Police Injury Pensions Policy

John Jarman made this Freedom of Information request to West Midlands Police

The request was successful.

From: John Jarman

11 December 2009

Dear West Midlands Police,

I am seeking certain information related to police injury pensions.

1. Do you have a written policy governing the management and review
of police injury pensions? If you do, please provide me with a
copy.

2. Since August 2004, to date, how many injury pensions have been
reduced when reviewed?

3. Since August 2004, to date, how many injury pensions have been
increased when reviewed?

4. Since August 2004, to date, how many injury pensions have been
reduced to the lowest band when the former officer in receipt of
the pension reached (or had already reached) the age of 65?

5. If your force has any document recording any analysis and/or
consideration of the guidance contained in Annex C to Home Office
circular 46/2004 please supply me with a copy.

6. If your force has any document recording any calculation and/or
projection of the potential budgetary savings and/or financial
impact that might result from adoption of the guidance contained in
Annex C to Home Office circular 46/2004 please supply me with a
copy.

Notes:

In this request, the term ‘document’ should be taken to mean any
record whether in printed or digital form, including reports,
minutes or transcripts of meetings, notes, memoranda, letters, and
email, etc.

Any information you supply should be in any standard digital
format, such as MS Word (.doc) or Adobe Portable Document Format
(.pdf) and sent to the address indicated, where it will be
available for viewing by visitors to the whatdotheyknow.com web
site.

Yours faithfully,

John Jarman

Link to this

From: foi
West Midlands Police

14 December 2009


Attachment attachment.txt
0K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Jarman

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000

Thank you for your request for information, received 11 December
2009, concerning Police Injury Pensions.

Your request is being considered and you will receive a response within
the statutory timescale of 20 working days, as defined by the Act, subject
to the application of any statutory exemptions. Where consideration is
being given to the application of any exemptions the 20 working day
timescale may be extended under the terms of the Act to a period
considered reasonable depending on the nature and circumstances of your
request. In such cases you will be notified and, where possible, a revised
time-scale will be indicated. In all cases we shall attempt to deal with
your request at the earliest opportunity.

There may be a fee payable for the retrieval, collation and provision of
the information requested, where the request exceeds the statutory limit.
In such cases you will be informed in writing and the 20 working day
timescale will be suspended until we receive payment from you or your
request is modified and /or reduced. If you chose not to make full payment
or modify your request then the request will remain unanswered.

Your request may require either full or partial transfer to another public
authority. You will be informed if your request is transferred.

Yours sincerely,

Freedom of Information Unit

Link to this

From: foi
West Midlands Police

13 January 2010


Attachment appeals procedure.pdf
11K Download View as HTML

Attachment 3105 ans 01.pdf
13K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Jarman

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000

Further to your email, received 11 December 2009 concerning Police Injury
Pensions I am pleased to enclose the following information. Please note
that these data are the closest we hold to your request. They should not
be interpreted as representing anything other than as described in this
response.

The attached document 3105_ans_01.pdf provides our response.

Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and
complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been
extracted from large disparate administrative data systems used by forces
for police purposes. The detail collected to respond specifically to your
request is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale
recording system. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data
collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into
account when interpreting those data.

The figures provided therefore are our best interpretation of relevance of
data to your request but you should be aware that the collation of figures
for ad hoc requests may have limitations and this should be taken into
account when those data are used.

If you decide to write an article / use the enclosed data we would ask you
to take into consideration the factors highlighted in this document so as
to not mislead members of the public or official bodies or misrepresent
the relevance of the whole or any part of this disclosed material.

Your attention is drawn to your right to request a re-examination of your
case under West Midlands Police review procedure (attached). Please note
that such an appeal must be received within six months of the date of this
correspondence.

If you require any further information, then please contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Freedom of Information Unit

West Midlands Police in complying with their statutory duty under sections
1 and 11 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to release the enclosed
information will not breach the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
However, the rights of the copyright owner of the enclosed information
will continue to be protected by law. Applications for the copyright
owner*s written permission to reproduce any part of the attached
information should be addressed to The Force Solicitor, West Midlands
Police Headquarters, Lloyd House, Colmore Circus Queensway, Birmingham, B4
6NQ.

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: John Jarman

18 January 2010

Dear West Midlands Police,

Freedom of Information Request Ref. 3105/09

Thank you for the information you have supplied so far.

Could I seek clarification of your answer to my question 4?

4. Since August 2004, to date, how many injury pensions have been
reduced to the lowest band when the former officer in receipt of
the pension reached (or had already reached) the age of 65?

You replied:

'We do not reduce awards upon the reaching of the age 65. Each
award is reviewed as and when required by the relevant medical
adviser. '

Are you saying that no injury pension was reduced to band 1 when
former officers' injury pensions were reviewed when they reached
the age of 65 (Aug 2004 to date) in accordance with Home Office
guidance? You state that you force follows the guidance, which
includes the option to reduce to band 1 at age 65.

Yours sincerely,

John Jarman

Link to this

From: foi
West Midlands Police

21 January 2010

Dear Mr Jarman

We are saying that no injury pension was reduced to band 1 because they were reviewed at age 65 because we do not use reaching the age of 65 as a criteria to review an award. We only review an award when the review date stated by the medical adviser has been reached whatever that age maybe. We do not follow the Home Office option to review all awards at age 65 as a trigger to reduce to band 1.

I trust that this answers your query.

Thanks,

Freedom of Information Unit

show quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
West Midlands Police only: