Reply to Hayley Martin for update of my request

Dear Hartlepool Council,

Dear Hayley Martin,
It appears that my Freedom of Information requests have been
combined with my Complaints,never the less, if you ask Customer
Services you will find I am still awaiting numerous answers to my
Freedom of Information requests contained in previous letters to
Hartlepool Council, dated Monday 19th October 2009, why you have
never received them is not for me to comment on.
On 24th December,2009, I received a reply from Stuart Green, which
failed to convince me that a full investigation had been
undertaken, I rejected his reply because it contained a number of
misleading and completly untrue statements.I requested a full
review, a letter of reply which again contained my original Freedom
of Information requests requiring answers was sent by e-mail
attachment on 7th January 2010. this atachment could not be opened
it was claimed,so to avoid any further embarrassment,I personally
delivered by Hand at the Main Council Office Complex,two copies of
my original letters, one to Stuart Green and one to Liz Crookson on
Wednesday 27th January 2010.
Liz Crookson very kindly sent me a e-mail the same day, to confirm
that she had received my letters requesting a reveiw and would pass
onto Stuart Green the other copy of my letters of request.
I do hope that this information will clarify the situation for you
regarding you having no previous knowledge of my Complaint or my
Freedom of Information requests.
I did meet in person and spoke on the telephone to your predecessor
Alyson Carman in December 2008 and again in January 2009, when we
did discuss some items mentioned above,in addition to any future
possible legal claims against Hartlepool Council I may consider.

Yours faithfully,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Customer Service,
Would you please be good enough to confirm or deny that my
objection to a Retrospective Planning application H/2009/0568
submitted yesterday Monday 8/2/2010. by e-mail was received by the
correct department in addition will you please clarify if the
office of Hayley Martin requires a copy. as I have received no
acknowledgement nor am I able to read my adverse comments on your
Internet site.

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Hayley Martin,
Thank you for your very prompt reply to my e-mail dated 9/2/2010,
and your confirmation that my letter of Objection to the
Retrospective Planning Application H/2009/0568 is now lodged with
the correct Planning Department.
There is however one point in your reply I would like to clarify,
you state that you do Not wish to have sight of my Retrospective
Planning Application, this is incorrect, I have never made such an
Application, In my letter I strongly OBJECT to the granting of this
Retrospective Planning Application H/2009/0568.

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Hayley Martin,

Would you please clarify your comments regarding retrospective
planning application H/2009/0568, I was unaware that I had
requested you to investigate my objections, in addition could you
please explain certificate B served on myself, as ( part land
owner,) I am unaware of these developments.

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Hartlepool Council,
Dear Hayley Martin,
My e-mail alert indicates that I have received a reply from your
good self but I am unable to locate it, would you please repeat
your message,

Yours faithfully,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Hayley Martin,

Freedom of information

I was unaware that my request for clarification of Certificate "A"
and Certificate "B" were not strictly Freedom of Information
requests, to save any further embarassment or misunderstanding, I
will resubmit my Freedom of Information requests regarding the
validity of answers on the Planning check lists which I claim are
not strictly true, I will also challenge that part of your answer
indicating that I only have part ownership of the Property.

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Freedomofinforma

I note your comments regarding my awaiting a response before
submitting any further related requests , I am still awaiting an
answer from Planning,I believe that there are some basic principles
involved here,would you please ensure that any further requests by
myself are replied to under the Freedom of Information Act which
contains a provision (section 11 ) requiring the requestor's
preferred means of communication to be used where it is reasonable.
a requestor using an @whatdotheyknow e-mail address is clearly
expressing a preference for a reply to be made electronically via
the site WhatDoTheyKnow.com which will ensure both the request, and
it's response, are freely available to view online.
Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Hartlepool Council,
Dear Hayley Martin
As a lawabiding Income tax and council tax payer,I believe I have a
legal right to peaceably protest to Hartlepool Borough Council
regarding the following,
1.
I believe that the latest letter of reply to my F.O.I. requests I
have received is a Pathetic and Disgraceful attempt to Justify the
Granting of an Outrageous and Unlawful Retrospective Planning
Decision, it fails completely.this is Undemocratic, Arrogant and is
no more than a Complete Cover-Up.
2.
I requested you, the F.O.I. Officer to post your answers on the
WHATDOTHEYKNOW Internet Site,as these were controversial Legal
questions for all to see, I though you were a Solicitor Appointed
by Hartlepool Council to answer F.O.I. requests from the public,I
am disappointed to note that you replied that they were NOT F.O.I.
requests, (5) of my requests were about Hartlepool Councils Legal
requirements in Implementing the Recent High Court Rulings
regarding Retrospective Planning Applications and a Legal
explanation on the 4 (four) year rule handed down by the High Court
Judge Sir Thayne Forbes, how can you claim these are NOT Legal
questions,
3.
Can you explain why and on what grounds were these questions NOT
genuine F.O.I. requests, yet you delegated the Development Control
Manager himself , Mr.Reece/or Mr Richard Trow , who was personally
involved himself , in this property dispute, in my Original
objection, in August 2008,I asked who drew up the original drawing,
when I pointed out the drawing indicated the new extension would be
physically attached to my property, he stated that he would alter
the drawings with a tipex pen.(no conflict of Interest there then )
to answer these Legal F.O.I. questions, would you please explain to
me, what Legal qualifications does the Unelected Council Planning
Officers hold to enable them to give a legal interpratation on High
Court Judge Sir Thayne Forbes Legal rulings on the granting or
refusal of Retrospective Planning Applications.
4.
These Unelected Council Planning Officers have completely rejected
the Recent High Court Explanation and Judgement Ruling handed down
by Sir Thayne Forbes regarding Retrospective Planning Applications.
which was appataining to my objection, I find this appalling and I
think this Legal Issue will no doubt be raised as "quite an
important one for the future"
I have no intension of letting this Miscarriage of Justice go
Unchallenged.
5.
According to this letter, the Retrospective Planning Application
decision was NOT made by the Democratic Elected Councillors on the
Planning Committee, who I though and Believed Considered all
CONTROVERSIAL Retrospective Planning Applications, but by the
Development Control Manager Mr Reece/or Rishard Trow, why do we
have Democratically Elected Councillors, if they have no input or
are not involved in discussing such CONTROVERSIAL Important Legally
Challenging Decisions. is this the type of Openness
, Transparentcy and Democracy we can now expect from our Elected
Councillors, not forgetting our Elected Mayor, Mr Stuart Drummond,(
did I waste my vote )
How can anyone in Hartlepool say that these decisions are made
Democratically.
The Freedom of Information Act contains a provision (section 11 )
requiring the requestor's preferred means of communication to be
used where it is reasonable. A requester using an @whatdotherknow
email address is clearly expressing a preference for a reply to be
made electronically via the site. WhatDoTheyKnow.com which ensures
both the request, and its response, are freely available on line. I
once again request that I be given this courtesy,no more letters be
sent to my home address.

Yours faithfully,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Freedomofinformation,
Dear Hayley Martin,
Thank you for your latest reply,Will you please explain the
following, why is my Planning Freedom of Information request not
valid ? you have previously stated on 26th February 2010, that The
Councils Validation check list for the Planning Application
H/2009/0568.which is used to ENSURE that you have the necessary and
appropriate Information to VALIDATE the the Planning Application,
and proceed to process it, shows that the application included
Certificate "A" completed by the applicant to indicate that ALL the
Works were on their Land, However following queries raised by me
and pursued with the applicant, Certificate "A" was amended to
Refer to Certificate "B"
Indicating that at least SOME of the application SITE was now in a
separate Ownership, (NOT TRUE )and a notice of application duly
served on me, as Partial Site Land Owner ( I repeat, to Honestly
and Truthfully VALIDATE and CONFIRM the ownership details recorded
on your CERTIFICATE "B" an Inspection and Examination of OUR Land
Title Deeds CE 74844, Purchased and Paid for from Yourselves,
Hartlepool Borough Council, on !st February 1984, and Recorded and
Registered with Land Registry, would have PROVED that the Ownership
details recorded on YOUR CERTIFICATE "B" were and are INCORRECT
(unless Hartlepool Borough Council Chief Solicitor J ANTHONY BROWN,
took payment from my wife and I for part of our property,
Hartlepool Borough Council, did not own or had any LEGAL RIGHT to
sell )?
As a lawabiding Income Tax and Full Council Tax payer. I have a
Legal Right to ask you the Town Solicitor the following questions,
What Legal Documentation, Land Title Deeds, Registered and Recorded
with Land Registry, or any other Documents, were Examined or
Consulted by Officers of Hartlepool Borough Council to arrive at
their Decision, that at Least some of the Applicants Site was in
Seperate Ownership, as stated in your VALIDATION Check List
contained in CERTIFICATE "B".
Before allowing this retrospective Planning Application to be
granted.

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Hayley Martin,
Your extreme tardiness in responding to my Freedom of Information
requests is now one month overdue is both deplorable and
inexcusable, I am a law abiding income tax and Hartlepool council
tax payer and believe I am entitled to a courteous reply,

May I further remind you once again,of the following, it is MY
understanding that the only way anyone can become a true LEGAL
owner of Land and Property is to obtain a CONVEYANCE and then have
your Solicitor Register the Land Title in the Land Register.

Our Land Title Deeds CE 74844 Title Absolute, clearly shows EXACTLY
what Property and Land Details we PURCHASED when buying our Council
House from you, Hartlepool Borough Council,in February 1984,Our
Land Title Deeds were confirmed and signed by Hartlepool Borough
Councils, Chief Solicityor J Anthony Brown,and our Solicitors
Levinson, Walker and Lister, our Receipt for our MORGAGE Redemption
Final Payment was Signed by Hartlepool Borough Councils Chief
Financial Officer Mr. J.D. WALTON, ( which we still Possess )

Your Legal Department are aware of all this, yet your Legal
Department allowed Certificate "A" and Certifiicate "B"
Hartlepool Council Validation Certificate of Ownership, Check
Lists to be submitted for Validation of Property Ownership for
Retrospective Planning Applications to be granted, without any
serious attempt to ENSURE that the Applicant is the Legal Owner of
the said Property, why was our Land Title Deeds CE 74844 not
Examined, it is INCREDIBLE, but TRUE, who submitted these False
Certicicates.
Some-one in Hartlepool Borough Council as something to hide ?

Under the circumstances, will you please produce and supply me with
a copy of the Following Documents, which I will need to produce
before taking this Property Fraud Matter through the Justice
System?

What Legal Documents, Land Title Deeds , Registered and Recorded
with Land Registry or any other Documents, Examined or Consulted by
Hartlepool Borough Council Officers (their names ) which clearly
States or Contains any Details not Recorded on my Original Land
Title Deeds,that part of my Land and Property was in Seperate
Ownership,as Hartlepool Borough Council have Previously Claimed,
was Used to ENSURE that you Hartlepool Borough Council, had the
Neccessary and Appropriate Information to VALIDATE and therefore
Grant this Controversial RETROSPECTIVE Planning Application which
Trespassed and Encroached over my Wash-House Roof,and was
physically attached secretly and without Planning Permission, to
the wall of my property, causing substantial criminal damage.

Will you please ensure that Information Procedure rules are
complied with, and reports and background papers are made Publicly
available as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Freedomofinformation,
Dear Hilary Martin,
Thank you for your recent reply, although I still disagree with
your comments,
THE FREEDOM of INFORMATION ACT is I believe the "LITTLE PEOPLE'S
CHARTER" it is MY Understanding that I have a Legal Right to ASK
for INFORMATION,
I believe that your last reply is once again a DELIBERATE attempt
to OBFUSCATE the Truth, I still maintain my Request for Information
is NOT a Planning Matter (as you claim) Retrospective or Otherwise,
and my Understanding is that Even if it was a Freedom of
Information request regarding a Planning Issue, I doubt you would ,
under the Law, have a strong case for Refusing to give me the
Information I have Requested.
I do not apologise for repeating the following,
It is MY understanding that the ONLY way ANYONE can become a true
LEGAL OWNER of Land and Property is to Obtain a "CONVEYANCE" and
then have your Solicitor Register and Record the Land Title in the
Land Register.as Our Solicitors Levinson, Walker and Lister Did,
after we PURCHASED our Land and Property from yourselves,
HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL, in 1984.

OUR Land Title Deeds CE 74844, TITLE ABSOLUTE, Clearly Shows
EXACTLY what Property and Land Details we PURCHASED when buying OUR
Council House from HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL, 1st February 1984.
OUR Land Title Deeds were CONFIRMED and SIGNED by the HARTLEPOOL
BOROUGH COUNCILS Chief Solicitor MR. J.Anthony Brown,and Our
Solicitors Levinson,Walker and Lister, OUR Receipt for OUR MORGAGE
Redemption FINAL Payment was Signed by the HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH
COUNCIL Chief Financial Officer, Mr.J.D.Walton, (which we still
Possess)
We are Absolutely Amazed that NO-ONE from HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH
COUNCIL,has EVER asked to EXAMINE OUR Original Legal Land Title
Deeds through- out this Dispute?
This is far to "SERIOUS" an "ISSUE" to "IGNORE" and it is to
Harmful to our DEMOCRACY to PRETEND that it can all be "SWEPT under
the CARPET"
This Clearly Confirms My Suspicions that Officers of HARTLEPOOL
BOROUGH COUNCIL are Unable to Challenge our LEGAL Ownership Details
on OUR Land Title Deeds CE 74844, Yet these Officers have CLAIMED
to have EXAMINED ALL NECESSARY and APPROPRIATE INFORMATION to
VALIDATE and Therefore GRANT the Retrospective Application,? These
are the Documents We wish to EXAMINE ?

"Will you PLEASE Produce and Supply US with a COPY of ANY and ALL
Documents which HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL Officers (Planning or
Legal ) claim to have EXAMINED and CONSULTED which Clearly States
or Contains ANY Details NOT Recorded on OUR ORIGINAL Land Title
Deeds CE 74844, that PROVES that Part of OUR Land and Property
which we BOUGHT and have PAID for in FULL from HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH
COUNCIL in ALL Good Faith, as Detailed and Legally Recorded on OUR
Land Title Deeds CE 74844 was in SEPERATE OWNERSHIP which Officers
of HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL CLAIM "THEY" EXAMINED and CONSULTED
to ENSURE that HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL had ALL the NECESSARY ans
APPROPRIATE Information to
Legally "VALIDATE" and therefore "GRANT" this Controversial
RETROSPECTIVE Planning Applicate.?

This is NOT a Planning Application, We are the LEGAL Owners of our
Property, Purchased in ALL Good Faith From Hartlepool Borough
Council,in 1984, and WE demand the Right to Examine ANY and ALL
Documents that enables HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL Officers to
attempt to Deprive us of ANY of OUR Legal Purchased Land and
Property,?

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Freedom of information,

Thursday 22 nd. April 2010.
Freedom of Information Officer.
Dear Hayley Martin,

Thank you for your Recent Reply to My FO.I. Requests, It Is My
Honest Opinion, that these Hartlepool Borough Councils Answers from
your Planning Department are Truly Outrageous. A Catalogue of LIES
and ERRORS and DELIBARATE EVASIONS, and I Feel an Attempt to
Derail My FOI Requests Once Again.

Will You Please Obtain the Copies of the Documents I Previously
Requested
or Alternatively Provide a Reason “ WHY “ NONE” of the Copies of
Documents Requested Have Been Provided. ? I am Already Suspicious.

Your Previous Reply, Your Words NOT Mine.
23rd February 2010.
Validation Check LIST with Regards to the “RETROSPECTIVE “ Planning
Application H/2009/0568.

“The Council's VALIDATION check list for the Planning Application
in
Question, which is “USED” to “ ENSURE “ that we “HAVE” the
Necessary and Appropriate Information to “ VALIDATE “ the Planning
Application and Proceed to Process It “ SHOWS “ That the
Application
Included CERTIFICATE “A” “COMPLETED “ by the APPLICANT
to Indicate that “ ALL” of the Works Were on “THEIR” Land , However
Following Queries Raised by you and Pursued with the Applicant, the
Certification was” Amended “ to Refer to CERTIFICATE “ B “
Indicating that at Least “SOME “ of the Application site Was In
“SEPARATE OWNERSHIP”
( To “VALIDATE”, “AUTHENTICATE” to “VERIFY” to “PROVE “)

“This then “MUST” be Viewed with “GRAVE SUSPICION “ Our Land Title
CE 74844, Clearly “Confirms” that the Land and Property We “BOUGHT”
and “PAID” for FROM “ Hartlepool Borough Council,” and Registered
by Land Registry is in “OUR TITLE.” “ANY” Attempt by Hartlepool
Borough Council to Deprive Us of OUR Legally Purchased Property ,
Will Be Vigorously and Legally Challenged in the COURTS.

( I Have No Intension of Allowing this Serious Fraudulent Attempt
to Deprive Us of OUR Land and Property, to Be Swept under the
Carpet .)

( The Planning Department State that they are “UNABLE” to Provide
ANY Further Information Other than What has Already Been “SENT” to
You Regarding The Ownership Enquires Made by The Planning
Department.
When Determining My Neighbours Application,
( This Is NOT TRUE , A Complete FABRICATION )

I Await For What Should Be a very Interesting “Explanation “as No
Doubt will Many Others on the Wide World “Internet “ Site.
in Addition I Intend To Submitt This Request for Information onto
The Local Internet Site, Scrap Heap Challenge, as soon a Possible
Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Hartlepool Council,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Hartlepool Council's
handling of my FOI request 'Reply to Hayley Martin for update of my
request'.

Your failure to produce ANY of the Documents and Information
previously Requested,

Will you please Produce and Nake Available to us a Copy of ANY and
ALL Documents Which Hartlepool Borough Council Officers ( Planning
and Legal )Claim to Have Examined and Consulted to Ensure that
Hartlepool Borough Council had All the Necessary and Legal
Documentation to VALIDATE and therefore GRANT the Controversial
Retrospective Planning Application

Any Documentary Evidence they Examined to Disprove our Ownership,of
ANY Part of Our Land and Property Legitimately Purchased From
Hartlepool Borough Council, Conveyed , Recorded and Registered with
Land Registry in 1984.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/re...

Yours faithfully,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Alyson Carman,

Tuesday, 15th June 2010.

Dear Alyson Carman,

Thank you for your reply to my request for a Internal Review .

I am disappointed and disturbed to find that you have been
appointed the person to conduct this Internal Review, as I would
consider that you have a conflict of interest in this matter,
having previously been personally involved and therefore fully
aware of this dispute, and knew that we where the Rightful owners
of this property.

I had previously informed Hayley Martin, your successor on 4th
February 2010 of our meetings and telephone conversations on two
separate occasions when we also discussed this matter in detail in
Hartlepool Borough Buildings, in December/January 2008/2009, when I
also gave to you copies of my documents , Land Title Deeds and
various letters I had written to Land Registry ( My letter dated
4th February, 2010.on this site confirms this )

You have failed to provide me with the copies of the documentation
I have previously requested. Which would prove that a Fraudulent
Property ownership certificate “A” or “B” had been submitted
claiming Land and Property which was not owned by the applicant
The planning application coding sheet you have sent, does not
contain any useful information .and I believe it is another attempt
to delay or frustrate my attempts for information.

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Alyson Carman,
Wednesday 23rd June 2010
Dear Alyson Carman,
Thank You for your recent reply to my Internal Review.
Unfortunately this serious matter cannot be ignored,

You are aware that I bought and paid for the Land and Property from
Hartlepool Borough Council, on 1st February 1984,

Hartlepool Borough Council do NOT have the legal Authority to
transfer any part of my Legally Purchased Property to my neighbour
by granting a Retrospective Planning Application, for their kitchen
extension,
which was Built without Planning Permission and was physically
attached and Included part of my private property.

Hartlepool Borough Councils continued refusal to supply the
information I requested , is in breach of the Freedom of
Information Act. And you are therefore breaking the law. Again ?

Your claim to be a Independent Decision Maker is complete nonsense.
You are confirming a decision made by your understudy, Haley
Martin, although you did not make the final decision, you certainly
where well aware of all the facts of property ownership, and my
original complaints. since August 2008.
How can you claim “ not “ to have a Conflict of Interest in this
Property Dispute.
(a)
You where well aware of the true ownership of the property after
our two personal meeting in December/January 2008/2009. You
examined my Land Title Deeds, CE 74844, signed by all the Town
Council Officials and Conveyed by Hartlepool Borough Council Chief
Solicitor, Mr. J Anthony Brown .
(b)
My recall of our two previous meetings does not agree with your
recollections, how can you remain silent when you are aware of the
true ownership of the Land and Property. You are one of the Council
Solicitors
If you have any doubts to my Allegations of Council Misconduct, why
don’t you consider Litigation proceedings against me.?
(b)
I again remind you that I am a full council tax payer, and have
every right to
voice a complaint when a planning decision is taken involving
property I own and I bought and paid for from Hartlepool Borough
Council. To ignore my right to object is criminal.

Your refusal to supply me with copies the documents I have
repeatedly requested, which Hartlepool Council officers had
previously claimed had been examined and consulted to” Validate “
this very Retrospective application submitted, only confirms my
suspicions that these certificates , legally required under part
V11 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (c.8 ) but never produced,
could only be fraudulent if they stated I did not own the Land and
Property.?

This leads me to consider a Formal Complaint to Cleveland Police
Authority requesting an investigation be carried out whether there
was evidence of Misconduct in Public Office by any Councillors and
Planning Officers who were responsible for the management of the
planning function at Hartlepool Borough Council when Granting this
Retrospective Planning Application.

My Land title deeds confirms our ownership of these Outbuildings,
our signed receipt for full payment, from the Chief Financial
officer Mr Walton, confirms Hartlepool Borough Council accepted
payment,

To allow your Planning Officers to Grant the Retrospective
Application without any consultation with the Elected Councillors
nor considering any of my Objections which included a physical part
of my privately owned property, It Is Dishonest at least and can
even be considered Criminal Behaviour.

I fully intend to continue this campaign for Justice against
Hartlepool Borough Council, We bought and paid for, our ex-council
house from Hartlepool Borough Council on 1st February 1984, and
their reluctance to accept their legal responsibilities in
investigating my Formal Complaints against some named Council
Employed Officers is Disgraceful.

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders

Dear Alyson Carman,

Friday 7 January 2011.

Dear Alyson Carman,
Reviewer of Freedom of Information Requests.
It is now several months since I wrote in reply to you, ( delay due
to illness ) objecting to your review of my freedom of Information
request , were I was asking for copies of all documents
particularly Certificates of Ownership, “A” and “B” that Hartlepool
Council Planning claimed to have been scrutinised to establish and
“VALIDATE” the true ownership of the disputed Land and Property
before granting the Controversial Retrospective Planning
Application H / 2009 / 0568 .These documents were refused by Hayley
Martin and again by you the Reviewing Authority.

My allegations of a “Conflict of Interest “ in that you personally
would be unable to give a unbiased decision was based on my
knowledge that you were personally aware that we Alan Harvey
Flounders and Jacqueline Flounders were and still are the sole “
ABSOLUTE” legal owners of “ALL” Land and property detailed and
registered and recorded with Land Registry, Durham on 29th March
1984. On Land Title Documents CE 74844 copies of these Legal Land
Title Documents where given to you in person by me, in your office,
in December 2008 and again in January 2009. and therefore I
maintain, that you were fully aware that these original legal Land
Title Deeds CE 74844, and other documents where issued and signed
by your own Legal Departments Chief Solicitor, J Anthony Brown, in
addition to our redemption payment of mortgage, acknowledged by
J.D. Walton I.P.F.A. Chief Financial Officer, when we purchased the
said property from Hartlepool Council on 1st February 1984.

It is my understanding from my solicitor, that when the Land
Registry registers a particular piece of freehold land for the
first time it will give it one of three (3 ) “classes” of title.
These are :- 1.Absolute 2.Qualified, 3.Posssessory

“ Absolute “ is the best class to have as it is “indefeasible,”
i.e. once it is granted the proprietor is recognised as the
“absolute owner” and no one can challenge his ownership, even if it
appears that a person may have a genuine claim to the land.”
Land Title Deeds CE 74844 Title Absolute, clearly shows EXACTLY
what Property and Land Details we PURCHASED when buying our Council
House from you, Hartlepool Borough Council, in February 1984,

Our Land Title Deeds were confirmed and signed by Hartlepool
Borough
Councils, Chief Solicitor J Anthony Brown, and our Solicitors
Levinson, Walker and Lister, our Receipt for our MORGAGE Redemption
Final Payment was Signed by Hartlepool Borough Councils Chief
Financial Officer Mr. J.D. WALTON, ( which we still Possess )

Your Legal Department are aware of all this, yet your Legal
Department ( to whom both you and Hayley Martin are part of )
allowed Certificate s of Property Ownership "A" "B" to be submitted
for “VALIDATION” of property ownership for a Retrospective Planning
Application ( previously built “Without “ planning permission “ to
the planning authority, which was granted by Mr Reece and Richard
Trow, without any input of the Elected Councillors or without any
serious attempt to “ENSURE” that the applicant was the Legal owner
of the said land and property, Hartlepool Council Officials Mr
Richard Trow was also aware of our ownership, ( after his home
visit to take Photographs ) whoever submitted certificates “A” and
“B” did so in an attempt to deprive us of our Legally Purchased
Land and Property.

An examination of our Land Title Deeds CE 74844, which you were
well aware of, after examining them in December/January 2008/2009.
in addition to Richard Trow, Planning Officer, and your enforcement
officer Paul Burgon, who also examined our title deeds after his
visits, would have clarified the property dispute immediately . ?

Under the circumstances , Hartlepool Councils total failure to make
any attempt to resolve this property dispute , leaves us with no
alterative but to seek redress in law, We therefore give you
immediate notice that we intend to commence legal proceedings
against Hartlepool Council and the named Council Officers. I will
be asking the Court for Hartlepool Council and all Officials named
to produce and supply me will copies of all Documents we have
previously requested and any and all documents you possess to
disprove of entitlement of Land and Property Ownership. I still
posses all E-Mails and other letters which promised action but
failed to enforce
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders
Copies to,
Hayley Martin, F.O.I. Officer
Mr Reece, Planning,
Richard Trow, Planning
Gill Scanlon,
Paul Burgon, Enforcement Officer.
Stuart Green
Liz Crookson

Yours sincerely,

alan harvey flounders