Follow this request
There is 1 person following this request
Act on what you've learnt
Similar requests
Corporate Manslaughter charges against councillors and council officers
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 12 March 2011
Yet another banned council taxpayer
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 26 April 2010
Amosite asbestos found on Harcourt Street site
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 16 July 2010
Stockport Council says every approach I make to the Council must be through the FOI Officer
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 27 February 2010
Cover up by LibDem Executive councillors of a possible offence under the Fraud Act
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 1 January 2011
Concerns about contamination on a 550 pupil primary school site
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 13 January 2010
Concerns about exposure of 550 young children to high levels of CO2
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 13 January 2010
Council taxpayers being allowed to look at contracts
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 19 August 2011
Escalating costs - were correct finanacial procedures followed by Stockport Council regarding the Harcourt Street School?
To Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council by Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) 13 January 2010
Possible illegal building of two large housing estates on public open space in the 1980s
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) made this Freedom of Information request to Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
Waiting for an internal review by Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council of their handling of this request.
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
13 January 2010
Dear Stockport Borough Council,
Stockport Council received a 100% grant from the Department for the
Environment for the reclamation of the former Jackson’s Brickyards
for recreational land – the land to the rear of Harcourt Street,
Melanie Drive and Mill Lane Reddish. A large proportion of this
land has already been built on and the Council currently intends to
build on most of the rest. Please let me see, by email, the terms
and conditions under which the Council received that 100%
reclamation grant.
Yours faithfully,
Sheila Oliver
From: FOI Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
13 January 2010
Dear Mrs Oliver,
I am writing in response to your request for information below (ref 2541).
As you have previously been informed, your requests for information about
Harcourt Street are considered to be vexatious under section 14(1) Freedom
of Information Act 2000 and manifestly unreasonable under Regulation
12(4)(b) Environmental Information Regulations 2004 and will not receive a
response. This decision has been through the Council's internal review
process and was upheld. It has also been investigated by the Information
Commissioner's Office at your request; the ICO upheld the Council's
decision in its Decision Notice.
Yours sincerely,
Claire Naven
Claire Naven
Data Protection & Freedom of Information Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
show quoted sections
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
13 January 2010
Dear FOI Officer,
With regards to the alleged vexatious nature of my requests
regarding this issue, I would draw your attention to the fact that
the Council has recently been forced, because of a public inquiry,
to disclose that the site that it proposed to educate 550 babies
and young children is indeed extensively contaminated. The Council
intended for the school to open in September 2008 and had it not
been for my "vexatious" efforts children would now be spending many
hours each day on a site contaminated with lead, arsenic and
asbestos on which no contamination remediation measures had been
carried out. They intended to protect young children from
contamination hotspots by means of prickly bushes. The plants would
have soaked up the contaminants and lost their prickly leaves,
exposing young primary school children to toxic hotspots. The
Council knew from records in its own archives, which were drawn to
its attention, that the site had been extensively tipped with
industrial waste from 1954 to 1974.
In addition the school was to be paid for by £6.69 million of
capital receipts and this figure has now been reduced to £1.6
million. Again, in trying to expose that fact I was not, to my
mind, being vexatious. The Council will now have to finance the
scheme with extensive borrowing at a time of a looming possible £45
million black hole in its budget.
I intend to write now to Mr. Thomas, the Information Commissioner,
himself explaining how I have striven to protect these innocent
children from the carcingenic effects of being exposed to chemicals
likely to bring about incidences of bladder cancer in them
The Director of Children and Young People's Directorate, a man who
serves on several important Government think tanks, said it would
take 84 hours at £25 per hour plus £300 photocopying costs for a
council officer to redact the files regarding this proposed school
before I could see them. Request refused not only to me but any
other resident in the town or possibly the country. How many
secrets can there be for a school development that would take a
council officer working full time for almost three weeks to remove
them? I wanted no photocopies but just to read the files. I had
seen the files in the months previously and just wanted to re-read
the files and see any additions. There were about four folders. The
Council failed to carry out an independent review of the issue for
six months - an unacceptable time frame. Once lifted it then
re-introduced the ban which has been in force for possibly three
out of the past four years.
