Hello! (Sign in or sign up)

Track this request

Act on what you've learnt

Similar requests

Documentation Relating to PC Appeal No 70 of 1997 A letter sent by the writer on the 25th February last to Jack Straw (Ministry of Justice) was re-directed, by them, to your office (Jackie Lindsay) to... Rejected.
Request sent to Privy Council Office by david schiller on 26 April 2008.
Crime investigation following allegations relating to and including Privy Council Appeal No 70 of 19977 Thank you for your response:- 1. There was only a preliminary investigation, carried out by a DS (now retired) whose faxes carried the heading ‘Spe... Rejected.
Follow up sent to Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) by david schiller on 14 April 2008.
Details of CPS's involvement with the allegations of 'perverting the course of justice' in relation to Privy Council Appeal No 70 of 1997 In 1998 or thereabouts the 'Met' contacted the CPS regarding criminal allegations relating to PC Appeal 70 of 1997. Because one of the accused is an... Information not held.
Request sent to Crown Prosecution Service by david schiller on 14 April 2008.

More similar requests

PC Appeal No70 of 1997: Conspiracy to Defeat Justice

A Freedom of Information request to Home Office by david schiller

Home Office did not have the information requested.

david schiller

4 May 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,
PC Appeal No 70 of 1997

Following the hearing of the above 'appeal' and subsequent investigations by the Metropolitan Police the Home Office were contacted by the undersigned in regard to accusations of criminal conduct by government personnel

Please supply the applicant with all documentation/records etc. in relation to the matter that the FOI legislation requires to be disclosed

Sincerely, D A Schiller

Link to this | Send follow up

Home Office

20 May 2008

Attachment ResponseT9256 8.doc

Reference : T9256/8

Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 04/05/2008 2:44:21 PM

A reply is attached.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply

david schiller

29 May 2008

Dear S John

Ref: T9256/8

Thank you for your response

The reason the Home Secretary was contacted was because of the action taken by John Stevens (Met Police) in apparently quashing an investigation which may involve criminal conduct by government ministers/personnel and/or senior Privy Councillors and/or personnel in Gibraltar (effectively the F&CO)

I copy below the text of an early letter to Jack Straw from which you should be able to locate your necessary files? I would be pleased to supply any further information should you require it
No meaningful response from any government office has been received

Sincerely, David Schiller
------------
Copy text:-
Admirals Walk, Marina Bay, Gibraltar

Jack Straw, MP Home Secretary House of Commons SW1A OM
22nd February 1999
Dear Mr Straw

PC Appeal No 70 of 1997: Perverting the Course of Public Justice

I was interested to hear of your recent encouragement to members of the public to take a more active role against low level crime

I do not know whether the matter I now outline is of interest to you or whether you may be able to offer any advice or assistance but if you can it would be appreciated; I cannot think of a much lower level to which crime could sink than demonstrated by what follows:-

Having taken some 5 years for an action to reach the local court of appeal and be granted leave to appeal to the Privy Council the appeal was stifled by the imposition of a condition with which it was known I could not comply

An application to Her Majesty for special leave to appeal was therefore made and granted in 1996 and thc appcal sct down for and hcard in Junc last ycar

The Respondent did not file a case within the time limits and therefore the rules required the appeal to be set down ex parte; it was not nor did the Respondent give notice that an appearance had been entered in the proceedings, also contrary to the rules

Subsequently a case was filed by the Respondent which included three affidavits by way of evidence which were accepted by the Law Lords and on which they relied in advising Her Majesty to dismiss the appeal. The affidavits are manifestly untrue and perjurious

The respondent Attorney General had never filed evidence in any of the proceedings below and that filed would, if it had been true, have been available at the outset; the rules and accepted practice prohibited it from being filed in the judicial committee appeal

Proceedings in Gibraltar for perjury and perverting the course of public justice against the various persons have been and are being stifled (eg the Magistrate has refused to take my Oath laying information against the Attorney General, surely an act unheard oft)

The Crown Prosecution Service have confIrmed to the Metropolitan Police that jurisdiction for an offence in proceedings in the Privy Council lies in the UK but to date no visible action has been taken by the Police to properly investigate

The Foreign Office who have been involved with the proceedings from the start have been asked to investigate allegations of criminal acts by the Governor, the Attorney General and others but are using the excuse that they will await the outcome of the Metropolitan Police investigation before replying

I could be waiting until jurisdiction moves to Madrid! Sincerely D A Schiller

Yours sincerely,

Link to this | Send follow up

Home Office

6 June 2008

Mr David Schiller,

Reference : T10708/8

Date: 06-Jun-2008

TREAT OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE

Thank you for your e-mail of 29/05/2008 11:14:35 AM regarding.....

The matters you have raised are the responsibility of Ministry of Justice.

We have therefore transferred your e-mail to
[email address], who will arrange for a reply to be
sent to you.

Transfer Desk

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply

Home Office

18 June 2008

Attachment ResponseT11957 8.doc

Reference : T11957/8

Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 12/06/2008 12:17:30 PM

A reply is attached.

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply