Planning and Highways Records on Private Driveway

Dear Sir or Madam,

In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, I hereby
request all documentation, copies of drawings, maps and
measurements relative to the Highways Department branding of the
main road junction with a private driveway leading to Bryn Goleu,
Capel Coch, Llangefni, as DANGEROUS.

With regard to a reply, Section 8.1.b of the FOI Act asks for an
"address for correspondence", and stipulates that an email address
is sufficient. If such information cannot be sent by email, please
let me know Immediately by email and arrangements will be made for
the file to be collected by private courier from your offices.

Pleas reply within the stipulated period

Yours faithfully,

GL Pritchard

Dear Sir or Madam,

Council Reference: 021.61.163/027.89.23.103C/JRWO/FW

The response to a perfectly reasonable request made to your
Highways Department is in no where addressing the questions asked
in the original request to the Council. We are very dissatisfied
with the Council Response as the issues are not even addressed and
have been completely avoided in a bland non specific answer passing
on all responsibility elsewhere.

We would now ask the Council Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
the Council Officials in question to review the original request
where it will become immediately apparent that the Head of Highways
Department has completely ignored the request for information. In
addition to this requested review, I have submitted a disclosure
under the Freedom of Information Act of 2000.

Yours faithfully
GL Pritchard

Dear Isle of Anglesey Council,
for the personal attention of the Chief Executive

Dear Sir

There has been no response whatsoever to my request filed in
according with the Freedom of Information Act. I would like to know
why the Council has not replied at all to this request for an
internal review and requesting copies of all relative documentation
applicable to the decision made to brand the private driveway to
Bryn Goleu LL77 7UR as Dangerous.

Please refer to all previous communications for dates and statutory
limits and you will find that the Council has obviously ignored
this formal and legal request.

I thank you for taking care of this matter urgently.

Yours faithfully,

Gwyn Pritchard

Dear BERYL JONES,

Thank you for your explanatory email. I have also requested full
details of all the paperwork associated with the Highways
Department branding of my private drive-way onto the main road -
dangerous. We believe that this decision has no legal merit or
substance and therefore request the parameters and legal references
by which the Highways Department made its decision.

Yours sincerely,

Gwyn Pritchard

Dear BERYL JONES,

Thanks you for your letter. The document mentions the following:

It was demonstrated that the officers had not used the term
dangerous but had referred throughout to the junction as
substandard in accordance with the appropriate legislation.

Could you therefore send me a copy of the legislation that depicts
the criteria for 'substandard' and what steps were taken by the
Officer(s) to arrive at the conclusion that the junction met the
substandard criteria. Please respond with a statement confirming or
denying that this substandard decision was as a result of any other
planning or highways permissions given to other businesses or
residents that resulted in this particular junction being
reclassified or described as substandard.

Simplified, did any other work recently done in the vicinity of the
junction cause the said junction to now be substandard.

Many thanks for a quick reply.

GL. Pritchard

Yours sincerely,

Gwyn Pritchard