Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To South Yorkshire Police by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To Hampshire Constabulary by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To Humberside Police by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To Kent Police by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To Northumbria Police by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To Thames Valley Police by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To Bedfordshire Police by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To South Wales Police by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
To West Yorkshire Police by William Old 6 February 2009
Regulation 24(2) Police Regulations 2003
William Old made this Freedom of Information request to Norfolk Constabulary
The request was successful.
From: William Old
6 February 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
My enquiry relates to your force policy for the situation where an
officer has been “temporarily promoted” to a higher rank (i.e. is
not “acting-up”, thereby receiving a “temporary salary” as provided
for in Annex I to Regulation 27 of the Police Regulations 2003),
has in due course reverted to his or her substantive rank, and has
subsequently been promoted again (whether substantively or again
only temporarily).
My request is for:
(a) any force policy or procedure document from which it would be
determined whether such an officer’s salary would take account of
that previous period in the higher rank – in accordance with
Reg.24(2) – or would alternatively be re-started back at the lowest
salary scale point for the higher rank, at the commencement of each
and every period of service in that higher rank; and...
(b) any force policy or procedure document that reported,
considered or reviewed the implications of the decision in Gill v
Chief Constable of Merseyside [Liverpool County Court, judgement
given on 28 August 2007], in which unequivocal judgement was given
against Merseyside Police by HH Judge Platts because the latter
procedure (as referred to above) is unlawful and does not comply
with Regulation 24(2).
Yours faithfully,
William Old
From: Freedom Of Information
Norfolk Constabulary
12 February 2009
Dear Mr Old,
Freedom of Information Request Reference N^o: FOI 082/09
I write in connection with your request for information, which has been
received by the Norfolk Constabulary.
The attached PDF document is provided as confirmation that your request
for information has been received, and provides an indication of the date
by which we aim to provide you with a response to your request. Should
you have any difficulty in opening the attachment, please confirm your
postal address and I will arrange for a paper copy to be forwarded to you.
Yours sincerely,
Nina Bond
Freedom of Information Department
Norfolk Constabulary
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Nina Bond |
| |
|Freedom of Information Administrator |
|Norfolk Constabulary |
|Jubilee House |
|Falconers Chase |
|Wymondham |
|Norfolk |
|NR18 OWW |
|Tel: 01953 423521 [mobile number] |
| |
|P It takes 24 trees to produce 1 ton of office paper! |
| |
| Think... is it really necessary to print this email? |
| |
| |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
This e-mail carries a disclaimer
Go here to view [1]Norfolk Constabulary Disclaimer
References
Visible links
1. http://www.norfolk.police.uk/article.cfm...
From: Freedom Of Information
Norfolk Constabulary
2 March 2009
Dear Mr Old
Freedom of Information Request Reference N^o: FOI 082/09
I write in connection with your request for information received by the
Norfolk Constabulary.
The attached document contains the Norfolk Constabulary's response to your
request. Responses to Freedom of Information requests are usually issued
in a PDF format than can be opened using the free Adobe Acrobat software.
Unfortunately, due to a technical issue we are currently unable to convert
this document into a PDF format. Should you have any difficulty in
opening the attached Word document, please confirm your postal address and
I will arrange for a paper copy to be forwarded to you.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Kindleysides
Freedom of Information Department
Norfolk Constabulary
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Richard Kindleysides
Freedom of Information Decision Maker
Freedom of Information Department
Professional Standards
Norfolk Constabulary
Operations and Communications Centre
Falconers Chase
Wymondham
Norfolk NR18 0WW
Tel: 01953 42 4487
Fax: 01953 42 4080
This e-mail carries a disclaimer
Go here to view [1]Norfolk Constabulary Disclaimer
References
Visible links
1. http://www.norfolk.police.uk/article.cfm...
From: William Old
2 March 2009
Dear Freedom Of Information,
As you surmised, I cannot access your response because it has been
saved in a proprietary, closed format (Word .doc). Please use your
Word package to save it as Rich Text format (.rtf), which is an
open, non-proprietary format that can be read by users of all
computing platforms, and re-post it here. Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
William Old
From: Freedom Of Information
Norfolk Constabulary
4 March 2009
Dear Mr Old,
Please find attached, `Rich Text' copies of the Freedom of Information
response published by the Norfolk Constabulary on the 2^nd of March 2009.
If you are still unable to open these documents, I will be happy to post
copies to you if you provide me with an address to which they can be
sent. If for any reason you feel that you need to withhold your address,
the whatdotheyknow.com website provides an HTML version of all responses
posted on this web-site. Having tested this facility on a computer that
does not have `Microsoft Word' installed, I can confirm that the responses
published on the 2^nd of March can be opened via this facility.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Kindleysides
Freedom of Information Department
Norfolk Constabulary
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Richard Kindleysides
Freedom of Information Decision Maker
Freedom of Information Department
Professional Standards
Norfolk Constabulary
Operations and Communications Centre
Falconers Chase
Wymondham
Norfolk NR18 0WW
Tel: 01953 42 4487
Fax: 01953 42 4080
This e-mail carries a disclaimer
Go here to view [1]Norfolk Constabulary Disclaimer
References
Visible links
1. http://www.norfolk.police.uk/article.cfm...
From: William Old
4 March 2009
Dear Freedom Of Information,
The "Temporary Promotions Policy" does not address the point in
issue (whether all periods of service in the higher rank are
aggregated and counted for pay purposes) but the second document
"Inputting Officers in Temp Promotion" confirms that Regulation
24(2) is indeed now properly complied with by the Norfolk
Constabulary, and I thank you for your comprehensive and helpful
response.
Yours sincerely,
William Old
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests





