality of Commercial Telecommunications
To Home Office by P. John 22 October 2009
Malware monitoring by TalkTalk
To Home Office by Leigh Park Initiative 22 October 2010
TalkTalk: Unlawful Surveillance of Internet Users
To Home Office by P. John 26 July 2010
Requests for information about RIPA 2000 in connection with Targeted Advertising
Steve Hankin made this Freedom of Information request to Home Office
The request was partially successful.
From: Steve Hankin
22 May 2008
Dear Sir or Madam,
Lord West of Spithead (Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Home
Office) has stated that the Home Office was asked by a number of
parties for a view on the compatibility of targeted advertising
services with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.
How many parties requested this information about RIPA 2000 and
compatibility of targeted advertising prior to the writing of the
January document produced in answer to these questions? (published
here http://cryptome.org/ho-phorm.pdf)
When were the requests received?
How many of the parties making such requests are British Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) operating in the UK?
Other than Phorm, have any other non-ISPs made such requests prior
to the writing of the paper referenced above?
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
Mr S Hankin
From: Steve Hankin
22 June 2008
Dear Sir or Madam,
I made a request for information on May 22nd 2008, but I have not
heard anything as yet. My understanding is that according to the
terms of the Freedom Of Information Act, I should have received a
response by now.
Could you please reply to my request for information which I am
doing under the FOI terms. I will repeat the questions below and
would be obliged if you would attend to this without further delay:
Lord West of Spithead (Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Home
Office) has stated that the Home Office was asked by a number of
parties for a view on the compatibility of targeted advertising
services with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.
How many parties requested this information about RIPA 2000 and
compatibility of targeted advertising prior to the writing of the
January document produced in answer to these questions? (published
here http://cryptome.org/ho-phorm.pdf)
When were the requests received?
How many of the parties making such requests are British Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) operating in the UK?
Other than Phorm, have any other non-ISPs made such requests prior
to the writing of the paper referenced above?
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
Mr S Hankin
Home Office
21 August 2008
Reference : T10463/8
Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 22/05/2008 11:19:19 PM
A reply is attached.
show quoted sections
Francis Irving left an annotation ( 4 December 2008)
Thanks Michael - I've now fixed the file extension so it is .pdf. It was incorrectly .doc in the original email from the Home Office.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






M Bimmler left an annotation (18 November 2008)
In order to view it, download it, manually change the file extension to ".pdf" (removing ".doc" from the filename) and open it with Adobe Reader.
Opening it with Microsoft Word or with the "view as html" option will *not* work.
Link to this