All council meeting questions on the subject are also banned, which
is an infringement of human rights to question elected
representatives.
I am now taking the issue to Mr. Thomas and will keep visitors to
this site appraised of developments.
Yours sincerely,
Sheila Oliver
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
15 January 2010
Dear Stockport Borough Council,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Stockport Borough
Council's handling of my FOI request 'Possible illegal building of
two large housing estates on public open space in the 1980s'.
A Senior Complaints Office at the Information Commission stated on
14/01/10 that I could continue to ask questions on this subject.
What has Stockport Council got to hide regarding this matter, which
is, as one can see from the nature of the question, a very
important one for local residents losing their last vestige of safe
open space, possibly illegally?
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/po...
Yours faithfully,
Sheila Oliver
From: FOI Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
25 January 2010
Dear Mrs Oliver,
I am writing in response to your email below (ref 2541).
As we have previously explained to you on a number of occasions, the
Council has already carried out an internal review of its decision to
refuse all your requests on the subject of Harcourt Street on the grounds
that they are vexatious and manifestly unreasonable. Your subsequent
complaint has also been investigated by the Information Commissioner's
Office which issued a Decision Notice and upheld the Council's decision.
On this basis, the Council will not be carrying out an internal review.
Yours sincerely,
Claire Naven
Claire Naven
Data Protection & Freedom of Information Officer
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
show quoted sections
From: Sheila Oliver (Account suspended)
16 February 2010
Dear Stockport Borough Council,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Stockport Borough
Council's handling of my FOI request 'Possible illegal building of
two large housing estates on public open space in the 1980s'.
Please note that the Information Commission Team Leader has stated
to me in a letter dated 15/2/10:-
... "Notice relates specifically to the request you made on 1st
December 2008 and does not make any finding regarding future
requests. If you have made further requests and these have been
refused you should ask the Council to review their requests and if
following this review you remain unhappy with their response you
can bring a new complaint to the Commissioner."
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/po...
Yours faithfully,
Sheila Oliver
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) left an annotation (24 March 2010)
"Council bosses decided NOT to hold a wide-ranging investigation into the death of a boy who died after an asthma attack at school, the MEN can reveal.
Stockport council officials considered carrying out a serious case review into the 11-year-old's death THREE times – but each time decided against.
The news came after an inquest jury found a catalogue of errors and neglect by staff at Offerton High School 'significantly contributed' to Sam's death.
He was left to sit in a corridor after suffering the attack while teachers failed to call an ambulance.
Parents Paul and Karen Linton are now considering legal action against the council.
The M.E.N understands officials in charge of safeguarding Stockport children did not believe the case met the criteria for a full serious case review...."
Manchester Evening News
The same people responsible for the above are the ones refusing to answer questions about this school to be built on toxic waste. The Information Commission has said the next step is to lodge an official complaint with Stockport Council about their refusal to respond, but the Complaints Officer won't even reply.
Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) left an annotation (17 October 2010)
Is my local MP Andrew Stunell having a laugh here? I repeatedly
asked him to make Stockport Council reply to questions, which they
have avoided for about four years:-
http://www.libdemvoice.org/andrew-stunel...
I shall ask him again for help and post his response, or lack of
it, on this site.
Have a look at this frightening You Tube clip of the brown asbestos
"experts" languidly and unscienficially removing brown asbestos
from the school site:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0rCPnP5H9o
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Make and explore Freedom of Information requests






Sheila Oliver (Account suspended) left an annotation (26 January 2010)
The Council was told on 14/01/10 by a senior Information Commission complaints officer that I could ask questions on this subject.
I shall be taking this matter to Mr. Thomas, Information Commissioner, himself.
Stockport Council has a lot to conceal, but I shall expose what they are trying to cover up. It doesn't matter how long it takes.
Link to this