PCN Targets - Cllr Chalkley Investigation

Ben Tweedy made this Freedom of Information request to Westminster City Council

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Westminster City Council should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

From: Ben Tweedy

19 November 2009

Dear Sir or Madam,

As you may be aware, the documentary Confessions of a Traffic
Warden is due to be broadcast by Channel 4 this evening at 9pm.

The director of the program, Ollie Lambert, has stated in a
Telegraph article (as can be found
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/r...)
that “The experience of myself and the Channel 4 production team
found there was an ingrained culture at all three Westminster bases
in which CEOs believed “high scoring” wardens were routinely
rewarded with overtime and more lucrative shifts.

“Only one CEO was prepared to make these allegations on camera, but
many CEOs felt that this practice was rife, and many confirmed it
off-camera.”

He added that Channel 4 had conducted its own private
investigation, which resulted in ten signed statements supporting
the claims made by the CEO about the existence of ticket targets,
and the link between NSL awarding overtime shifts to CEOs who meet
ticket target expectations.

In that same article Councillor Danny Chalkley, Westminster's
cabinet member for city management, said: "Westminster council does
not set targets for the number of tickets issued by parking
attendants and has not done so for over five years. Any evidence to
suggest otherwise will be fully investigated."

I would class ten signatures backing up a statement as "any
evidence".

In light of the above, please answer the following questions

1) When will Danny Chalkley be launching a full investigation?

2) Which INDEPENDENT body will be carrying out this investigation?
I ask this as there is an obvious conflict of interest if the
investigation is to be carried out by Danny or Westminster City
Council.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Ben

Link to this

Westminster City Council

19 November 2009

Confirmation of Freedom Of Information Request

Thank you for your request for information.

Your request details have now been recorded and will be passed on to the
appropriate Divisional Records Officer for action.

This Freedom Of Information Request was based on the following
information:

Name: Ben Tweedy
Address: See email address
Email: [FOI #23430 email]
Telephone:
Request Details: As you may be aware, the documentary Confessions of
a Traffic
Warden is due to be broadcast by Channel 4 this evening at 9pm.

The director of the program, Ollie Lambert, has stated in a
Telegraph article (as can be found
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/r...)
that “The experience of myself and the Channel 4 production team
found there was an ingrained culture at all three Westminster bases
in which CEOs believed “high scoring” wardens were routinely
rewarded with overtime and more lucrative shifts.

“Only one CEO was prepared to make these allegations on camera, but
many CEOs felt that this practice was rife, and many confirmed it
off-camera.”

He added that Channel 4 had conducted its own private
investigation, which resulted in ten signed statements supporting
the claims made by the CEO about the existence of ticket targets,
and the link between NSL awarding overtime shifts to CEOs who meet
ticket target expectations.

In that same article Councillor Danny Chalkley, Westminster's
cabinet member for city management, said: "Westminster council does
not set targets for the number of tickets issued by parking
attendants and has not done so for over five years. Any evidence to
suggest otherwise will be fully investigated."

I would class ten signatures backing up a statement as "any
evidence".

In light of the above, please answer the following questions

1) When will Danny Chalkley be launching a full investigation?

2) Which INDEPENDENT body will be carrying out this investigation?
I ask this as there is an obvious conflict of interest if the
investigation is to be carried out by Danny or Westminster City
Council.

FOI Reference Number: 4649
Target Completion Date: 17/12/2009

Please do not reply to this email.
This is an automatic response to your request, and replies to this message
will not be actioned.

If you need to contact Westminster City Council regarding your request,
please contact:

mailto:[Westminster City Council request email]
Tel:020 7641 3921

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: FOI
Westminster City Council

9 December 2009


Attachment FOI Request Response Letter Tweedy FOI 4649.doc
134K Download View as HTML


Dear Mr Tweedy,

Please find attached our response to your recent request, submitted to the
Council under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

<<FOI Request Response Letter - Tweedy FOI 4649.doc>>

Yours sincerely,

Tanya Holden
Data Protection & FOI Officer
Knowledge and Information Management
Westminster City Council
101 Orchardson Street
London, NW8 8EA
Tel: 0207 641 6451
Fax: 0207 641 2872
Email: [Westminster City Council request email]
[1]www.westminster.gov.uk

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. file://www.westminster.gov.uk

Link to this

From: Ben Tweedy

11 December 2009

Dear Tanya,

Thank you for your reply. Can please advise me on what would
constitute substantial evidence (as i take from your reply that
Cllr Chalkley doesn't feel the producers comments can be classed as
evidence), and who would be the best person to submit this to?

Yours sincerely,

Ben Tweedy

Link to this

From: FOI
Westminster City Council

14 December 2009

Dear Mr Tweedy,

Thank you for your email below.

Please note that the Council's response to your FOI request did not
contain any reference to Councillor Chalkley's opinion on the producer's
comments (which were cited in your original request).

Further, your additional questions are outside of the scope of the Freedom
of Information Act 2000 and, therefore, will not be responded to here.

I can inform you, however, that any complaints and/or related
correspondence should be directed to either the relevant department or
through the formal complaints process. I include a link here for your
convenience:

[1]http://www.westminster.gov.uk/services/c...

Yours sincerely,

Tanya Holden
Data Protection & FOI Officer
Knowledge and Information Management
Westminster City Council
101 Orchardson Street
London, NW8 8EA
Tel: 0207 641 6451
Fax: 0207 641 2872
Email: [Westminster City Council request email]
[2]www.westminster.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Ben Tweedy

14 December 2009

Dear Tanya,

Thank you for your reply, however that link you supplied doesn't
work and leads to an error page. Can you please provide the correct
link?

Yours sincerely,

Ben Tweedy

Link to this

From: FOI
Westminster City Council

22 December 2009

Dear Mr Tweedy,

Thank you for your email.

The reason why the provided link does not appear to work is due to the
fact that, because of how long it is, it has been split between two lines.

If I try to resend the link it is most likely that this will occur again.
In order to access the information, therefore, I suggest that rather than
clicking on the link, you instead copy and paste all of the link into the
internet address bar.

Yours sincerely,

Tanya Holden
Data Protection & FOI Officer
Knowledge and Information Management
Westminster City Council
101 Orchardson Street
London, NW8 8EA
Tel: 0207 641 6451
Fax: 0207 641 2872
Email: [Westminster City Council request email]
[1]www.westminster.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Link to this

Norris left an annotation (26 April 2010)

NSL Services Ltd: Who gave you permission to talk http://nutsville.com/?p=1272

Councillor Danny Chalkley: http://nutsville.com/chalkley/

No To Bike Parking Tax: http://www.notobikeparkingtax.com

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Westminster City Council only: