Hello! (Sign in or sign up)

Track this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

Request for full disclosure of BERRs response to the EU commission Text of the letter in question, addressed to Kim Darroch: Dear Sir, I am writing to you in relation to certain issues arising from the past and fut... Rejected.
Request to Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform by Patrick Seurre. Annotated by Richard McMillan on 15 October 2008.
Request for the name of the ISP being used by the Dept. Email Content stored in attached file 'Long_Email_Body_19_12_2008.html'. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored... Awaiting response.
Response by Department of Health to Patrick Seurre on 19 December 2008.
PowerPoint presentation to ISPs (mobile telephone and internet records) in the House of Lords, on Monday, November 17th, the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, asked a supplementary question to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary o... Awaiting classification.
Request sent to Home Office by Michael Bimmler on 18 November 2008.

More similar requests

Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page?

Requests for information about RIPA 2000 in connection with Targeted Advertising

A Freedom of Information request to Home Office by Steve Hankin

The request was partially successful.

Steve Hankin

22 May 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

Lord West of Spithead (Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Home
Office) has stated that the Home Office was asked by a number of
parties for a view on the compatibility of targeted advertising
services with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.

How many parties requested this information about RIPA 2000 and
compatibility of targeted advertising prior to the writing of the
January document produced in answer to these questions? (published
here http://cryptome.org/ho-phorm.pdf)

When were the requests received?

How many of the parties making such requests are British Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) operating in the UK?

Other than Phorm, have any other non-ISPs made such requests prior
to the writing of the paper referenced above?

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,

Mr S Hankin

Link to this | Send follow up

Steve Hankin

22 June 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

I made a request for information on May 22nd 2008, but I have not
heard anything as yet. My understanding is that according to the
terms of the Freedom Of Information Act, I should have received a
response by now.

Could you please reply to my request for information which I am
doing under the FOI terms. I will repeat the questions below and
would be obliged if you would attend to this without further delay:

Lord West of Spithead (Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Home
Office) has stated that the Home Office was asked by a number of
parties for a view on the compatibility of targeted advertising
services with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.

How many parties requested this information about RIPA 2000 and
compatibility of targeted advertising prior to the writing of the
January document produced in answer to these questions? (published
here http://cryptome.org/ho-phorm.pdf)

When were the requests received?

How many of the parties making such requests are British Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) operating in the UK?

Other than Phorm, have any other non-ISPs made such requests prior
to the writing of the paper referenced above?

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,

Mr S Hankin

Link to this | Send follow up

Home Office

21 August 2008


Attachment ResponseT10463 8.pdf
270K Download View as HTML


Reference : T10463/8

Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 22/05/2008 11:19:19 PM

A reply is attached.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Michael Bimmler left an annotation (18 November 2008)

nota: the attachment is at the moment a ".doc file", but it is actually a PDF file!
In order to view it, download it, manually change the file extension to ".pdf" (removing ".doc" from the filename) and open it with Adobe Reader.
Opening it with Microsoft Word or with the "view as html" option will *not* work.

Link to this

Francis Irving left an annotation (4 December 2008)

Thanks Michael - I've now fixed the file extension so it is .pdf. It was incorrectly .doc in the original email from the Home Office.

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)

Steve Hankin only: Reply to Home Office | Request an internal review
Home Office only: Respond to request