PC Appeal No70 of 1997: Conspiracy to Defeat Justice

Dear Sir or Madam,
PC Appeal No 70 of 1997

Following the hearing of the above 'appeal' and subsequent
investigations by the Metropolitan Police the Home Office were
contacted by the undersigned in regard to accusations of criminal
conduct by government personnel

Please supply the applicant with all documentation/records etc. in
relation to the matter that the FOI legislation requires to be
disclosed

Sincerely, D A Schiller

Dear S John

Ref: T9256/8

Thank you for your response

The reason the Home Secretary was contacted was because of the
action taken by John Stevens (Met Police) in apparently quashing an
investigation which may involve criminal conduct by government
ministers/personnel and/or senior Privy Councillors and/or
personnel in Gibraltar (effectively the F&CO)

I copy below the text of an early letter to Jack Straw from which
you should be able to locate your necessary files? I would be
pleased to supply any further information should you require it
No meaningful response from any government office has been received

Sincerely, David Schiller
------------
Copy text:-
Admirals Walk, Marina Bay, Gibraltar

Jack Straw, MP Home Secretary House of Commons SW1A OM
22nd February 1999
Dear Mr Straw

PC Appeal No 70 of 1997: Perverting the Course of Public Justice

I was interested to hear of your recent encouragement to members of
the public to take a more active role against low level crime

I do not know whether the matter I now outline is of interest to
you or whether you may be able to offer any advice or assistance
but if you can it would be appreciated; I cannot think of a much
lower level to which crime could sink than demonstrated by what
follows:-

Having taken some 5 years for an action to reach the local court of
appeal and be granted leave to appeal to the Privy Council the
appeal was stifled by the imposition of a condition with which it
was known I could not comply

An application to Her Majesty for special leave to appeal was
therefore made and granted in 1996 and thc appcal sct down for and
hcard in Junc last ycar

The Respondent did not file a case within the time limits and
therefore the rules required the appeal to be set down ex parte; it
was not nor did the Respondent give notice that an appearance had
been entered in the proceedings, also contrary to the rules

Subsequently a case was filed by the Respondent which included
three affidavits by way of evidence which were accepted by the Law
Lords and on which they relied in advising Her Majesty to dismiss
the appeal. The affidavits are manifestly untrue and perjurious

The respondent Attorney General had never filed evidence in any of
the proceedings below and that filed would, if it had been true,
have been available at the outset; the rules and accepted practice
prohibited it from being filed in the judicial committee appeal

Proceedings in Gibraltar for perjury and perverting the course of
public justice against the various persons have been and are being
stifled (eg the Magistrate has refused to take my Oath laying
information against the Attorney General, surely an act unheard
oft)

The Crown Prosecution Service have confIrmed to the Metropolitan
Police that jurisdiction for an offence in proceedings in the Privy
Council lies in the UK but to date no visible action has been taken
by the Police to properly investigate

The Foreign Office who have been involved with the proceedings from
the start have been asked to investigate allegations of criminal
acts by the Governor, the Attorney General and others but are using
the excuse that they will await the outcome of the Metropolitan
Police investigation before replying

I could be waiting until jurisdiction moves to Madrid! Sincerely D
A Schiller

Yours sincerely,